Outcomes of Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke in Patients Aged ≥90 Years

Background and Purpose: Outcomes in patients ≥90 years of age with stroke due to large vessel occlusion were compared between endovascular therapy (EVT) and medical management. Methods: Of 2420 acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion in a prospective, multicenter, nationwide registry in Japan, patients aged ≥90 years with occlusion of the internal carotid artery or M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery were included. The primary effectiveness outcome was a favorable outcome at 3 months, defined as achieving a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 or return to at least the prestroke modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 72 hours after onset. Intergroup biases were adjusted by multivariable adjustment with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results: A total of 150 patients (median age, 92 [interquartile range, 90–94] years; median prestroke modified Rankin Scale score, 2 [interquartile range, 0–4]) were analyzed. EVT was performed in 49 patients (32.7%; mechanical thrombectomy, n=43). The EVT group showed shorter time from onset to hospital arrival ( P =0.03), higher Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score ( P <0.01), and a higher rate of treatment with intravenous thrombolysis ( P <0.01) than the medical management group. The favorable outcome was seen in 28.6% of the EVT group and 6.9% of the medical management group ( P <0.01). EVT was associated with the favorable outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 8.44 [95% CI, 1.88–37.97]). Rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were similar between the EVT group (0.0%) and the medical management group (3.9%; P =0.30). Conclusions: Patients who underwent EVT showed better functional outcomes than those with medical management without increased symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages. Given proper patient selection, withholding EVT solely on the basis of the age of patients may not offer the best chance of good outcome. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02419794.

Download Full-text

Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Prestroke Disability

Journal of the American Heart Association ◽

10.1161/jaha.121.020783 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Kanta Tanaka ◽

Hiroshi Yamagami ◽

Takeshi Yoshimoto ◽

Kazutaka Uchida ◽

Takeshi Morimoto ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Scale Score ◽

Endovascular Therapy ◽

Medical Management ◽

Favorable Outcome ◽

Modified Rankin Scale ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Management Group ◽

Scale Scores ◽

Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background Outcomes after stroke as a result of large‐vessel occlusion in patients with prestroke disability were compared between endovascular therapy (EVT) and medical management. Methods and Results Of 2420 patients with acute stroke with large‐vessel occlusion in a prospective, multicenter, nationwide registry in Japan, patients with prestroke modified Rankin Scale scores 2 to 4 with occlusion of the internal carotid artery, or M1 of the middle cerebral artery were analyzed. The primary effectiveness outcome was the favorable outcome, defined as return to at least the prestroke modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. A total of 339 patients (237 women; median 85 [interquartile range (IQR), 79–89] years of age; median prestroke modified Rankin Scale score of 3 [IQR, 2–4]) were analyzed. EVT was performed in 175 patients (51.6%; mechanical thrombectomy, n=139). The EVT group was younger ( p <0.01) and had lower prestroke modified Rankin Scale scores ( p <0.01) than the medical management group. The favorable outcome was seen in 28.0% of the EVT group and in 10.9% of the medical management group ( p <0.01). EVT was associated with the favorable outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.55–5.85; mixed effects multivariable model with inverse probability of treatment weighting). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates were similar between the EVT (4.0%) and medical management (4.3%) groups ( p =1.00). Conclusions Patients who underwent EVT showed better functional outcomes than those with medical management. Given proper patient selection, withholding EVT solely on the basis of prestroke disability might not offer the best chance of favorable outcome. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02419794.

Download Full-text

Thrombectomy Versus Combined Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Stroke

Stroke ◽

10.1161/strokeaha.120.031599 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Xu Tong ◽

Yilong Wang ◽

Jens Fiehler ◽

Clayton T. Bauer ◽

Baixue Jia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Endovascular Treatment ◽

Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽

Real World ◽

Odds Ratio ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Practice Setting ◽

