Is There a “Direct” Answer: Should We Perform Exchange Transfusion for Neonatal Predominantly Conjugated Hyperbilirubinemia?

2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 221-225
Author(s):  
Ori Hochwald ◽  
Liron Borenstein-Levin ◽  
Gil Dinur ◽  
Amir Kugelman
Author(s):  
Erbu Yarci ◽  
Cuneyt Tayman ◽  
Ufuk Cakir ◽  
Utku Serkant

Background:: Hyperviscosity of blood secondary to polycythemia results in increased resistance to blood flow and decrease in delivery of oxygen. Objective:: To evaluate whether serum endocan, NSE and IMA levels can be compared in terms of endothelial injury/ dysfunction and neuronal damage in term neonates with polycythemia who underwent PET. Methods:: 38 symptomatic polycythemic newborns having PET and 38 healthy newborns were included in the study. Blood samples for endocan, NSE and IMA were taken at only postnatal 24 hours of age in the control group and in polycytemia group just before PET, at 24 and 72 hours after PET. Results:: The polycythemia group had higher serum endocan(1073,4 ± 644,8 vs. 378,8 ± 95,9ng/ml; p<0.05), IMA(1,32 ± 0,34 vs.0,601 ± 0,095absorbance unit; p<0.05) and NSE(44,7 ± 4,3 vs. 26,91 ± 7,12μg/l; p<0.05) levels than control group before the PET procedure. At 24 hours after PET, IMA(0,656 ± 0,07 vs. 0,601 ± 0,095absorbance unit; p<0.05) and endocan(510,9 ± 228,6 vs. 378,8 ± 95,9ng/ml; p<0.05) levels were closer to the control group, being still statistically significant higher. NSE levels decreased to control group levels having no difference between the PET and control groups at 24 hours after PET (28,98 ± 6,5 vs. 26,91 ± 7,12μg/l; p>0.05). At 72 hours after PET the polycythemia and control groups did not differ statistically for IMA, endocan and NSE levels (p>0.05). Conclusion:: Serum endocan and IMA levels can be used as a biomarker for endothelial damage / dysfunction and tissue hypoxia in infants with symptomatic polycytemia.


2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Martin Potthast ◽  
Matthias Hagen ◽  
Benno Stein

No Web technology has undergone such an impressive evolution as Web search engines did and still do. Starting with the promise of "Bringing order to the Web" 1 by compiling information sources matching a query, retrieval technology has been evolving to a kind of "oracle machinery", being able to recommend a single source, and even to provide direct answers extracted from that source. Notwithstanding the remarkable progress made and the apparent user preferences for direct answers, this paradigm shift comes at a price which is higher than one might expect at first sight, affecting both users and search engine developers in their own way. We call this tradeoff "the dilemma of the direct answer"; it deserves an analysis which has to go beyond system-oriented aspects but scrutinize the way our society deals with both their information needs and means to information access. The paper in hand contributes to this analysis by putting the evolution of retrieval technology and the expectations at it in the context of information retrieval history. Moreover, we discuss the trade offs in information behavior and information system design that users and developers may face in the future.


Vox Sanguinis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon F. Watchko ◽  
M. Jeffrey Maisels

Blood ◽  
1965 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 805-818 ◽  
Author(s):  
HAROLD R. ROBERTS ◽  
MARGARET B. SCALES ◽  
JOHN T. MADISON ◽  
WILLIAM P. WEBSTER ◽  
GEORGE D. PENICK

Abstract Factor VIII inhibitors which developed in four patients with hemophilia A are described. These inhibitors are apparently specific for Factor VIII and are capable of inducing a transient hemophilic state when injected into dogs. The genesis, properties, and mode of action of these inhibitors can be explained on an immunologic basis and it seems most likely that they represent an antibody to Factor VIII. One hemophilia A patient, with retroperitoneal hematoma and a potent Factor VIII inhibitor, was successfully treated by an exchange transfusion followed by administration of purified porcine Factor VIII.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document