scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Recanalization Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke With Large Vessel Occlusion

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 2026-2035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Hui ◽  
Chuanjie Wu ◽  
Wenbo Zhao ◽  
Huan Sun ◽  
Jun Hao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Intraarterial Thrombolysis

Background and Purpose: The optimal recanalization strategy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion continues to be an area of active interest. Network meta-analysis can provide insight when direct comparative evidence is lacking. Methods: A systematic review of the literature using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and SinoMed was performed, and a search was conducted for clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and StrokeCenter.org. Four independent reviewers conducted the study selection, data abstraction, and quality assessments. Results: The literature review identified 17 trials including 3236 patients and 8 ongoing clinical trials. Sample sizes ranged from 7 to 656 participants. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) was the most common intervention, followed by IVT plus mechanical thrombectomy (MT), IVT plus intraarterial thrombolysis, intraarterial thrombolysis alone, and MT alone. In the pooled network meta-analysis, IVT+MT was associated with a higher rate of independent functioning. In contrast, IVT was ranked as the most ineffective treatment strategy with respect to neurological functions, while direct MT was ranked as the least safe intervention with respect to all-cause mortality. Also, irrespective of assessment tools, endovascular treatment plus IVT led to higher successful recanalization rate than thrombolysis alone. Conclusions: Compared with other recanalization treatments, IVT+MT seems to be the most effective strategy, without increasing detrimental effects, for thrombolysis-eligible patients with large vessel occlusion-acute ischemic stroke. To improve the current evidentiary basis for recanalization treatment, future trials and real-world studies are warranted and should use unified definitions of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and recanalization.

scholarly journals Endovascular Thrombectomy for Low ASPECTS Large Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 612-619
Author(s):  
Jose Danilo B. Diestro ◽  
Adam A. Dmytriw ◽  
Gabriel Broocks ◽  
Karen Chen ◽  
Joshua A. Hirsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Medical Group ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy

ABSTRACT:Background:The current American Heart Association guidelines for acute ischemic stroke reserve Grade 1A recommendation for the use of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for patients with an Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) of ≥6.Objective:We aim to determine the safety and efficacy of EVT for large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke patients with low ASPECTS (5 or less).Methods:Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies appraising the outcomes of EVT for low ASPECTS ischemic stroke. A meta-analysis of proportions compared the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing EVT and those receiving best medical therapy only.Results:Nine studies (1,196 patients) were included. There was a trend (p = 0.11) toward a higher rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) in the EVT group (9.2%; 95% CI 6.1–13.6; I2 53.37%) compared to the medical group (5.5%; 95% CI 3.7–8.1; I2 0%). There was no difference (p = 0.41) in the pooled 90-day mortality of EVT patients (30.7%; 95% CI 21.7–41.5; I2 84.23%) and medical patients (36.6%; 95% CI 26.4–48.1; I2 76.2%). EVT patients had better (p = 0.001) 90-day outcomes, with 27.7% (95% CI 21.8–34.5; I2 62.08%) of patients attaining a modified Rankin Scale of 0–2 compared to only 3.7% (95% CI 2.3–5.9; I2 87.21%) in the medical group.Conclusions:This meta-analysis demonstrates a trend in higher sICH among low ASPECTS patients undergoing EVT. Despite this, a significant proportion of this subset of patients still achieved good functional outcomes at 90 days. Randomized trials are necessary to substantiate this result as significant bias is inherent in the observational studies included in this review.

Abstract 106: Safety and Efficacy of Sonothrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion: International Collaborative Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios Tsivgoulis ◽  
Aristeidis H Katsanos ◽  
Jürgen Eggers ◽  
Vincent Larrue ◽  
Lars Thomassen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

