The timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and nano-ligation clip for acute calculous cholecystitis under guidance of Tokyo guidelines 2018 (multi-center retrospective analysis)

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1681-1690
Author(s):  
Hongsheng Wu ◽  
Keqiang Ma ◽  
Lei Yu ◽  
Weili Gu ◽  
Yong Yan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Optimum Time ◽  
Tokyo Guidelines ◽  
Acute Calculous Cholecystitis ◽  
Group A ◽  
Calculous Cholecystitis

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been recognized as the standard surgical method for cholecystectomy. A nano-absorbable ligation clip. The material used in the ligation clip is composed of basic materials (poly(p-dioxanone), poly trimethylene carbonate or polycaprolactone) and nano-short fibers (Polyglycolide acid or polylactide). The short nano-fibers maintain the crystalline form evenly dispersed in the base material. The diameter of short nano-fibers is 300–500 nm and the length is 20–50 µm. The nano-absorbable ligation clip has strong closing force and will not cause closure failure. However, there are still some controversies about the optimum time for LC treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) patients, and the optimum time for performing LC based on evidence-based medicine has not been unanimously recognized. Here, we explore LC timing for ACC treatment under the guidance of the Tokyo Guidelines for Acute Cholecystitis 2018 (TG18). We retrospectively analyzed the data of 3,147 ACC cases undergoing LC in eight hospitals in China. According to the time from the onset of the patient’s symptoms to the operation, they were divided into the following three groups: Group A (onset to operation time of ≤3 days), Group B (onset to operation time of 4–7 days), and Group C (onset to operation time of >7 days). There was no obvious statistical difference in preoperative indicators, such as gender ratio, history of hypertension, diabetes, and abdominal operation; ASA Classification; and TG18 Classification between the three groups. Similarly, the results of preoperative laboratory indices (e.g., white blood cell, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, platelet, serum creatinine, and international normalized ratio) showed no obvious statistical difference between the three groups. The comparison of gallbladder characteristics under B-ultrasound showed no significant statistical difference between the three groups. However, the conversion rate in Group C was significantly higher than that in Groups A and B, the incidence of complications (e.g., bile leakage, bile duct injury, and wound infection) was significantly higher in Group C than that in Groups A and B, and the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in Group A than that in Groups B and C. A comprehensive analysis of patients’ medical records in multiple medical centers confirms that it is safe and feasible to perform early LC 7 days before the onset of ACC, which can significantly decrease postoperative complications and shorten the postoperative hospital stay for ACC patients. Performing early LC for ACC patients under the TG18 guidelines is safe and feasible. Additionally, since TG18 has obvious practicability and guidance for the clinical practice of hepatobiliary surgery, it is worthy of popularization and application in China.

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES BETWEEN EARLY AND DELAYED LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN ACUTE CALCULOUS CHOLECYSTITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 796-800
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ismail ◽  
Nasir Mehmood Wattoo ◽  
Muhammad Qasim Butt ◽  
Fareeha Naz
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Acute Calculous Cholecystitis ◽  
Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Calculous Cholecystitis ◽  
Post Operative Complications

Objective: To compare early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute calculous cholecystitis in terms of mean operative time, hospital stay, conversion rate to open surgery and post-operative complications. Study Design: Quasi experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Army Liver Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Pak-Emirates Military Hospital Rawalpindi, from Jul to Dec 2018. Methodology: A total of 170 patients (85 in each group) diagnosed as a case of acute calculous cholecystitis who met the sample selection criteria were included. Group A patients underwent early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 72 hours of admission while group B patients underwent conservative management followed by delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after 6 weeks. All patients were followed for operative time, hospital stay, per-operative difficulties encountered and post-operative complications. Results: Group A had a mean operation time of 43.9 ± 11.1 minutes, while group B had a mean operation time of 45.8 ± 10.1 minutes (p=0.83). The mean duration of hospitalization was 2.8 ± 1.1 days in group A and 5.3 ± 0.8 days in group B (p<0.001). Complications were measured at a frequency of 14.1% in group A and 5.9% in group B (p=0.07). Conclusion: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is better than delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute calculous cholecystitis in terms of hospital stay and per-operative difficulties faced. The post-operative complications between the two groups are comparable.

