Abstract WMP14: Association of Systolic Blood Pressure, LDL Cholesterol, and Hgb A1c With White Matter Hyperintensity on MRI in the ACCORDION MIND Study

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam H de Havenon ◽  
Tanya Turan ◽  
Rebecca Gottesman ◽  
Sharon Yeatts ◽  
Shyam Prabhakaran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Ldl Cholesterol ◽  
Vascular Risk Factor ◽  
White Matter Hyperintensity ◽  
Vascular Risk ◽  
Linear Regression Models ◽  
Risk Factor Profile ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: While retrospective studies have shown that poor control of vascular risk factors is associated with progression of white matter hyperintensity (WMH), it has not been studied prospectively. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) mean, LDL cholesterol, and Hgb A1c will be correlated with WMH progression in diabetics. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the Memory in Diabetes (MIND) substudy of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Follow-on Study (ACCORDION). The primary outcome was WMH progression, evaluated by fitting linear regression models to the WMH volume on the month 80 MRI and adjusting for the WMH volume on the baseline MRI. The primary predictors were the mean values of SBP, LDL, and A1c from baseline to month 80. We defined a good vascular risk factor profile as mean SBP <120 mm Hg and mean LDL <120 mg/dL. Results: We included 292 patients, with a mean (SD) age of 62.6 (5.3) years and 55.8% male. The mean number of SBP, LDL, and A1c measurements per patient was 17, 5, and 12. We identified 86 (29.4%) patients with good vascular risk factor profile. In the linear regression models, mean SBP and LDL were associated with WMH progression and in a second fully adjusted model they both remained associated with WMH progression (Table). Those with a good vascular risk factor profile had less WMH progression (β Coefficient -0.80, 95% CI -1.42, -0.18, p=0.012). Conclusions: Our data reinforce prior research showing that higher SBP and LDL is associated with progression of WMH in diabetics, likely secondary to chronic microvascular ischemia, and suggest that control of these factors may have protective effects. This study has unique strengths, including prospective serial measurement of the exposures, validated algorithmic measurement methodology for WMH, and rigorous adjudication of study data. Clinical trials are needed to investigate the effect of vascular risk factor reduction on WMH progression.

scholarly journals The Pregravid Vascular Risk Factor Profile of Low-Risk Women Who Develop Pregnancy Outcomes That Predict Future Cardiovascular Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-70
Author(s):  
Roslyn Mainland ◽  
Shi Wu Wen ◽  
Hongzhuan Tan ◽  
Shujin Zhou ◽  
Chang Ye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Vascular Risk Factor ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Vascular Risk ◽  
Risk Factor Profile ◽  
Low Risk Women

scholarly journals White matter hyperintensity burden in acute stroke patients differs by ischemic stroke subtype

Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. e79-e88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Katrin Giese ◽  
Markus D. Schirmer ◽  
Adrian V. Dalca ◽  
Ramesh Sridharan ◽  
Kathleen L. Donahue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
White Matter ◽  
Brain Mri ◽  
Vascular Risk Factor ◽  
White Matter Hyperintensity ◽  
Large Artery ◽  
Vascular Risk ◽  
Stroke Subtypes ◽  
Small Artery Occlusion

ObjectiveTo examine etiologic stroke subtypes and vascular risk factor profiles and their association with white matter hyperintensity (WMH) burden in patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke (AIS).MethodsFor the MRI Genetics Interface Exploration (MRI-GENIE) study, we systematically assembled brain imaging and phenotypic data for 3,301 patients with AIS. All cases underwent standardized web tool–based stroke subtyping with the Causative Classification of Ischemic Stroke (CCS). WMH volume (WMHv) was measured on T2 brain MRI scans of 2,529 patients with a fully automated deep-learning trained algorithm. Univariable and multivariable linear mixed-effects modeling was carried out to investigate the relationship of vascular risk factors with WMHv and CCS subtypes.ResultsPatients with AIS with large artery atherosclerosis, major cardioembolic stroke, small artery occlusion (SAO), other, and undetermined causes of AIS differed significantly in their vascular risk factor profile (all p < 0.001). Median WMHv in all patients with AIS was 5.86 cm3 (interquartile range 2.18–14.61 cm3) and differed significantly across CCS subtypes (p < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, age, hypertension, prior stroke, smoking (all p < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.041) were independent predictors of WMHv. When adjusted for confounders, patients with SAO had significantly higher WMHv compared to those with all other stroke subtypes (p < 0.001).ConclusionIn this international multicenter, hospital-based cohort of patients with AIS, we demonstrate that vascular risk factor profiles and extent of WMH burden differ by CCS subtype, with the highest lesion burden detected in patients with SAO. These findings further support the small vessel hypothesis of WMH lesions detected on brain MRI of patients with ischemic stroke.

Aortic Compliance Declines with Glucose Intolerance Independently of Blood Pressure - a Novel Vascular Risk Factor?

