scholarly journals Stent Design, Restenosis and Recurrent Stroke After Carotid Artery Stenting in the International Carotid Stenting Study

Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 3013-3020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandy D. Müller ◽  
John Gregson ◽  
Dominick J.H. McCabe ◽  
Paul J. Nederkoorn ◽  
H. Bart van der Worp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Carotid Stenting ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Stent Design ◽  
Open Cell ◽  
Closed Cell

Background and Purpose— Open-cell carotid artery stents are associated with a higher peri-procedural stroke risk than closed-cell stents. However, the effect of stent design on long-term durability of carotid artery stenting (CAS) is unknown. We compared the medium- to long-term risk of restenosis and ipsilateral stroke between patients treated with open-cell stents versus closed-cell stents in the ICSS (International Carotid Stenting Study). Methods— Patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis were randomized to CAS or endarterectomy and followed with duplex ultrasound for a median of 4.0 years. We analyzed data from patients with completed CAS procedures, known stent design, and available ultrasound follow-up. The primary outcome, moderate or higher restenosis (≥50%) was defined as a peak systolic velocity of >1.3 m/s on ultrasound or occlusion of the treated internal carotid artery and analyzed with interval-censored models. Results— Eight hundred fifty-five patients were allocated to CAS. Seven hundred fourteen patients with completed CAS and known stent design were included in the current analysis. Of these, 352 were treated with open-cell and 362 with closed-cell stents. Moderate or higher restenosis occurred significantly less frequently in patients treated with open-cell (n=113) than closed-cell stents (n=154; 5-year risks were 35.5% versus 46.0%; unadjusted hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53–0.88). There was no significant difference in the risk of severe restenosis (≥70%) after open-cell stenting (n=27) versus closed-cell stenting (n=43; 5-year risks, 8.6% versus 12.7%; unadjusted hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.37–1.05). The risk of ipsilateral stroke beyond 30 days after treatment was similar with open-cell and closed-cell stents (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.35–1.75). Conclusions— Moderate or higher restenosis after CAS occurred less frequently in patients treated with open-cell stents than closed-cell stents. However, both stent designs were equally effective at preventing recurrent stroke during follow-up. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.isrctn.com/ . Unique identifier: ISRCTN25337470.

Effect of Open- vs Closed-Cell Stent Design on Periprocedural Outcomes and Restenosis After Carotid Artery Stenting: A Systematic Review and Comprehensive Meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavlos Texakalidis ◽  
Stefanos Giannopoulos ◽  
Damianos G. Kokkinidis ◽  
Giuseppe Lanzino
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stent Design ◽  
Open Cell ◽  
Stent Restenosis ◽  
Closed Cell ◽  
Ischemic Attack ◽  
In Stent Restenosis

Purpose:To compare periprocedural complications and in-stent restenosis rates associated with open- vs closed-cell stent designs used in carotid artery stenting (CAS). Methods: A systematic search was conducted to identify all randomized and observational studies published in English up to October 31, 2017, that compared open- vs closed-cell stent designs in CAS. Identified studies were included if they reported the following outcomes: stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction (MI), hemodynamic depression, new ischemic lesions detected on imaging, and death within 30 days, as well as the incidence of in-stent restenosis. A random-effects model meta-analysis was employed. Model results are reported as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The I2 statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. Results: Thirty-three studies (2 randomized trials) comprising 20, 291 patients (mean age 71.3±3.0 years; 74.6% men) were included. Patients in the open-cell stent group had a statistically significant lower risk of restenosis ⩾40% (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.92; I2=0%) and ⩾70% (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.52; I2=0%) at a mean follow-up of 24 months. No statistically significant differences were identified for periprocedural stroke, TIA, new ischemic lesions, MI, hemodynamic depression, or death within 30 days after CAS. Sensitivity analysis of the 2 randomized controlled trials only did not point to any significant differences either. Conclusion: Use of open-cell stent design in CAS is associated with a decreased risk for restenosis when compared to the closed-cell stent, without significant differences in periprocedural outcomes.

