scholarly journals Arctic Mixed-Phase Stratiform Cloud Properties from Multiple Years of Surface-Based Measurements at Two High-Latitude Locations

2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (9) ◽  
pp. 2874-2887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gijs de Boer ◽  
Edwin W. Eloranta ◽  
Matthew D. Shupe
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Water ◽  
Microwave Radiometer ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Mixed Phase ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Microphysical Properties ◽  
Cloud Properties ◽  
Arctic Change ◽  
Mixed Phase Clouds ◽  
Water Contents

Abstract Macro- and microphysical properties of single-layer stratiform mixed-phase clouds are derived from multiple years of lidar, radar, and radiosonde observations. Measurements were made as part of the Mixed-Phase Arctic Clouds Experiment (MPACE) and the Study of Environmental Arctic Change (SEARCH) in Barrow, Alaska, and Eureka, Nunavut, Canada, respectively. Single-layer mixed-phase clouds occurred between 4% and 26% of the total time observed, varying with season and location. They had mean cloud-base heights between ∼700 and 2100 m and thicknesses between ∼200 and 700 m. Seasonal mean cloud optical depths ranged from 2.2 up. The clouds existed at temperatures of ∼242–271 K and occurred under different wind conditions, depending on season. Utilizing retrievals from a combination of lidar, radar, and microwave radiometer, mean cloud microphysical properties were derived, with mean liquid effective diameters estimated from 16 to 49 μm, mean liquid number densities on the order of 104–105 L−1, and mean water contents estimated between 0.07 and 0.28 g m−3. Ice precipitation was shown to have mean ice effective diameters of 50–125 μm, mean ice number densities on the order of 10 L−1, and mean water contents estimated between 0.012 and 0.031 g m−3. Mean cloud liquid water paths ranged from 25 to 100 g m−2. All results are compared to previous studies, and potential retrieval errors are discussed. Additionally, seasonal variation in macro- and microphysical properties was highlighted. Finally, fraction of liquid water to ice mass was shown to decrease with decreasing temperature.

scholarly journals Clouds at Arctic Atmospheric Observatories. Part II: Thermodynamic Phase Characteristics

2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 645-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Shupe
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Water ◽  
Microwave Radiometer ◽  
Winter Season ◽  
Lower Troposphere ◽  
Mixed Phase ◽  
Ice Clouds ◽  
Cloud Properties ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cloud Ice ◽  
Mixed Phase Clouds

Abstract Cloud phase defines many cloud properties and determines the ways in which clouds interact with other aspects of the climate system. The occurrence fraction and characteristics of clouds distinguished by their phase are examined at three Arctic atmospheric observatories. Each observatory has the basic suite of instruments that are necessary to identify cloud phase, namely, cloud radar, depolarization lidar, microwave radiometer, and twice-daily radiosondes. At these observatories, ice clouds are more prevalent than mixed-phase clouds, which are more prevalent than liquid-only clouds. Cloud ice occurs 60%–70% of the time over a typical year, at heights up to 11 km. Liquid water occurs at temperatures above −40°C and is increasingly more likely as temperatures increase. Within the temperature range from −40° to −30°C, liquid water occurs in 3%–5% of the observed cloudiness. Liquid water is found higher in the atmosphere when accompanied by ice; there are few liquid-only clouds above 3 km, although liquid in mixed-phase clouds occurs at heights up to about 7–8 km. Regardless of temperature or height, liquid water occurs 56% of the time at Barrow, Alaska, and at a western Arctic Ocean site, but only 32% of the time at Eureka, Nunavut, Canada. This significant difference in liquid occurrence is due to a relatively dry lower troposphere during summer at Eureka in addition to warmer cloud temperatures with more persistent liquid water layers at the far western locations. The most persistent liquid clouds at these locations occur continuously for more than 70 h in the autumn and more than 30 h in the winter. Ice clouds persist for much longer than do liquid clouds at Eureka and occur more frequently in the winter season, leading to a total cloud occurrence annual cycle that is distinct from the other observatories.

