Evidence-Based Practice in the Management of Vascular Access Devices for Home Parenteral Nutrition Therapy

2006 ◽  
Vol 30 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. S82-S93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcia Ryder
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 19-24
Author(s):  
J. Blake Hotchkiss ◽  
Judy Thompson

Highlights Abstract Background: Vascular access device insertion is one of the most performed procedures in healthcare today. With different device types available to provide infusion therapy, there are many different variables to consider, including the process of obtaining informed consent from patients. This literature review aims to discuss common themes present in current evidence-based practice and point out critical areas of variability that exist. Methods: A literature review was conducted searching Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs Institute for Evidence-Based Practice, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases for recently published articles in the English language and those written in English. Articles were screened to include those that describe informed consent within the context of vascular access or other invasive procedures. There were 35 articles and 5 systematic reviews identified that met criteria for inclusion in this literature review. Discussion: The topics of ethics, legal responsibility, who provided consent, and how education about procedures was performed demonstrated clear insight into how to improve the consent process. Some areas in current evidence lack clear direction and create variability in the informed consent procedure. These included who should obtain consent from the patient and which vascular access devices required a written consent. Who obtains consent was found to be more related to current legal precedence and not the clinician inserting the device like that found when a nonphysician clinician performed the procedure. Vascular access device related variability in requiring written versus verbal consent was found to be rooted in the degree of complexity of the procedure, need for specialized training, and the inherent risk to the patient. Conclusion: These two areas of variability described in current clinical practice require more research and consensus agreement to standardize the practice of obtaining informed consent in vascular access device insertion.


2002 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet P. Baxter ◽  
Jan M. Tait

Home parenteral nutrition is required by patients with intestinal disease such that they are unable to maintain nutritional status or fluid volume without this treatment. A Managed Clinical Network has been established in Scotland. The aims of this multi-professional group are to ensure equity of access and that patients are managed according to nationally-agreed evidence-based procedures and protocols. The Clinical Standards Board for Scotland has provided support in preparing a quality-assurance framework to which the network must adhere.


2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (6) ◽  
pp. S-694
Author(s):  
Suzanne Hansen ◽  
Ramandeep Mangat ◽  
Jane Plant ◽  
María Inés Pinto Sanchez ◽  
David Armstrong

1994 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-34
Author(s):  
Carroll Reider ◽  
William Guss

2020 ◽  
pp. 175717742097680
Author(s):  
Carole Hallam ◽  
Andrea Denton ◽  
Valya Weston ◽  
Helen Dunn ◽  
Tim Jackson ◽  
...  

Background: In 2016, a UK vessel health and preservation (VHP) framework was developed to support healthcare staff to select the most appropriate vascular access device for patients requiring intravenous therapy. The VHP framework was based on available evidence and expert consensus. The VHP was based on available evidence and expert consensus. Development of the VHP 2020 Framework: A multidisciplinary team reviewed the original UK VHP framework and considered new published evidence, national and international guidelines and expert opinion. A literature search was performed using Cinahl and Medline, incorporating a variety of terms linked to vascular access devices, assessment and selection. Articles published in and after 2014 in English were included. Twelve articles were found to be relevant including three evidence-based guidelines, two randomised control trials and one systematic review. Findings: Three main studies provided the evidence for the update: the MAGIC study that assessed the appropriateness of peripherally inserted central catheters in patients; a study that utilised the ‘A-DIVA scale’ to predict the likelihood of difficult venous access; and a study that incorporated an ‘I-DECIDED tool’ for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and decision-making for device removal. In addition, published guidelines provided evidence that the original advice on appropriate osmolarity of medicines for peripheral administration needed updating. Conclusion: The 2020 UK VHP framework reflects latest evidence-based research and guidelines, providing healthcare staff updated guidance to assist in maintaining good practice in vascular access assessment and device selection and patient safety.


2005 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 246-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Nagao ◽  
Y. Funayama ◽  
K. Fukushima ◽  
C. Shibata ◽  
K. Takahashi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document