The China model withering? Institutional roots of China’s local developmentalism

Urban Studies ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 230-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fubing Su ◽  
Ran Tao
Keyword(s):  
China Model

scholarly journals Missing Links in The China Model

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 568-576
Author(s):  
Chenyang Li
Keyword(s):  
China Model

scholarly journals Supplementary material to "Mid-Holocene climate change over China: model-data discrepancy"

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yating Lin ◽  
Gilles Ramstein ◽  
Haibin Wu ◽  
Raj Rani ◽  
Pascale Braconnot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Model Data ◽  
Holocene Climate ◽  
Holocene Climate Change ◽  
China Model ◽  
Supplementary Material ◽  
Data Discrepancy

The China Model: one country, six authors

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (73) ◽  
pp. 169-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minglu Chen ◽  
David S. G. Goodman
Keyword(s):  
China Model

scholarly journals The Future of Meritocracy: A Discussion of Daniel Bell’s The China Model

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-64
Author(s):  
Yongle Zhang ◽  
Colleen Howe
Keyword(s):  
Twentieth Century ◽  
Western World ◽  
Confucian Tradition ◽  
World Today ◽  
The Future ◽  
China Model ◽  
Political Legitimation ◽  
Political Meritocracy

Abstract Compared to Wang Shaoguang’s approach to re-interpret the old concept “democracy” to overcome the Schumpeterian model of political legitimation, Daniel Bell’s Political Meritocracy takes a more challenging path, attempting to build a new discourse of legitimacy centering on the concept “meritocracy” and incorporating elements of ancient China’s traditions, the socialist revolutions in the twentieth century, and the system of competitive elections common in the Western world today. This inspiring work is full of incisive arguments, but could be improved by further considering the tension between the Confucian tradition and the revolutionary tradition in the twentieth century.

Concluding Thoughts

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Bell
Keyword(s):  
Active Role ◽  
Political Reform ◽  
Chinese Government ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
China Model ◽  
Political Meritocracy ◽  
The Ideal ◽  
Chinese Adaptation ◽  
Mao Era

This chapter considers three basic principles of the China model and how they have guided political reform in the post-Mao era: democracy at the bottom, experimentation in the middle, and political meritocracy at the top. There remains a large gap between the ideal and the reality, however, and the chapter suggests ways of closing that gap, noting that the legitimacy problem is perhaps the most serious threat to the meritocratic system. It argues that the Chinese government may need to secure the people's consent to the Chinese adaptation of vertical democratic meritocracy by means such as a referendum. It concludes by discussing the exportability of the China model: while the model as a whole cannot readily be adopted by countries with a different history and culture, its different planks can be selectively adopted and the Chinese government can play a more active role in promoting its model abroad.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document