Abstract TP9: ASPECTS Values in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion and Time of Arrival to Emergency Department: Estimation of Eligibility for Endovascular Stroke Therapy

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxim Mokin ◽  
Aparna Pendurthi ◽  
Christopher Primiani ◽  
William S Burgin
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Stroke Onset ◽  
Time Of Arrival ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Therapy ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Stroke Therapy

Background: Favorable imaging profile according to The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) is an important selection criterion for endovascular therapy in patients with acute stroke from anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO). The goal of this study was analyze the relationship between ASPECTS values and time of arrival to emergency department (ED) after stroke onset, and its impact on patient’s eligibility for endovascular stroke therapy. Methods: analysts of ASPECTS values in consecutive patients with acute stroke from anterior circulation LVO admitted within 24 hours of onset was performed. Criteria from American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) guidelines based on the proposed class I-II recommendations, including the ‘favorable’ ASPECTS range of 6-10 were applied to determine frequency of potentially eligible patients for endovascular stroke therapy. Results: Of 641 patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting within the first 24 hours of onset, 71 (11%) had anterior circulation LVO. Medium time from arrival to ED to noncontrast head CT was 6 minutes. 72% of patients arrived to ED within the first 6 hours, 18% within 6-12 hours, and 10% within 12-24 hours of symptom onset. Based on ‘favorable’ ASPECTS criterion alone, 80% of patients with anterior circulation LVO who arrive to the ED within the first 6 hours of stroke onset would qualify for endovascular therapy. Of those who arrived to ED within 6-24 hours of stroke onset, 50% had ‘favorable’ ASPECTS. Conclusions: 50% of patients with stroke from anterior circulation LVO who arrive to ED within 6-24 hours of onset have ‘favorable’ ASPECTS, making them potentially eligible for endovascular stroke therapy.

Abstract 202: Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke With Distal Large Vessel Occlusion in the Anterior Circulation

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amrou Sarraj ◽  
Navdeep Sangha ◽  
Muhammad Shazam Hussain ◽  
Dolora Wisco ◽  
Nirav Vora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Iv Tpa

Introduction: Five RCTs demonstrated the superiority of endovascular therapy (EVT) over best medical management (MM) for acute ischemic strokes (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation. Patients with M2 occlusions, however, were underrepresented (95 randomized; 51 EVT treated). Evidence from RCTs of the benefit of EVT for M2 occlusions is lacking, as reflected in the recent AHA guidelines. Methods: A retrospective cohort was pooled from 10 academic centers from 1/12 to 4/15 of AIS patients with LVO isolated to M2 presenting within 8 hours from last known normal (LKN). Patients were divided into EVT and MM groups. Primary outcome was 90 day mRS (good outcome 0-2); secondary outcome was sICH. Logistic regression compared the 2 groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated predictors of good outcome in the EVT group. Results: Figure 1 shows participating centers, 522 patients (288 EVT and 234 MM) were identified. Table (1) shows baseline characteristics. MM treated patients were older and had higher IV tPA treatment rates, otherwise the 2 groups were balanced. 62.7 % EVT patients had mRS 0-2 at 90 days compared to 35.4 % MM (figure 2). EVT patients had 3 times the odds of good outcome as compared to MM patients (OR: 3.1, 95% CI:2.1-4.4, P <0.001) even after adjustment for age, NIHSS, ASPECTS, IV tPA and LKN to door time (OR: 3.2, 95%CI: 2-5.2, P<0.001). sICH rate was 5.6 %, which was not statistically different than the MM group (table 1, P=0.1). Age, NIHSS, good ASPECTS, LKN to reperfusion time and successful reperfusion mTICI ≥ 2b were independent predictors of good outcome in EVT patients. There was a linear relationship between good outcome and time LKN to reperfusion (Figure 3). Conclusion: Despite inherent limitations of its retrospective design, our study suggests that EVT may be effective and safe for distal LVO (M2) relative to best MM. A trial randomizing M2 occlusions to EVT vs. MM is warranted to confirm these findings.

