Capital Budgeting in a Multidivisional Firm

1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 519-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil Arya ◽  
Jonathan Glover ◽  
Richard A. Young

The purpose of this paper is to study capital budgeting in a setting where emphasis is on control over project selection. We construct a model of a multidivisional firm in which there are no constraints on investment and all projects have a positive net present value. Nevertheless, we show that it is optimal for the center to use relative project ranking in determining which projects are to be funded.

Author(s):  
Miyase Karabulut ◽  
Sıtkı Sönmezer ◽  
Vedat Zeki Yenen ◽  
Zeynep Emir

Capital budgeting is crucial for firms that have projects to evaluate especially when the projects are mutually exclusive or financing is scarce. The aim of the study is to determining the most widely used methodologies in capital budgeting decisions and their effectiveness. A qualitative research will provide cement sector specific examples in assessing industry projects and compares the methods of Net Present Value, İnternal rate of Return, Pay-back period, discounted pay-back period and MIRR. Each method is briefly discussed and its drawbacks and advantages are mentioned in detail. Other sectors are also examined in terms of capital budgeting. Our preliminary results indicate that net present value method dominates capital budgeting decisions in the sectors under study.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-110
Author(s):  
Eka Lusvita Wulandari ◽  
Lily Rahmawati Harahap

Capital budgeting in practice is intended to conduct an investment analysis of some available investment alternatives, and then determine or choose the most profitable investment. Inappropriateness in determining investment options will result in losses of either real losses or losses due to loss of opportunity to gain an opportunity cost that can actually be realized. The investment analysis will select the available investment opportunities, so that investment can be selected that will provide the greatest benefit of every dollar invested. Capital budgeting techniques can be analyzed by appraisal method of investment as follows: Average Rate of Return, Payback Period , Net Present Value, and Profitability Index.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 71
Author(s):  
Robert J. Sweeney

Capital budgeting decisions generally involve the commitment of resources in the current period to secure positive cash flows over time that generate a rate of return in excess of the cost of the funds invested. The most common techniques used to perform this analysis are the Net Present Value (NPV) and the Internal Rate of Return (IRR).Conceptually, these two techniques are substitutable; i.e. the resulting decision from a NPV analysis is identical to the decision from an IRR analysis. In practice, however, the NPV and the IRR can, on occasion, produce conflicting decisions. Specifically, when analyzing mutually exclusive assets the Net Present Value can support one asset while the Internal Rate of Return supports the other. The purpose of this paper is twofold; first, to highlight structural deficiencies in the conventional application of the NPV and the IRR, and second, to demonstrate a procedure to correct for these structural errors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-84
Author(s):  
Umar Farooq ◽  
Bilal Haider Subhani

This study reviews the empirical studies arranged on Pakistani capital market and specifies the pattern of three corporate finance practices.  The subject of corporate finance discusses the various activities performed at firm level such as capital budgeting, capital structure, and dividend payout policy. The capital budgeting technique consists of six methods i.e., net present value, discounted cash flow, payback period, and internal rate of return etc. but Pakistani firms often interested in net present value and internal rate of return for capital investment evaluation. Similarly, the capital structure decision carries the debate on two options of financing i.e., debt financing and equity financing but literature shows that the Pakistani firms generally follow the pecking order theory and prefer more debt financing. Similarly, as for concern dividend payout policy, literature discusses the different theories and determinants but still unable to generalize the dividend payout trend specifically in Pakistani context. Corporate managers and policymakers can use the conclusion for strategic purposes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Aod Abdul Jawad

Toko Kue Baper Cokelat merupakan salah satu bentuk usaha perorangan yang salah satu produk andalannya adalah cokelat praline. Pada penelitian ini penulis membahas mengenai kelayakan usaha cokelat praline pada aspek pemasaran, teknis dan keuangan. Penulis menganalisa data keuangan toko dalam periode Januari 2018 sampai dengan Desember 2018. Metode yang digunakan adalah Capital Budgeting. Dari hasil analisa dalam periode Januari sampai dengan Desember 2018, didapat hasil usaha cokelat praline pantas dijalankan. Mengacu pada perhitungan Tingkat Pengembalian rata-rata (ARR) didapatkan nilai 132,09% lebih besar daripada tingkat cost of capital 7,37%, Net Present Value (NPV) positif bernilai Rp 216,643,572.14, Profitability Index diperoleh nilai 3,13 sesuai persyaratan harus lebih dari 1 ,Tingkat pengembalian Investasi (IRR) menghasilkan nilai 23,06% lebih besar dari tingkat suku bunga terendah 5,75%, Periode Pengembalian Investasi didapatkan hasil pengembalian dalam jangka waktu 3 tahun 2 bulan 13 hari.


2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 6502-6508
Author(s):  
Sushain Koul, Dr. Parag Ravikant Kaveri

Perhaps the most difficult hurdle which companies come across is the selection of the project which is beneficial to the organization in the long-run and also increases the present value of the shareholders. This is where Capital Budgeting comes into play. Capital Budgeting is one of the most important areas of financial management. This paper gives an overview of what capital budgeting is, what different types of techniques comes under capital budgeting and how to represent capital budgeting technique algorithmically. In this paper we also throw some light on what the results of various capital budgeting techniques will be if any banking organization follows these techniques and compare those results. These techniques namely as Payback Period (PP), Average Rate of Return (ARR), Net Present Value (NPV), Profitability Index (PI) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) are used to evaluate projects.


2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Zeller ◽  
Brian B. Stanko

<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">This paper demonstrates how to build risk into capital investment decisions.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>We illustrate how to combine distribution theory, technology, and a business professional&rsquo;s skills and insight into a capital investment analysis.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>In addition, we show how management can approximate the risk of each cash flow estimate and display the overall capital investment results.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>This framework is extended by showing how a mutually exclusive decision can be improved, using a lease versus purchase example.</span><a style="mso-footnote-id: ftn1;" name="_ftnref1" href="http://journals.cluteonline.com/index.php/JABR/author/saveSubmit/#_ftn1"><span class="MsoFootnoteReference"><span style="mso-special-character: footnote;"><span class="MsoFootnoteReference"><span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;">[1]</span></span></span></span></a><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>An Excel template is readily available from the authors allowing a hands-on application of the framework presented in this paper.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>In addition, this paper positions the reader to comfortably use more advanced analytics, such as Monte Carlo simulation, a tool that is readily available in commercial software applications.</span></span></p><div style="mso-element: footnote-list;"><br /><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><hr size="1" /></span><div id="ftn1" style="mso-element: footnote;"><p class="MsoFootnoteText" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">This paper focuses on the application of net present value.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>The advantage of using net present value in a capital budgeting decision is that it shows the potential stakeholder wealth creation and wealth destruction.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>An internal rate of return analysis is intentionally left out of this paper.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>According to Brealey, Myers and Allen, <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Principles of Corporate Finance</em>, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2006, pp. 91-99, internal rate of return should not be used to evaluate mutually exclusive capital investments.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span></span></span></p></div></div>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document