After the Bell and into the Night

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 409-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy McCuddy ◽  
Finn-Aage Esbensen

Objectives: This study examines the effects of traditional bullying, cyberbullying, and dual-bullying victimization on subsequent delinquent outcomes. Method: Data come from a longitudinal sample of middle school students ( N = 3,271) as part of the evaluation of the Gang Resistance Education and Training (GREAT) program. A hybrid random effects model is used to estimate the between- and within-individual effects of traditional, cyber-, and dual-bullying victimization while controlling for other predictors of delinquency. Outcomes include general delinquency, violent and nonviolent delinquency, and substance use. Results: The findings demonstrate that those who are cyberbullied exhibit a higher propensity for substance use and nonviolent delinquency compared to those who are traditionally bullied. Changes in dual victimization within respondents over time are most strongly related to general delinquency. With one exception, the effect of traditional bullying victimization remained weakest in all of the models. Conclusions: This study finds evidence that victims of cyberbullying may be more likely to engage in delinquent and deviant behavior compared to victims of traditional bullying. Criminologists and antibullying prevention efforts should consider the broader role of cyberbullying victimization in the developmental processes of adolescents.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruili Li ◽  
Qiguo Lian ◽  
Qiru Su ◽  
Luhai Li ◽  
Meixian Xie ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives The prevalence of being bullied traditionally among U.S. high school students is expected to reduce to 17.9%, according to Healthy People 2020 Initiatives. We examined trends in traditional and cyberbullying victimization with the latest large-scale time-series data in the United States. Methods We analyzed the data from the 2011-2017 national Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) to access the trends in traditional and cyberbullying among U.S. high school students. We identified the temporal trends using multivariate logistic regression analyses, accounting for survey design features of YRBS. Results The overall prevalence of victimization was 19.74% for traditional bullying and 15.38% for cyberbullying, suggesting that cyberbullying is not a low frequent phenomenon. The prevalence of victimization ranged from 20.19% to 19.04% for traditional bullying and 16.23% to 14.77% for cyberbullying, and the declined trends for the two kinds of bullying victimization were both statistically non-significant. The degree of overlap between the two kinds of bullying victimization was about 60%. Besides, female students experienced more traditional and cyberbullying than male peers within each survey cycle. Conclusions No declined trends in traditional and cyberbullying victimization were observed during 2011-2017. Female students are more likely to experience bullying. To achieve the Healthy People 2020 goal on bullying, more work is needed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myriam Forster ◽  
Timothy J. Grigsby ◽  
Alden Bunyan ◽  
Jennifer Beth Unger ◽  
Thomas William Valente

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 1252-1267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ágnes Zsila ◽  
Róbert Urbán ◽  
Mark D. Griffiths ◽  
Zsolt Demetrovics

Abstract Studies investigating the similarities and differences in traditional bullying and cyberbullying experiences have demonstrated considerable gender differences concerning its determinants. The aim of the present study was to provide further evidence for the differential role of determinants for males and females by investigating the moderating role of traditional bullying and anger rumination in the relationship of past cyberbullying victimization and recent cyberbullying perpetration in respect to gender. A total of 1500 Hungarian adolescents and adults (57.9% male, M age = 28.9 years, SD = 8.7) completed an online survey on bullying experiences. Results indicated that males were more likely than females to engage in cyberbullying when they had been previously bullied online. Furthermore, high anger rumination elevated the risk of perpetration among male cyberbullying victims, while repeated victimization in traditional bullying increased the risk of cyberbullying perpetration among females. These results underline the importance of considering gender differences in intervention efforts against bullying.


2020 ◽  
pp. 088740342092144
Author(s):  
Ryan Broll ◽  
Dylan Reynolds

Parents are deemed morally—and, increasingly, legally—responsible for their children’s misbehavior, and their parental aptitude is questioned if their children are victimized. Parental responsibility laws and blameworthiness extend to common occurrences like bullying. Literature broadly supports these principles for some offenses through findings that effective parenting styles are associated with improved adolescent outcomes, but evidence about the relationship between parenting styles and bullying is underdeveloped and inconclusive. To study the relationship between parenting styles and traditional bullying and cyberbullying offending and victimization, data were collected from a sample of 435 Canadian middle and high school students. The results suggest that parenting styles are not associated with traditional bullying offending or victimization; however, neglectful parenting was associated with cyberbullying offending and indulgent parenting was associated with cyberbullying victimization. These findings suggest that the demandingness dimension of parenting, which is characterized by rule setting and monitoring, is important for cyberbullying prevention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document