Spatial and Temporal Network Sampling Effects on the Correlation and Variance Structures of Rain Observations

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 187-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Jameson

Abstract Network observations are affected by the length of the temporal interval over which measurements are combined as well as by the size of the network. When the observation interval is small, only network size matters. Networks then act as high-pass filters that distort both the spatial correlation function ρr and, consequently, the variance spectrum. For an exponentially decreasing ρr, a method is presented for returning the observed spatial correlation to its original, intrinsic value. This can be accomplished for other forms of ρr. When the observation interval becomes large, however, advection enhances the contributions from longer wavelengths, leading to a distortion of ρr and the associated variance spectrum. However, there is no known way to correct for this effect, which means that the observation interval should be kept as small as possible in order to measure the spatial correlation correctly. Finally, it is shown that, in contrast to network measurements, remote sensing instruments act as low-pass filters, thus complicating comparisons between the two sets of observations. It is shown that when the network-observed spatial correlation function can be corrected to become a good estimate of the intrinsic spatial correlation function, the Fourier transform of this function (variance spectrum) can then be spatially low-pass filtered in a manner appropriate for the remote sensor. If desired, this filtered field can then be Fourier transformed to yield the spatial correlation function relevant to the remote sensor. The network and simulations of the remote sensor observations can then be compared to better understand the physics of differences between the two set of observations.

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 2689-2698 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Jameson

Abstract In previous work it was found that over a small network of disdrometers, the variability of probability size distributions (PSDs) expressed using the relative dispersion (RD; the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean) increased with the expansion of the network size. The explanation is that the network acts to integrate the Fourier transform of the spatial correlation function from smallest wavelengths to those comparable to the network size . Consequently, as increases, so do the variances at the different drop sizes. Thus, RD and PSD variability grow as increases. The limits to this growth, however, were not determined quantitatively. This finding is given fuller theoretical quantitative meaning over much larger dimensions by explicitly deriving the variance contributions at all the different drop sizes as well as for a variety of moments of the PSD by using spatial radial correlation functions estimated from temporal correlations. This is justifiable when the time for each observation is short. One example is provided. The relative dispersion of the PSD is dominated by fluctuations in the occurrences of the larger drops. The RDs of the raw moments are only a few percent of the PSD. Thus, approaches attempting to estimate radial correlation functions using, say, radar measurements of moments are of limited utility, a usefulness further compromised by the distortion of the correlation function by filtering over the beam dimension. These findings present a challenge for efforts to validate remote sensing measurements by ground truth experiments using networks.


2002 ◽  
Vol 123 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Tago ◽  
E. Saar ◽  
J. Einasto ◽  
M. Einasto ◽  
V. Müller ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 1386-1397 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Jameson ◽  
M. L. Larsen ◽  
A. B. Kostinski

Abstract Past studies of the variability of drop size distributions (DSDs) have used moments of the distribution such as the mass-weighted mean drop size as proxies for the entire size distribution. In this study, however, the authors separate the total number of drops Nt from the DSD leaving the probability size distributions (PSDs); that is, DSD = Nt × PSD. The variability of the PSDs are then considered using the frequencies of size [P(D)] values at each different drop diameter P(PD | D) over an ensemble of observations collected using a network of 21 optical disdrometers. The relative dispersions RD of P(PD | D) over all the drop diameters are used as a measure of PSD variability. An intrinsic PSD is defined as an average over one or more instruments excluding zero drop counts. It is found that variability associated with an intrinsic PSD fails to characterize its true variability over an area. It is also shown that this variability is not due to sampling limitations but rather originates for physical reasons. Furthermore, this variability increases with the expansion of the network size and with increasing drop diameter. A physical explanation is that the network acts to integrate the Fourier transform of the spatial correlation function from smaller toward larger wavelengths as the network size increases so that the contributions to the variance by all spatial wavelengths being sampled also increases. Consequently, RD and, hence, PSD variability will increase as the size of the area increases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document