scholarly journals The Vertical Profile of Liquid and Ice Water Content in Midlatitude Mixed-Phase Altocumulus Clouds

2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 2487-2495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence D. Carey ◽  
Jianguo Niu ◽  
Ping Yang ◽  
J. Adam Kankiewicz ◽  
Vincent E. Larson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Content ◽  
Liquid Water ◽  
Cloud Microphysics ◽  
Mixed Phase ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Ice Water Content ◽  
Mixed Phase Clouds ◽  
Ice Water ◽  
Water Contents

Abstract The microphysical properties of mixed-phase altocumulus clouds are investigated using in situ airborne measurements acquired during the ninth Cloud Layer Experiment (CLEX-9) over a midlatitude location. Approximately ⅔ of the sampled profiles are supercooled liquid–topped altocumulus clouds characterized by mixed-phase conditions. The coexistence of measurable liquid water droplets and ice crystals begins at or within tens of meters of cloud top and extends down to cloud base. Ice virga is found below cloud base. Peak liquid water contents occur at or near cloud top while peak ice water contents occur in the lower half of the cloud or in virga. The estimation of ice water content from particle size data requires that an assumption be made regarding the particle mass–dimensional relation, resulting in potential error on the order of tens of percent. The highest proportion of liquid is typically found in the coldest (top) part of the cloud profile. This feature of the microphysical structure for the midlatitude mixed-phase altocumulus clouds is similar to that reported for mixed-phase clouds over the Arctic region. The results obtained for limited cases of midlatitude mixed-phase clouds observed during CLEX-9 may have an implication for the study of mixed-phase cloud microphysics, satellite remote sensing applications, and the parameterization of mixed-phase cloud radiative properties in climate models.

A 19-Month Record of Marine Aerosol–Cloud–Radiation Properties Derived from DOE ARM Mobile Facility Deployment at the Azores. Part I: Cloud Fraction and Single-Layered MBL Cloud Properties

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 3665-3682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiquan Dong ◽  
Baike Xi ◽  
Aaron Kennedy ◽  
Patrick Minnis ◽  
Robert Wood
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
High Pressure ◽  
Liquid Water ◽  
Mixed Boundary ◽  
Cloud Condensation Nuclei ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Microphysical Properties ◽  
Cloud Properties

Abstract A 19-month record of total and single-layered low (<3 km), middle (3–6 km), and high (>6 km) cloud fractions (CFs) and the single-layered marine boundary layer (MBL) cloud macrophysical and microphysical properties was generated from ground-based measurements at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program (ARM) Azores site between June 2009 and December 2010. This is the most comprehensive dataset of marine cloud fraction and MBL cloud properties. The annual means of total CF and single-layered low, middle, and high CFs derived from ARM radar and lidar observations are 0.702, 0.271, 0.01, and 0.106, respectively. Greater total and single-layered high (>6 km) CFs occurred during the winter, whereas single-layered low (<3 km) CFs were more prominent during summer. Diurnal cycles for both total and low CFs were stronger during summer than during winter. The CFs are bimodally distributed in the vertical with a lower peak at ~1 km and a higher peak between 8 and 11 km during all seasons, except summer when only the low peak occurs. Persistent high pressure and dry conditions produce more single-layered MBL clouds and fewer total clouds during summer, whereas the low pressure and moist air masses during winter generate more total and multilayered clouds, and deep frontal clouds associated with midlatitude cyclones. The seasonal variations of cloud heights and thickness are also associated with the seasonal synoptic patterns. The MBL cloud layer is low, warm, and thin with large liquid water path (LWP) and liquid water content (LWC) during summer, whereas during winter it is higher, colder, and thicker with reduced LWP and LWC. The cloud LWP and LWC values are greater at night than during daytime. The monthly mean daytime cloud droplet effective radius re values are nearly constant, while the daytime droplet number concentration Nd basically follows the LWC variation. There is a strong correlation between cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentration NCCN and Nd during January–May, probably due to the frequent low pressure systems because upward motion brings more surface CCN to cloud base (well-mixed boundary layer). During summer and autumn, the correlation between Nd and NCCN is not as strong as that during January–May because downward motion from high pressure systems is predominant. Compared to the compiled aircraft in situ measurements during the Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment (ASTEX), the cloud microphysical retrievals in this study agree well with historical aircraft data. Different air mass sources over the ARM Azores site have significant impacts on the cloud microphysical properties and surface CCN as demonstrated by great variability in NCCN and cloud microphysical properties during some months.