Modified Rankin Scale ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background and Purpose: A recent randomized controlled trial DIRECT-MT (Direct Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy to Revascularize AIS Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Efficiently in Chinese Tertiary Hospitals) compared the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) versus combined intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and MT for acute large vessel occlusion. The current study utilized a prospective, nationwide registry to validate the results of the DIRECT-MT trial in a real-world practice setting. Methods: Subjects were selected from a prospective cohort of acute large vessel occlusion patients undergoing endovascular treatment at 111 hospitals from 26 provinces in China (ANGEL-ACT registry [Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Work Flow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke]) between November 2017 and March 2019. All patients eligible for IVT and receiving MT were reviewed and then grouped according to whether prior IVT or not (MT and combined IVT+MT). After a 1:1 propensity score matching, the outcome measures including the 90-day modified Rankin Scale, successful recanalization, door-to-puncture time, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and intraprocedural embolization were compared. Results: A total of 1026 patients, 600 in the MT group and 426 in the combined group, were included. Among 788 patients identified after matching, there were no significant differences in the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (median, 3 versus 3 points; P =0.82) and successful recanalization (86.6% versus 89.3%; P =0.23) between the two groups; however, patients of the MT group had a shorter door-to-puncture time (median, 112 versus 136 minutes; β=−45.02 [95% CI, −68.31 to −21.74]), lower rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (5.5% versus 10.1%; odds ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.30–0.91]), and embolization (4.6% versus 8.1%; odds ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.30–0.98]) than those of the combined group. Conclusions: This matched-control study largely confirmed the findings of the DIRECT-MT trial in a real-world practice setting, suggesting that MT may carry similar effectiveness to combined IVT+MT for acute large vessel occlusion patients, despite MT alone seems to be associated with a shorter in-hospital delay until procedure, lower risks of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and embolization. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03370939.

Download Full-text

Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Beyond 6 Hours From Onset

Stroke ◽

10.1161/strokeaha.119.027974 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 51 (7) ◽

pp. 2051-2057 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Ilaria Casetta ◽

Enrico Fainardi ◽

Valentina Saia ◽

Giovanni Pracucci ◽

Marina Padroni ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Treatment ◽

Scale Score ◽

Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽

Ct Perfusion ◽

Modified Rankin Scale ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽

Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background and Purpose: To evaluate outcome and safety of endovascular treatment beyond 6 hours of onset of ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation, in routine clinical practice. Methods: From the Italian Registry of Endovascular Thrombectomy, we extracted clinical and outcome data of patients treated for stroke of known onset beyond 6 hours. Additional inclusion criteria were prestroke modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 and ASPECTS score ≥6. Patients were selected on individual basis by a combination of CT perfusion mismatch (difference between total hypoperfusion and infarct core sizes) and CT collateral score. The primary outcome measure was the score on modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. Safety outcomes were 90-day mortality and the occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Data were compared with those from patients treated within 6 hours. Results: Out of 3057 patients, 327 were treated beyond 6 hours. Their mean age was 66.8±14.9 years, the median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 16, and the median onset to groin puncture time 430 minutes. The most frequent site of occlusion was middle cerebral artery (45.1%). Functional independence (90-day modified Rankin Scale score, 0–2) was achieved by 41.3% of cases. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 6.7% of patients, and 3-month case fatality rate was 17.1%. The probability of surviving with modified Rankin Scale score, 0–2 (odds ratio, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.43–0.77]) was significantly lower in patients treated beyond 6 hours as compared with patients treated earlier No differences were found regarding recanalization rates and safety outcomes between patients treated within and beyond 6 hours. There were no differences in outcome between people treated 6-12 hours from onset (278 patients) and those treated 12 to 24 hours from onset (49 patients). Conclusions: This real-world study suggests that in patients with large vessel occlusion selected on the basis of CT perfusion and collateral circulation assessment, endovascular treatment beyond 6 hours is feasible and safe with no increase in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.

Download Full-text

Endovascular versus medical therapy for large-vessel anterior occlusive stroke presenting with mild symptoms

International Journal of Stroke ◽

10.1177/1747493019873510 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 15 (3) ◽

pp. 324-331 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Dylan N Wolman ◽

