scholarly journals Infective complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in relation to preoperative urine culture status

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-13
Author(s):  
Birendra Kumar Yadav ◽  
Robin Bahadur Basnet ◽  
Anil Shrestha ◽  
Parish Mani Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Group A ◽  
One Year ◽  
Group B ◽  
Stone Characteristics ◽  
Negative Urine Culture ◽  
Infective Complications

Introductions: Fever and sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) secondary to urinary tract infection is a major determinant of overall post PCNL complications. This study aims to analyse infective complications after PCNL in relation to pre-operative urine culture status. Methods: A comparative analysis of post PCNL infective complications in pre-operative urine culture positive (Group A) and negative (Group B) was done for one year during June 2017 to May 2018 in department of urology, Bir Hospital, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal. Demographics, stone characteristics, mean operative time, post-operative hospital stay and post-operative complications as per Modified Clavien classification were compared between the two groups. Results: Out of total 136 PCNL patients, 51 were in Group A and 85 in Group B. Infective complications were significantly high, 28 (54.90%) in group A compared to 20 (23.53%) in group B, p=0.004. The most common isolate was Escherichia coli 19 (37.25%), sensitive to amikacin 37 (72.55%). The mean operation time, transfusion and hospital stay was not statically different in two groups. Morality occurred in 1 (1.96%) in group A. Conclusions: Infective complications were significantly high after PCNL in patients with preoperative positive urine culture, even when it was treated to sterile with sensitive antibiotics, compared to patients with preoperative negative urine culture.

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES BETWEEN EARLY AND DELAYED LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN ACUTE CALCULOUS CHOLECYSTITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 796-800
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ismail ◽  
Nasir Mehmood Wattoo ◽  
Muhammad Qasim Butt ◽  
Fareeha Naz
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Acute Calculous Cholecystitis ◽  
Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Calculous Cholecystitis ◽  
Post Operative Complications

Objective: To compare early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute calculous cholecystitis in terms of mean operative time, hospital stay, conversion rate to open surgery and post-operative complications. Study Design: Quasi experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Army Liver Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Pak-Emirates Military Hospital Rawalpindi, from Jul to Dec 2018. Methodology: A total of 170 patients (85 in each group) diagnosed as a case of acute calculous cholecystitis who met the sample selection criteria were included. Group A patients underwent early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 72 hours of admission while group B patients underwent conservative management followed by delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after 6 weeks. All patients were followed for operative time, hospital stay, per-operative difficulties encountered and post-operative complications. Results: Group A had a mean operation time of 43.9 ± 11.1 minutes, while group B had a mean operation time of 45.8 ± 10.1 minutes (p=0.83). The mean duration of hospitalization was 2.8 ± 1.1 days in group A and 5.3 ± 0.8 days in group B (p<0.001). Complications were measured at a frequency of 14.1% in group A and 5.9% in group B (p=0.07). Conclusion: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is better than delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute calculous cholecystitis in terms of hospital stay and per-operative difficulties faced. The post-operative complications between the two groups are comparable.