Introduction: Conflicting evidence has been published regarding the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis (sonothrombolysis) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Methods: We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing sonothrombolysis with or without addition of microspheres (treatment group) to intravenous thrombolysis alone (control group) in AIS patients with LVO. Results: We included 6 in total RCTs that enrolled 1077 AIS patients. A total of 138 and 134 confirmed LVO patients were randomized to treatment and control groups respectively (median age 68 years, 58% men, median baseline NIHSS score 16). Patients randomized to sonothrombolysis had increased odds of complete recanalization compared to patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis alone (40.3% vs. 22.4%; OR=2.30, 95%CI: 1.05-5.02; adjusted OR=2.33, 95%CI: 1.02-5.34). They also tended to have increased odds of any (complete or partial recanalization (66.4% vs. 53.0%; OR=1.78, 95%CI: 0.95-3.33; adjusted OR=1.85, 95%CI: 0.97-3.53). The likelihood of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage did not differ between the two groups (7.3% vs. 3.7%, OR=2.52, 95%CI: 0.77-8.29; adjusted OR=2.55, 95%CI: 0.76-8.52). No differences in the likelihood of asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted OR: 1.30, 95%CI: 0.38-4.39), three-month mortality (adjusted OR: 1.23, 95%CI: 0.25-6.05), three-month favorable functional outcome (mRS-scores of 0-1; adjusted OR: 1.43, 95%CI: 0.64-3.19) and three-month functional independence (mRS-scores of 0-2; adjusted OR: 1.43, 95%CI: 0.77-2.64) were documented. Conclusion: Sonothrombolysis was associated with a two-fold increase in the odds of complete recanalization compared to intravenous thrombolysis alone in AIS patients with LVOs. Further study of the safety and efficacy of sonothrombolysis is warranted.

Abstract TP23: Mortality Risk in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Treated With Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios Tsivgoulis ◽  
Aristeidis H Katsanos ◽  
Konark Malhotra ◽  
Nitin Goyal ◽  
Lina Palaiodimou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Meta Regression

Introduction: Recent randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) have provided solid evidence that mechanical thrombectomy (MT) coupled with best medical therapy (BMT) improve functional outcomes of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) compared to BMT alone. However, they provided inconclusive evidence on the benefit of MT on mortality. Methods: We evaluated the association of MT+BMT compared to BMT with the risk of three-month mortality using aggregate data from all available RCTs. We also sought to identify potential predictors on the mortality risk and performed univariate meta-regression analyses. Results: Our literature search identified 11 eligible RCTs, including a total of 2,460 patients. The pooled rates of 3-month mortality were 15% (95%CI:12-19%) and 19% (95%CI:16-23%), respectively, in the MT+BMT and BMT groups. In the overall analysis MT+BMT was associated with a significantly lower risk for 3-month mortality compared to BMT (Risk Ratio=0.83, 95% confidence interval:0.69-0.99; p=0.04), without heterogeneity across included studies (I 2 =3%,p for Cochran Q=0.41). No evidence of publication bias was present in funnel plot inspection and Egger’s statistical test (p=0.762). In meta-regression analyses no moderating effect on the aforementioned association was detected with patient age (p=0.254), gender (p=0.702), admission systolic blood pressure (p=0.601), admission glucose (p=0.277), onset-to-groin puncture time (p=0.985), administration of intravenous alteplase prior to MT (p=0.804), MT under general anesthesia (p=0.735) and successful reperfusion following MT (p=0.663). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis provides evidence that MT+BMT reduce the risk of three-month mortality compared to BMT alone. This association appears not to be moderated by individual patient or procedural characteristics.

Effect of “drip-and-ship” and “drip-and-drive” on endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion: a single-center retrospective study

2021 ◽  
pp. 028418512110068
Author(s):  
Yu Hang ◽  
Zhen Yu Jia ◽  
Lin Bo Zhao ◽  
Yue Zhou Cao ◽  
Huang Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Primary Stroke Center ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

Background Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO) were usually transferred from a primary stroke center (PSC) to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) for endovascular treatment (drip-and-ship [DS]), while driving the doctor from a CSC to a PSC to perform a procedure is an alternative strategy (drip-and-drive [DD]). Purpose To compare the efficacy and prognosis of the two strategies. Material and Methods From February 2017 to June 2019, 62 patients with LVO received endovascular treatment via the DS and DD models and were retrospectively analyzed from the stroke alliance based on our CSC. Primary endpoint was door-to-reperfusion (DTR) time. Secondary endpoints included puncture-to-recanalization (PTR) time, modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) rates at the end of the procedure, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Results Forty-one patients received the DS strategy and 21 patients received the DD strategy. The DTR time was significantly longer in the DS group compared to the DD group (315.5 ± 83.8 min vs. 248.6 ± 80.0 min; P < 0.05), and PTR time was shorter (77.2 ± 35.9 min vs. 113.7 ± 69.7 min; P = 0.033) compared with the DD group. Successful recanalization (mTICI 2b/3) was achieved in 89% (36/41) of patients in the DS group and 86% (18/21) in the DD group ( P = 1.000). Favorable functional outcomes (mRS 0–2) were observed in 49% (20/41) of patients in the DS group and 71% (15/21) in the DD group at 90 days ( P = 0.089). Conclusion Compared with the DS strategy, the DD strategy showed more effective and a trend of better clinical outcomes for AIS patients with LVO.

