Efficacy and Safety of Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction According to N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide: Insights From the DAPA-HF Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jawad H. Butt ◽  
Carly Adamson ◽  
Kieran F. Docherty ◽  
Rudolf A. de Boer ◽  
Mark C. Petrie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Background: Effective therapies for HFrEF usually reduce NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) levels, and it is important to establish whether new treatments are effective across the range of NT-proBNP. Methods: We evaluated both these questions in the DAPA-HF (Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure) trial. Patients in New York Heart Association functional class II to IV with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% and a NT-proBNP level ≥600 pg/mL (≥600 ng/L; ≥400 pg/mL if hospitalized for HF within the previous 12 months or ≥900 pg/mL if atrial fibrillation/flutter) were eligible. The primary outcome was the composite of an episode of worsening HF or cardiovascular death. Results: Of the 4744 randomized patients, 4742 had an available baseline NT-proBNP measurement (median, 1437 pg/mL [interquartile range, 857–2650 pg/mL]). Compared with placebo, treatment with dapagliflozin significantly reduced NT-proBNP from baseline to 8 months (absolute least-squares mean reduction, −303 pg/mL [95% CI, −457 to −150 pg/mL]; geometric mean ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.88–0.96]). Dapagliflozin reduced the risk of worsening HF or cardiovascular death, irrespective of baseline NT-proBNP quartile; the hazard ratio for dapagliflozin versus placebo, from lowest to highest quartile was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.27–0.67), 0.77 (0.56–1.04), 0.78 (0.60–1.01), and 0.78 (0.64–0.95); P for interaction=0.09. Consistent benefits were observed for all-cause mortality. Compared with placebo, dapagliflozin increased the proportion of patients with a meaningful improvement (≥5 points) in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score ( P for interaction=0.99) and decreased the proportion with a deterioration ≥5 points ( P for interaction=0.87) across baseline NT-proBNP quartiles. Conclusions: In patients with HFrEF, dapagliflozin reduced NT-proBNP by 300 pg/mL after 8 months of treatment compared with placebo. In addition, dapagliflozin reduced the risk of worsening HF and death, and improved symptoms, across the spectrum of baseline NT-proBNP levels included in DAPA-HF. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03036124.

Клиническое значение результатов исследования DAPA HF (Dapagliflozin and prevention of adverse-outcomes in heart failure) для пациентов и врачей. Консенсус совета Экспертов

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (223) ◽  
pp. 2-14
Author(s):  
Gulmira Alipova ◽  
◽  
Anna Bazarova ◽  
Nazira Bazarova ◽  
Rimma Bazarbekova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Persistent Symptoms

The article presents the results of the DAPA-HF study - evaluating the efficacy of dapagliflozin, used at a dose of 10 mg once a day, in addition to the standard treatment for patients with chronic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, compared to placebo. An analysis of current clinical recommendations related to this issue was carried out, the results of recent clinical studies and metaanalyses conducted were highlighted. Based on the results of the study, the need is postulated to optimize drug therapy of this category to patients with persistent symptoms of heart failure, despite standard therapy, with the addition of dapagliflozin to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalizations for heart failure, improve the course of the disease. Keywords: chronic heart failure, dapagliflozin, low ejection fraction, effects of type 2 sodium-glucose co transporter inhibitors, diabetes mellitus.

Mode of Death in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From PARAGON-HF Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akshay S. Desai ◽  
Muthiah Vaduganathan ◽  
John G. Cleland ◽  
Brian L. Claggett ◽  
Ebrahim Barkoudah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Sudden Death ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Mode Of Death

