scholarly journals Stent Design, Restenosis and Recurrent Stroke after Carotid Artery Stenting in the International Carotid Stenting Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 713
Author(s):  
M.D. Muller ◽  
J. Gregson ◽  
D.J.H. McCabe
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Carotid Stenting ◽  
Stent Design

scholarly journals Stent Design, Restenosis and Recurrent Stroke After Carotid Artery Stenting in the International Carotid Stenting Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 343
Author(s):  
M.D. Muller ◽  
J. Gregson ◽  
D.J. McCabe ◽  
P.J. Nederkoorn ◽  
H.B. van der Worp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Carotid Stenting ◽  
Stent Design

scholarly journals Stent Design, Restenosis and Recurrent Stroke After Carotid Artery Stenting in the International Carotid Stenting Study

Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 3013-3020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandy D. Müller ◽  
John Gregson ◽  
Dominick J.H. McCabe ◽  
Paul J. Nederkoorn ◽  
H. Bart van der Worp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Carotid Stenting ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Stent Design ◽  
Open Cell ◽  
Closed Cell

Background and Purpose— Open-cell carotid artery stents are associated with a higher peri-procedural stroke risk than closed-cell stents. However, the effect of stent design on long-term durability of carotid artery stenting (CAS) is unknown. We compared the medium- to long-term risk of restenosis and ipsilateral stroke between patients treated with open-cell stents versus closed-cell stents in the ICSS (International Carotid Stenting Study). Methods— Patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis were randomized to CAS or endarterectomy and followed with duplex ultrasound for a median of 4.0 years. We analyzed data from patients with completed CAS procedures, known stent design, and available ultrasound follow-up. The primary outcome, moderate or higher restenosis (≥50%) was defined as a peak systolic velocity of >1.3 m/s on ultrasound or occlusion of the treated internal carotid artery and analyzed with interval-censored models. Results— Eight hundred fifty-five patients were allocated to CAS. Seven hundred fourteen patients with completed CAS and known stent design were included in the current analysis. Of these, 352 were treated with open-cell and 362 with closed-cell stents. Moderate or higher restenosis occurred significantly less frequently in patients treated with open-cell (n=113) than closed-cell stents (n=154; 5-year risks were 35.5% versus 46.0%; unadjusted hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53–0.88). There was no significant difference in the risk of severe restenosis (≥70%) after open-cell stenting (n=27) versus closed-cell stenting (n=43; 5-year risks, 8.6% versus 12.7%; unadjusted hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.37–1.05). The risk of ipsilateral stroke beyond 30 days after treatment was similar with open-cell and closed-cell stents (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.35–1.75). Conclusions— Moderate or higher restenosis after CAS occurred less frequently in patients treated with open-cell stents than closed-cell stents. However, both stent designs were equally effective at preventing recurrent stroke during follow-up. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.isrctn.com/ . Unique identifier: ISRCTN25337470.

Endovascular Advances for Extracranial Carotid Stenosis

Neurosurgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 74 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S92-S101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge L. Eller ◽  
Travis M. Dumont ◽  
Grant C. Sorkin ◽  
Maxim Mokin ◽  
Elad I. Levy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Carotid Stenosis ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenosis ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Carotid Stenting ◽  
Historical Background ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Endovascular Management ◽  
The Past

Abstract Carotid artery stenting has become a viable alternative to carotid endarterectomy in the management of carotid stenosis. Over the past 20 years, many trials have attempted to compare both treatment modalities and establish the indications for each one, depending on clinical and anatomic features presented by patients. Concurrently, carotid stenting techniques and devices have evolved and made endovascular management of carotid stenosis safe and effective. Among the most important innovations are devices for distal and proximal embolic protection and new stent designs. This paper reviews these advances in the endovascular management of carotid artery stenosis within the context of the historical background.

scholarly journals Computed tomography indicators of cerebral microperfusion improve long term after carotid stenting in symptomatic patients

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pawel J Winklewski ◽  
Mariusz Kaszubowski ◽  
Grzegorz Halena ◽  
Agnieszka Sabisz ◽  
Kamil Chwojnicki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Ct Perfusion ◽  
Carotid Stenting ◽  
Cerebral Microcirculation ◽  
Symptomatic Carotid ◽  
Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis ◽  
Before And After

