scholarly journals Oral Anticoagulation in Asian Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and a History of Intracranial Hemorrhage

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 416-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
So-Ryoung Lee ◽  
Eue-Keun Choi ◽  
Soonil Kwon ◽  
Jin-Hyung Jung ◽  
Kyung-Do Han ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose— Warfarin is associated with a better net clinical benefit compared with no treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and history of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). There are limited data on nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in these patients, especially in the Asian population. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of NOACs to warfarin in a large-scale nationwide Asian population with AF and a history of ICH. Methods— Using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment database from January 2010 to April 2018, we identified patients with oral anticoagulant naïve nonvalvular AF with a prior spontaneous ICH. For the comparisons, warfarin and NOAC groups were balanced using propensity score weighting. Ischemic stroke, ICH, composite outcome (ischemic stroke+ICH), fatal ischemic stroke, fatal ICH, death from composite outcome, and all-cause death were evaluated as clinical outcomes. Results— Among 5712 patients with AF with prior ICH, 2434 were treated with warfarin and 3278 were treated with NOAC. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced after propensity score weighting (mean age 72.5 years and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score 4.0). Compared with warfarin, NOAC was associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77 [95% CI, 0.61–0.97]), ICH (HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.47–0.92]), and composite outcome (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.60–0.88]). NOAC was associated with lower risks of fatal stroke (HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.32–0.89]), death from composite outcome (HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.34–0.81]), and all-cause death (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.69–0.99]) than warfarin. NOAC showed nonsignificant trends toward to reduce fatal ICH compared with warfarin (HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.20–1.03]). Conclusions— NOAC was associated with a significant lower risk of ICH and ischemic stroke compared with warfarin. NOAC might be a more effective and safer treatment option for Asian patients with nonvalvular AF and a prior history of ICH.

Author(s):  
Joris J Komen ◽  
Tomas Forslund ◽  
Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse ◽  
Olaf H Klungel ◽  
Mia von Euler ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims To analyze 90-day mortality in AF patients after a stroke or a severe bleed and assess associations with the type of antithrombotic treatment at the event. Methods and Results From the Stockholm Healthcare database, we selected 6 017 patients with a known history of AF who were diagnosed with ischemic stroke, 3 006 with intracranial hemorrhage, and 4 291 with a severe gastrointestinal bleed (GIB). The 90-day mortality rates were 25.1% after ischemic stroke, 31.6% after intracranial hemorrhage, and 16.2% after severe GIB. We used Cox regression and propensity score matched analyses to test the association between antithrombotic treatment at the event and 90-day mortality. After intracranial hemorrhage, there was a significantly higher mortality rate in warfarin compared to NOAC treated patients (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.36 CI: 1.04 – 1.78). After an ischemic stroke and a severe GIB, patients receiving antiplatelets or no antithrombotic treatment had significantly higher mortality rates compared to patients on NOACs, but there was no difference comparing warfarin to NOACs (aHR 0.84 CI: 0.63 – 1.12 after ischemic stroke, aHR 0.91 CI: 0.66 – 1.25 after severe GIB). Propensity score matched analysis yielded similar results. Conclusion Mortality rates were high in AF patients suffering from an ischemic stroke, an intracranial hemorrhage, or a severe GIB. NOAC treatment was associated with a lower 90 day mortality after intracranial hemorrhage than warfarin.


Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethem Murat Arsava ◽  
Ezgi Yetim ◽  
Ugur Canpolat ◽  
Necla Ozer ◽  
Kudret Aytemir ◽  
...  

Background: The role of short-lasting (<30 sec) runs of atrial fibrillation (AF) in ischemic stroke pathophysiology is currently unknown. Although these non-sustained attacks are considered as a risk factor for future development of longer lasting, classical AF episodes, prior research has highlighted that associated clinical stroke features are not entirely similar between these two types of arrhythmias. In this study we determined the prevalence of short-lasting AF in stroke-free controls and compared it to a consecutive series of ischemic stroke patients. Methods: A total 235 controls, without any prior history stroke or AF, were evaluated with ECG and 24-hour Holter monitoring for the presence of <30-sec or ≥30-sec lasting AF episodes. The results were compared to a consecutive series of ischemic stroke patients without prior history of AF (n=456). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine demographic and cardiovascular factors related to <30-sec lasting AF and its association with ischemic stroke. Results: Expectedly, the frequency of newly diagnosed ≥30-sec lasting AF, detected either on ECG or Holter monitoring, was significantly higher in patients with ischemic stroke (18% vs. 2%; p<0.01). Non-sustained AF was positively related to old age (p<0.01), female gender (p=0.01) and hypertension (p<0.01) in univariate analyses. In multivariate analyses, after adjustment for demographic and cardiovascular risk factors, presence of non-sustained AF was significantly higher among both cryptogenic (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.02-3.10) and non-cryptogenic (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.15-2.94) stroke patients with respect to controls. Conclusion: Our study shows a higher prevalence of non-sustained AF episodes in ischemic stroke patients in comparison to controls. Whether this cross-sectional association translates into causality in terms of stroke pathophysiology will be the subject of future studies.