scholarly journals Stent Design, Restenosis and Recurrent Stroke After Carotid Artery Stenting in the International Carotid Stenting Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 343
Author(s):  
M.D. Muller ◽  
J. Gregson ◽  
D.J. McCabe ◽  
P.J. Nederkoorn ◽  
H.B. van der Worp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Carotid Stenting ◽  
Stent Design

scholarly journals Angioplasty and carotid artery stenting: clinical and morphological factors affecting long-term outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 2470
Author(s):  
F. B. Shukurov ◽  
E. S. Bulgakova ◽  
B. A. Rudenko ◽  
N. E. Gavrilova ◽  
T. V. Tvorogova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Lesion Length ◽  
Open Cell ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Residual Stenosis ◽  
Stent Restenosis

Aim. To identify clinical and morphological factors affecting the longterm outcomes of endovascular angioplasty and carotid artery stenting.Material and methods. The analysis included 198 patients after carotid artery stenting between 03.2014 and 05.2018. There were following inclusion criteria: (1) 50% of symptomatic or 70% of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis of according to NASCET (North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial) criteria; (2) follow-up for each patient for at least 1 year. Using the univariate and multivariate logistic regression, risk factors associated with adverse events were determined.Results. The incidence of major adverse events during the 12-month follow-up was 9,6% (n=19), including 4 (2%) major and 6 (3%) minor strokes, 7 (3,5%) cases of transient ischemic attack; one (0,5%) patient had transient blindness and one (0,5%) died in the long-term follow-up period due to acute cerebrovascular accident in the target arterial territory. Also, 11 (5,6%) patients had restenosis >50% after 12-month follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed that long-term outcomes were significantly affected by: age >70 years (odds ratio (OR)=1,27, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1,07-1,61 (p=0,01); using of open-cell stents (OR=1,02, 95% CI: 1,01-1,03 (p=0,034)); contralateral stenosis (OR=1,28, 95% CI: 1,05-1,57 (p=0,01); lesion length >15 mm (OR=1,46, 95% CI: 1,12-1,89 (p=0,01)); residual stenosis <30% (OR=1,38, 95% CI: 1,09-1,49 (p=0,012)); complicated atherosclerotic plaque (OR=1,78, 95% CI: 1,21- 2,34 (p=0,007)). The development of in-stent restenosis was significantly influenced by factors such as the residual stenosis ><30% (OR=1,26, 95% CI: 1,1-1,65; p=0,017) and severe plaque calcification (OR=1,24, 95% CI: 1,04-1,31; p=0,02). Conclusion. The results obtained indicate the need for more careful preparation for endovascular intervention. Such factors as the use of open-cell stents, contralateral stenosis, lesion length >< 30% (OR=1,38, 95% CI: 1,09-1,49 (p=0,012)); complicated atherosclerotic plaque (OR=1,78, 95% CI: 1,21- 2,34 (p=0,007)). The development of in-stent restenosis was significantly influenced by factors such as the residual stenosis <30% (OR=1,26, 95% CI: 1,1-1,65; p=0,017) and severe plaque calcification (OR=1,24, 95% CI: 1,04-1,31; p=0,02).Conclusion. The results obtained indicate the need for more careful preparation for endovascular intervention. Such factors as the use of open-cell stents, contralateral stenosis, lesion length >15 mm, and residual stenosis < 30% may be associated with an increased risk of adverse events.

Incidence of embolism associated with carotid artery stenting: open-cell versus closed-cell stents

2013 ◽  
Vol 119 (3) ◽  
pp. 642-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keun Young Park ◽  
Dong Ik Kim ◽  
Byung Moon Kim ◽  
Hyo Suk Nam ◽  
Young Dae Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenosis ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Artery Stenosis ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Stent Design ◽  
Open Cell ◽  
Stent Type ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Closed Cell

