A Rare Case of Urinothorax as a Result of Penetrating Trauma

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110508
Author(s):  
Casey Connors ◽  
Zaheer Faizi ◽  
Asanthi Ratnasekera

Urinothorax, defined as urine within the pleural space, is an uncommon finding in published trauma literature. To date, there are less than ten recorded cases of non-iatrogenic trauma-induced urinothorax, most resulting from blunt traumatic injuries from motor vehicle collisions. Given the rarity of the condition, the diagnosis is often missed or delayed. Once the diagnosis is suspected, the most reliable finding is a pleural fluid to serum creatinine ratio of >1. A confirmed diagnosis of urinothorax then requires drainage of pleural fluid and management of distal ureteral obstruction. Unfortunately, the added complexity of the poly-trauma patient obscures this difficult diagnosis often leading to a delay in treatment and prolonged hospital stay. No current published literature exists on penetrating trauma as a cause of urinothorax. Here, we describe a unique case of urinothorax in a 32-year-old male as a result of penetrating trauma.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcos Aranda ◽  
Dana Poloni ◽  
Elisabeth Coffin ◽  
Bryan Hendren

ABSTRACT Introduction Physical profiling is critical to the individual medical readiness of all military service members. This classification system provides detailed information about an individual’s functional abilities. Profile information is used in determining whether a service member is medically deployable or non-deployable. Limited research has been conducted on the impact of acute traumatic injuries on duty status and profiles in the non-deployed setting. The purpose of this study was to characterize injured service members presenting to a CONUS MTF emergency department whose acute traumatic injury resulted in a profile. Materials and Methods A retrospective review of patients who presented to the Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center emergency department with traumatic injuries from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019, was performed. Patients were identified by searching electronic encounter records for trauma-specific ICD-10 codes. Returned patient records were then reviewed for active duty status, branch, age, gender, rank, mechanism, protective equipment, substance use, procedures, and disposition. Profiles of soldiers were reviewed for indication and duration. Patients with profiles were compared to those without profiles. Correlation with age was determined by t-test, correlation with profile length was determined by ANOVA, and correlation with the remaining categorical variables was determined with chi-squared analysis. Results Eight hundred and thirty-two service members were reviewed. One hundred and eight (13%) soldiers had a profile. Patients were 23.2% female with no difference between the two groups. Patients were an average of 28.7 years old. The most common mechanisms were physical training (PT) (33.1%) and falls (12.9%). Physical training and motor vehicle collisions were more common in the profile group. Combatives and crush injuries of the hand were less common in the profile group. Major procedures were more common in the profile group, and minor procedures were less common. Admissions, quarters, immediate referrals, and release without limitations were more common in the profile group. The mean duration of profiles was 48.9 days, and 7.4% were permanent. Conclusions Non-battle injuries in the garrison setting are a significant threat to readiness. This analysis of acute traumatic injuries suggests that mechanism of injury was similar to previous reports with PT and falls being most common. Interventions should be targeted at PT and motor vehicle collisions as these were more common in the profile group. This series is also similar to previous reports that extremity injuries are the most common cause of profiles. However, TBIs were more common in our analysis. Further research that encompasses all garrison MTF acute traumatic injuries is needed to define the true impact on readiness and guide development of injury prevention strategies.


2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 4-7
Author(s):  
Charles N. Brooks ◽  
Christopher R. Brigham