Stroke ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacy Y Chu ◽  
Samuel Sommaruga ◽  
David Hwang ◽  
Jennifer Dearborn ◽  
Lauren Sansing ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J J Komen ◽  
T Forslund ◽  
A K Mantel - Teeuwisse ◽  
O H Klungel ◽  
B Wettermark ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Anticoagulation treatment reduces the risk of stroke but increases the risk of bleeding in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. There is little data on survival after a stroke or a severe bleed. Objective To analyze 90-day mortality in AF patients after an ischemic stroke, an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) or a gastrointestinal bleed (GIB) and assess associations with the type of antithrombotic treatment preceding the event. Methods From the Stockholm Healthcare database (n=2.3 million inhabitants) we selected all AF patients suffering from an ischemic stroke, an intracranial bleed, or a severe GIB requiring acute hospital care between July 2011 and August 2018 and assessed 90-day mortality rates. We assessed current use of warfarin, non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC), or antiplatelet agents at the time of the event. We used a Cox regression to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs), adjusting for components of the Charlson Comorbidity Index, the CHADsVASc score, the HAS-BLED score, comedication, and year of inclusion, for the association between treatment preceding the event and mortality. In addition, we performed log-rank tests in propensity score matched cohorts. Results Of 105 313 patients with AF, 6 017 were included after an ischemic stroke, 3 006 after an ICH, and 4 291 after a GIB. 90-day mortality rates were 25.1%, 31.6% and 16.2%, respectively. Patients suffering from an ischemic stroke were the oldest at 81.6±9.8 (S.D:) years of age followed by patients suffering from an ICH (80.2±9.8 years) or a GIB (78.7±10.5 years). A large proportion of patients suffering ischemic stroke (72%) had no anticoagulant treatment preceding the event. After ICH, there was a significantly increased risk of mortality in warfarin compared to NOAC treated patients after adjusting for confounders (aHR: 1.36 CI: 1.04–1.78). Patients receiving antiplatelets or no treatment had significantly higher mortality rates than patients on NOAC treatment, both after an ischemic stroke and a GIB, but there was no significant difference between warfarin and NOACs (aHR 0.84 CI: 0.63–1.12 after ischemic stroke, aHR 0.91 CI: 0.66–1.25 after GIB). Propensity score matched analyses yielded similar results. Survival curves after event Conclusion Mortality rates are high in AF patients suffering from an ischemic stroke, an ICH, or a GIB. NOAC treatment was associated with a lower 90-day mortality after ICH than warfarin, but no such difference was found after ischemic stroke or GIB. After ischemic stroke and GIB, mortality rates were higher in antiplatelet treated and untreated patients compared to NOAC treated patients. Acknowledgement/Funding Swedish Heart Lung Foundation


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T F Chao ◽  
S A Chen

Abstract Background Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) having a history of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) were excluded from the pivotal randomized trials comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of DOACs and warfarin among AF patients having a history of ICH. Method A total of 4,540 AF patients having a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥1 for males and ≥2 for females who had a history of ICH and received oral anticoagulants (DOACs in 3,493 and warfarin in 1,047) were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. A propensity matching analysis was performed to balance the baseline differences, and 973 patients were finally identified in each groups. Results The risk of ischemic stroke did not differ significantly between warfarin and DOACs (4.41%/yr vs 4.87%/yr; HR 0.985, p=0.927). The risks of bleeding events were lower with DOACs compared to warfarin with a HR (95% CI) of 0.752 (0.573–0.986, p=0.040) for major bleeding and 0.614 (0.379–0.995, p 0.048) for ICH. The risk of mortality was also lower in patients treated with DOACs (HR = 0.539; 95% CI = 0.453–0.642, p<0.001). The cumulative incidence curves of each events for 2 groups are shown in Figure. Conclusion Compared to warfarin, DOACs were associated with a similar risk of ischemic stroke and better safety profiles among AF patient with a history of ICH.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Guo ◽  
James R Brorson ◽  
Andrew Beaser ◽  
Zaid A Aziz ◽  
Cevher Ozcan ◽  
...  

