Abstract P251: Estimates and Temporal Trends for US Nationwide 30-Day Hospital Readmission Among Patients With Ischemic Stroke Treated With Thrombolytic Therapy

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saqib Chaudhry ◽  
Ibrahim Laleka ◽  
Zelalem Bahiru ◽  
Mohammad Rauf A Chaudhry ◽  
Hussan S Gill ◽  
...  

Background: Avoidance of readmission is linked to improved quality of care, reduction in cost, and is a desirable patient-centered outcome. Nationally representative readmission metrics for patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolytic treatment (IV-tPA) are unavailable to date. Such estimates are necessary for benchmarking performance. Objectives: To identify US nationwide estimates and a temporal trend for 30-day hospital readmissions. Methods: We identified the cohort by year-wise analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database between January 1, 2010, and September 30, 2015. The database represents 50% of all US hospitalizations from 22 geographically dispersed states. Participants were adult (=>18 years) patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of acute ischemic (ICD-9-CM 433.x1 and 434.x1) who were treated with thrombolytic therapy (ICD-9-CM 9910). Readmission was defined as any admission within 30 days of index hospitalization discharge. Results: Based on study criteria, 57,676 eligible patients were included (mean [SE] age, 68.7 ± 14.4 years; 48.7% were women). Thirty-day readmission rate for acute ischemic stroke patients treated with IV-tPA was 11.17 % (95%CI, 10.92 %-11.43%). On average, there was a 4.4% annual decline in readmission between 2010 and 2014, which was statistically significant for the period of investigation (odds ratio, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.94-0.97). Age ≥ 65 years (OR 1.16 P <.0001), medical history of congestive heart failure (OR 1.11 P = 0.0056), chronic lung disease (OR 1.11 P = 0.0034) and renal failure (OR 1.35 P = <.0001) were independent predictors of readmission within 30 days. Conclusion: Nationally representative readmission metrics can be used to benchmark hospitals’ performance, and a temporal trend of 4.4 % may be used to evaluate the effectiveness of readmission reduction strategies.

Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee H Schwamm ◽  
Syed F Ali ◽  
Mathew J Reeves ◽  
Eric E Smith ◽  
Jeffrey L Saver ◽  
...  

Introduction: Utilization of IV tPA is challenging for many hospitals. Using data from the national Get With The Guidelines-Stroke program, we analyzed changes over time in the characteristics of the hospitals that treated patients with tPA. Methods: We analyzed patient-level data from 2003-2011 at 1600 GWTG hospitals that joined the program at any time during the study period and admitted any acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients arriving ≤ 2 hr of onset and eligible for tPA. Descriptive trends by time were analyzed by chi-square or Wilcoxon test for continuous data. Results: IV tPA was given within 3 hr at 1394 sites to 50,798/ 75,115 (67.6%) eligible AIS patients arriving ≤ 2 hr; 206 (14.8%) sites had a least one eligible patients but no tPA use. IV tPA treatment rates varied substantially across hospitals (median 61.2%, range 0-100%), with > 200 hospitals providing tPA < 10% of the time (Figure). Over time, more patients and a larger proportion of patients were treated at smaller (median bed size 407 vs. 372, p< 0.001), non-academic, Southern hospitals, and those with lower annualized average ischemic stroke volumes (252.4 vs. 235.2, p< 0.001) (Table). While more than half of all tPA patients were treated at Primary Stroke Centers, this proportion did not change over time. The proportion of patients treated at high volume tPA treatment sites (average > 20/year) increased over time (31.9 vs. 34.5, p< 0.007). Conclusion: Over the past decade, while primary stroke centers still account for more than half of all treatments, tPA has been increasingly delivered in smaller, non-academic hospitals. These data support the continued emphasis on stroke team building and systems of care at US hospitals.


Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011527
Author(s):  
Amie W. Hsia ◽  
Marie L Luby ◽  
Richard Leigh ◽  
John K. Lynch ◽  
Zurab Nadareishvili ◽  
...  

