Container Characteristics and Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift1

Author(s):  
Arun Garg ◽  
U. Saxena

A laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the effects of handles, shape of the container, and dimensions of the container on maximum acceptable weight of lift using a psychophysical methodology. Ten male college students were required to lift six different boxes with handles, six without handles, and three different mailbags from the floor to a bench height (76 cm), using a free-style lifting technique. The six boxes varied in length and width, and the three mailbags varied in diameter and length. Statistical analysis showed that the maximum acceptable weights for mailbags and boxes without handles were lower than those for boxes with handles. The maximum acceptable weight significantly increased with an increase in dimensions of the mailbag. Among all the container characteristics studied, handles were found to have the most profound effect on maximum acceptable weight. It is concluded that the recommendations for maximum acceptable weight of the load based on boxes with handles need to be adjusted when applied to boxes without handles or to some other types of containers.

1979 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 179-182
Author(s):  
Arun Garg ◽  
U. Saxena

A laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the effects of couplings, shape of the container, and width of the tote box on maximum acceptable weight of lift. Ten male college students were required to lift three different tote boxes with handles, one tote box without handles and one mailbag from floor to a bench height (76 cm). A psychophysical methodology was employed to determine the maximum acceptable weight of lift. The results indicated that size, shape and couplings are significant variables to consider when establishing guidelines for maximum acceptable weight.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Price Wolf ◽  
Michael Prior ◽  
Brittany Machado ◽  
Kristen Torp ◽  
Annie Tsai

1974 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1031-1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger L. Terry ◽  
Sarah L. Ertel

Liking scores for hostile, sexual, and nontendentious cartoons were correlated with personality factor scores of 20 female and 19 male college students. Sexual cartoons were liked more by males, especially by those tending to be tough or group-dependent, than by females, especially by those with higher general intelligence. Nonsense cartoons were liked more by females, especially by those with lower general intelligence.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-314
Author(s):  
Hyo-Jeong Kim ◽  
Ji-U Hyeong ◽  
Sang-Hee Lee

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document