Abstract 1122‐000022: Delays in Care for Patients with Acute Stroke During Hospitalization for Other Reasons

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Vigilante ◽  
Parth Patel ◽  
Prasanth Romiyo ◽  
Lauren Thau ◽  
Mark Heslin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Symptom Recognition ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Recognition Imaging

Introduction : In‐hospital stroke (IHS) is defined as stroke that occurs during hospitalization for non‐stroke conditions. We aimed to understand the timing of symptom recognition for patients who experienced IHS and its impact on the care they receive. Methods : A prospective, single center registry of adult patients (9/20/19‐2/28/21) was queried for acute anterior circulation IHS. Indications for hospitalization, delays from last known well (LKW) to symptom recognition, imaging, and treatment were explored. Results : Of 928 consecutively evaluated adults with acute stroke, 85 (9%) developed an anterior circulation IHS, 39 (46%) of whom were female, with a median age of 67 years (IQR 60–76) and median NIHSS of 15 (IQR 4–22). Sixty‐eight (80%) had a >1 hour delay from last known well to symptom recognition. Two patients (2%) received IV thrombolysis, although another 38 (45%) would have been eligible if not for a delay in symptom recognition. An ICA, M1, or M2 occlusion was observed in 18 patients (21%), 7 of whom were treated at a median of 174 minutes after LKW (IQR 65–219). Compared to the 11 patients who did not undergo thrombectomy with large vessel occlusion, those who underwent thrombectomy had non‐significantly shorter delays from LKW until neuroimaging (median 85 [IQR 65‐162] vs. 216 [IQR 133‐507], p = 0.12). Conclusions : While uncommon, patients with IHS experience delays in symptom recognition and treatment, which lead to exclusion from acute care treatment such as thrombolysis and thrombectomy. Earlier detection with more frequent nursing assessments or advanced neuromonitoring devices in at‐risk patients may reduce delays in care.

Abstract WP26: Validation of Predictive Scales of Functional Outcome After Endovascular Therapy Using the REVASCAT Data

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Perez de la Ossa ◽  
Srikant Rangaraju ◽  
Tudor Jovin ◽  
Anoni Dávalos ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Best Medical Treatment

Introduction: Various scales have been developed to predict long-term clinical outcome after endovascular therapy (EVT) in stroke patients. The objective of this study was to validate and compare five well-validated scales in terms of predictive accuracy for functional independence in a recent endovascular stroke trial (REVASCAT). Hypothesis: We hypothesize that predictive scales (PRE, THRIVE, HIAT2, SPAN-100, FAR) have good-excellent (AUC>0.7) predictive accuracy for good functional outcome and can predict the beneficial effect of EVT demonstrated in randomized clinical trials. Methods: REVASCAT (Randomized Trial of Revascularization with Solitaire-FR Device versus Best Medical Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Stroke Due to Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Presenting within Eight Hours of Symptom Onset) enrolled 206 patients who were randomized to receive EVT or best medical treatment. Five scores (PRE-score, THRIVE, HIAT2, SPAN-100 and FAR-score) were retrospectively calculated on patients who received EVT. Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) for good outcome (mRS 0-2 at 90 days) for each scale were compared. Using the highest predictive scales, the proportion of patients with good outcome by the score categorized in quartiles was analyzed. Results: 103 patients received EVT in the REVASCAT trial (mean age 65.7, median NIHSS 17). Baseline NIHSS, baseline CT-ASPECTS, age and atrial fibrillation, but not previous iv tPA or DM, were associated with good outcome in multivariable analysis. AUC for good outcome was ≥0.70 for FAR (0.74) and PRE (0.70) scores while SPAN-100 (0.67), HIAT2 (0.65) and THRIVE (0.64) had lower AUCs although differences were not statistically significant. The higher the score on the PRE and FAR scores, the lower the proportion of patients with good outcome (PRE-score: 1QT 44.4%, 2QT 24.4%, 3QT 22.2%, 4 QT 8.9%; FAR-score: 1QT 57.8%, 2QT 22.2%, 3QT 6.7%, 4QT 3.3%). Benefit of EVT accordingly to the score on the different scales will be also presented. Conclusions: Of the 5 stroke scales, FAR and PRE had better predictive accuracy for functional independence after EVT. These tools may facilitate decision making for EVT in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke.

Abstract TP43: Is Unintended Hypothermia After Endovascular Therapy Associated With Improved Functional Outcome of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke?

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Hartmann ◽  
Simon Winzer ◽  
Timo Siepmann ◽  
Lars-Peder Pallesen ◽  
Alexandra Prakapenia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Risk Ratios

