scholarly journals The Role of Atmosphere Feedbacks during ENSO in the CMIP3 Models. Part III: The Shortwave Flux Feedback

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 4275-4293 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Lloyd ◽  
Eric Guilyardi ◽  
Hilary Weller
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Southern Oscillation ◽  
Dominant Role ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Dynamical Response ◽  
Eastern Equatorial Pacific ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
High Level ◽  
Sst Anomalies

Abstract Previous studies using coupled general circulation models (GCMs) suggest that the atmosphere model plays a dominant role in the modeled El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), and that intermodel differences in the thermodynamical damping of sea surface temperatures (SSTs) are a dominant contributor to the ENSO amplitude diversity. This study presents a detailed analysis of the shortwave flux feedback (αSW) in 12 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 3 (CMIP3) simulations, motivated by findings that αSW is the primary contributor to model thermodynamical damping errors. A “feedback decomposition method,” developed to elucidate the αSW biases, shows that all models underestimate the dynamical atmospheric response to SSTs in the eastern equatorial Pacific, leading to underestimated αSW values. Biases in the cloud response to dynamics and the shortwave interception by clouds also contribute to errors in αSW. Changes in the αSW feedback between the coupled and corresponding atmosphere-only simulations are related to changes in the mean dynamics. A large nonlinearity is found in the observed and modeled SW flux feedback, hidden when linearly calculating αSW. In the observations, two physical mechanisms are proposed to explain this nonlinearity: 1) a weaker subsidence response to cold SST anomalies than the ascent response to warm SST anomalies and 2) a nonlinear high-level cloud cover response to SST. The shortwave flux feedback nonlinearity tends to be underestimated by the models, linked to an underestimated nonlinearity in the dynamical response to SST. The process-based methodology presented in this study may help to correct model ENSO atmospheric biases, ultimately leading to an improved simulation of ENSO in GCMs.

Evaluation of the tail of the probability distribution of daily and sub-daily precipitation in CMIP6 models

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-61
Author(s):  
Jesse Norris ◽  
Alex Hall ◽  
J. David Neelin ◽  
Chad W. Thackeray ◽  
Di Chen
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Daily Precipitation ◽  
Precipitation Amount ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Lower Troposphere ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Cloud Tops ◽  
The Tropics ◽  
Fraction Models

AbstractDaily and sub-daily precipitation extremes in historical Coupled-Model-Intercomparison-Project-Phase-6 (CMIP6) simulations are evaluated against satellite-based observational estimates. Extremes are defined as the precipitation amount exceeded every x years, ranging from 0.01–10, encompassing the rarest events that are detectable in the observational record without noisy results. With increasing temporal resolution there is an increased discrepancy between models and observations: for daily extremes the multi-model median underestimates the highest percentiles by about a third, and for 3-hourly extremes by about 75% in the tropics. The novelty of the current study is that, to understand the model spread, we evaluate the 3-D structure of the atmosphere when extremes occur. In midlatitudes, where extremes are simulated predominantly explicitly, the intuitive relationship exists whereby higher-resolution models produce larger extremes (r=–0.49), via greater vertical velocity. In the tropics, the convective fraction (the fraction of precipitation simulated directly from the convective scheme) is more relevant. For models below 60% convective fraction, precipitation amount decreases with convective fraction (r=–0.63), but above 75% convective fraction, this relationship breaks down. In the lower-convective-fraction models, there is more moisture in the lower troposphere, closer to saturation. In the higher-convective-fraction models, there is deeper convection and higher cloud tops, which appears to be more physical. Thus, the low-convective models are mostly closer to the observations of extreme precipitation in the tropics, but likely for the wrong reasons. These inter-model differences in the environment in which extremes are simulated hold clues into how parameterizations could be modified in general circulation models to produce more credible 21st-Century projections.

scholarly journals Evaluation of a unique approach to high-resolution climate modeling using the Model for Prediction Across Scales – Atmosphere (MPAS-A) version 5.1

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 3725-3743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison C. Michaelis ◽  
Gary M. Lackmann ◽  
Walter A. Robinson
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Southern Oscillation ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
General Circulation Models