scholarly journals Impacts of Secondary Ice Production on Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds based on ARM Observations and CESM2

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Zhao ◽  
Xiaohong Liu ◽  
Vaughan T. J. Phillips ◽  
Sachin Patade
Keyword(s):  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Ice Nucleation ◽  
Number Concentration ◽  
Mixed Phase ◽  
Department Of Energy ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Ice Crystal ◽  
Ice Production ◽  
Mixed Phase Clouds

Abstract. For decades, measured ice crystal number concentrations have been found to be orders of magnitude higher than measured ice nucleating particles in moderately cold clouds. This observed discrepancy reveals the existence of secondary ice production (SIP) in addition to the primary ice nucleation. However, the importance of SIP relative to primary ice nucleation remains highly unclear. Furthermore, most weather and climate models do not represent well the SIP processes, leading to large biases in simulated cloud properties. This study demonstrates a first attempt to represent different SIP mechanisms (frozen raindrop shattering, ice-ice collisional break-up, and rime splintering) in a global climate model (GCM). The model is run in the single column mode to facilitate comparisons with the Department of Energy (DOE)'s Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment (M-PACE) observations. We show the SIP importance in the four types of clouds during M-PACE (i.e., multilayer, and single-layer stratus, transition, and front clouds), with the maximum enhancement in ice crystal number concentration by up to 4 orders of magnitude in the moderately-cold clouds. We reveal that SIP is the dominant source of ice crystals near the cloud base for the long-lived Arctic single-layer mixed-phase clouds. The model with SIP improves the occurrence and phase partitioning of the mixed-phase clouds, reverses the vertical distribution pattern of ice number concentration, and provides a better agreement with observations. The findings of this study highlight the importance of considering the SIP in GCMs.

scholarly journals Statistics on clouds and their relation to thermodynamic conditions at Ny-Ålesund using ground-based sensor synergy

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 4105-4126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Nomokonova ◽  
Kerstin Ebell ◽  
Ulrich Löhnert ◽  
Marion Maturilli ◽  
Christoph Ritter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Microwave Radiometer ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Mixed Phase ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Time Data ◽  
Liquid Water Path ◽  
Marine Research ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Water Path ◽  
Mixed Phase Clouds

Abstract. The French–German Arctic research base AWIPEV (the Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research – AWI – and the French Polar Institute Paul Emile Victor – PEV) at Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard, is a unique station for monitoring cloud-related processes in the Arctic. For the first time, data from a set of ground-based instruments at the AWIPEV observatory are analyzed to characterize the vertical structure of clouds. For this study, a 14-month dataset from Cloudnet combining observations from a ceilometer, a 94 GHz cloud radar, and a microwave radiometer is used. A total cloud occurrence of ∼81 %, with 44.8 % multilayer and 36 % single-layer clouds, was found. Among single-layer clouds the occurrence of liquid, ice, and mixed-phase clouds was 6.4 %, 9 %, and 20.6 %, respectively. It was found that more than 90 % of single-layer liquid and mixed-phase clouds have liquid water path (LWP) values lower than 100 and 200 g m−2, respectively. Mean values of ice water path (IWP) for ice and mixed-phase clouds were found to be 273 and 164 g m−2, respectively. The different types of single-layer clouds are also related to in-cloud temperature and the relative humidity under which they occur. Statistics based on observations are compared to ICOsahedral Non-hydrostatic (ICON) model output. Distinct differences in liquid-phase occurrence in observations and the model at different environmental temperatures lead to higher occurrence of pure ice clouds. A lower occurrence of mixed-phase clouds in the model at temperatures between −20 and −5 ∘C becomes evident. The analyzed dataset is useful for satellite validation and model evaluation.

