Barriers to Engagement in Collaborative Care Treatment of Uncontrolled Diabetes in a Safety-Net Clinic

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 621-630
Author(s):  
Brittaney Belyeu ◽  
Lydia Chwastiak ◽  
Joan Russo ◽  
Meghan Kiefer ◽  
Kathy Mertens ◽  
...  

Purpose The purpose of the study was to evaluate patient factors associated with nonengagement in a Diabetes Collaborative Care Team (DCCT) program in a safety-net clinic. Methods The first 18 months of a multidisciplinary care, team-based diabetes care management program in a safety-net primary care clinic were studied. Nonengagement was defined as fewer than 2 visits with a team member during the 18 months of the program. Patients who did not engage in the program were compared with those who did engage on demographics, comorbid medical and psychiatric diagnoses, and cardiovascular risk factors, using univariate and multivariable analyses. Results Of the 151 patients referred to the DCCT, 68 (45%) were nonengaged. In unadjusted analyses, patients who did not engage were more likely to be female and have higher baseline A1C values; they were less likely to have major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, any depression diagnosis, and hyperlipidemia. Female gender and chronic pain were independently associated with nonengagement after multivariable adjustment. Conclusions The findings suggest that among patients with uncontrolled diabetes in an urban safety-net primary care clinic, there is a need to address barriers to engagement for female patients and to integrate chronic pain management strategies within multicondition collaborative care models.

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joji Suzuki, MD ◽  
Michele L. Matthews, PharmD ◽  
David Brick, BA ◽  
Minh-Thuy Nguyen ◽  
Robert N. N. Jamison, PhD ◽  
...  

Objective: To implement a collaborative care management program with buprenorphine in a primary care clinic.Design: Prospective observational study.Setting: A busy urban academic primary care clinic affiliated with a tertiary care hospital.Participants: Opioid-dependent patients or patients with chronic pain using opioids nonmedically were recruited for the study. A total of 45 participants enrolled.Interventions: Patients were treated with buprenorphine and managed by a supervising psychiatrist, pharmacist care manager, and health coaches. The care manager conducted buprenorphine inductions and all follow-up visits. Health coaches offered telephonic support. The psychiatrist supervised both the care manager and health coaches.Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes were treatment retention at 6 months, and change in the proportion of aberrant toxicology results and opioid craving scores from baseline to 6 months. After data collection, clinical outcomes were compared between opioid-dependent patients and patients with chronic pain using opioids nonmedically. Overall, 55.0 percent of participants (25/45) remained in treatment at 6 months. Primary care physicians (PCPs)' attitudes about opioid dependence treatment were surveyed at baseline and at 18 months.Results: Forty-three patients (95.6 percent) accepted treatment and 25 (55.0 percent) remained in treatment at 6 months. The proportion of aberrant urine toxicology results decreased significantly from baseline to 6 months (p < 0.01). Craving scores significantly decreased from baseline to 6 months (p < 0.01). Opioid-dependent patients, as opposed to patients with chronic pain using opioids nonmedically, were significantly more likely to complete 6 months of treatment (p < 0.05). PCPs' confidence in treating opioid dependence in primary care increased significantly from baseline to 18 months postimplementation (p < 0.01).Conclusion: Collaborative care management for opioid dependence with buprenorphine may be feasible in a primary care clinic. More research is needed to understand the role of buprenorphine in managing patients with chronic pain using opioids nonmedically.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S200-S200
Author(s):  
Michael Hansen ◽  
Barbara Trautner ◽  
Roger Zoorob ◽  
George Germanos ◽  
Osvaldo Alquicira ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Use of antibiotics without a prescription (non-prescription use) contributes to antimicrobial resistance. Non-prescription use includes obtaining and taking antibiotics without a prescription, taking another person’s antibiotics, or taking one’s own stored antibiotics. We conducted a quantitative survey focusing on the factors that impact patients’ decisions to use non-prescription antibiotics. Methods We surveyed patients visiting public safety net primary care clinics and private emergency departments in a racially/ethnically diverse urban area. Surveys were read aloud to patients in Spanish and English. Survey domains included patients’ perspectives on which syndromes require antibiotic treatment, their perceptions of health care, and their access to antibiotics without a prescription. Results We interviewed 190 patients, 122 from emergency departments (64%), and 68 from primary care clinics (36%). Overall, 44% reported non-prescription antibiotic use within the past 12 months. Non-prescription use was higher among primary care clinic patients (63%) than the emergency department patients (39%, p = 0.002). The majority felt that antibiotics would be needed for bronchitis (78%) while few felt antibiotics would be needed for diarrhea (30%) (Figure 1). The most common situation identified “in which respondents would consider taking antibiotics without contacting a healthcare provider was “got better by taking this antibiotic before” (Figure 2). Primary care patients were more likely to obtain antibiotics without prescription from another country than emergency department patients (27% vs. 13%, P=0.03). Also, primary care patients were more likely to report obstacles to seeking a doctor’s care, such as the inability to take time off from work or transportation difficulties, but these comparisons were not statistically significant. Figure 1. Patients’ agreement that antibiotics would be needed varied by symptom/syndrome. Figure 2. Situations that lead to non-prescription antibiotic use impacted the two clinical populations differently Conclusion Non-prescription antibiotic use is a widespread problem in the two very different healthcare systems we included in this study, although factors underlying this practice differ by patient population. Better understanding of the factors driving non-prescription antibiotic use is essential to designing patient-focused interventions to decrease this unsafe practice. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2017 ◽  
Vol 129 (5) ◽  
pp. 524-530
Author(s):  
Carrie N. Vogler ◽  
Stacy Sattovia ◽  
Laura Y. Salazar ◽  
Tiffany I. Leung ◽  
Albert Botchway

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. e277-e277 ◽  
Author(s):  
M U Shalowitz ◽  
J S Eng ◽  
C O McKinney ◽  
J Krohn ◽  
B Lapin ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 548-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik R. Vanderlip ◽  
Wayne Katon ◽  
Joan Russo ◽  
Dan Lessler ◽  
Paul Ciechanowski

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document