scholarly journals A comparative study of two operative procedures in anterior hypospadias repair: limited urethral mobilization and tubularized incised plate urethroplasty.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1578-1584
Author(s):  
Shafiq ur Rehman ◽  
Fareena Ishtiaq ◽  
Zarlish Fazal ◽  
Muhammad Anwar ◽  
Saad Fazal
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Cosmetic Appearance ◽  
Tubularized Incised Plate ◽  
Group A ◽  
Tubularized Incised Plate Urethroplasty ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Objectives: This study is aimed to compare the results of limited urethral mobilization and tubularized incised plate urethroplasty in the management of anterior hypospadias, in terms of cosmetic and functional outcomes, complication rate, operative time, and hospital stay. Study Design: Prospective Randomized Controlled study. Settings: Department of Pediatric Surgery, DHQ Teaching Hospital Sahiwal. Period: January 2019 to December 2020. Material and Methods: A total of 89 patients with anterior hypospadias were included. Patients were divided randomly into two groups. In group A, limited urethral mobilization was performed and in group B, tubularized incised plate urethroplasty was carried out. A self-structured performa was used to collect the data of all patients. Both groups were compared in terms of the operation time, hospital stay, postoperative complications, cosmetic appearance, and functional outcomes. Results: Forty-five patients were included in group A, age ranged from 2.5 to 12 years (mean 4.83years). Forty-four patients were included in group B and their ages ranged from 3.5 to 11years (mean 4.76 years). The operation time was significantly less for group A than for group B. In group A, it ranged from 54 to 69 min with an average time of 60.51 min and in group B from 70 to 88 min, with an average of 79.34 min. The mean hospital stay period in group A was 7.37 days, ranged from 7 to 9 days, and in group B was 11.04 days, ranging from 10 to 13 days. The mean follow-up period in both groups was 7.45 months, ranging from 3 months to 12 months. Meatal stenosis was the most common complication in group A, which developed in 6.66% (n=3) patients. Urethrocutaneous fistula was the most common complication in group B, which developed in 6.81% (n=3) patients. Cosmetic appearance and functional outcome were good and comparable in both groups. Conclusion: Although both techniques, tubularized incised plate and limited urethral mobilization urethroplasty are acceptable modalities for the management of anterior hypospadias. But limited urethral mobilization urethroplasty seems to be a good option due to its simplicity, short hospital stay, significant shorter operative time, low fistula formation rate, and good cosmetic and functional outcomes.

Counter-Irrigation as a Novel Technique versus the Standard Technique in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Ahmed El-Sakka ◽  
Abdelnaser Elgamasy ◽  
Karim Sallam ◽  
Mohamed G. Soliman
Keyword(s):  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Standard Technique ◽  
Prospective Randomized Trial ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Free Rate

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of our counter-irrigation technique versus the standard technique in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) by assessment of the stone-free rate after the procedures and its safety in terms of comparing the intraoperative time, Hb deficit, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, auxiliary procedures, and perioperative complications with that of the standard one. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This prospective randomized trial was conducted on patients with renal stone 2–3 cm in diameter without contraindications to PCNL. The patients were randomized into group A in which the counter-irrigation technique has been performed and group B who were managed by the standard technique. The preoperative characteristics including demographic data and stone parameters were compared between both groups. The primary outcome was the stone-free rate assessed by noncontrast spiral CT after 3 months. The secondary outcome included intraoperative time, Hb deficit, blood transfusion, hospital stay, auxiliary procedure required, and rate of complications. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Forty-eight patients were included in this study. Overall, no significant difference was observed between both groups regarding preoperative characteristics, Hb deficit, and complication rate. Operative time was significantly shorter in group B (<i>p</i> = 0.001). None of our patients required blood transfusion. The stone-free rates at 3 months were significantly better in group A (95% for group A and 70% for group B, <i>p</i> = 0.04). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our results indicate that our counter-irrigation technique has lower stone migration with subsequent significantly better stone-free rate versus the standard technique. We can recommend this technique as a potentially valid option for cases with large stone burden when the access to the upper calyx is feasible to minimize significant residual fragments.

scholarly journals Comparison of Cohen and Lich-Gregoir ureteral reimplantation in the surgical management of primary unilateral vesicoureteral reflux in children