David G Marcellus ◽

Maarten G Lansberg ◽

Gregory Albers ◽

Adrien Guenego ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽

Medical Management ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽

Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background Acute ischemic stroke patients with a large-vessel occlusion but mild symptoms (NIHSS ≤ 6) pose a treatment dilemma between medical management and endovascular thrombectomy. Aims To evaluate the differences in clinical outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy-eligible patients with target-mismatch perfusion profiles who undergo either medical management or endovascular thrombectomy. Methods Forty-seven patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion, NIHSS ≤ 6, and a target-mismatch perfusion imaging profile were included. Patients underwent medical management or endovascular thrombectomy following treating neurointerventionalist and neurologist consensus. The primary outcome measure was NIHSS shift. Secondary outcome measures were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, in-hospital mortality, and 90-day mRS scores. The primary intention-to-treat and as-treated analyses were compared to determine the impact of crossover patient allocation on study outcome measures. Results Forty-seven patients were included. Thirty underwent medical management (64%) and 17 underwent endovascular thrombectomy (36%). Three medical management patients underwent endovascular thrombectomy due to early clinical deterioration. Presentation NIHSS ( P = 0.82), NIHSS shift ( P = 0.62), and 90-day functional independence (mRS 0–2; P = 0.25) were similar between groups. Endovascular thrombectomy patients demonstrated an increased overall rate of intracranial hemorrhage (35.3% vs. 10.0%; P = 0.04), but symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was similar between groups ( P = 0.25). In-hospital mortality was similar between groups ( P = 0.46), though all two deaths in the medical management group occurred among crossover patients. Endovascular thrombectomy patients demonstrated a longer length of stay (7.6 ± 7.2 vs. 4.3 ± 3.9 days; P = 0.04) and a higher frequency of unfavorable discharge to a skilled-nursing facility ( P = 0.03) rather than home ( P = 0.05). Conclusions Endovascular thrombectomy may pose an unfavorable risk-benefit profile over medical management for endovascular thrombectomy-eligible acute ischemic stroke patients with mild symptoms, which warrants a randomized trial in this subpopulation.

Download Full-text

Mobile Interventional Stroke Teams Improve Outcomes in the Early Time Window for Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke

Stroke ◽

10.1161/strokeaha.121.034222 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Jacob R. Morey ◽

Xiangnan Zhang ◽

Naoum Fares Marayati ◽

Stavros Matsoukas ◽

Emily Fiano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Scale Score ◽

Time Window ◽

Early Time ◽

National Institutes Of Health ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Late Time ◽

Modified Rankin Scale ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Endovascular Thrombectomy

Background and Purpose: Endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke is a time-sensitive intervention. The use of a Mobile Interventional Stroke Team (MIST) traveling to Thrombectomy Capable Stroke Centers to perform endovascular thrombectomy has been shown to be significantly faster with improved discharge outcomes, as compared with the drip-and-ship (DS) model. The effect of the MIST model stratified by time of presentation has yet to be studied. We hypothesize that patients who present in the early window (last known well of ≤6 hours) will have better clinical outcomes in the MIST model. Methods: The NYC MIST Trial and a prospectively collected stroke database were assessed for patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy from January 2017 to February 2020. Patients presenting in early and late time windows were analyzed separately. The primary end point was the proportion with a good outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2) at 90 days. Secondary end points included discharge National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and modified Rankin Scale. Results: Among 561 cases, 226 patients fit inclusion criteria and were categorized into MIST and DS cohorts. Exclusion criteria included a baseline modified Rankin Scale score of >2, inpatient status, or fluctuating exams. In the early window, 54% (40/74) had a good 90-day outcome in the MIST model, as compared with 28% (24/86) in the DS model ( P <0.01). In the late window, outcomes were similar (35% versus 41%; P =0.77). The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at discharge was 5.0 and 12.0 in the early window ( P <0.01) and 5.0 and 11.0 in the late window ( P =0.11) in the MIST and DS models, respectively. The early window discharge modified Rankin Scale was significantly better in the MIST model ( P <0.01) and similar in the late window ( P =0.41). Conclusions: The MIST model in the early time window results in better 90-day outcomes compared with the DS model. This may be due to the MIST capturing high-risk fast progressors at an earlier time point. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03048292.

Download Full-text

Repeated Mechanical Endovascular Thrombectomy for Recurrent Large Vessel Occlusion

Stroke ◽

10.1161/strokeaha.120.033393 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Ghada A. Mohamed ◽

Hassan Aboul Nour ◽

Raul G. Nogueira ◽

Mahmoud H. Mohammaden ◽

Diogo C. Haussen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Scale Score ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

The United States ◽

Outcome Data ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Time Interval ◽

Modified Rankin Scale ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Previously Treated

Background and Purpose: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is now the standard of care for large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. However, little is known about the frequency and outcomes of repeat MT (rMT) for patients with recurrent LVO. Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter cohort of patients who underwent rMT at 6 tertiary institutions in the United States between March 2016 and March 2020. Procedural, imaging, and outcome data were evaluated. Outcome at discharge was evaluated using the modified Rankin Scale. Results: Of 3059 patients treated with MT during the study period, 56 (1.8%) underwent at least 1 rMT. Fifty-four (96%) patients were analyzed; median age was 64 years. The median time interval between index MT and rMT was 2 days; 35 of 54 patients (65%) experienced recurrent LVO during the index hospitalization. The mechanism of stroke was cardioembolism in 30 patients (56%), intracranial atherosclerosis in 4 patients (7%), extracranial atherosclerosis in 2 patients (4%), and other causes in 18 patients (33%). A final TICI recanalization score of 2b or 3 was achieved in all 54 patients during index MT (100%) and in 51 of 54 patients (94%) during rMT. Thirty-two of 54 patients (59%) experienced recurrent LVO of a previously treated artery, mostly the pretreated left MCA (23 patients, 73%). Fifty of the 54 patients (93%) had a documented discharge modified Rankin Scale after rMT: 15 (30%) had minimal or no disability (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2), 25 (50%) had moderate to severe disability (modified Rankin Scale score 3–5), and 10 (20%) died. Conclusions: Almost 2% of patients treated with MT experience recurrent LVO, usually of a previously treated artery during the same hospitalization. Repeat MT seems to be safe and effective for attaining vessel recanalization, and good outcome can be expected in 30% of patients.

