Buen vivir as an Alternative Development Model: Ecuador’s Bumpy Road toward a Postextractivist Society

2021 ◽  
pp. 0094582X2110081
Author(s):  
Jorge Enrique Forero

The Rafael Correa administration, usually characterized as “neo-extractivist,” did in fact propose an alternative development model that, under a particular understanding of the notion of buen vivir, aimed to overcome the country’s economic dependence on extractive activities through its gradual replacement by a knowledge-intensive economic sector. An examination of this model, some of the main policies implemented in order to configure it, and the main obstacles encountered in the process confirms the classic intuition of so-called dependency theory: that the ability of peripheral countries to overcome their reliance on commodities exports is constrained by economic and institutional mechanisms that limit their room for maneuver. La administración de Rafael Correa, generalmente caracterizada como “neoextractivista”, propuso un modelo de desarrollo alternativo que, bajo un entendimiento particular de la noción del buen vivir, tenía como objetivo superar la dependencia económica del país de las actividades extractivas a través de una sustitución gradual por un sector económico intensivo en conocimiento. Un análisis de este modelo, algunas de las principales políticas implementadas para configurarlo, y los principales obstáculos encontrados en el proceso confirman la clásica intuición de la llamada teoría de la dependencia: que la capacidad de los países periféricos para superar su dependencia de las exportaciones de productos básicos está limitada por mecanismos económicos e institucionales que limitan el margen de maniobra.

Author(s):  
Paweł Wiechetek

In the context of modern Guatemala, the article analyzes the process of evolution and consolidation of the neocolonial model of the “banana republic,” as well as bottom-up attempts to build a counter-narrative and alternative development concept (buenvivir) from a postcolonial and transmodernist perspective. The author focuses on identification and description of divergences in the ways of discursive construction of reality by the Guatemalan oligarchy and the Maya population in areas designated for large investment projects. To this end, a comparative analysis of the discourse and practices of both sides of the conflict is carried out with respect to categories such as “power”, “territory” and “development.”


Itinerario ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-56
Author(s):  
Adriaan C. van Oss

Dependency theory, which places responsibility for the underdevelopment of the peripheral zones of the world economy upon the North Atlantic core, might well be called a Latin American invention. It goes back, after all, to an article published in 1949 by the Argentine economist Raul Prebisch. Since that time, acceptance of the basic argument — which emphasizes intercontinental trade — has grown, also among historians. Economic dependence with respect to the North Atlantic world began during the colonial era, and forms the principal legacy of that period of Latin American history, according to Stanley and Barbara Stein's The Colonial Heritage of Latin America, first published in 1970 and now in its tenth printing.1 This view has it that economic dependence grew out of Spanish exploitation of American gold and silver, + maritime commerce in tropical plantation products. The entire Spanish colonial world in America would appear to have rested on these two pillars.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document