scholarly journals Esophageal Injury and Temperature Monitoring During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheldon M. Singh ◽  
Andre d'Avila ◽  
Shephal K. Doshi ◽  
William R. Brugge ◽  
Rudolph A. Bedford ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. e000058
Author(s):  
Joseph G Akar ◽  
James P Hummel ◽  
Xiaoxi Yao ◽  
Lindsey Sangaralingham ◽  
Sanket Dhruva ◽  
...  

ObjectivesContact force-sensing catheters allow real-time catheter-tissue contact force monitoring during atrial fibrillation. These catheters were rapidly adopted into clinical practice following market introduction in 2014, but concerns have been raised regarding collateral damage such as esophageal injury. We sought to examine whether the introduction of force-sensing catheters was associated with a change in short-term and intermediate-term acute care use, complications and mortality following atrial fibrillation ablation.DesignRetrospective cohort analysis. We used inverse probability treatment weight matching to account for the differences in baseline characteristics between groups.SettingWe examined patients included in the OptumLabs Data Warehouse who underwent ablation for atrial fibrillation before (2011–2013) and after (2015–2017) the market introduction of contact force-sensing catheters.Main outcome measuresWe examined 30-day and 90-day rates of all-cause acute care use, including hospitalizations and emergency department visits, as well as death and hospitalization for catheter-related complications, including atrioesophageal fistula, pericarditis, cardiac tamponade/perforation and stroke/transient ischemic attack.ResultsOur sample included 3470 and 5772 patients who underwent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation before and after market introduction of contact force-sensing catheters, respectively. Complication rates were low and did not differ between the two periods (p>0.10 for each outcome). The 30-day and 90-day mortality was 0.1% and 0.3%, respectively after market introduction and unchanged from prior to 2014. The 90-day rates of all-cause acute care use decreased, from 27.0% in 2011–2013 to 23.9% in 2015–2017 (p<0.001).ConclusionsAF ablation-related catheter complications and mortality are low and there has been no significant change following the introduction of force-sensing catheters.


Heart Rhythm ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. S318
Author(s):  
Andrea Natale ◽  
Domenico G. Della Rocca ◽  
Carola Gianni ◽  
Chintan G. Trivedi ◽  
Amin Al-Ahmad ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 2256-2261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Halbfass ◽  
Artur Berkovitz ◽  
Borche Pavlov ◽  
Kai Sonne ◽  
Karin Nentwich ◽  
...  

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. S326
Author(s):  
Tarek Ayoub ◽  
Abdel Hadi El Hajjar ◽  
Lilas Dagher ◽  
Gursukhman Deep Singh Sidhu ◽  
Nassir F. Marrouche

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Miwa Ito ◽  
Hisanori Kanazawa ◽  
Tadashi Hoshiyama ◽  
Yusei Kawahara ◽  
Kenichi Tsujita

Introduction: Esophageal injury is known to be a serious complication occurs after catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). Hypothesis: We investigated the factors associated with the occurrence of EI after CA. Also esophageal temperature monitoring (ETM) can be useful, multiple factors such as patient characteristics and specific strategies for radiofrequency energy delivery also merit consideration. Methods: Among 508 patients who underwent CA of AF, endoscopy was performed the next day after CA to examine for EI. The incidence of EI was compared between 200 patients who done ETM (ETM group) and 308 patients who didn’t done ETM (Non-ETM group) during CA. The Shortest Distance between esophagus and posterior left atrium measured on contrast Computed Tomography (SD-CT) was also compared between both groups. Results: No differences were observed between both groups in total amount of radiofrequency energy applications. However, EI occurred more frequently in Non-ETM group (8/200 patients; 4.0 % vs 27/308 patients; 8.8 %, p=0.042). There was no significant difference in SD-CT between ETM and Non-ETM group. However, SD-CT in patients with EI was significantly shorter than SD-CT in patients without EI, both in ETM (2.4±0.7 vs 4.3±0.9 mm, p<0.001) and in Non-ETM group (2.5±0.2 vs 4.2±0.9 mm, p=0.017), respectively. Multiple regression analysis revealed that only SD-CT significantly correlated with EI. The area under a receiver operating characteristic curve using ST-CT as a predictive marker in EI patients was 0.968 (p<0.001). When the cut-off value of EI was set at 2.9mm, the sensitivity and specificity for EI diagnosis were 96.6% and 87.5%. Conclusions: The use of ETM is absolutely safe and necessary in order to prevent the occurrence of thermal EI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document