scholarly journals Simultaneous and synergistic profiling of cloud and drizzle properties using ground-based observations

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie P. Rusli ◽  
David P. Donovan ◽  
Herman W. J. Russchenberg
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Water ◽  
Optimal Estimation ◽  
Liquid Water Content ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Unified Framework ◽  
Forward Models ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Brightness Temperatures ◽  
Microphysical Properties ◽  
Cloud Properties

Abstract. Despite the importance of radar reflectivity (Z) measurements in the retrieval of liquid water cloud properties, it remains non-trivial to interpret Z due to the possible presence of drizzle droplets within the clouds. So far, there has been no published work that utilizes Z to identify the presence of drizzle above the cloud base in an optimized and a physically-consistent manner. In this work, we develop a retrieval technique that exploits the synergy of different remote sensing systems to carry out this task and to subsequently profile the microphysical properties of the cloud and drizzle in a unified framework. This is accomplished by using ground-based measurements of Z, lidar attenuated backscatter below as well as above the cloud base, and microwave brightness temperatures. Fast physical forward models coupled to cloud and drizzle structure parametrization are used in an optimal estimation type framework in order to retrieve the best-estimate for the cloud and drizzle property profiles. The cloud retrieval is first evaluated using synthetic signals generated from large-eddy simulation output to verify the forward models used in the retrieval procedure and the vertical parametrization of the liquid water content. From this exercise it is found that, on average, the cloud properties can be retrieved within 5 % of the mean truth. The full cloud-drizzle retrieval method is then applied to a selected ACCEPT campaign dataset collected in Cabauw, The Netherlands. An assessment of the retrieval products is performed using three independent methods from the literature, each was specifically developed to retrieve only the cloud properties, the drizzle properties below the cloud base, or the drizzle fraction within the cloud, respectively. One-to-one comparisons, taking into account the uncertainties or limitations of each retrieval, show that our results are generally consistent with what is derived using the three independent methods.

scholarly journals Statistics on clouds and their relation to thermodynamic conditions at Ny-Ålesund using ground-based sensor synergy

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Nomokonova ◽  
Kerstin Ebell ◽  
Ulrich Löhnert ◽  
Marion Maturilli ◽  
Christoph Ritter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Microwave Radiometer ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Mixed Phase ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Time Data ◽  
Ice Clouds ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Cloud Temperature ◽  
Thermodynamic Conditions ◽  
Mixed Phase Clouds

Abstract. The French–German Arctic Research Base AWIPEV at Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard, is an unique station for monitoring cloud related processes in the Arctic. For the first time, data from a set of ground-based instruments at AWIPEV observatory are analyzed to characterize the vertical structure of clouds. For this study, a 14-month dataset from Cloudnet combining observations from a ceilometer, a 94 GHz cloud radar and a microwave radiometer, is used. The total cloud occurrence of 81 %, with 44.8 % of multi-layer and 36 % of single-layer clouds was found. Among single-layer clouds the occurrence of liquid, ice and mixed-phase clouds was 6.4 %, 9 % and 20.6 %, respectively. It was found, that more than 90 % of single-layer liquid and mixed-phase clouds have LWP values lower than 100 and 200 g m2, respectively. Mean values of IWP for ice and mixed-phase clouds were found to be 273 and 164 g m2, respectively. The different types of single-layer clouds are also related to in-cloud temperature and relative humidity under which they occur. Statistics based on observations are compared to the ICON model output. Distinct differences in liquid phase occurrence in observations and the model at different environmental temperatures leading to higher occurrence of pure ice clouds and lower occurrence of mixed-phase clouds in the model at temperatures between −20° and −5 °C become evident. The analyzed dataset is useful for satellite validation and model evaluation.