1990 ◽  
Vol 78 (s22) ◽  
pp. 32P-32P ◽  
Author(s):  
JK Cruickshank ◽  
JS Wright ◽  
S Kontis ◽  
RG Gosling
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Glucose Intolerance ◽  
Vascular Risk Factor ◽  
Vascular Risk ◽  
Aortic Compliance

The Effects of Mean of Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure on Incident Brain Vascular Lesions and Functional-Cognitive Decline

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Bibek Gyanwali ◽  
Celestine Xue Ting Cai ◽  
Christopher Chen ◽  
Henri Vrooman ◽  
Chuen Seng Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cognitive Decline ◽  
Hippocampal Volume ◽  
Intracranial Stenosis ◽  
Vascular Lesions ◽  
Linear Regression Models ◽  
Volume Functional ◽  
Mri Scans ◽  
The Mean

Background: Cerebrovascular disease (CeVD) is an underlying cause of cognitive impairment and dementia. Hypertension is a known risk factor of CeVD, but the effects of mean of visit-to-visit blood pressure (BP) on incident CeVD and functional-cognitive decline remains unclear. Objective: To determine the association between mean of visit-to-visit BP with the incidence and progression of CeVD [white matter hyperintensities (WMH), infarcts (cortical infarcts and lacunes), cerebral microbleeds (CMBs), intracranial stenosis, and hippocampal volume] as well as functional-cognitive decline over 2 years of follow-up. Methods: 373 patients from a memory-clinic underwent BP measurements at baseline, year 1, and year 2. The mean of visit-to-visit systolic BP, diastolic BP, pulse pressure, and mean arterial pressure were calculated. Baseline and year 2 MRI scans were graded for WMH, infarcts, CMBs, intracranial stenosis, and hippocampal volume. Functional-cognitive decline was assessed using locally validated protocol. Logistic and linear regression models with odds ratios, mean difference, and 95%confidence interval were constructed to analyze associations of visit-to-visit BP on CeVD incidence and progression as well as functional-cognitive decline. Results: Higher mean of visit-to-visit diastolic BP was associated with WMH progression. Higher tertiles of diastolic BP was associated with WMH progression and incident CMBs. There was no association between mean of visit-to-visit BP measures with incident cerebral infarcts, intracranial stenosis, change in hippocampal volume, and functional-cognitive decline. Conclusion: These findings suggest the possibility of hypertension-related vascular brain damage. Careful monitoring and management of BP in elderly patients is essential to reduce the incidence and progression of CeVD.

scholarly journals Assessing Early Heterogeneity in Doubling Times of the COVID-19 Epidemic across Prefectures in Mainland China, January–February, 2020

Epidemiologia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac Chun-Hai Fung ◽  
Xiaolu Zhou ◽  
Chi-Ngai Cheung ◽  
Sylvia K. Ofori ◽  
Kamalich Muniz-Rodriguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regression Models ◽  
Doubling Time ◽  
Metropolitan Areas ◽  
Mainland China ◽  
Linear Regression Models ◽  
Case Count ◽  
Daily Time Series ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Doubling Times ◽  
Daily Time

To describe the geographical heterogeneity of COVID-19 across prefectures in mainland China, we estimated doubling times from daily time series of the cumulative case count between 24 January and 24 February 2020. We analyzed the prefecture-level COVID-19 case burden using linear regression models and used the local Moran’s I to test for spatial autocorrelation and clustering. Four hundred prefectures (~98% population) had at least one COVID-19 case and 39 prefectures had zero cases by 24 February 2020. Excluding Wuhan and those prefectures where there was only one case or none, 76 (17.3% of 439) prefectures had an arithmetic mean of the epidemic doubling time <2 d. Low-population prefectures had a higher per capita cumulative incidence than high-population prefectures during the study period. An increase in population size was associated with a very small reduction in the mean doubling time (−0.012, 95% CI, −0.017, −0.006) where the cumulative case count doubled ≥3 times. Spatial analysis revealed high case count clusters in Hubei and Heilongjiang and fast epidemic growth in several metropolitan areas by mid-February 2020. Prefectures in Hubei and neighboring provinces and several metropolitan areas in coastal and northeastern China experienced rapid growth with cumulative case count doubling multiple times with a small mean doubling time.

Abstract 121: Vascular Risk Factor Control in the Year After Ischemic Stroke Versus Myocardial Infarction

Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn M Bravata ◽  
Jared Brosch ◽  
Jason Sico ◽  
Fitsum Baye ◽  
Laura Myers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Vascular Risk Factor ◽  
Vascular Risk ◽  
Hypertension Control ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Risk Factor Control ◽  
Facility Level

Background: The Veterans Health Administration has multiple quality improvement activities directed at improving vascular risk factor control. We sought to examine facility quality of blood pressure (BP) control (<140/90 mm Hg), lipid control (LDL-cholesterol <100 mg/dL) and glycemic control (HbA1c <9%) in the one-year after hospitalization for ischemic stroke or acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: We assembled a retrospective cohort of patients hospitalized with stroke or AMI (fiscal year 2011). Facilities were included if they admitted ≥25 stroke patients and ≥25 AMI patients. A facility-level consolidated measure of vascular risk factor control was calculated for the 3 processes of care (number of passes divided by number of opportunities). Results: A total of 2432 patients had a new stroke and 4873 had a new primary AMI (at 75 facilities). Stroke patients had worse vascular risk factor control than AMI patients (mean facility rate on consolidated measure: stroke, 70% [95%CI 0.68-0.72] vs AMI, 77% [0.75-0.78]). The greatest disparity between stroke and AMI patients was in hypertension control: at 87% of hospitals, fewer stroke patients achieved BP control than AMI patients (mean facility pass rate: stroke, 41% vs AMI, 52%; p<0.0001). Overall there were no statistical differences for stroke versus AMI patients in facility-level hyperlipidemia control (71% vs 73%, p=0.33) and glycemic control (79% versus 82%, p=0.24). AMI patients had more outpatient visits than stroke patients in the year after discharge [AMI: mean 7.9 visits (standard deviation 6.1)]; stroke: mean 6.0 visits (standard deviation 4.5; p<0.0001].); the primary difference in outpatient utilization was additional cardiology visits for AMI patients (2.5 visits with cardiology per AMI patient vs 0.4 visits per stroke patient; p<0.001). Conclusions: These results demonstrated clinically substantial disparities in hypertension control among patients with stroke vs patients with AMI. It may be that cardiologists provided risk factor management to AMI patients that stroke patients did not receive. The etiology of these observed differences merits additional investigation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document