scholarly journals Evidence‐to‐Practice Gap for Preventing Procedure‐Related Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Author(s):  
Satoshi Shoji ◽  
Mitsuaki Sawano ◽  
Alexander T. Sandhu ◽  
Paul A. Heidenreich ◽  
Yasuyuki Shiraishi ◽  
...  

Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. This risk can be minimized with reduction of contrast volume via preprocedural risk assessment. We aimed to identify quality gaps for implementing the available risk scores introduced to facilitate more judicious use of contrast volume. Methods and Results We grouped 14 702 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention according to the calculated NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) AKI risk score quartiles (Q1 [lowest]–Q4 [highest]). We compared the used contrast volume by the baseline renal function and NCDR AKI risk score quartiles. Factors associated with increased contrast volume usage were determined using multivariable linear regression analysis. The overall incidence of AKI was 8.9%. The used contrast volume decreased in relation to the stages of chronic kidney disease (168 mL [SD, 73.8 mL], 161 mL [SD, 75.0 mL], 140 mL [SD, 70.0 mL], and 120 mL [SD, 73.7 mL] for no, mild, moderate, and severe chronic kidney disease, respectively; P <0.001), albeit no significant correlation was observed with the calculated NCDR AKI risk quartiles. Of the variables included in the NCDR AKI risk score, anemia (7.31 mL [1.76–12.9 mL], P =0.01), heart failure on admission (10.2 mL [6.05–14.3 mL], P <0.001), acute coronary syndrome presentation (10.3 mL [7.87–12.7 mL], P <0.001), and use of an intra‐aortic balloon pump (17.7 mL [3.9–31.5 mL], P =0.012) were associated with increased contrast volume. Conclusions The contrast volume was largely determined according to the baseline renal function, not the patients' overall AKI risk. These findings highlight the importance of comprehensive risk assessment to minimize the contrast volume used in susceptible patients.

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoon Suk Park ◽  
Chan Joon Kim ◽  
Jeong-Eun Yi ◽  
Byung-Hee Hwang ◽  
Tae-Hoon Kim ◽  
...  

Background: Considering that contrast medium is excreted through the whole kidney in a similar manner to drug excretion, the use of raw estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) rather than body surface area (BSA)-normalized eGFR is thought to be more appropriate for evaluating the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). Methods: This study included 2,189 myocardial infarction patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the independent risk factors. We used receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves to compare the ratios of contrast volume (CV) to eGFR with and without BSA normalization in predicting CI-AKI. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC curve for the model including all the significant variables such as diabetes mellitus, left ventricular ejection fraction, preprocedural glucose, and the CV/raw modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) eGFR ratio was 0.768 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.720-0.816; p < 0.001]. When the CV/raw MDRD eGFR ratio was used as a single risk value, the AUC of the ROC curve was 0.650 (95% CI, 0.590-0.711; p < 0.001). When the CV/MDRD eGFR ratio with BSA normalization ratio was used, the AUC of the ROC curve further decreased to 0.635 (95% CI, 0.574-0.696; p < 0.001). The difference between the two AUCs was significant (p = 0.002). Conclusions: Raw eGFR is a better predictor for CI-AKI than BSA-normalized eGFR.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan S. Go ◽  
Thida C. Tan ◽  
Rishi V. Parikh ◽  
Andrew P. Ambrosy ◽  
Leonid V. Pravoverov ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Acute kidney injury is a common complication of percutaneous coronary intervention and has been associated with an increased risk of death and progressive chronic kidney disease. However, whether the timing of acute kidney injury after urgent percutaneous coronary intervention could be used to improve patient risk stratification is not known. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study in adults surviving an urgent percutaneous coronary intervention between 2008 and 2013 within Kaiser Permanente Northern California, a large integrated healthcare delivery system, to evaluate the impact of acute kidney injury during hospitalization at 12 (±6), 24 (±6) and 48 (±6) hours after urgent percutaneous coronary intervention and subsequent risks of adverse outcomes within the first year after discharge. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models with adjustment for a high-dimensional propensity score for developing acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention to examine the associations between acute kidney injury timing and all-cause death and worsening chronic kidney disease. Results Among 7250 eligible adults undergoing urgent percutaneous coronary intervention, 306 (4.2%) had acute kidney injury at one or more of the examined time periods after percutaneous coronary intervention. After adjustment, acute kidney injury at 12 (±6) hours was independently associated with higher risks of death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.19–5.75) and worsening kidney function (aHR 2.40, 95% CI:1.24–4.63). Similar results were observed for acute kidney injury at 24 (±6) hours and death (aHR 3.90, 95% CI:2.29–6.66) and worsening chronic kidney disease (aHR 4.77, 95% CI:2.46–9.23). Acute kidney injury at 48 (±6) hours was associated with excess mortality (aHR 1.97, 95% CI:1.19–3.26) but was not significantly associated with worsening kidney function (aHR 0.91, 95% CI:0.42–1.98). Conclusions Timing of acute kidney injury after urgent percutaneous coronary intervention may be differentially associated with subsequent risk of worsening kidney function but not death.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (B) ◽  
pp. 983-989
Author(s):  
Mohamed Ahmed ◽  
Gamal Hamed Ibrahim ◽  
Mahmoud Adel ◽  
Amira Ismail ◽  
Abdallah Almaghraby ◽  
...  

Background: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), is an important complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to study the role of serum midkine (MK) as an early biomarker of CI-AKI. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study. It includes 100 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min/1.73m2. All patients were undergoing PCI for ACS. We measured serum midkine before, 2 and 24 hours after PCI.  Results: The mean age of the patients was 70.32±3.62 years, 74% males. Twenty-seven patients developed CI-AKI. The CI-AKI group has a history of diabetes mellitus (DM) and/or dyslipidemia, history of diuretics, metformin and/or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin-receptor blockers (ACEI/ARBs) use. The CI-AKI patients have low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (EF < 45%) and low Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) before PCI. The CI-AKI received more contrast volume, had a longer duration of PCI  and had high Mehran risk score after PCI. Comparison between the two studied groups regarding serum MK showed that there was a statistically significant difference regarding serum MK 2 hours after PCI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for serum MK showed that serum MK measured 2 hours after PCI was statistically significant to predict CI-AKI. Conclusion: An early Serum MK after PCI can be used as an early predictor of CI-AKI in ACS patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document