scholarly journals Emergency medical dispatchers’ ability to identify large vessel occlusion stroke during emergency calls

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauli E. T. Vuorinen ◽  
Jyrki P. J. Ollikainen ◽  
Pasi A. Ketola ◽  
Riikka-Liisa K. Vuorinen ◽  
Piritta A. Setälä ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Emergency Call ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Emergency Response System ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Cortical Ischemia

Abstract Background In acute ischemic stroke, conjugated eye deviation (CED) is an evident sign of cortical ischemia and large vessel occlusion (LVO). We aimed to determine if an emergency dispatcher can recognise LVO stroke during an emergency call by asking the caller a binary question regarding whether the patient’s head or gaze is away from the side of the hemiparesis or not. Further, we investigated if the paramedics can confirm this sign at the scene. In the group of positive CED answers to the emergency dispatcher, we investigated what diagnoses these patients received at the emergency department (ED). Among all patients brought to ED and subsequently treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) we tracked the proportion of patients with a positive CED answer during the emergency call. Methods We collected data on all stroke dispatches in the city of Tampere, Finland, from 13 February 2019 to 31 October 2020. We then reviewed all patient records from cases where the dispatcher had marked ‘yes’ to the question regarding patient CED in the computer-aided emergency response system. We also viewed all emergency department admissions to see how many patients in total were treated with MT during the period studied. Results Out of 1913 dispatches, we found 81 cases (4%) in which the caller had verified CED during the emergency call. Twenty-four of these patients were diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke. Paramedics confirmed CED in only 9 (11%) of these 81 patients. Two patients with positive CED answers during the emergency call and 19 other patients brought to the emergency department were treated with MT. Conclusion A small minority of stroke dispatches include a positive answer to the CED question but paramedics rarely confirm the emergency medical dispatcher’s suspicion of CED as a sign of LVO. Few patients in need of MT can be found this way. Stroke dispatch protocol with a CED question needs intensive implementation.

Differences in Acute Ischemic Stroke Management and Prognosis between Multiple Large-Vessel Occlusion and Single Large-Vessel Occlusion: Subanalysis of the RESCUE-Japan Registry 2

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-404
Author(s):  
Kotaro Tatebayashi ◽  
Kazutaka Uchida ◽  
Hiroto Kageyama ◽  
Hirotoshi Imamura ◽  
Nobuyuki Ohara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Tandem Occlusion ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Patient Prognosis

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The management and prognosis of acute ischemic stroke due to multiple large-vessel occlusion (LVO) (MLVO) are not well scrutinized. We therefore aimed to elucidate the differences in patient characteristics and prognosis of MLVO and single LVO (SLVO). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-Acute Embolism Japan Registry 2 (RESCUE-Japan Registry 2) enrolled 2,420 consecutive patients with acute LVO who were admitted within 24 h of onset. We compared patient prognosis between MLVO and SLVO in the favorable outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤2, and in mortality at 90 days by adjusting for confounders. Additionally, we stratified MLVO patients into tandem occlusion and different territories, according to the occlusion site information and also examined their characteristics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among the 2,399 patients registered, 124 (5.2%) had MLVO. Although there was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of hypertension as a risk factor, the mean arterial pressure on admission was significantly higher in MLVO (115 vs. 107 mm Hg, <i>p</i> = 0.004). MLVO in different territories was more likely to be cardioembolic (42.1 vs. 10.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.0002), while MLVO in tandem occlusion was more likely to be atherothrombotic (39.5 vs. 81.3%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). Among MLVO, tandem occlusion had a significantly longer onset-to-door time than different territories (200 vs. 95 min, <i>p</i> = 0.02); accordingly, the tissue plasminogen activator administration was significantly less in tandem occlusion (22.4 vs. 47.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.003). However, interestingly, the endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) was performed significantly more in tandem occlusion (63.2 vs. 41.7%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–5.0). The type of MLVO was the only and significant factor associated with EVT performance in multivariate analysis. The favorable outcomes were obtained less in MLVO than in SLVO (28.2 vs. 37.1%; aOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30–0.76). The mortality rate was not significantly different between MLVO and SLVO (8.9 vs. 11.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.42). <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> The prognosis of MLVO was significantly worse than that of SLVO. In different territories, we might be able to consider more aggressive EVT interventions.