Abstract. We present multi-seasonal simulations representative of present-day and future environments using the global Model for Prediction Across Scales – Atmosphere (MPAS-A) version 5.1 with high resolution (15 km) throughout the Northern Hemisphere. We select 10 simulation years with varying phases of El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and integrate each for 14.5 months. We use analyzed sea surface temperature (SST) patterns for present-day simulations. For the future climate simulations, we alter present-day SSTs by applying monthly-averaged temperature changes derived from a 20-member ensemble of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5) general circulation models (GCMs) following the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 emissions scenario. Daily sea ice fields, obtained from the monthly-averaged CMIP5 ensemble mean sea ice, are used for present-day and future simulations. The present-day simulations provide a reasonable reproduction of large-scale atmospheric features in the Northern Hemisphere such as the wintertime midlatitude storm tracks, upper-tropospheric jets, and maritime sea-level pressure features as well as annual precipitation patterns across the tropics. The simulations also adequately represent tropical cyclone (TC) characteristics such as strength, spatial distribution, and seasonal cycles for most Northern Hemisphere basins. These results demonstrate the applicability of these model simulations for future studies examining climate change effects on various Northern Hemisphere phenomena, and, more generally, the utility of MPAS-A for studying climate change at spatial scales generally unachievable in GCMs.

scholarly journals Bias-corrected climate projections for South Asia from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project-6

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vimal Mishra ◽  
Udit Bhatia ◽  
Amar Deep Tiwari
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Impact Assessment ◽  
South Asia ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
River Basins ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Intercomparison Project

Abstract Climate change is likely to pose enormous challenges for agriculture, water resources, infrastructure, and livelihood of millions of people living in South Asia. Here, we develop daily bias-corrected data of precipitation, maximum and minimum temperatures at 0.25° spatial resolution for South Asia (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, and Sri Lanka) and 18 river basins located in the Indian sub-continent. The bias-corrected dataset is developed using Empirical Quantile Mapping (EQM) for the historic (1951–2014) and projected (2015–2100) climate for the four scenarios (SSP126, SSP245, SSP370, SSP585) using output from 13 General Circulation Models (GCMs) from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project-6 (CMIP6). The bias-corrected dataset was evaluated against the observations for both mean and extremes of precipitation, maximum and minimum temperatures. Bias corrected projections from 13 CMIP6-GCMs project a warmer (3–5°C) and wetter (13–30%) climate in South Asia in the 21st century. The bias-corrected projections from CMIP6-GCMs can be used for climate change impact assessment in South Asia and hydrologic impact assessment in the sub-continental river basins.

Mechanism of the Double peaked El Nino

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Na-Yeon Shin ◽  
Jong-Seong Kug ◽  
Felicity S. McCormack ◽  
Neil J. Holbrook
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Heat Budget ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Warm Pool ◽  
Eastern Pacific ◽  
Dynamical Analysis ◽  
Cold Tongue ◽  
Central Pacific ◽  
Sst Anomalies

<p>   In the past decades, our understanding of the ENSO phenomenon increased steadily. Especially, one of the most interesting topics was the El Niño type because of the different global impacts. The classic classification is the two types of the El Niño and there are various terms to refer this. The conventional El Niño is called the Cold tongue El Niño or the Eastern pacific El Niño. And the other type of the El Niño is called the Warm pool El Niño, the Central pacific El Niño, the El Niño Modoki or the dateline El Niño. However, in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project version 5 (CMIP5) Coupled General Circulation Models (CGCMs) results, those have been shown the Double peaked El Niño events which are the new type of the El Niño due to the climatological cold tongue bias. Double peaked El Niño events are defined as a positive sea surface temperature anomalies are separated into two centers (in Western and Eastern Pacific) and grow individually and simultaneously, and the peak of SST anomalies exceeds the threshold.</p><p>   Double peaked El Niño events are found in not only the models, but also the observations. But there are no dynamical analysis of observations. In this study, the mechanism giving rise to Double peaked El Niño in observation is examined by analyzing the mixed layer heat budget equation and comparing with the Warm Pool El Niño and Cold tongue El Niño.</p><p>   The warm SST anomalies of the western peak and the eastern peak are caused by different dynamic mechanism. Western peaks of Double peaked El Niño are similar to the Warm Pool El Niño. Those can be developed by Zonal advection feedback terms and negative anomalous wind speed, whereas eastern peaks of Double peaked El Niño are different from Warm pool El Niño. Thermocline feedback term considerably contribute to the occurrence of eastern peak. Differences of intensity of the precipitation(4-8N, 195-225E) derive other significant differences of the zonal wind stress(5S-5N, 170-200E), sea level(5S-5N, 230-250E) and zonal current(5S-5N, 230-250E). Thus, the process above can induce the eastern peak of the Double peaked El Niño.</p>

scholarly journals An Assessment of Future Southern Hemisphere Blocking Using CMIP5 Projections from Four GCMs

