scholarly journals Luminosity thresholds of colored surfaces are determined by their upper-limit luminances empirically internalized in the visual system

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (13) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
Takuma Morimoto ◽  
Ai Numata ◽  
Kazuho Fukuda ◽  
Keiji Uchikawa
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuma Morimoto ◽  
Ai Numata ◽  
Kazuho Fukuda ◽  
Keiji Uchikawa

Some objects in the real world themselves emit a light, and we typically have a fairly good idea as to whether a given object is self-luminous or illuminated by a light source. However, it is not well understood how our visual system makes this judgement. This study aimed to identify determinants of luminosity threshold, a luminance level at which the surface begins to appear self-luminous. We specifically tested a hypothesis that our visual system knows a maximum luminance level that a surface can reach under the physical constraint that surface cannot reflect more lights that incident lights and apply this prior to determine the luminosity thresholds. Observers were presented a 2-degree circular test field surrounded by numerous overlapping color circles, and luminosity thresholds were measured as a function of (i) the chromaticity of the test field, (ii) the shape of surrounding color distribution and (iii) the color of illuminant lighting surrounding colors. We found that the luminosity thresholds strongly depended on test chromaticity and peaked around the chromaticity of test illuminants and decreased as the purity of the test chromaticity increased. However, the locus of luminosity thresholds over chromaticities were nearly invariant regardless of the shape of surrounding color distribution and generally well resembled the locus drawn from theoretical upper-limit luminance but also the locus drawn from the upper boundary of real objects. These trends were particularly evident for test illuminants on blue-yellow axis and curiously did not hold under atypical illuminants such as magenta or green. Based on these results, we propose a theory that our visual system empirically internalizes the gamut of surface colors under illuminants typically found in natural environments and a given surface appears self-luminous when its luminance exceeds this heuristic upper-limit luminance.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samson Chengetanai ◽  
Adhil Bhagwandin ◽  
Mads F. Bertelsen ◽  
Therese Hård ◽  
Patrick R. Hof ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Klaus-Ruediger Peters

Differential hysteresis processing is a new image processing technology that provides a tool for the display of image data information at any level of differential contrast resolution. This includes the maximum contrast resolution of the acquisition system which may be 1,000-times higher than that of the visual system (16 bit versus 6 bit). All microscopes acquire high precision contrasts at a level of <0.01-25% of the acquisition range in 16-bit - 8-bit data, but these contrasts are mostly invisible or only partially visible even in conventionally enhanced images. The processing principle of the differential hysteresis tool is based on hysteresis properties of intensity variations within an image.Differential hysteresis image processing moves a cursor of selected intensity range (hysteresis range) along lines through the image data reading each successive pixel intensity. The midpoint of the cursor provides the output data. If the intensity value of the following pixel falls outside of the actual cursor endpoint values, then the cursor follows the data either with its top or with its bottom, but if the pixels' intensity value falls within the cursor range, then the cursor maintains its intensity value.


1996 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Umiltà ◽  
Francesca Simion ◽  
Eloisa Valenza

Four experiments were aimed at elucidating some aspects of the preference for facelike patterns in newborns. Experiment 1 showed a preference for a stimulus whose components were located in the correct arrangement for a human face. Experiment 2 showed a preference for stimuli that had optimal sensory properties for the newborn visual system. Experiment 3 showed that babies directed their attention to a facelike pattern even when it was presented simultaneously with a non-facelike stimulus with optimal sensory properties. Experiment 4 showed the preference for facelike patterns in the temporal hemifield but not in the nasal hemifield. It was concluded that newborns' preference for facelike patterns reflects the activity of a subcortical system which is sensitive to the structural properties of the stimulus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document