Objectives: We tested the hypothesis that computed tomography (CT) perfusion markers of cerebral microcirculation would improve 36 months after internal carotid artery stenting for symptomatic carotid stenosis while results obtained 6–8 weeks after the stenting procedure would yield a predictive value. Methods: We recruited consecutive eligible patients with >70% symptomatic carotid stenosis with a complete circle of Willis and normal vertebral arteries to the observational cohort study. We detected changes in the cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), mean transit time (MTT), time to peak (TTP) and permeability surface area-product (PS) before and after carotid stenting. We have also compared the absolute differences in the ipsilateral and contralateral CT perfusion markers before and after stenting. The search for regression models of “36 months after stenting” results was based on a stepwise analysis with bidirectional elimination method. Results: A total of 34 patients completed the 36 months follow-up (15 females, mean age of 69.68±S.D. 7.61 years). At 36 months after stenting, the absolute values for CT perfusion markers had improved: CBF (ipsilateral: +7.76%, contralateral: +0.95%); CBV (ipsilateral: +5.13%, contralateral: +3.00%); MTT (ipsilateral: –12.90%; contralateral: –5.63%); TTP (ipsilateral: –2.10%, contralateral: –4.73%) and PS (ipsilateral: –35.21%, contralateral: –35.45%). MTT assessed 6–8 weeks after stenting predicted the MTT value 36 months after stenting (ipsilateral: R2=0.867, contralateral R2=0.688). Conclusions: We have demonstrated improvements in CT perfusion markers of cerebral microcirculation health that persist for at least 3 years after carotid artery stenting in symptomatic patients. MTT assessed 6–8 weeks after stenting yields a predictive value.

Effect of Open- vs Closed-Cell Stent Design on Periprocedural Outcomes and Restenosis After Carotid Artery Stenting: A Systematic Review and Comprehensive Meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavlos Texakalidis ◽  
Stefanos Giannopoulos ◽  
Damianos G. Kokkinidis ◽  
Giuseppe Lanzino
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stent Design ◽  
Open Cell ◽  
Stent Restenosis ◽  
Closed Cell ◽  
Ischemic Attack ◽  
In Stent Restenosis

Purpose:To compare periprocedural complications and in-stent restenosis rates associated with open- vs closed-cell stent designs used in carotid artery stenting (CAS). Methods: A systematic search was conducted to identify all randomized and observational studies published in English up to October 31, 2017, that compared open- vs closed-cell stent designs in CAS. Identified studies were included if they reported the following outcomes: stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction (MI), hemodynamic depression, new ischemic lesions detected on imaging, and death within 30 days, as well as the incidence of in-stent restenosis. A random-effects model meta-analysis was employed. Model results are reported as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The I2 statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. Results: Thirty-three studies (2 randomized trials) comprising 20, 291 patients (mean age 71.3±3.0 years; 74.6% men) were included. Patients in the open-cell stent group had a statistically significant lower risk of restenosis ⩾40% (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.92; I2=0%) and ⩾70% (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.52; I2=0%) at a mean follow-up of 24 months. No statistically significant differences were identified for periprocedural stroke, TIA, new ischemic lesions, MI, hemodynamic depression, or death within 30 days after CAS. Sensitivity analysis of the 2 randomized controlled trials only did not point to any significant differences either. Conclusion: Use of open-cell stent design in CAS is associated with a decreased risk for restenosis when compared to the closed-cell stent, without significant differences in periprocedural outcomes.

Management of Mobile Floating Carotid Plaque Using Carotid Artery Stenting

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 653-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elie Y. Chakhtoura ◽  
Jonathan E. Goldstein ◽  
Robert W. Hobson
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Carotid Plaque ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Carotid Stenting ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Unique Nature ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Purpose: To present management techniques for dealing with mobile floating carotid plaque (MFCP), which represents an indeterminate risk of embolic cerebrovascular events. Case Reports: Two high-risk patients with a history of carotid endarterectomy were diagnosed with MFCP by duplex ultrasound scanning. One patient had a left hemispheric transient ischemic attack while the other was asymptomatic with a moderate stenosis. Both were successfully treated with carotid artery stenting, achieving complete coverage of the MFCP. Their outcomes were uneventful, and sustained patency of the stented arteries has been observed during an event-free survival of 32 and 44 months, respectively. Conclusions: Based upon the unique nature of these lesions and our satisfactory clinical results, we believe that carotid stenting may be a viable option for the treatment of MFCP.

What Have We Learned from the Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) Study?

Vascular ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio M. Biasi ◽  
Alberto Froio ◽  
Gaetano Deleo ◽  
Claudia Piazzoni ◽  
Valter Camesasca
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Carotid Plaque ◽  
Independent Risk Factor ◽  
Carotid Stenting ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Carotid Angioplasty ◽  
Cerebral Embolization

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is used widely to treat carotid lesions. Indication to CAS is mostly based, both in trial and in clinical practice, on the percentage of stenosis and the presence or absence of preprocedural neurologic symptoms, whereas the features of the plaque are somehow disregarded and ignored. The most severe complication of CAS is stroke, related to cerebral embolization from carotid plaque. Several studies showed that echolucent plaques generate a higher number of embolic particles following carotid stenting. Echolucency can be measured using the gray scale median, which is an objective and quantitative computer-assisted grading of the echogenicity of carotid plaques. As previously demonstrated in the ICAROS study, carotid plaque echolucency is an independent risk factor for stroke in carotid stenting. Carotid plaque echolucency is one of the parameters that should be mandatory to be considered for indication to treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document