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 424-429
Author(s):  
Cemil Aydin ◽  
Ali Akkoc ◽  
Ramazan Topaktas ◽  
Aykut Bugra Senturk ◽  
Zeynep Banu Aydin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Vesicoureteral Reflux ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Ureteral Reimplantation ◽  
Macroscopic Hematuria ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) represents one of the most significant risk factors for acute pyelonephritis in children. Various intravesical and extravesical techniques have been described for the surgical correction of VUR. The aim of our study was to compare the results of open intravesical and extravesical procedures for unilateral primary VUR in children. METHODS Between January 2012 and August 2018, 38 children with primary VUR who underwent open ureteral reimplantation surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The Cohen (intravesical) and the Lich-Gregoir (extravesical) approach were grouped as groups A and B, respectively. The groups were compared for age, gender, preoperative reflux grade, presence of lower urinary tract symptoms, operation time, discomfort and pain, analgesic requirements, duration of hematuria, postoperative complications, and hospital stay. All the parameters were statistically compared. RESULTS There were 38 patients in this study. Group A had 18 patients, and group B had 20 patients. The mean operative time was significantly shorter in group B than in group A. The mean hospital stay was also shorter in group B. The urethral foley stay period was 4.7±0.9 days 2±0 days (p = 0.000*), respectively, for group A and B. Macroscopic hematuria was seen in group A. The objective pain scale was worse after intravesical surgery. Analgesic requirements were higher in group A (p =0.131). CONCLUSION Intravesical and extravesical ureteroneocystostomy methods are equally successful and feasible in the treatment of primary unilateral VUR. The Cohen technique is associated with a longer and more painful hospital stay, gross hematuria, and longer operative time, compared to the Lich-Gregoir technique.

scholarly journals Comparison of tubeless versus tubed percutaneous nephrolithotomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-31
Author(s):  
Rajiv Shah ◽  
Nirmal Lamichhane ◽  
Sudeep Raj K.C.
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Renal Calculi ◽  
P Value ◽  
Transfusion Rate ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Tubeless Pcnl ◽  
Post Operative Complications

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is an effective treatment for large renal calculi and usually a nephrostomy tube is placed in the kidney at the end of procedure to avoid post operative complications. This is to compare the outcome of tubeless PCNL versus tubed PCNL. In a randomized prospective study of sixty-four consecutive patients were enrolled and divided into two groups; A being tubeless group and B being nephrostomy group with 32 patients in each arm divided by quota sampling restricted block method with allocation ratio of 1:1. The mean age in group A was 36.69 ± 13.65 years and in group B was 38.09 ± 13.18 years with no significant p value (p = 0.501). Duration of hospital stay in group A was 3.63 ± 1.04 days and in group B was 6.34 ± 1.71 days with a significant p value (p = 0.001). In group A 31 (96.9%) and in group B 24 (75%) cases were not transfused with blood while 1 (3.1%) and 8 (25%) cases were transfused with blood with a significant p value (p = 0.026). The post operative complications were comparable in between two groups. Therefore tubeless PCNL reduces the hospital stay and blood transfusion rate with no obvious post operative complications.

Primary Anastamosis Versus Colostomy in Patients with Penetrating Colonic Injuries

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 1159-1161
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Stab Wound ◽  
Primary Anastomosis ◽  
Primary Group ◽  
Emergency Ward ◽  
Colonic Injury ◽  
Surgical Department ◽  
Group A ◽  
One Year ◽  
Group B

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the outcomes among primary anastomosis versus colostomy in patients with penetrating colonic injuries. Study Design: Comparative Study Place and Duration: Study was conducted at surgical department of Mardan Medical complex, Mardan and Bakhtawar Amin Medical & Dental College, Multan for duration of one year from January, 2020 to January 2021 Methods: 70 patients were presented in this study. Patients were aged between 18-75 years. Patients details demographics age, sex and body mass index were recorded after taking informed written consent. Patients penetrating colonic injuries were admitted in emergency ward. Patients were equally (n=35) divided into 2-groups, A and B. For abdominal surgery, group A received primary anastomosis and group B received colostomy. Post-operatively outcomes and complications among both groups were identified. SPSS 22.0 version was used to analyze the data. Results: Mean age of the patients was 29.48 ± 16.4 years with mean BMI 23.16 ± 08.13 kg/m2. Total 50 (71.43%) were males and 20 (28.57%) were females. Fire arm injured 55 (78.6%) was the most common cause of colonic injury followed by stab wound 10 (14.3%) among both groups. Small gut 28 (40%) was the most common organ injured followed by liver 13 (18.6%). Mean hospital stay in primary group was 7.45 ± 7.6 days while in colostomy group hospital stay was 9.54 ± 5.9 days. Postoperatively complications were lower in group A, wound infection found in 9 (25.71%) patients while in group B it was 11 (31.43%). Rate of mortality in primary group was 2 (5.71%) while in colostomy group was 4 (11.43%). Conclusion: We concluded in this study that primary anastomosis was effective because of less hospital stay and less post-operatively complications as compared to colostomy. Mortality rate was higher observed in colostomy group as compared to primary. Keywords: Colostomy, Primary anastomy, Colonic Injuries