Object Carotid artery stenting (CAS) can be an alternative option for carotid endarterectomy in the prevention of ischemic stroke caused by carotid artery stenosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of stent design on the incidence of procedural and postprocedural embolism associated with CAS treatment. Methods Ninety-six symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, consisting of 79 males and 17 females, with moderate to severe carotid artery stenosis and a mean age of 69.0 years were treated with CAS. The stent type (48 closed-cell and 48 open-cell stents) was randomly allocated before the procedure. Imaging, procedural, and clinical outcomes were assessed and compared. The symptomatic subgroup (76 patients) was also analyzed to determine the influence of stent design on outcome. Results New lesions on postprocedural diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were significantly more frequent in the open-cell than in the closed-cell stent group (24 vs 12, respectively; p = 0.020). The 30-day clinical outcome was not different between the 2 stent groups. In the symptomatic patient group, stent design (p = 0.017, OR 4.173) and recent smoking history (p = 0.036, OR 4.755) were strong risk factors for new lesions on postprocedural DWI. Conclusions Stent design may have an influence on the risk of new embolism, and selecting the appropriate stent may improve outcome.

Abstract W P17: Spontaneous Dilatation of Stents at Three Months After Carotid Artery Stenting Without Post-Carotid Artery Stenting Balloon Dilatation

Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuhei Tanno ◽  
Takahisa Mori ◽  
Tomonori Iwata ◽  
Yoshinori Aoyagi ◽  
Shigen Kasakura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Balloon Dilatation ◽  
Conventional Angiography ◽  
Minimum Width ◽  
Lateral Projection ◽  
Closed Cell ◽  
Dilatation Rate ◽  
Stent Diameter

Objective: The aim of our retrospective study was to investigate how wide stents were spontaneously dilated at three months after carotid artery stenting (CAS) without post-CAS balloon dilatation (BT). Methods: We included in our analysis patients 1) who underwent elective CAS without post-CAS BT from January 2012 to March 2014, 2) who underwent follow-up conventional angiography at 3 months after CAS, Patients’ baseline characteristics, stent types (open cell: OP or closed cell: CL), stent diameter (SD) at the site with minimum width on the lateral projection immediately and at 3 month after CAS were evaluated. Results: Sixty-two lesions in fifty-nine patients were analyzed. Their average age was 74.9 years old, median SD immediately after CAS was 3.27mm(3.08_3.64:interquartile range), median SD at 3 months was 3.99mm(3.58-4.27), and thus SD was spontaneously dilated (p<0.0001). In OP types (18 cases), median SD changed from 3.59 to 4.05 mm and in CL types (44 cases) from 3.22 to 3.85 mm. Median SD after deployment was wider in OP type anytime (p<0.05), whereas dilatation rate seemed to be bigger in CL type. Conclusion: Stents were spontaneously dilated about 10 to 20% without post-CAS balloon dilatation. SD at 3 months was wider in OP type, whereas dilatation rate at 3 months was bigger in CL type.

scholarly journals The CRP/albumin ratio: a novel predictor of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.N Calik ◽  
T Cinar ◽  
D Inan ◽  
D Genc ◽  
H Kuplay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Albumin Ratio ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Stent Restenosis ◽  
In Stent Restenosis

Abstract Background In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a potential problem and raises concerns about the long-term safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS). As inflammation has a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of ISR, a novel and more sensitive inflammatory marker, CRP/albumin ratio (CAR) may be used to predict ISR in patients undergoing CAS. Purpose The present study aimed to assess the predictive value of preprocedural C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) for ISR after CAS. Method In this retrospective study, 206 patients who underwent successful CAS procedure in a tertiary heart centre were included. For each patient, both C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum albumin were determined before the index procedure. The CAR was calculated by dividing serum CRP by serum albumin level. The main end-point of the study was ISR during long-term follow-up. Results ISR developed in 34 (16.5%) out of 206 patients after a mean follow-up of 24.2±1.5 months. The CAR was significantly elevated in patients with ISR compared to those who were not (0.99 [1.3] vs. 0.15 [0.2], p&lt;0.01, respectively). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, the CAR was an independent predictor of ISR (HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.29–2.64, p&lt;0.01). A ROC curve analysis revealed that the optimal value of CAR in predicting ISR was &gt;0.53 with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 97.1% [area under curve (AUC) 0.98, p&lt;0.001]. Conclusion The present study demonstrated that CAR, a new inflammatory-based index, is a strong independent predictor of ISR after CAS. As a simple and easily accessible parameter, this index may be used for the assessment of ISR in patients who are treated with CAS. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document