scholarly journals Perceptual effects of unequal saccadic adaptation produced by a dichoptic step

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Anna Kosovicheva ◽  
Peter J. Bex
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 947-955
Author(s):  
R. A. Raashid ◽  
A. M. F. Wong ◽  
A. Blakeman ◽  
H. C. Goltz

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 496-496
Author(s):  
T. Collins ◽  
J. Wallman

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 1809-1813 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Ditterich ◽  
T. Eggert ◽  
A. Straube

A shift of the visual attention focus is known to precede saccades. However, how the metrics of both this presaccadic attention shift and the saccade are coupled is still unclear. We altered the saccade size by short-term saccadic adaptation to determine whether the attention focus would still be shifted to the location of the saccade target or to the modified postsaccadic eye position. The results showed that saccadic adaptation had no influence on the presaccadic attention shift. Thus either different processes determine the metrics of the attention shift and of the saccade or saccadic adaptation causes only modifications on a lower hierarchical level of saccade programming, thereby not influencing the metrics of the attention shift.


2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. 1399-1410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabian Schnier ◽  
Markus Lappe

Saccadic adaptation is a mechanism to increase or decrease the amplitude gain of subsequent saccades, if a saccade is not on target. Recent research has shown that the mechanism of gain increasing, or outward adaptation, and the mechanism of gain decreasing, or inward adaptation, rely on partly different processes. We investigate how outward and inward adaptation of reactive saccades transfer to other types of saccades, namely scanning, overlap, memory-guided, and gap saccades. Previous research has shown that inward adaptation of reactive saccades transfers only partially to these other saccade types, suggesting differences in the control mechanisms between these saccade categories. We show that outward adaptation transfers stronger to scanning and overlap saccades than inward adaptation, and that the strength of transfer depends on the duration for which the saccade target is visible before saccade onset. Furthermore, we show that this transfer is mainly driven by an increase in saccade duration, which is apparent for all saccade categories. Inward adaptation, in contrast, is accompanied by a decrease in duration and in peak velocity, but only the peak velocity decrease transfers from reactive saccades to other saccade categories, i.e., saccadic duration remains constant or even increases for test saccades of the other categories. Our results, therefore, show that duration and peak velocity are independent parameters of saccadic adaptation and that they are differently involved in the transfer of adaptation between saccade categories. Furthermore, our results add evidence that inward and outward adaptation are different processes.


2013 ◽  
Vol 109 (10) ◽  
pp. 2596-2605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara C. Steenrod ◽  
Matthew H. Phillips ◽  
Michael E. Goldberg

Activity in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) represents a priority map that can be used to direct attention and guide eye movements. However, it is not known whether this activity represents the location of saccade targets or the actual eye movement made to acquire them. We recorded single neurons from rhesus macaques ( Macaca mulatta) while they performed memory-guided delayed saccades to characterize the response profiles of LIP cells. We then separated the saccade target from the saccade end point by saccadic adaptation, a method that induces a change in the gain of the oculomotor system. We plotted LIP activity for all three epochs of the memory-guided delayed-response task (visual, delay period, and presaccadic responses) as a function of target location and saccade end point. We found that under saccadic adaptation the response profile for all three epochs was unchanged as a function of target location. We conclude that neurons in LIP reliably represent the locations of saccade targets, not the amplitude of the saccade required to acquire those targets. Although LIP transmits target information to the motor system, that information represents the location of the target and not the amplitude of the saccade that the monkey will make.


2009 ◽  
Vol 587 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Lappe
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 1909-1917
Author(s):  
Svenja Gremmler ◽  
Markus Lappe

We investigated whether the proprioceptive eye position signal after the execution of a saccadic eye movement is used to estimate the accuracy of the movement. If so, saccadic adaptation, the mechanism that maintains saccade accuracy, could use this signal in a similar way as it uses visual feedback after the saccade. To manipulate the availability of the proprioceptive eye position signal we utilized the finding that proprioceptive eye position information builds up gradually after a saccade over a time interval comparable to typical saccade latencies. We confined the retention time of gaze at the saccade landing point by asking participants to make fast return saccades to the fixation point that preempt the usability of proprioceptive eye position signals. In five experimental conditions we measured the influence of the visual and proprioceptive feedback, together and separately, on the development of adaptation. We found that the adaptation of the previously shortened saccades in the case of visual feedback being unavailable after the saccade was significantly weaker when the use of proprioceptive eye position information was impaired by fast return saccades. We conclude that adaptation can be driven by proprioceptive eye position feedback. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We show that proprioceptive eye position information is used after a saccade to estimate motor error and adapt saccade control. Previous studies on saccadic adaptation focused on visual feedback about saccade accuracy. A multimodal error signal combining visual and proprioceptive information is likely more robust. Moreover, combining proprioceptive and visual measures of saccade performance can be helpful to keep vision, proprioception, and motor control in alignment and produce a coherent representation of space.


2012 ◽  
Vol 108 (10) ◽  
pp. 2819-2826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svenja Wulff ◽  
Annalisa Bosco ◽  
Katharina Havermann ◽  
Giacomo Placenti ◽  
Patrizia Fattori ◽  
...  

The saccadic amplitude of humans and monkeys can be adapted using intrasaccadic target steps in the McLaughlin paradigm. It is generally believed that, as a result of a purely retinal reference frame, after adaptation of a saccade of a certain amplitude and direction, saccades of the same amplitude and direction are all adapted to the same extent, independently from the initial eye position. However, recent studies in humans have put the pure retinal coding in doubt by revealing that the initial eye position has an effect on the transfer of adaptation to saccades of different starting points. Since humans and monkeys show some species differences in adaptation, we tested the eye position dependence in monkeys. Two trained Macaca fascicularis performed reactive rightward saccades from five equally horizontally distributed starting positions. All saccades were made to targets with the same retinotopic motor vector. In each session, the saccades that started at one particular initial eye position, the adaptation position, were adapted to shorter amplitude, and the adaptation of the saccades starting at the other four positions was measured. The results show that saccades that started at the other positions were less adapted than saccades that started at the adaptation position. With increasing distance between the starting position of the test saccade and the adaptation position, the amplitude change of the test saccades decreased with a Gaussian profile. We conclude that gain-decreasing saccadic adaptation in macaques is specific to the initial eye position at which the adaptation has been induced.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document