scholarly journals IS RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY PREFEREABLE OVER MINI PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH RENAL CALCULUS OF LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 2 CM SIZE?

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Girish H M ◽  
Sanman K N ◽  
G G Laxman Prabhu ◽  
Ranjit Shetty
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Renal Calculus ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Operative Outcomes ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Group A ◽  
Laboratory Investigations ◽  
Group B ◽  
Free Rate

Objective: To compare intraoperative and post-operative outcomes between mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (miniPCNL) and Retrograde intrarenoscopy (RIRS) groups. Materials and methods: A total of 66 patients were alternatively allocated to undergo miniPCNL (33patients, group A) and RIRS (33patients, group B) groups. All patients were evaluated by history, laboratory investigations, X-ray Kidney ureter bladder (KUB), Ultrasonography and computerized tomography (CT) scan to determine stone number, location and size. Operative time, stone free rate, duration of hospital stay and complications were compared between both groups. Results: Demographic parameters were comparable between two groups. Stone free rate was similar in both groups. Mean duration of procedure was less for miniPCNL when compared to RIRS with P < 0.0001. Duration of post-operative stay for miniPCNL was longer when compared to RIRS with P < 0.0001. Complications like intra operative bleeding, post-operative fever and blood transfusion were similar in both groups. The RIRS group patients experienced reasonably less pain postoperatively as per Visual analogue scale (VAS) score when compared to miniPCNL group with P < 0.0001. Conclusion: Though RIRS and miniPCNL have good and comparable stone free rate with low complication rates, favourable pain score and less hospital stay makes RIRS a preferred option over miniPCNL.

Comparison of one-year prognosis of patients classified as chronic critical lower limb ischaemia according to TASC II or European consensus definition in the COPART cohort

VASA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 0220-0228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Vircoulon ◽  
Carine Boulon ◽  
Ileana Desormais ◽  
Philippe Lacroix ◽  
Victor Aboyans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Critical Limb Ischaemia ◽  
Limb Ischaemia ◽  
Medical Group ◽  
Consensus Definition ◽  
Transcutaneous Oxygen ◽  
European Consensus ◽  
Group A ◽  
One Year ◽  
Group B

Background: We compared one-year amputation and survival rates in patients fulfilling 1991 European consensus critical limb ischaemia (CLI) definition to those clas, sified as CLI by TASC II but not European consensus (EC) definition. Patients and methods: Patients were selected from the COPART cohort of hospitalized patients with peripheral occlusive arterial disease suffering from lower extremity rest pain or ulcer and who completed one-year follow-up. Ankle and toe systolic pressures and transcutaneous oxygen pressure were measured. The patients were classified into two groups: those who could benefit from revascularization and those who could not (medical group). Within these groups, patients were separated into those who had CLI according to the European consensus definition (EC + TASC II: group A if revascularization, group C if medical treatment) and those who had no CLI by the European definition but who had CLI according to the TASC II definition (TASC: group B if revascularization and D if medical treatment). Results: 471 patients were included in the study (236 in the surgical group, 235 in the medical group). There was no difference according to the CLI definition for survival or cardiovascular event-free survival. However, major amputations were more frequent in group A than in group B (25 vs 12 %, p = 0.046) and in group C than in group D (38 vs 20 %, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Major amputation is twice as frequent in patients with CLI according to the historical European consensus definition than in those classified to the TASC II definition but not the EC. Caution is required when comparing results of recent series to historical controls. The TASC II definition of CLI is too wide to compare patients from clinical trials so we suggest separating these patients into two different stages: permanent (TASC II but not EC definition) and critical ischaemia (TASC II and EC definition).

