XVIII Tolerance of the Normal Human Ear to Topical Dimethyl Sulfoxide

1966 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 208-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles P. Lebo ◽  
Paul E. Poenisch ◽  
William S. McAfee
1970 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
KC Toran ◽  
BK Lal

Introduction: Endotracheal intubation can produce various degrees of temporary and sometimes permanent damage to the laryngotracheal mechanism. Recent development of computer based voice analysis technology can now detect a minute changes in acoustic waveforms which a normal human ear cannot. In the study we compared and analyzed the acoustic waveforms of 35 patients undergoing surgery under intubation anaesthesia. Objective: The aim of the present series is to analyze the effects of short term intubation with computerized voice laboratory. Materials and methods: Values of acoustic waveforms obtained from 35 patients were compared 48 hours after the short term endotracheal intubation anaesthesia. The comparisons were made in terms of perturbation (jitter and shimmer), harmonic- to noise ratio (HNR) and fundamental frequency (F0). Results: The pre-intubated voice characteristics when compared with the post-intubation group did not reveal any statistical difference (P>0.05). However, there was only a minimal decrease in F0. Conclusion: The study revealed that, short term intubation anaesthesia does not alter the acoustic characteristics. The analysis of acoustic waveforms is a non invasive technique that helps to evaluate the effects of tracheal intubation on laryngeal function, a technique that warrants further evaluation. Key words: Acoustic characteristics; Endotracheal intubation; Voice DOI: 10.3126/kumj.v8i1.3219 Kathmandu University Medical Journal (2010), Vol. 8, No. 1, Issue 29, 35-39


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
Li Zhuo ◽  
Xiaoguang Li ◽  
Zhiyong Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1957 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merle Lawrence ◽  
Phillip A. Yantis
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 187 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 110.e1-110.e7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiarella Sforza ◽  
Gaia Grandi ◽  
Miriam Binelli ◽  
Davide G. Tommasi ◽  
Riccardo Rosati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
L. K. Doraiswamy

Ultrasonics or ultrasound refers to sound waves beyond the audible range of the human ear. The normal human hearing range is 16-16,000 cycles per second. The accepted terminology for one cycle per second is the Hertz (or Hz), and hence the hearing range is expressed as 16 Hz to 16kHz. Ultrasound is normally considered to lie approximately in the range of 15kHz to 10 MHz, that is, 15 x 103 to 10000 x 103 cycles per second, with acoustic wavelengths of 10 to 0.01 cm. Like any sound wave, ultrasound is propagated through a medium in alternating cycles of compression and stretching or rarefaction. These produce certain effects in the medium that can be usefully exploited. One such application is in the field of synthetic organic chemistry, first reported by Richards and Loomis (1927) and designated sonochemistry. The most appealing feature of sonochemistry is its ability to enhance reaction rates, often to remarkably high levels under environmentally benign conditions. Despite this potential, economic considerations have precluded the use of sonochemical processes. It is noteworthy, however, that a change in perspective appears to be emerging, as evidenced by the fact that a pilot plant is currently being funded by a French company to sonochemically oxidize cyclohexanol to cyclohexanone, and developmental work is underway in Germany to produce 4 tons of Grignard reagent per year (Ondrey et al., 1996). A number of books and reviews covering mostly the chemical aspects of sonochemistry have appeared over the years, for example, Suslick, 1988, 198, 1990a,b; Ley and Low, 1989; Mason, 1986, 1990a,b, 1991; Mason and Lorime 1989; Price, 1992; Bremner, 1994; Low, 1995; Luche, 1998. A recent review Thompson and Doraiswamy (1999) covers both the chemical and engineering aspects of sonochemistry and another by Keil and Swamy (1999) examines the present state of our understanding of sonoreactor design. Sonochemical enhancement of reaction rates is caused by a phenomenon called cavitation. Therefore, we largely confine the treatment in this chapter to the chemical and reaction engineering (scale-up) aspects of cavitation and its associated effects (see Shah et al., 1999, for a detailed treatment). An alternative means of achieving the same result is by mimicking the ultrasonic effect by inducing “hydrodynamic cavitation.”


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document