Download Full-text

Intra-Arterial Adjunctive Medications for Acute Ischemic Stroke During Mechanical Thrombectomy

Stroke ◽

10.1161/strokeaha.120.031738 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 52 (4) ◽

pp. 1192-1202

Author(s):

Vanessa H.E. Chen ◽

Grace K.H. Lee ◽

Choon-Han Tan ◽

Aloysius S.T. Leow ◽

Ying-Kiat Tan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽

Risk Ratio ◽

Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Tissue Type ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background and Purpose: In patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion, the role of intra-arterial adjunctive medications (IAMs), such as urokinase, tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator), or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has not been clearly established. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of concomitant or rescue IAM for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion patients undergoing MT. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register databases from inception until March 13, 2020. We analyzed all studies with patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion in the anterior or posterior circulation that provided data for the two treatment arms, (1) MT+IAM and (2) MT only, and also reported on at least one of the following efficacy outcomes, recanalization and 90-day modified Rankin Scale, or safety outcomes, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 90-day mortality. Data were collated in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: Sixteen nonrandomized observational studies with a total of 4581 patients were analyzed. MT only was performed in 3233 (70.6%) patients, while 1348 (29.4%) patients were treated with both MT and IAM. As compared with patients treated with MT alone, patients treated with combination therapy (MT+IAM) had a higher likelihood of achieving good functional outcome (risk ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.03–1.24]) and a lower risk of 90-day mortality (risk ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.72–0.94]). There was no significant difference in successful recanalization (risk ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.99–1.06]) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage between the two groups (risk ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.87–1.46]). Conclusions: In acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion, the use of IAM together with MT may achieve better functional outcomes and lower mortality rates. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to establish the safety and efficacy of IAM as adjunctive treatment to MT.

Download Full-text

Impact of Strategy on Clinical Outcome in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Successfully Reperfused: ETIS Registry Results

Stroke ◽

10.1161/strokeaha.121.034422 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Marian Douarinou ◽

Benjamin Gory ◽

Arturo Consoli ◽

Bertrand Lapergue ◽

Maeva Kyheng ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Odds Ratio ◽

Therapy Group ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Favorable Outcome ◽

Modified Rankin Scale ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Bridging Therapy ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Vessel Occlusion

Background and Purpose: Approximately half of the patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion do not achieve functional independence despite successful reperfusion. We aimed to determine influence of reperfusion strategy (bridging therapy, intravenous thrombolysis alone, or mechanical thrombectomy alone) on clinical outcomes in this population. Methods: From ongoing, prospective, multicenter, observational Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke registry in France, all patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who achieved successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b-3) following reperfusion therapy were included. Primary end point was favorable outcome, defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale score ≤2. Patient groups were compared using those treated with bridging therapy as reference. Differences in baseline characteristics were reduced after propensity score-matching, with a maximum absolute standardized difference of 14% for occlusion site. Results: Among 1872 patients included, 970 (51.8%) received bridging therapy, 128 (6.8%) received intravenous thrombolysis alone, and the remaining 774 (41.4%) received MT alone. The rate of favorable outcome was comparable between groups. Excellent outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0–1) was achieved more frequently in the bridging therapy group compared with the MT alone (odds ratio after propensity score-matching, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.50–0.96]). Regarding safety outcomes, hemorrhagic complications were similar between the groups, but 90-day mortality was significantly higher in the MT alone group compared with the bridging therapy group (odds ratio, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.09–2.37]). Conclusions: This real-world observational study of patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion demonstrated a similar rate of favorable outcome following successful reperfusion with different therapeutic strategies. However, our results suggest that bridging therapy compared with MT alone is significantly associated with excellent clinical outcome and lower mortality. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03776877.

Download Full-text