Background: Patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction comprise a heterogeneous group including some with mildly reduced EF. We hypothesized that mode of death differs by EF in ambulatory patients with HF and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Methods: PARAGON-HF trial (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker Global Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction) compared clinical outcomes in 4796 patients with chronic HF and EF ≥45% randomly assigned to sacubitril/valsartan or valsartan. We examined the mode of death in relation to baseline EF in logistic regression models and the effect of randomized treatment on cause-specific death in Cox regression models. Nonlinear relationships with continuous EF were modelled using quadratic and cubic terms. Results: Of 691 deaths during the trial, 416 (60%) were ascribed to cardiovascular, 220 (32%) to noncardiovascular, and 55 (8%) to unknown causes. Of cardiovascular deaths, 154 (37%) were due to sudden death, 118 (28%) were due to HF, 35 (8%) to stroke, 27 (6%) to myocardial infarction, and 82 (20%) to other cardiovascular causes. Rates of all-cause, cardiovascular, and sudden death were higher in those with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (all P <0.001), while rates of non-cardiovascular death were greater in patients with higher EF. Sacubitril/valsartan did not reduce overall death, cardiovascular death, or sudden death compared with valsartan, irrespective of baseline EF (all P for interaction >0.30). Conclusions: Among patients with HF and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction enrolled in PARAGON-HF, the proportion of cardiovascular and sudden death were higher in those with lower left ventricular EF, and the proportion of noncardiovascular death rose with EF. Regardless of EF, sacubitril/valsartan did not reduce death from any cause compared with valsartan. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01920711.

Abstract 13104: The Concomitant Inflammation Affect the Ratio of N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide to B-type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsutomu Kawai ◽  
Takahisa Yamada ◽  
Tetsuya Watanabe ◽  
Shunsuke Tamaki ◽  
Shungo Hikoso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Inflammatory Status ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Multicenter Prospective Observational Study

Backgrounds: Although B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP ) are interrelated parameters in assessment heart failure severity and prognosis, the ratio of NT-proBNP to BNP (NT-proBNP/BNP) are affected by various clinical factors, such as renal function. However, little is known about the influence of inflammation on NT-proBNP/BNP in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods and Results: Patients data were extracted from PURSUIT-HFpEF registry, which is a multicenter prospective observational study including patients hospitalized for acute heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction of >50%. Of 871 patients, data of BNP and NT-proBNP was available in 654 patients. The median baseline concentration of BNP was 474 pg/ml (299-720), NT-proBNP was 3310 pg/ml (1740-6840), and NT-proBNP/BNP was 7.6 (5.0-11.8). In multivariable linear regression analyses, older age [odds ratio (OR); 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI); 1.02-1.09, p=0.001], higher creatinine [OR; 2.63, 95% CI; 1.66-4.16, p<0.001], and higher C-reactive protein (CRP) [OR; 1.17, 95% CI; 1.06-1.28, p<0.001] were significantly associated with a higher NT-proBNP/BNP (>median value of 7.6). However, other factors expected to affect NT-proBNP/BNP, such as atrial fibrillation and body mass index, were not associated with a higher NT-proBNP/BNP in this study. Patients in the highest CRP quartile had significantly higher NT-proBNP/BNP than those with other quartiles. Conclusion: In HFpEF patients, concomitant inflammation was associated with high NT-proBNP/BNP, which indicated that we need a careful interpretation on these two natriuretic peptides of patients with HFpEF and inflammatory status, such as infection.

scholarly journals Influence of polypharmacy on patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a retrospective analysis on adverse outcomes in the TOPCAT trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (702) ◽  
pp. e62-e70
Author(s):  
Yuzhong Wu ◽  
Wengen Zhu ◽  
Xin He ◽  
Ruicong Xue ◽  
Weihao Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Heart Function ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

BackgroundPolypharmacy is common in heart failure (HF), whereas its effect on adverse outcomes in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unclear.AimTo evaluate the prevalence, prognostic impacts, and predictors of polypharmacy in HFpEF patients.Design and settingA retrospective analysis performed on patients in the Americas region (including the US, Canada, Argentina, and Brazil) with symptomatic HF and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45% in the TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist) trial, an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted during 2006–2013 in six countries.MethodPatients were categorised into four groups: controls (<5 medications), polypharmacy (5–9 medications), hyperpolypharmacy, (10–14 medications), and super hyperpolypharmacy (≥15 medications). The outcomes and predictors in all groups were assessed.ResultsOf 1761 participants, the median age was 72 years; 37.5% were polypharmacy, 35.9% were hyperpolypharmacy, and 19.6% were super hyperpolypharmacy, leaving 7.0% having a low medication burden. In multivariable regression models, three experimental groups with a high medication burden were all associated with a reduction in all-cause death, but increased risks of HF hospitalisation and all-cause hospitalisation. Furthermore, several comorbidities (dyslipidemia, thyroid diseases, diabetes mellitus, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), a history of angina pectoris, diastolic blood pressure <80 mmHg, and worse heart function (the New York Heart Association functional classification level III and IV) at baseline were independently associated with a high medication burden among patients with HFpEF.ConclusionA high prevalence of high medication burden at baseline was reported in patients with HFpEF. The high medication burden might increase the risk of hospital readmission, but not the mortality.