Abstract Multiple factors determine the likelihood, type, and severity of bodily injury following a motor vehicle collision and, in turn, influence the need for treatment, extent of disability, and likelihood of permanent impairment. Among the most important factors is the change in velocity due to an impact (Δv). Other factors include the individual's strength and elasticity, body position at the time of impact, awareness of the impending impact (ie, opportunity to brace, guard, or contract muscles before an impact), and effects of braking. Because Δv is the area under the acceleration vs time curve, it combines force and duration and is a useful way to quantify impact severity. The article includes a table showing the results of a literature review that concluded, “the consensus of human subject research conducted to date is that a single exposure to a rear-end impact with a Δv of 5 mph or less is unlikely to result in injury” in most healthy, restrained occupants. Because velocity incorporates direction as well as speed, a vehicular occupant is less likely to be injured in a rear impact than when struck from the side. Evaluators must consider multiple factors, including the occupant's pre-existing physical and psychosocial status, the mechanism and magnitude of the collision, and a variety of biomechanical variables. Recommendations based solely on patient history and physical findings (and, perhaps, imaging studies) may be ill-informed.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Author(s):  
James K. Kuan ◽  
Robert Kaufman ◽  
Jonathan L. Wright ◽  
Charles Mock ◽  
Avery B. Nathens ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Tim Nutbeam ◽  
Rob Fenwick ◽  
Jason Smith ◽  
Omar Bouamra ◽  
Lee Wallis ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) are a common cause of major trauma and death. Following an MVC, up to 40% of patients will be trapped in their vehicle. Extrication methods are focused on the prevention of secondary spinal injury through movement minimisation and mitigation. This approach is time consuming and patients may have time-critical injuries. The purpose of this study is to describe the outcomes and injuries of those trapped following an MVC: this will help guide meaningful patient-focused interventions and future extrication strategies. Methods We undertook a retrospective database study using the Trauma Audit and Research Network database. Patients were included if they were admitted to an English hospital following an MVC from 2012 to 2018. Patients were excluded when their outcomes were not known or if they were secondary transfers. Results This analysis identified 426,135 cases of which 63,625 patients were included: 6983 trapped and 56,642 not trapped. Trapped patients had a higher mortality (8.9% vs 5.0%, p < 0.001). Spinal cord injuries were rare (0.71% of all extrications) but frequently (50.1%) associated with other severe injuries. Spinal cord injuries were more common in patients who were trapped (p < 0.001). Injury Severity Score (ISS) was higher in the trapped group 18 (IQR 10–29) vs 13 (IQR 9–22). Trapped patients had more deranged physiology with lower blood pressures, lower oxygen saturations and lower Glasgow Coma Scale, GCS (all p < 0.001). Trapped patients had more significant injuries of the head chest, abdomen and spine (all p < 0.001) and an increased rate of pelvic injures with significant blood loss, blood loss from other areas or tension pneumothorax (all p < 0.001). Conclusion Trapped patients are more likely to die than those who are not trapped. The frequency of spinal cord injuries is low, accounting for < 0.7% of all patients extricated. Patients who are trapped are more likely to have time-critical injuries requiring intervention. Extrication takes time and when considering the frequency, type and severity of injuries reported here, the benefit of movement minimisation may be outweighed by the additional time taken. Improved extrication strategies should be developed which are evidence-based and allow for the expedient management of other life-threatening injuries.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 101091
Author(s):  
Christine M. Wickens ◽  
Anca R. Ialomiteanu ◽  
Patricia Di Ciano ◽  
Gina Stoduto ◽  
Robert E. Mann

2021 ◽  
pp. 194338752199173
Author(s):  
Kevin Hong ◽  
James Jeong ◽  
Yehudah N. Susson ◽  
Shelly Abramowicz

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess patterns of maxillofacial trauma in the pediatric population in Atlanta. This information is important to help guide management and allocate resources for treatment of maxillofacial injuries at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta (CHOA). Methods: This study was a retrospective chart review of children who presented from 2006 to 2015. Inclusion criteria were: (1) age 18 years old or younger, (2) presentation to emergency department, (3) diagnosis of maxillofacial fractures, and (4) evaluation by Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Otolaryngology, or Plastic Surgery services. Medical records were reviewed to record demographic, mechanism of injury, fracture location, and yearly incidence of injury. Descriptive statistics were computed to summarize findings and overall trends. Results: During the study period, 39,833 patients were identified. Of them, 1995 met the inclusion criteria. The majority were male (n = 1359, 68%) with an average age of 9.4 years old (range of 1 month to 18 years old). Mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle collisions (MVC) (n = 597, 29.9%), fall (n = 565, 28.3%), sports injury (n = 317, 15.9%), pedestrian struck (n = 215, 10.8%), assault/abuse (n = 204, 10.2%), other (n = 81, 4.1%), or gunshot wound (n = 16, 0.8%). Fracture sites were mandible (n = 519, 26%), complex (n = 479, 24%), nasal (n = 419, 21%), dentoalveolar (n = 279, 14%), orbital (n = 259, 13%), and maxilla (n = 40, 2%). Males had a higher incidence of assault than females (n = 185, 91% of assaults). The incidence of maxillofacial trauma increased with age with a peak incidence in 13 to 16-year-olds (n = 566, 28.3%). During the years examined, there was an upward trend in MVCs as the etiology with a peak incidence of facial fractures due to MVCs occurring in 2015. All other mechanisms remained constant during this time period. Conclusions: There was an increase in pediatric facial fractures secondary to motor vehicle collisions from 2007 to 2015 despite improvements in regulations, traffic safety, and technology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document