scholarly journals Arctic Mixed-Phase Cloud Properties from AERI Lidar Observations: Algorithm and Results from SHEBA

2005 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 427-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. D. Turner
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Water ◽  
Heat Budget ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Precipitable Water ◽  
Mixed Phase ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Retrieval Algorithm ◽  
Cloud Optical Depth ◽  
Microphysical Properties ◽  
Ice Particles

Abstract A new approach to retrieve microphysical properties from mixed-phase Arctic clouds is presented. This mixed-phase cloud property retrieval algorithm (MIXCRA) retrieves cloud optical depth, ice fraction, and the effective radius of the water and ice particles from ground-based, high-resolution infrared radiance and lidar cloud boundary observations. The theoretical basis for this technique is that the absorption coefficient of ice is greater than that of liquid water from 10 to 13 μm, whereas liquid water is more absorbing than ice from 16 to 25 μm. MIXCRA retrievals are only valid for optically thin (τvisible < 6) single-layer clouds when the precipitable water vapor is less than 1 cm. MIXCRA was applied to the Atmospheric Emitted Radiance Interferometer (AERI) data that were collected during the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) experiment from November 1997 to May 1998, where 63% of all of the cloudy scenes above the SHEBA site met this specification. The retrieval determined that approximately 48% of these clouds were mixed phase and that a significant number of clouds (during all 7 months) contained liquid water, even for cloud temperatures as low as 240 K. The retrieved distributions of effective radii for water and ice particles in single-phase clouds are shown to be different than the effective radii in mixed-phase clouds.

scholarly journals Properties of Arctic liquid and mixed phase clouds from ship-borne Cloudnet observations during ACSE 2014

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peggy Achtert ◽  
Ewan J. O'Connor ◽  
Ian M. Brooks ◽  
Georgia Sotiropoulou ◽  
Matthew D. Shupe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Content ◽  
Liquid Water ◽  
Liquid Water Content ◽  
Mixed Phase ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Ice Clouds ◽  
Ice Water Content ◽  
Mixed Phase Clouds ◽  
Ice Water ◽  
Cloud Top Temperature

Abstract. This study presents Cloudnet retrievals of Arctic clouds from measurements conducted during a three-month research expedition along the Siberian shelf during summer and autumn 2014. During autumn, we find a strong reduction in the occurrence of liquid clouds and an increase for both mixed-phase and ice clouds at low levels compared to summer. About 80 % of all liquid clouds observed during the research cruise show a liquid water path below the infra-red black body limit of approximately 50 g m−2. The majority of mixed-phase and ice clouds had an ice water path below 20 g m−2. Cloud properties are analysed with respect to cloud-top temperature and boundary layer structure. Changes in these parameters have little effect on the geometric thickness of liquid clouds while mixed-phase clouds during warm-air advection events are generally thinner than when such events were absent. Cloud-top temperatures are very similar for all mixed-phase clouds. However, more cases of lower cloud-top temperature were observed in the absence of warm-air advection. Profiles of liquid and ice water content are normalised with respect to cloud base and height. For liquid water clouds, the liquid water content profile reveals a strong increase with height with a maximum within the upper quarter of the clouds followed by a sharp decrease towards cloud top. Liquid water content is lowest for clouds observed below an inversion during warm-air advection events. Most mixed-phase clouds show a liquid water content profile with a very similar shape to that of liquid clouds but with lower maximum values during warm-air advection. The normalised ice water content profiles in mixed-phase clouds look different from that of liquid water content. They show a wider range in maximum values with lowest ice water content for clouds below an inversion and highest values for clouds above or extending through an inversion. The ice water content profile generally peaks at a height below the peak in the liquid water content profile – usually in the centre of the cloud, sometimes closer to cloud base, likely due to particle sublimation as the crystals fall through the cloud.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document