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (21) ◽  
pp. 7599-7611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Parsons ◽  
James A. Renwick ◽  
Adrian J. McDonald
Keyword(s):  
Southern Hemisphere ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Southern Annular Mode ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Future Projections ◽  
South Pacific Ocean ◽  
Blocking Activity ◽  
Intercomparison Project

AbstractThis study is concerned with blocking events (BEs) in the Southern Hemisphere (SH), their past variability, and future projections. ERA-Interim (ERA-I) is used to compare the historical output from four general circulation models (GCMs) from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5); the output of the representative concentration pathway 4.5 and 8.5 (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) projections are also examined. ERA-I shows that the higher latitudes of the South Pacific Ocean (SPO) are the main blocking region, with blocking occurring predominantly in winter. The CMIP5 historical simulations also agree well with ERA-I for annual and seasonal BE locations and frequencies. A reduction in BEs is observed in the SPO in the 2071–2100 period in the RCP4.5 projections, and this is more pronounced for the RCP8.5 projections and occurs predominantly during the spring and summer seasons. Preliminary investigations imply that the southern annular mode (SAM) is negatively correlated with blocking activity in the SPO in all seasons in the reanalysis. This negative correlation is also observed in the GCM historical output. However, in the RCP projections this correlation is reduced in three of the four models during summer, suggesting that SAM may be less influential in summertime blocking in the future.

scholarly journals GCM Simulations of the Climate in the Central United States

2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 1016-1031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth E. Kunkel ◽  
Xin-Zhong Liang
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Scalar Fields ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Atmospheric Model ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Central United States ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Precipitation Changes

Abstract A diagnostic analysis of relationships between central U.S. climate characteristics and various flow and scalar fields was used to evaluate nine global coupled ocean–atmosphere general circulation models (CGCMs) participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). To facilitate identification of physical mechanisms causing biases, data from 21 models participating in the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) were also used for certain key analyses. Most models reproduce basic features of the circulation, temperature, and precipitation patterns in the central United States, although no model exhibits small differences from the observationally based data for all characteristics in all seasons. Model ensemble means generally produce better agreement with the observationally based data than any single model. A fall precipitation deficiency, found in all AMIP and CMIP models except the third-generation Hadley Centre CGCM (HadCM3), appears to be related in part to slight biases in the flow on the western flank of the Atlantic subtropical ridge. In the model mean, the ridge at 850 hPa is displaced slightly to the north and to the west, resulting in weaker southerly flow into the central United States. The CMIP doubled-CO2 transient runs show warming (1°–5°C) for all models and seasons and variable precipitation changes over the central United States. Temperature (precipitation) changes are larger (mostly less) than the variations that are observed in the twentieth century and the model variations in the control simulations.

scholarly journals A multi-diagnostic approach to cloud evaluation

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 2547-2566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith D. Williams ◽  
Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Model Development ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Cloud Amount ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Diagnostic Techniques ◽  
Model Errors ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Model Development Process

Abstract. Most studies evaluating cloud in general circulation models present new diagnostic techniques or observational datasets, or apply a limited set of existing diagnostics to a number of models. In this study, we use a range of diagnostic techniques and observational datasets to provide a thorough evaluation of cloud, such as might be carried out during a model development process. The methodology is illustrated by analysing two configurations of the Met Office Unified Model – the currently operational configuration at the time of undertaking the study (Global Atmosphere 6, GA6), and the configuration which will underpin the United Kingdom's Earth System Model for CMIP6 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6; GA7). By undertaking a more comprehensive analysis which includes compositing techniques, comparing against a set of quite different observational instruments and evaluating the model across a range of timescales, the risks of drawing the wrong conclusions due to compensating model errors are minimized and a more accurate overall picture of model performance can be drawn. Overall the two configurations analysed perform well, especially in terms of cloud amount. GA6 has excessive thin cirrus which is removed in GA7. The primary remaining errors in both configurations are the in-cloud albedos which are too high in most Northern Hemisphere cloud types and sub-tropical stratocumulus, whilst the stratocumulus on the cold-air side of Southern Hemisphere cyclones has in-cloud albedos which are too low.

scholarly journals Quantifying Uncertainty in the Modelling Process; Future Extreme Flood Event Projections Across the UK