Objective:To determine the IV tPA treatment rate of minor acute ischemic stroke (mAIS) patients at our centers and compare the frequency of MRI targets by treatment stratification and clinical severity, we evaluated clinical characteristics and baseline MRIs for tPA-treated and untreated patients.Methods:Patients with ischemic stroke from 2015-2017 with admit NIHSS<6 were considered. The Treated cohort: 1) received standard IV tPA, and 2) screened with baseline MRI. The Untreated cohort received: 1) no acute intervention, and 2) baseline MRI <4 hours from onset. Patients were stratified into “clearly” and “not clearly” disabling deficits by NIHSS elements. Baseline MRI was evaluated by independent raters for AIS targets, with frequencies compared between groups.Results:Of 255 mAIS patients ≤4.5 hours from onset, 140 (55%) received IV tPA, accounting for 46% of all IV tPA patients (n=305). Eighty-five percent (n=119) were screened with baseline MRI and had significantly more frequent imaging targets compared to those untreated (n=90). Of this treated cohort, 75% (n=89) were not clearly-disabling. Except for perfusion-diffusion mismatch (81% clearly-disabling versus 56% not clearly-disabling (p=0.036)), there were no significant differences in the frequency of imaging targets across the treated cohort stratified by clinical severity.Conclusions:In MRI-screened mAIS, imaging targets were more frequently seen in patients treated with IV tPA, with similar frequencies even in those without clearly-disabling deficits. MRI targets could be used to guide thrombolytic therapy in mAIS patients; however, a randomized trial is needed to demonstrate efficacy.


Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 94 (12) ◽  
pp. e1249-e1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle H. Leppert ◽  
Stefan Sillau ◽  
Richard C. Lindrooth ◽  
Sharon N. Poisson ◽  
Jonathan D. Campbell ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo examine whether early follow-up with primary care or neurology is associated with lower all-cause readmissions within 30 and 90 days after acute ischemic stroke admission.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who were discharged home after acute ischemic stroke, identified by ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, using PharMetrics, a nationally representative claims database of insured Americans from 2009 to 2015. The primary predictor was outpatient primary care or neurology follow-up within 30 and 90 days of discharge, and the primary outcome was all-cause 30- and 90-day readmissions. Multivariable Cox models were used with primary care and neurology visits specified as time-dependent covariates, with adjustment for patient demographics, comorbid conditions, and stroke severity measures.ResultsThe cohort included 14,630 patients. Readmissions within 30 days occurred in 7.3% of patients, and readmissions within 90 days occurred in 13.7% of patients. By 30 days, 59.3% had a primary care visit, and 24.4% had a neurology visit. Primary care follow-up was associated with reduced 30-day readmissions (hazard ratio [HR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72–0.98). Primary care follow-up before 90 days did not reach significance (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.83–1.03). Neurology follow-up was not associated with reduced readmissions within 30 or 90 days (HR 1.05, 95% CI; HR 1.00, 95% CI, respectively).ConclusionEarly outpatient follow-up with primary care is associated with a reduction in 30-day hospital readmissions. Early outpatient follow-up may represent an important opportunity for intervention after acute stroke admissions.


Author(s):  
Hasan Karadeli ◽  
Ruken Simsekoglu

Objective: The term ‘mild stroke’ is used to describe stroke patients with a NIHSS score of 0 to 6. There is still no clear decision regarding the application of iv recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (iv-tPA) to patients who is admitted with an acute ischemic stroke and is in the mild stroke category. In our study, we aimed to analyze the data of patients who applied to our stroke center with an acute mild stroke clinic and received iv-tPA treatment and their three-month follow-up. Methods: A total of 47 (age 69.1 ± 14.1, 28 female) mild stroke patients were included out of 350 patients receiving thrombolytic therapy. Intravenous thrombolysis was initiated with a maximum delay of 4.5 hours in all patients. Patients had a NIHS score less than 6. NIHSS scores immediately before starting thrombolytic therapy and scores 24 hours after treatment were recorded. Modified Rankin Scale scores (mRS) at admission, 1 and 3 months were recorded. Results: NIHSS scores of the patients who received tPA decreased significantly after the treatment (p = 0.001). The patients’ 1st and 3rd month mRS scores were statistically significantly decreased according to the mRS scores when they entered the treatment (p = 0.001). Conclusions: This study highlights the efficacy of iv-tPA in acute ischemic stroke patients with mild symptoms and demonstrates the low risk profile of this therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document