scholarly journals Incidence of Bacteriuria after Urodynamic Study with or without Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Women with Urinary Incontinence

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 534-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Hirakauva ◽  
Ana Bianchi-Ferraro ◽  
Eliana Zucchi ◽  
Marcio Kajikawa ◽  
Manoel Girão ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Placebo Control ◽  
Urodynamic Study ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

Introduction The presence of bacteria in urine is called bacteriuria, which may be symptomatic or asymptomatic. The manipulation of the urinary tract during urodynamic study (UDS), which is an invasive procedure, can result in urinary tract infection (UTI). Studies on the use of prophylactic antibiotics for UDSs are contradictory. Some investigators concluded that they were valuable and others did not. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis before UDS. This is a placebo-control randomized double-blind study. Methods Two-hundred and seventeen women affected by urinary incontinence were eligible for this study. All patients had presented negative urine culture previous to the UDS. They were randomized in four groups: group A received placebo, group B received 500 mg of levofloxacin, group C received 80 mg trimethoprim and 400 mg sulfamethoxazole and group D received 100 mg of nitrofurantoin. A urine culture was performed 14 days after the UDS. Results We observed asymptomatic bacteriuria after the UDS in five patients in group A, one in group B, one in group C and one in group D. Only one patient on group A had symptomatic bacteriuria. We didn't observe statistical difference between the groups. When we recategorized the patients in two groups, the incidence of bacteriuria was significantly higher in the placebo group compared with the antibiotic group. Conclusion The conclusion is that antibiotic prophylaxis before the UDS did not reduce the incidence of UTI in women within the target population.

Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for the management of highly complex renal tumors with PADUA score ⩾10: A single center analysis.

2021 ◽  
pp. 039156032110016
Author(s):  
Francesco Chiancone ◽  
Marco Fabiano ◽  
Clemente Meccariello ◽  
Maurizio Fedelini ◽  
Francesco Persico ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Post Operative Complications

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal tumors of high surgical complexity (PADUA score ⩾10). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 93 consecutive patients who underwent PN at our department from January 2015 to September 2019. 21 patients underwent open partial nephrectomy (OPN) (Group A) and 72 underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) (Group B). All OPNs were performed with a retroperitoneal approach, while all LPNs were performed with a transperitoneal approach by a single surgical team. Post-operative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Results: The two groups showed no difference in terms of patients’ demographics as well as tumor characteristics in all variables. Group A was found to be similar to group B in terms of operation time ( p = 0.781), conversion to radical nephrectomy ( p = 0.3485), and positive surgical margins ( p = 0.338) while estimated blood loss ( p = 0.0205), intra-operative ( p = 0.0104), and post-operative ( p = 0.0081) transfusion rates, drainage time ( p = 0.0012), pain score at post-operative day 1 (<0.0001) were significantly lower in Group B. The rate of enucleation and enucleoresection/polar resection was similar ( p = 0.1821) among the groups. Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative factors were not independently associated with the surgical approach. There was a statistically significant difference in complication rate (<0.0001) between the two groups even if no significant difference in terms of grade ⩾3 post-operative complications ( p = 0.3382) was detected. Discussion: LPN represents a feasible and safe approach for high complex renal tumors if performed in highly experienced laparoscopic centers. This procedure offers good intraoperative outcomes and a low rate of post-operative complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document