Validation of a 12-mRNA Score for Mortality Risk Stratification in Critically Ill Patients

Author(s):  
A. Moore ◽  
J. Roque ◽  
B.D. Shaller ◽  
T. Asuni ◽  
J.E. Levitt ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Helmersson-Karlqvist ◽  
Miklos Lipcsey ◽  
Johan Ärnlöv ◽  
Max Bell ◽  
Bo Ravn ◽  
...  

AbstractDecreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is linked to poor survival. The predictive value of creatinine estimated GFR (eGFR) and cystatin C eGFR in critically ill patients may differ substantially, but has been less studied. This study compares long-term mortality risk prediction by eGFR using a creatinine equation (CKD-EPI), a cystatin C equation (CAPA) and a combined creatinine/cystatin C equation (CKD-EPI), in 22,488 patients treated in intensive care at three University Hospitals in Sweden, between 2004 and 2015. Patients were analysed for both creatinine and cystatin C on the same blood sample tube at admission, using accredited laboratory methods. During follow-up (median 5.1 years) 8401 (37%) patients died. Reduced eGFR was significantly associated with death by all eGFR-equations in Cox regression models. However, patients reclassified to a lower GFR-category by using the cystatin C-based equation, as compared to the creatinine-based equation, had significantly higher mortality risk compared to the referent patients not reclassified. The cystatin C equation increased C-statistics for death prediction (p < 0.001 vs. creatinine, p = 0.013 vs. combined equation). In conclusion, this data favours the sole cystatin C equation rather than the creatinine or combined equations when estimating GFR for risk prediction purposes in critically ill patients.


2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 1967-1972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Li ◽  
Xin Zhao ◽  
Shumei Li

Background/Aims: The prognostic role of serum procalcitonin level in critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia was unclear. The aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between serum procalcitonin level and mortality risk in critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Methods: Data of critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia were retrospectively collected. Demographics, comorbidities, and serum procalcitonin level were extracted from electronic medical records. The primary outcome was mortality within two months after diagnosis. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the prognostic role of serum procalcitonin level in those patients. Results: A total of 115 critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia were enrolled in our study. Serum procalcitonin level was not associated with age, gender, or other comorbidities. Univariate Cox regression model showed that high serum procalcitonin level was associated increased risk of morality within 2 months after diagnosis (OR = 2.32, 95% CI 1.25-4.31, P = 0.008). Multivariable Cox regression model showed that high serum procalcitonin level was independently associated increased risk of morality within 2 months after diagnosis (OR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.26-4.50, P = 0.008). Conclusion: High serum procalcitonin level is an independent prognostic biomarker of mortality risk in critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia, and it's a promising biomarker of prognosis in critically ill patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 136
Author(s):  
C. C. Copeland ◽  
A. Young ◽  
T. Grogan ◽  
E. Gabel ◽  
A. Dhillon ◽  
...  

Medicine ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (29) ◽  
pp. e7543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Chen ◽  
Hang Du ◽  
Bao-hua Wei ◽  
Xue-ni Chang ◽  
Chen-ming Dong

Critical Care ◽  
10.1186/cc880 ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 4 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P160 ◽  
Author(s):  
FHY Yap ◽  
GM Joynt ◽  
TA Buckley

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viveka Björck ◽  
Lisa I Påhlman ◽  
Mikael Bodelsson ◽  
Ann_Cathrine Petersson ◽  
Thomas Kander

Abstract Background Group A streptococci (GAS) are known to cause serious invasive infections but little is known about outcomes when patients with these infections are admitted to intensive care. We wanted to describe critically ill patients with severe sepsis or septic shock due to invasive GAS (iGAS) and compare them with other patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Methods Adult patients admitted to a general intensive care unit (ICU) in Sweden (2007-2019) were screened for severe sepsis or septic shock according to Sepsis 2 definition. Individuals with iGAS infection were identified. The outcome variables were mortality, days alive and free of vasopressors and invasive mechanical ventilation, maximum acute kidney injury score for creatinine, use of continuous renal replacement therapy and maximum sequential organ failure assessment score during the ICU stay. Age, simplified acute physiology score (SAPS 3) and iGAS were used as independent, explanatory variables in regression analysis. Cox regression was used for survival analyses. Results iGAS was identified in 53 of 1021 (5.2%) patients. Patients with iGAS presented lower median SAPS 3 score (62 [56–72]) vs 71 [61–81]), p < 0.001), had a higher frequency of cardiovascular cause of admission to the ICU (38 [72%] vs 145 [15%], p < 0.001) and had a higher median creatinine score (173 [100–311] vs 133 [86–208] µmol/L, p < 0.019). Of the GAS isolates, 50% were serotyped emm 1/T1 and this group showed signs of more pronounced circulatory and renal failure than patients with non- emm 1/T1, ( p = 0.036 and p = 0.007, respectively). After correction for severity of illness (SAPS 3) and age, iGAS infection was associated with lower mortality risk; 95% confidence interval (CI) of hazard ratio (HR) 0.204–0.746, p < 0.001. Morbidity analyses demonstrated that iGAS patients were more likely to develop renal failure. Conclusion Critically ill patients with iGAS infection had a lower mortality risk but a higher degree of renal failure compared to similarly ill sepsis patients. emm 1/T1 was found to be the most dominant serotype and patients with emm1 /T1 demonstrated more circulatory and renal failure than patients with other serotypes of iGAS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document