Hanging Maneuver in Right Hepatectomy for Recurrent Metastases with Diaphragmatic Infiltration after Radiofrequency Ablation: A New Indication

2007 ◽  
Vol 73 (9) ◽  
pp. 884-887
Author(s):  
Gennaro Nuzzo ◽  
Felice Giuliante ◽  
Francesco Ardito ◽  
Maria Vellone ◽  
Ivo Giovannini

The liver hanging maneuver is a safe technique to prevent bleeding during transection when a right hepatectomy by an anterior approach, without previous mobilization of the liver, is required. This article proposes a new indication for this technique. The liver hanging maneuver may be useful during right hepatectomy for local recurrence of liver metastases previously treated by radiofrequency ablation (RFA). In these cases, necrosis or fibrosis induced by RFA and local recurrence may cause strong adhesions between liver parenchyma and the diaphragm, thus increasing the risk of bleeding during liver mobilization. Between January 2003 and March 2006, seven patients with recurrent colorectal liver metastases of the right hemiliver, after previous treatment by RFA, underwent right hepatectomy. Liver resection was feasible with the proposed technique in all patients. In four cases, a limited diaphragmatic resection was associated. There was no mortality. Postoperative morbidity was 42.8 per cent. An anterior approach with the liver hanging maneuver for recurrent liver metastases after RFA should be recommended when the metastases are located posteriorly, are not detachable from the diaphragm, and the preliminary mobilization of the right liver may be difficult.

2019 ◽  
Vol 103 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 80-86
Author(s):  
Gen Tsujio ◽  
Kenjiro Kimura ◽  
Yukie Tauchi ◽  
Go Ohira ◽  
Ryosuke Amano ◽  
...  

Introduction: The anterior approach to the inferior vena cava (IVC) by the liver hanging maneuver is effective in resecting large retrohepatic tumors without mobilizing the right lobe. Case presentation: A 50-year-old man was referred to our hospital with a diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. He had severe congestive heart failure and cardiac ejection fraction was 15%. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (US) showed an adrenal mass about 80 mm in diameter. The tumor-infiltrated posterior segment of the right hepatic lobe and tumor were widely attached to the IVC. After treatment of congestive heart failure with conservative therapy, surgery was planned. Right adrenectomy and right hepatectomy were performed, the latter using the liver hanging maneuver to avoid mobilizing the right lobe, and we were able to minimize blood pressure fluctuations and perform the operation safely. The histopathologic diagnosis was malignant pheochromocytoma. Conclusions: We performed right hepatectomy without mobilizing the right lobe by the liver hanging maneuver and minimized stimulation of the tumor. We could perform the operation safely using the liver hanging maneuver, which seems effective in such cases.


2016 ◽  
Vol 263 (1) ◽  
pp. e11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Vennarecci ◽  
Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri ◽  
Giuseppe Maria Ettorre

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15171-15171
Author(s):  
H. Hayashi ◽  
T. Beppu ◽  
J. Nasu ◽  
T. Masuda ◽  
T. Mizumoto ◽  
...  

15171 Background: Liver hanging maneuver is a new technique in anterior approach of major hepatectomy. However, the impact of the maneuver has never been fully investigated in patients with liver tumors. To evaluate the surgical benefits of liver hanging maneuver, we set up a comparative study in right-side major hepatectomy. Methods: From 2000 to 2006, 326 hepatectomy were performed in our institution. Fifty-eight patients with liver tumor (hepatocellularcarcinoma in 36, metastatic liver tumor in 13, and the others in 9) considered for right-side major hepatectomy were prospectively analyzed. Right-side hepatectomy included 26 right hepatectomy, 24 extended right hepatectomy, and 8 tri-segmentectomy. The patients were devided into a group with conventional approach (n = 21), a group with anterior approach without hanging maneuver (n = 19), and a group with approach with liver hanging maneuver (n = 18). In the three groups, age, body mass index, child-pugh classification, type of liver tumor, staging in hepatocellularcarcinoma, tumor size, resected liver weights, intraoperative blood loss, frequency of transfusion and surgical time were analyzed. Results: In conventional approach, anterior approach without hanging maneuver, and approach with liver hanging maneuver, mean age was 55, 59, and 65 years, and mean tumor size was 65, 75, and 108mm, respectively. Patients with liver hanging maneuver were significantly elder (p<0.05) and have larger tumor size (p<0.01). There were no significant differences in body mass index, child-pugh classification, type of liver tumor, staging in hepatocellularcarcinoma, and resected liver weights. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 1771, 805, and 704g, and mean surgical time was 562, 483, and 435minutes, and the frequency of red blood cell transfusion was 33, 21, and 17%, respectively. Patients with liver hanging maneuver had significantly less intraoperative blood loss (P=0.0001) and surgical time (P=0.002). The frequency of red blood cell transfusion in the liver hanging maneuver group was significantly lower than that of the conventional group (p<0.05). Postoperative morbidity rate were 33.3, 15.8, and 16.7%, respectively. Conclusions: Liver hanging maneuver is less invasive and a quite useful method for right-side major hepatectomy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


HPB Surgery ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew McKay ◽  
Katherine Fradette ◽  
Jeremy Lipschitz

Recently some have called for randomized controlled trials comparing RFA to hepatic resection, particularly for patients with only a few small metastases. The objectives were to compare local recurrence and survival following RFA and hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. This was a retrospective review of open RFA and hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases between January 1998 and May 2007. All patients who had RFA were considered to have unresectable disease. 58 patients had hepatic resection and 43 had RFA. A 5-year survival after resection was 43% compared to 23% after RFA. For patients with solitary lesions, a 5-year survival was 48% after resection and 15% after RFA. Sixty percent of patients suffered local recurrences after RFA compared to 7% after hepatic resection. RFA is inferior to resection. The results observed in this study support the consensus that RFA cannot be considered an equivalent procedure to hepatic resection.


2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 4732-4733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Takahashi ◽  
Go Wakabayashi ◽  
Hiroyuki Nitta ◽  
Daiki Takeda ◽  
Yasushi Hasegawa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document