Introduction: Hypothermia may be neuroprotective in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (acLVO) who receive endovascular therapy (EVT) are frequently hypothermic after the procedure. We sought to analyze whether this unintended hypothermia was associated with improved functional outcome. Methods: We extracted data of consecutive patients (01/2016-04/2019) from our prospective EVT database that includes all patients screened for EVT at our center. We included patients with acLVO who received EVT and analyzed recanalization (mTICI 2b-3) and complications (i.e., pneumonia, bradyarrhythmia, venous thromboembolism) during the hospital course. We assessed functional outcome at 3 months and analyzed risk ratios (RR) for good outcome (mRS scores 0-2) and mortality of patients who were hypothermic (<36°C) compared to patients who were normothermic ( > 36°C) after EVT. We compared the frequency of complications and calculated RRs for good outcome and mortality in the subgroup with recanalization. Results: Among 674 patients with anterior circulation ischemic stroke, 372 patients received EVT for acLVO (178 [47%] male, age 77 years [65-82], NIHSS score 16 [12 - 20]). Of these, 186 patients (50%) were hypothermic (median [IQR] temperature 35.2°C [34.7-35.6]) and 186 patients were normothermic (media temperature 36.4 [36.2-36.8]) after EVT. At 3 months, 54 of 186 (29.0%) hypothermic patients compared with 65 of 186 (35.0%) normothermic patients had a good outcome (RR, 0.83; 95%CI 0.62-1.12) and 52 of 186 (27.9%) hypothermic patients compared with 46 of 186 (24.7%) normothermic patients had died (RR, 1.13; 95%CI 0.8-1.59). This relation was consistent in 307 patients (82.5% of all EVTs) with successful recanalization (good outcome: RR, 0.85; 95%CI 0.63-1.14.; mortality: RR, 1.05; 95%CI 0.7-1.57). More hypothermic patients suffered pneumonia (37.8% vs. 24.7%; p=0.003) or bradyarrhythmia (55.6% vs. 18.3%; p<0.001). Venous thromboembolism was distributed similarly (5.4% vs. 6.5%; p=0.42). Conclusion: Unintended hypothermia following EVT for acLVO was not associated with improved functional outcome or reduced mortality but an increased complication rate in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Abstract TP38: Re-Occlusion During Endovascular Therapy for Acute Stroke Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion

Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Hao ◽  
Jacob Morey ◽  
Xiangnan Zhang ◽  
Emily Chapman ◽  
Reade DeLeacy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Vessel Occlusion

Infarct growth patterns may vary in acute stroke due to large vessel occlusion and recanalization with endovascular therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 6432-6440
Author(s):  
Dong-Seok Gwak ◽  
Hong-Kyun Park ◽  
Cheolkyu Jung ◽  
Jae Hyoung Kim ◽  
Juneyoung Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Growth Patterns ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion

An Evidence-based Update on Acute Endovascular Stroke Therapy

US Neurology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
Michael Chen ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Infarction ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Therapy ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Endovascular Stroke Therapy

In 2015, there is now level 1 evidence from prospective randomized controlled trials proving the clinical efficacy of acute endovascular stroke therapy. Specifically, patients who would stand to benefit need to have a large vessel occlusion (LVO), need to be treated within the first 6 hours after symptom onset, and be treated by experienced neurointerventionalists who can consistently achieve high rates of Thombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2b/3 recanalization.

Abstract TP31: Variability of Stroke Patients Meeting Endovascular Stroke Trial Criteria in a Non-clinical Trial Setting

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer E Fugate ◽  
Waleed Brinjikji ◽  
Harry Cloft ◽  
David F Kallmes ◽  
Alejandro A Rabinstein
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Therapy ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Radiological Criteria ◽  
Trial Setting ◽  
Endovascular Stroke Therapy

Introduction: Five randomized trials proving the efficacy and safety of mechanical embolectomy for ischemic stroke patients used differing radiological methods to select patients for treatment. Hypothesis: The percentage of patients evaluated in a non-clinical trial setting that would meet radiological criteria to be included in the five trials will differ substantially. Methods: Retrospective study of consecutive ischemic stroke patients who were considered for endovascular stroke therapy based on confirmed intracranial large vessel occlusion (M1, M2, or carotid terminus) at an academic medical center from April 2010 - November 2014. All patients underwent CT perfusion and CT angiogram. Results: The table shows baseline characteristics of 119 patients. Median age was 69 years (IQR 57-79) and median NIHSS 18 (IQR 14-21). Most patients had ASPECTS score ≥ 6 (n=105, 88.2%). The M1 segment of MCA was the most common vessel occluded (n=81, 68%). All 119 patients (100%) met radiological criteria for MR CLEAN while 105 (88.2%) met criteria for SWIFT-PRIME, 96 (80.7%) for REVASCAT, 80/116 (69.0%) for EXTEND IA, and 74 (62.2%) for ESCAPE. IV TPA was given to 58 patients (48.7%) and acute endovascular stroke therapy attempted in 66 (55.5%). Any intracranial hemorrhage was more common in the patients treated with endovascular therapy than in those who were not (36% vs. 17%, p=0.025). The frequency of symptomatic ICH did not significantly differ between these two groups (6.1% vs 3.8%, p=0.691). Conclusions: The percentage of patients with acute stroke and large vessel occlusion that would qualify for endovascular stroke trials based on radiological criteria varies considerably (62%-100%) in a non-clinical trial cohort from an academic comprehensive stroke center. Additional individual patient characteristics influence treatment decisions in non-clinical trial settings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document