Abstract TP1: The Promising System to Support Rural Area Where No Intervenitionists to Perform Embolectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke "Drive and Retrieve Method"

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiya Osanai
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Rural Area ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion

Introduction: In Japan, endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke from large vessel occlusion should be performed by neurointerventionists. However, most hospitals in rural area , that offer treatment for cerebral vascular disease do not have access to a neurointerventionist; the rural areas are especially affected. Thus, Our University has offered support to institutions without a neurointerventionist, to perform endovascular treatment. The neurointerventionists stationed in other hospitals drive to retrieve the resultant clot since the acute ischemic stroke from large vessel occlusion. We called this the “drive and retrieve system” method, and launched the prospective trial to evaluate the validity and efficacy of this method. Herein, we report the initial results of this trial. Methods: Nine institutes across our affiliated hospitals within a one-hour drive from Sapporo City took part in this trial. Three of these 9 institutes that have a full-time neurointerventionist were registered as the source. When an episode of acute ischemic stroke requiring intervention occurred in the other 6 hospitals, the available neurointerventionist provided treatment based on the drive and retrieve method. The neurointerventionists’ schedules was updated and distributed to all participating units twice a week, so that the supported hospitals could immediately make contact when required. We analysis the data of 44 cases in this trial from July 2015 to April 2016. Results: For 41 out of 44 cases (93%), Neurointerventionaists were able to respond immediately. The median time from door-to-puncture was 90 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 72-125). The median time from puncture to recanalization was also 76 min (IQR: 57.5-99.5). The recanalization rate (TICI 2b/3) was 77 %. mRS 0-2 was 39%. Conclusion: The drive and retrieve system has the potential to support rural medical institutes that do not have access to a full-time neurointerventionist.

Abstract P104: Incidence, Characteristics and Outcomes of Large Vessel Stroke in Covid-19: An International Multicenter Study

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyank Khandelwal ◽  
Fawaz Al-Mufti ◽  
Ambooj Tiwari ◽  
Amit Singla ◽  
Adam A Dmytriw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
African Americans ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
International Multicenter Study ◽  
International Multicenter

Background: While there are reports of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in COVID-19 patients, the overall incidence of acute ischemic stroke and clinical characteristics of large vessel occlusion in such patient remains to be established. Methods: A retrospective, international multicenter study of large vessel occlusion (LVO) was undertaken from March 1 to May 1, 2020 at 12 stroke centers from 4 countries. Detailed data were collected on consecutive LVOs in hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the incidence of AIS/LVO was measured. Among patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy, stroke outcomes along with COVID-19 symptoms were reported. Results: Out of a total of 6698 COVID-19 patients admitted to 10 stroke centers, the incidence of stroke was found to be 1.3% (range 0.6-2.6%). The median age of patients who presented with LVO was 51 years (range 27-87) and in the US centers, African Americans comprised 28% of all patients. Ten patients (16 %) were less than 50 years of age with no significant risk factors for LVOs the vast majority. Among the LVOs eligible for MT, the average time to presentation from symptom onset to presentation was 9.3 hours. Successful revascularization was achieved in 81% of patients and the intracranial hemorrhage rate was 14% with no symptomatic hemorrhages. Twenty-one (50%) patients were either discharged to home or to acute rehabilitation facilities. Conclusion: LVOs was predominant in patients with AIS and COVID-19, occurring at a significantly younger age and affecting African Americans disproportionately.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document