scholarly journals Combined Assessment of D-Dimer with the Get with the Guidelines—Heart Failure Risk Score and N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure with Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 3564
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Naruse ◽  
Junnichi Ishii ◽  
Hiroshi Takahashi ◽  
Fumihiko Kitagawa ◽  
Eirin Sakaguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Baseline Model ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Get With The Guidelines ◽  
D Dimer

The prognostic role of D-dimer in different types of heart failure (HF) is poorly understood. We investigated the prognostic value of D-dimer on admission, both independently and in combination with the Get With The Guidelines—Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) risk score and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and acute decompensated HF (HFpEF) or reduced LVEF (HFrEF). Baseline D-dimer levels were measured on admission in 1670 patients (mean age: 75 years) who were hospitalized for worsening HF. Of those patients, 586 (35%) were categorized as HFpEF (LVEF ≥ 50%) and 1084 as HFrEF (LVEF < 50%). During the 12-month follow-up period after admission, 360 patients died. Elevated levels (at least the highest tertile value) of D-dimer, GWTG-HF risk score, and NT-proBNP were all independently associated with mortality in all HFpEF and HFrEF patients (all p < 0.05). Adding D-dimer to a baseline model with a GWTG-HF risk score and NT-proBNP improved the net reclassification and integrated discrimination improvement for mortality greater than the baseline model alone in all populations (all p < 0.001). The number of elevations in D-dimer, GWTG-HF risk score, and NT-proBNP were independently associated with a higher risk of mortality in all study populations (HFpEF and HFrEF patients; all p < 0.001). The combination of D-dimer, which is independently predictive of mortality, with the GWTG-HF risk score and NT-proBNP could improve early prediction of 12-month mortality in patients with acute decompensated HF, regardless of the HF phenotype.

scholarly journals How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA–PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (40) ◽  
pp. 3297-3317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burkert Pieske ◽  
Carsten Tschöpe ◽  
Rudolf A de Boer ◽  
Alan G Fraser ◽  
Stefan D Anker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Diagnostic Algorithm ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Exercise Stress ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract Making a firm diagnosis of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a challenge. We recommend a new stepwise diagnostic process, the ‘HFA–PEFF diagnostic algorithm’. Step 1 (P=Pre-test assessment) is typically performed in the ambulatory setting and includes assessment for HF symptoms and signs, typical clinical demographics (obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elderly, atrial fibrillation), and diagnostic laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography. In the absence of overt non-cardiac causes of breathlessness, HFpEF can be suspected if there is a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, no significant heart valve disease or cardiac ischaemia, and at least one typical risk factor. Elevated natriuretic peptides support, but normal levels do not exclude a diagnosis of HFpEF. The second step (E: Echocardiography and Natriuretic Peptide Score) requires comprehensive echocardiography and is typically performed by a cardiologist. Measures include mitral annular early diastolic velocity (e′), left ventricular (LV) filling pressure estimated using E/e′, left atrial volume index, LV mass index, LV relative wall thickness, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, LV global longitudinal systolic strain, and serum natriuretic peptide levels. Major (2 points) and Minor (1 point) criteria were defined from these measures. A score ≥5 points implies definite HFpEF; ≤1 point makes HFpEF unlikely. An intermediate score (2–4 points) implies diagnostic uncertainty, in which case Step 3 (F1: Functional testing) is recommended with echocardiographic or invasive haemodynamic exercise stress tests. Step 4 (F2: Final aetiology) is recommended to establish a possible specific cause of HFpEF or alternative explanations. Further research is needed for a better classification of HFpEF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document