scholarly journals ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 185-192
Author(s):  
TARIQ HASSAN CH ◽  
ASGHAR ALI ◽  
MUNAWAR JAMIL
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Biliary Tree ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Total Hospital ◽  
Acute Calculous Cholecystitis ◽  
Total Hospital Stay ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Gallstones are common biliary pathology. The Vast majority of subjects are asymptomatic. About 0.2% of the population suffering from gallstones develop acute cholecystitis every year. In case of acute calculous cholecystitis, cholecystectomy can be performed early i.e during the same admission or interval i.e after 6 weeks of conservative management. Objective: To compare the early and interval cholecystectomy in acute calculous cholecystitis for morbidity, postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay and complications. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Setting: Department of Surgery Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur. Duration of Study: Two year study from December 2007 to December 2009. Subject and Methods: Sixty patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected for this study. The patients were divided into two groups. Group A patients were managed by early cholecystectomy and group B patients by intervalcholecystectomy. Postoperatively patients were evaluated for postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay and postoperative complications. Results: The mean age of the patients in group A was 42.2 + 10.7 years and in group B was 42.2+ 10.7 years. The Male to female ratio was 1:4 in both groups. The mean postoperative hospital stay in group A was 4.0+ 1.8days and in group B was 3.8+ 1.4 days. The mean total hospital stayin group A was 6.5 + 1.7 days and in group B was 10.2 + 1.3 days. The P value was less than 0.001, which was significant. In distribution of postoperative complications, in group A there were 1(3.3%) injury to biliary tree, 4(13.3%) wound infection,1(3.3%) wound haematoma, 3 (10%) seroma and 1(3.3%) wound dehiscence. While in group B there were 1(3.3%) injury to biliary tree, 3(10%) wound infection,2 (6.7%) wound haematoma, 2(6.7%) & no patient of wound dehiscence. Conclusion: Our study suggests that early cholecystectomy is a better treatment option than interval cholecystectomy because it has less total hospital stay, needs single hospital visit and has no risk of developing complications during wait for surgery.

scholarly journals Nondrainage after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Calculous Cholecystitis Does Not Increase the Postoperative Morbidity

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianguo Qiu ◽  
Ming Li
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
End Points ◽  
Acute Calculous Cholecystitis ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Calculous Cholecystitis

Background. It is now established that prophylactic drainage is not needed after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for chronic calculous cholecystitis. However, the benefit of drains versus their potential harm for acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) following laparoscopic LC has been questioned. Therefore, we conducted a comparative study to assess the need for drainage.Methods. Between January 2014 and October 2016, 212 patients with ACC undergoing LC undergo either drainage (n= 106) or no drainage (n= 106). The primary end points were the number of patients with postoperative drain-related complications, early and late Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, and hospital stay. Secondary end points included estimated blood loss, postoperative recovery, analgesia requirement, and cosmetic satisfaction result.Results. There was no bile duct injury and mortality in both groups. The overall complication rate was 12.5% with no significant difference between those with or without drainage (P=0.16). Normal activity resumption was significantly faster and the postoperative hospital stay was slightly shorter in the nondrainage group (P=0.03 andP= 0.04, respectively). The early VAS score in the drainage group was significantly higher (p<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in postoperative hematology test, late VAS score, and patient satisfaction of cosmetic outcome.Conclusion. Routine drainage for patients with ACC after LC may not be justified with similar drain-related complications compared with nondrainage group.

scholarly journals Correlation between the Severity and Outcome of Acute Calculous Cholecystits According to Tokyo Guidelines

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pradip Thapa ◽  
Krishna Mohan Adhikari ◽  
Anup Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Tokyo Guidelines ◽  
Acute Calculous Cholecystitis ◽  
Severity Grading ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Emergency Cholecystectomy ◽  
Calculous Cholecystitis ◽  
Grade Iii

