scholarly journals Defining phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of glioblastoma stem cells by mass cytometry

JCI Insight ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano Galdieri ◽  
Arijita Jash ◽  
Olga Malkova ◽  
Diane D. Mao ◽  
Patrick A. DeSouza ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 839-846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinmei Wang ◽  
Xiaomeng Huang ◽  
Zhaogang Yang ◽  
Daniel Gallego-Perez ◽  
Junyu Ma ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 4011
Author(s):  
Brianna Chen ◽  
Dylan McCuaig-Walton ◽  
Sean Tan ◽  
Andrew P. Montgomery ◽  
Bryan W. Day ◽  
...  

Glioblastoma display vast cellular heterogeneity, with glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) at the apex. The critical role of GSCs in tumour growth and resistance to therapy highlights the need to delineate mechanisms that control stemness and differentiation potential of GSC. Dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A) regulates neural progenitor cell differentiation, but its role in cancer stem cell differentiation is largely unknown. Herein, we demonstrate that DYRK1A kinase is crucial for the differentiation commitment of glioblastoma stem cells. DYRK1A inhibition insulates the self-renewing population of GSCs from potent differentiation-inducing signals. Mechanistically, we show that DYRK1A promotes differentiation and limits stemness acquisition via deactivation of CDK5, an unconventional kinase recently described as an oncogene. DYRK1A-dependent inactivation of CDK5 results in decreased expression of the stemness gene SOX2 and promotes the commitment of GSC to differentiate. Our investigations of the novel DYRK1A-CDK5-SOX2 pathway provide further insights into the mechanisms underlying glioblastoma stem cell maintenance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 186 ◽  
pp. 114437
Author(s):  
Monira Hoque ◽  
Siu Wai Wong ◽  
Ariadna Recasens ◽  
Ramzi Abbassi ◽  
Nghi Nguyen ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 425-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoichiro Kawamura ◽  
Jun Takouda ◽  
Koji Yoshimoto ◽  
Kinichi Nakashima

2011 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S171
Author(s):  
D. Danovi ◽  
A. Folarin ◽  
S. Pollard

Glia ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (10) ◽  
pp. 1687-1698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Bai ◽  
Justin D. Lathia ◽  
Peisu Zhang ◽  
William Flavahan ◽  
Jeremy N. Rich ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. e0172884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Pollak ◽  
Karan G. Rai ◽  
Cory C. Funk ◽  
Sonali Arora ◽  
Eunjee Lee ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii199-ii200
Author(s):  
Luciano Galdieri ◽  
Arijita Jash ◽  
Olga Malkova ◽  
Diane Mao ◽  
Jian Campian ◽  
...  

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) kills almost all patients within 2 years. A subpopulation of cells, GBM stem cells (GSCs), contributes to treatment resistance and recurrence. A major therapeutic goal is to kill GSCs, but no targeted therapy yet exists. Since their discovery, GSCs have been isolated using single surface markers, such as CD15, CD44, CD133, and a-6 integrin. It remains unknown how these single surface marker-defined GSC populations compare to each other in terms of signal transduction and function and whether expression of different combinations of these markers is associated with distinct phenotypes. Using mass cytometry and fresh operating room specimens, we found that 15 distinct GSC subpopulations exist in vivo and they differ in their MEK/ERK, WNT, and AKT pathway activation status. In culture, some subpopulations were lost and previously undetectable ones materialized. GSCs highly expressing all four surface markers had the greatest self-renewal capacity and in vivo tumorigenicity as well as the strongest WNT pathway activation. This work highlights the signaling and phenotypic diversity in GSC subpopulations, together suggesting that not all GSCs are equivalent. These observations should be considered when studying GSCs in the laboratory, with implications for the development of treatments that target GSCs and prevent tumor recurrence in patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document