Geosciences ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Cameron Ellis ◽  
Annie Visser-Quinn ◽  
Gordon Aitken ◽  
Lindsay Beevers
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Extreme Value ◽  
Extreme Flood ◽  
Emissions Scenarios ◽  
Rcp 8.5 ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Model Chain

With evidence suggesting that climate change is resulting in changes within the hydrologic cycle, the ability to robustly model hydroclimatic response is critical. This paper assesses how extreme runoff—1:2- and 1:30-year return period (RP) events—may change at a regional level across the UK by the 2080s (2069–2098). Capturing uncertainty in the hydroclimatic modelling chain, flow projections were extracted from the EDgE (End-to-end Demonstrator for improved decision-making in the water sector in Europe) multi-model ensemble: five Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) General Circulation Models and four hydrological models forced under emissions scenarios Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 2.6 and RCP 8.5 (5 × 4 × 2 chains). Uncertainty in extreme value parameterisation was captured through consideration of two methods: generalised extreme value (GEV) and generalised logistic (GL). The method was applied across 192 catchments and aggregated to eight regions. The results suggest that, by the 2080s, many regions could experience large increases in extreme runoff, with a maximum mean change signal of +34% exhibited in East Scotland (1:2-year RP). Combined with increasing urbanisation, these estimates paint a concerning picture for the future UK flood landscape. Model chain uncertainty was found to increase by the 2080s, though extreme value (EV) parameter uncertainty becomes dominant at the 1:30-year RP (exceeding 60% in some regions), highlighting the importance of capturing both the associated EV parameter and ensemble uncertainty.

scholarly journals Mid-Pliocene climate modelled using the UK Hadley Centre Model: PlioMIP Experiments 1 and 2

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 837-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. J. Bragg ◽  
D. J. Lunt ◽  
A. M. Haywood
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Concentration ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Coupled Models ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Proxy Reconstructions ◽  
Hadley Centre ◽  
The Uk

Abstract. The Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project (PlioMIP) project is a sub-project of the Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP) whose objective is to compare predictions of the mid-Pliocene climate from the widest possible range of general circulation models. The mid-Pliocene (3.3–3.0 Ma) is the most recent sustained period of greater warmth and atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration than the pre-industrial times and as such has potential to inform predictions of our warming climate in the coming century. This paper describes the UK contribution to PlioMIP using the Hadley Centre Model both in atmosphere-only mode (HadAM3, PlioMIP Experiment 1) and atmosphere-ocean coupled mode (HadCM3, PlioMIP Experiment 2). The coupled model predicts a greater overall warming (3.3 °C) relative to the control than the atmosphere-only (2.5 °C). The Northern Hemisphere latitudinal temperature gradient is greater in the coupled model with a warmer equator and colder Arctic than the atmosphere-only model, which is constrained by sea surface temperatures from Pliocene proxy reconstructions. The atmosphere-only model predicts a reduction in equatorial precipitation and south Asian monsoon intensity whereas the coupled models shows and increase in the intensity of these systems. Sensitivity studies using alternative boundary conditions for both the Pliocene and the control simulations are presented, which indicate the sensitivity of the mid-Pliocene warming to uncertainties in both pre-industrial and mid-Pliocene climate.

scholarly journals The Arctic Predictability and Prediction on Seasonal-to-Interannual TimEscales (APPOSITE) data set

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 8809-8833 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Day ◽  
S. Tietsche ◽  
M. Collins ◽  
H. F. Goessling ◽  
V. Guemas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Southern Oscillation ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Arctic Climate ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Initial Value ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Atmospheric Data ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
British Atmospheric Data Centre

Abstract. Recent decades have seen significant developments in seasonal-to-interannual timescale climate prediction capabilities. However, until recently the potential of such systems to predict Arctic climate had not been assessed. This paper describes a multi-model predictability experiment which was run as part of the Arctic Predictability and Prediction On Seasonal to Inter-annual Timescales (APPOSITE) project. The main goal of APPOSITE was to quantify the timescales on which Arctic climate is predictable. In order to achieve this, a coordinated set of idealised initial-value predictability experiments, with seven general circulation models, was conducted. This was the first model intercomparison project designed to quantify the predictability of Arctic climate on seasonal to inter-annual timescales. Here we present a description of the archived data set (which is available at the British Atmospheric Data Centre) and an update of the project's results. Although designed to address Arctic predictability, this data set could also be used to assess the predictability of other regions and modes of climate variability on these timescales, such as the El Niño Southern Oscillation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document