Introduction: Acute Calculous Cholecystitis is a condition in which the gallbladder becomes inflamed due to cholelithiasis. Early diagnosis, severity grading and appropriate intervention reduce both morbidity and mortality. The aim of this prospective study is to correlate the severity with the outcome of acute calculous cholecystitis according to Tokyo Guidelines. Methods: This was a hospital based prospective study conducted in the Department of Surgery, Nepalgunj Medical College Teaching Hospital for a period of two years from April 2017 to March 2019. The patients were classified into three groups according to the severity grading in the Tokyo guidelines (TG18/ TG13). Clinical characteristics among these patients were analyzed for comparison. Results: Among all diagnostic criteria, right upper quarter (RUQ)h abdominal pain (94%) Murphy's sign (94%) and thickened gallbladder wall (80%) had the highest sensitivity rates (p<0.032), whereas elevated white cell count (32%) and RUQ abdominal mass (32%) had the lowest sensitivity rates (p<0.035). Higher sensitivity rates of diagnostic criteria were related to severe cholecystitis, except for Fever (46%) and elevated white blood cell (WBC) count (32%). All the 28 patients in grade I and selected patients 3 out of 6in grade II underwent early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) without any conversion and increased morbidity and mortality. Out of16 patients in grade III there was 2 mortalities due to ARDS, 1 needed Ultrasonography (USG) guided cholecystostomy, 1 underwent emergency cholecystectomy. 16 patients, 3 in grade II and 13 in grade III underwent interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy safely. There were no major postoperative morbidities except for superficial surgical site infection (SSI) in 1 patient in grade III who underwent emergency cholecystectomy Higher grade of severity was associated with increased morbidity and mortality (p<0.03). Conclusion: A combination of diagnostic criteria with different path physiologic findings, as noted in the Tokyo guidelines, can help clinicians make the correct diagnosis for patients with acute cholecystitis and there was strong correlation between the severity and outcomes of acute cholecystitis.

scholarly journals ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 185-192
Author(s):  
TARIQ HASSAN CH ◽  
ASGHAR ALI
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Biliary Tree ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Total Hospital ◽  
Acute Calculous Cholecystitis ◽  
Total Hospital Stay ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Gallstones are common biliary pathology. The Vast majority of subjects are asymptomatic. About 0.2% of the population suffering from gallstones develop acute cholecystitis every year. In case of acute calculous cholecystitis, cholecystectomy can be performed early i.e during the same admission or interval i.e after 6 weeks of conservative management. Objective: To compare the early and interval cholecystectomy in acute calculous cholecystitis for morbidity, postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay and complications. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Setting: Department of Surgery Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur. Duration of Study: Two year study from December 2007 to December 2009. Subject and Methods: Sixty patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected for this study. The patients were divided into two groups. Group A patients were managed by early cholecystectomy and group B patients by intervalcholecystectomy. Postoperatively patients were evaluated for postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay and postoperative complications. Results: The mean age of the patients in group A was 42.2 + 10.7 years and in group B was 42.2+ 10.7 years. The Male to female ratio was 1:4 in both groups. The mean postoperative hospital stay in group A was 4.0+ 1.8days and in group B was 3.8+ 1.4 days. The mean total hospital stayin group A was 6.5 + 1.7 days and in group B was 10.2 + 1.3 days. The P value was less than 0.001, which was significant. In distribution of postoperative complications, in group A there were 1(3.3%) injury to biliary tree, 4(13.3%) wound infection,1(3.3%) wound haematoma, 3 (10%) seroma and 1(3.3%) wound dehiscence. While in group B there were 1(3.3%) injury to biliary tree, 3(10%) wound infection,2 (6.7%) woundhaematoma, 2(6.7%) & no patient of wound dehiscence. Conclusion: Our study suggests that early cholecystectomy is a better treatment option than interval cholecystectomy because it has less total hospital stay, needs single hospital visit and has no risk of developing complications during wait for surgery.

scholarly journals A comparison of outcomes of four ports versus three ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-71
Author(s):  
K. Koirala ◽  
G. Simkhada ◽  
N. Adhikari ◽  
R. Mukhia ◽  
S. Shakya
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Acute Calculous Cholecystitis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Surgeon Experience ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Calculous Cholecystitis ◽  
Post Operative Complications

Background: Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy is performed using four ports. With increasing surgeon experience, there is a trend towards performing it using three ports. The aim of this study was to compare the three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the conventional four-port technique in terms of safety, benefits and feasibility in a teaching hospital and private hospital setups.Materials & Methods: A retrospective review of medical records was performed on patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at KIST Medical College and Teaching Hospital and Om Hospital & Research Center P. Ltd by a single laparoscopic surgeon. The review included demographics, operating time, analgesics requirement, post- operative hospital stay and intra-operative and post-operative complications. The data were tabulated in MS-Excel and statistically analyzed using SPSS statistics software, version 21.Results: There were 150 patients included in this study with 75 patients in each three and four-port groups. The demographics were comparable in both groups. 7.3% were diagnosed with acute calculous cholecystitis, 76.7% with chronic calculous cholecystitis and 3.3 % were gall bladder polyps. Four-port technique was generally required for the acute calculous cholecystitis which was statistically significant. The three-port group had a shorter mean operative time than the four-port group. There was no statistically significant difference in the doses of analgesics requirement and mean post-operative hospital stay in both groups. There were no major intra and post-operative complications in both groups. Four-port technique was commonly done in teaching hospital and the three-port in private hospital.Conclusions: There is significant number of laparoscopic cases being performed using three ports and we concluded that the three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and feasible in experienced hand although there is no significant benefit. The study also showed an increasing use of four-port technique in the teaching institution which is better to clearly visualize the anatomy of the Calot’s triangle. So we recommend using the four-port technique for teaching the beginners and as the experience is gained, we can gradually shift to three-port technique and at the same time we shouldn’t hesitate to convert to four-port in difficult cases.JMMIHS.2018;4(1):66-71

scholarly journals Infective complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in relation to preoperative urine culture status