Introduction: Although implantable cardiac monitors (ICM) improve atrial fibrillation (AF) detection relative to Holters or other extended ambulatory cardiac monitors (EACMs) (e.g., 30-day event monitors or outpatient telemetry) in clinical trials, data are limited on their performance in the community setting. We investigated AF detection in ischemic stroke patients and subsequent initiation of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in a real-world setting. Methods: We identified patients with ischemic stroke (2010-2015) in IBM MarketScan, a national prospectively acquired data set in whom Holters, EACMs, or ICMs were ordered. We further selected patients with no prior history of AF or OAC and continuous database enrollment 6 mos pre- and 24 mos post monitoring. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for baseline characteristics differences between monitoring types. Logrank test was used to compare the Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves for AF detection and OAC initiation in patients with AF. Results: A total of 6,287 patients were analyzed: 4,107 Holter (age 63±14 yrs, 46% female, 28% coronary artery disease [CAD], 71% hypertension [HTN]), 1,829 EACM (age 61±14 yrs, 49% female, 27% CAD, 73% HTN), and 351 implanted with ICM (age 63±13 yrs, 51% female, 38% CAD, 82% HTN). After 1:1 PSM, the Holter-ICM cohort comprised of 664 patients and the EACM-ICM cohort comprised of 676 patients. In the Holter-ICM pair, 2 yr AF diagnoses rate was 14.5% for Holter vs 38.3% for ICM (logrank p<0.01, Panel A). In the EACM-ICM pair, 2 yr AF diagnoses rate was 15.4% for EACM vs 38.2% for ICM (logrank p<0.01, Panel B). Initiation of OAC in AF patients by 2 yrs was 41.7% for Holters vs 49.6% for ICMs (logrank p=0.30, Panel C) and 61.5% for EACM vs 49.6% for ICM (logrank p=0.16, Panel D). Conclusion: In community patients with ischemic stroke with no history of AF or prior OAC, rates of OAC initiation are comparable between monitoring types when AF is detected, and ICM outperforms Holter and EACM for the detection of AF.


Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 2245-2249 ◽  
Author(s):  
So-Ryoung Lee ◽  
Eue-Keun Choi ◽  
Soonil Kwon ◽  
Kyung-Do Han ◽  
Jin-Hyung Jung ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose— Limited evidence exists on the effectiveness and safety of warfarin and all 4 available non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) from current clinical practice in the Asian population with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. We aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of warfarin and 4 NOACs. Methods— We studied a retrospective nonrandomized observational cohort of oral anticoagulant naïve nonvalvular patients with atrial fibrillation treated with warfarin or NOACs (rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, or edoxaban) from January 2015 to December 2017, based on the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment database. For the comparisons, warfarin to 4 NOACs and NOAC to NOAC comparison cohorts were balanced using the inverse probability of treatment weighting. Ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, major bleeding, and a composite clinical outcome were evaluated. Results— A total of 116 804 patients were included (25 420 with warfarin, 35 965 with rivaroxaban, 17 745 with dabigatran, 22 177 with apixaban, and 15 496 with edoxaban). Compared with warfarin, all NOACs were associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, major bleeding, and composite outcome. Apixaban and edoxaban showed a lower rate of ischemic stroke compared with rivaroxaban and dabigatran. Apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban had a lower rate of gastrointestinal bleeding and major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban. The composite clinical outcome was nonsignificantly different for apixaban versus edoxaban. Conclusions— In this large contemporary nonrandomized Asian cohort, all 4 NOACs were associated with lower rates of ischemic stroke and major bleeding compared with warfarin. Differences in clinical outcomes between NOACs may give useful guidance for physicians to choose drugs to fit their particular patient clinical profile.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Feng Wang ◽  
Chao Jiang ◽  
Liu He ◽  
Xin Du ◽  
Cai-Hua Sang ◽  
...  

Background: “Atrial fibrillation Better Care” (ABC) pathway has been proposed to improve the management of patients suffered from atrial fibrillation (AF). This integrated or holistic management approach comprise of three aspects, including “A” Avoid stroke or Anticoagulation; “B” Better symptom control with rate or rhythm control strategies; “C” Cardiovascular risk factor and Concomitant diseases management. We aimed to confirm the beneficial evidence of ABC pathway compliance in a Chinese AF cohort.Method and Results: From the Chinese Atrial Fibrillation registry (CAFR) dataset, a total of 19,187 non-valvular AF patients were enrolled, of which 4.365 (22.8%) were ABC pathway compliant (ABC compliance group). During a median follow-up of 4.1 ± 1.8 years, The incident rate of all-cause death in ABC compliance group and non-ABC compliance group is 2.7 and 1.1 per 100 person-year (p &lt; 0.001), the incident rate of ischemic stroke is 1.3 and 0.8% per 100 person-year (p &lt; 0.001), the incident rate of composite outcome, which consist of all-cause death, ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage, is 3.8 and 1.9 per 100 person-year (p &lt; 0.001). On Cox multivariable analysis, ABC pathway shows an independently association with reduction of all-cause death [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.70–0.95] and the composite outcome (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76–0.96). The increasingly components of ABC integrated care compliance is associated with lower risk of all-cause death and composite events.Conclusion: In a large cohort of Chinese AF patients, ABC pathway compliance shows an independently association with reduction of all-cause death and composite outcome of all-cause death, ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage. Better compliance of ABC integrated care contributes to lower HR for adverse events.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document