scholarly journals Is Guided Search 6.0 compatible with Reverse Hierarchy Theory

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Jeremy M Wolfe
1991 ◽  
Vol 73 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 271-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.G. O'Neill ◽  
R.V. O'Neill ◽  
R.J. Norby

Author(s):  
Massimo Poesio

Discourse is the area of linguistics concerned with the aspects of language use that go beyond the sentence—and in particular, with the study of coherence and salience. In this chapter we present a few key theories of these phenomena. We distinguish between two main types of coherence: entity coherence, primarily established through anaphora; and relational coherence, expressed through connectives and other relational devices. Our discussion of anaphora and entity coherence covers the basic facts about anaphoric reference and introduces the dynamic approach to the semantics of anaphora implemented in theories such as Discourse Representation Theory, based on the notion of discourse model and its updates. With regards to relational coherence, we review some of the main claims about the relational structure of discourse—such as the claim that coherent discourses have a tree structure, or the right frontier hypothesis—and four main theoretical approaches: Rhetorical Structure Theory, Grosz and Sidner’s intentional structure theory, the inference-based approach developed by Hobbs and expanded in Segmented DRT, and the connective-based account. Finally we cover theories of local and global salience and its effects, including Gundel’s Activation Hierarchy theory and Grosz and Sidner’s theory of the local and global focus.


2019 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 440-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vahid Riahi ◽  
M.A. Hakim Newton ◽  
M.M.A. Polash ◽  
Kaile Su ◽  
Abdul Sattar
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 24-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Moran ◽  
M. Zehetleitner ◽  
H. J. Muller ◽  
M. Usher

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-200
Author(s):  
Yota Ueda ◽  
Hiroyuki Ebara ◽  
Koki Nakayama ◽  
Syuhei Iida
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
John R. Dixon

The goal of this paper is to raise awareness and generate discussion about research methodology in engineering design. Design researchers are viewed as a single communicating community searching for scientific theories of engineering design; that is, theories that can be tested by formal methods of hypothesis testing. In the paper, the scientific method for validating theories is reviewed, and the need for operational definitions and for experiments to identify variables and meaningful abstractions is stressed. The development of a design problem taxonomy is advocated. Generating theories is viewed as guided search. Three types of design theories are described: prescriptive, cognitive descriptive, and computational. It is argued that to seek prescriptions is premature and that, unless the human and institutional variables are reduced to knowledge and control, cognitive descriptive theories will be impossibly complex. A case is made for a computational approach, though it also shown that computational and cognitive research approaches can be mutually supportive.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document