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-13
Author(s):  
Birendra Kumar Yadav ◽  
Robin Bahadur Basnet ◽  
Anil Shrestha ◽  
Parish Mani Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Group A ◽  
One Year ◽  
Group B ◽  
Stone Characteristics ◽  
Negative Urine Culture ◽  
Infective Complications

Introductions: Fever and sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) secondary to urinary tract infection is a major determinant of overall post PCNL complications. This study aims to analyse infective complications after PCNL in relation to pre-operative urine culture status. Methods: A comparative analysis of post PCNL infective complications in pre-operative urine culture positive (Group A) and negative (Group B) was done for one year during June 2017 to May 2018 in department of urology, Bir Hospital, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal. Demographics, stone characteristics, mean operative time, post-operative hospital stay and post-operative complications as per Modified Clavien classification were compared between the two groups. Results: Out of total 136 PCNL patients, 51 were in Group A and 85 in Group B. Infective complications were significantly high, 28 (54.90%) in group A compared to 20 (23.53%) in group B, p=0.004. The most common isolate was Escherichia coli 19 (37.25%), sensitive to amikacin 37 (72.55%). The mean operation time, transfusion and hospital stay was not statically different in two groups. Morality occurred in 1 (1.96%) in group A. Conclusions: Infective complications were significantly high after PCNL in patients with preoperative positive urine culture, even when it was treated to sterile with sensitive antibiotics, compared to patients with preoperative negative urine culture.

scholarly journals Mortality risk estimation in acute calculous cholecystitis: beyond the Tokyo Guidelines

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana María González-Castillo ◽  
Juan Sancho-Insenser ◽  
Maite De Miguel-Palacio ◽  
Josep-Ricard Morera-Casaponsa ◽  
Estela Membrilla-Fernández ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Tokyo Guidelines ◽  
Acute Calculous Cholecystitis ◽  
Calculous Cholecystitis ◽  
Non Surgical Treatment

Abstract Background Acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) is the second most frequent surgical condition in emergency departments. The recommended treatment is the early laparoscopic cholecystectomy; however, the Tokyo Guidelines (TG) advocate for different initial treatments in some subgroups of patients without a strong evidence that all patients will benefit from them. There is no clear consensus in the literature about who is the unfit patient for surgical treatment. The primary aim of the study is to identify the risk factors for mortality in ACC and compare them with Tokyo Guidelines (TG) classification. Methods Retrospective unicentric cohort study of patients emergently admitted with and ACC during 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2016. The study comprised 963 patients. Primary outcome was the mortality after the diagnosis. A propensity score method was used to avoid confounding factors comparing surgical treatment and non-surgical treatment. Results The overall mortality was 3.6%. Mortality was associated with older age (68 + IQR 27 vs. 83 + IQR 5.5; P = 0.001) and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.5 + 5.3 vs. 0+2; P = 0.001). A logistic regression model isolated four mortality risk factors (ACME): chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 4.66 95% CI 1.7–12.8 P = 0.001), dementia (OR 4.12; 95% CI 1.34–12.7, P = 0.001), age > 80 years (OR 1.12: 95% CI 1.02–1.21, P = 0.001) and the need of preoperative vasoactive amines (OR 9.9: 95% CI 3.5–28.3, P = 0.001) which predicted the mortality in a 92% of the patients. The receiver operating characteristic curve yielded an area of 88% significantly higher that 68% (P = 0.003) from the TG classification. When comparing subgroups selected using propensity score matching with the same morbidity and severity of ACC, mortality was higher in the non-surgical treatment group. (26.2% vs. 10.5%). Conclusions Mortality was higher in ACC patients treated with non-surgical treatment. ACME identifies high-risk patients. The validation to ACME with a prospective multicenter study population could allow us to create a new alternative guideline to TG for treating ACC. Trial registration Retrospectively registered and recorded in Clinical Trials. NCT04744441

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document