scholarly journals More Bang for Their Buck: Why (and When) Family Firms Better Leverage Corporate Social Responsibility

2022 ◽  
pp. 014920632110660
Author(s):  
James G. Combs ◽  
Peter Jaskiewicz ◽  
Rahul Ravi ◽  
Judith L. Walls
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Stakeholder Relationships ◽  
Strategic Actions ◽  
Corporate Social

Family firms take different strategic actions because of their desire to grow and preserve socioemotional wealth (SEW), but pursuing SEW also generates what we call SEW resources that deliver advantages in certain contexts. We develop and test this idea with respect to corporate social responsibility (CSR). We theorize that SEW resources such as reputation, strong stakeholder relationships, and long-term orientation help family firms better leverage symbolic CSR to enhance short-term firm performance and better leverage substantive CSR to enhance long-term firm performance. Regression analyses on a 20-year panel of S& P 500 firms provide supportive evidence. Findings indicate that family firms not only “do it differently” to preserve SEW; they sometimes “do it better” because of SEW.

scholarly journals Program Corporate Social Responsibility di Industri Hotel: Sebuah Keuntungan atau Kerugian untuk Hotel

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 502
Author(s):  
Maria Pia Adiati
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Activity ◽  
Public Image ◽  
Term Result ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Short Term Result ◽  
The Social ◽  
Corporate Social

A word of CSR which stands for Corporate Social Responsibility is now becoming popular and more often many companies insert the CSR activities into its company profile. CSR has another different names such as Social Activity or Sustainability Development. CSR program according to wikipedia ia an organization or company has a responsibility to its customer, employees, share holders, community and environment in every aspect involved in company operasional. In the management science, there is a level whereas it is called social responsibility or it is just social obligation. Many opinions argues that CSR program will reduce the profit of the respected company. But many opinions denies the previous argue by saying the CSR program is a long term program profit gain since the short term result is good public image. The good public image will lead the loyalti of customer to keep using the product or service from the hotel. The customer loyalti also affected by the customer’s opinion, if they involves in the social activities held by the hotel, they also participate in a social activity.

scholarly journals Do Corporate Social Responsibility Activities Reduce Credit Risk? Short and Long-Term Perspectives

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (24) ◽  
pp. 6962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thuy Thi Thu Truong ◽  
Jungmu Kim
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Credit Risk ◽  
Credit Default Swap ◽  
Community Diversity ◽  
Employee Relations ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Corporate Social

This study examines the short- and long-run effects of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on the credit risk implied in credit derivative prices. Measuring the different term effects on credit risk by the slope of credit default swap (CDS) spreads with different maturities, we investigate how CSR activities affect credit risk differently in the short and long run. Fama-MacBeth regressions reveal that firms with higher CSR scores tend to have more gently decreasing CDS slopes because, on average, CSR activities reduce credit risk in the long run more than in the short run. An analysis of individual CSR categories shows that while community, diversity and employee relations lead to a lower CDS slope, human rights and product characteristics increase the CDS slope. This finding suggests that not all CSR activities affect short-term and long-term credit risks in the same direction. Therefore, even though CSR activities can reduce credit risk in the long-run, some CSR activities may increase the short-term credit risk and hence increase short-term borrowing costs.

scholarly journals Empirical study on the correlation of corporate social responsibility with the banks efficiency and stability

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 86-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Vasileva ◽  
Anna Lasukova
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Main Hypothesis ◽  
National Bank ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

The aim of this paper is to investigate the relationship between the concept of corporate social responsibility and the most important characteristics of banking – the efficiency and stability in a sample of twelve Ukrainian banks, which are the biggest banks in Ukraine according to the classification of the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU). Our research covers the period from 2006 to 2012. Based on the literature review we construct two main hypothesis related to the impact on the corporate social responsibility concept (CSR) of the following independent variables: 1 – efficiency (as a short term period characteristics of banking), 2 – stability (as a long term characteristics of banking).

scholarly journals Family Firms, Chaebol Affiliations, and Corporate Social Responsibility

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 3016
Author(s):  
Haeyoung Ryu ◽  
Soo-Joon Chae
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Economic Justice ◽  
Activity Levels ◽  
Corporate Groups ◽  
Corporate Social

This study analyzes the corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities of family-owned firms by investigating public companies in Korea. By nature of their governance structures, which are aligned with the interests of their shareholders and management, family firms are managed from a long-term perspective based on a sense of ownership. While CSR implementation entails investment costs, it ultimately increases firm value by enhancing the firm’s reputation and brand image. As such, family firms are expected to be more active than non-family firms regarding CSR investments. We conducted an empirical analysis based on the Korean Economic Justice Institute Index (KEJI Index) from the Citizens’ Coalition for Economic Justice and found that family firms’ CSR scores were higher than those of non-family firms. This indicates that family firms are relatively more active in their CSR activities, as they are managed from a long-term viewpoint. However, family firms classified as large-scale corporate groups (chaebols) had lower CSR activity levels. This is because when family firms are classified as corporate groups, they can enjoy monopolistic market positioning through their subsidiaries, and are thus more likely to utilize the resources originally required for CSR in other projects that conform to the pursuit of firm interests.

scholarly journals Executive Incentives Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility under Earnings Pressure and Institutional Investors Supervision

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 2492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lili Ding ◽  
Zhongchao Zhao ◽  
Lei Wang
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Institutional Investors ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Institutional Csr ◽  
Csr Strategy ◽  
Technical Csr ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Impact

This paper theoretically explores the impact of the incentive preferences of executives (i.e., short-term incentives and long-term incentives) on corporate social responsibility (CSR) decisions (i.e., institutional CSR and technical CSR). Further, the paper presents the mechanism through which executives influence CSR activities by the pressures from financial analysts and institutional investors supervision. Using a large sample of China-listed firms over 2007–2017, we achieve some helpful empirical results. The executives with short-term incentives tend to implement technical CSR strategy, while those with long-term incentives tend to implement institutional CSR strategy. Executives with short-term incentives, compared with those with long-term incentives, show stronger inter-temporal tradeoffs behaviors in the earnings pressure context. Furthermore, dedicated institutional investors can effectively attenuate the hypocritical behaviors of executives, and the effectiveness of governance shows a positive relationship with investors’ horizon. Our findings enrich the understanding on the relationship between the executives and CSR decisions in the earnings pressure context and further helps to perfect the institutional design in China’s listed companies.

Do institutional investors have homogeneous influence on corporate social responsibility? Evidence from investor investment horizon

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Meng ◽  
Xiaoqiong Wang
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Institutional Investors ◽  
Empirical Support ◽  
Investment Horizon ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Institutional Shareholders

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relation between the investment horizon of institutional investors and corporate social responsibility (CSR). Design/methodology/approach Utilizing unique datasets on CSR and the investor horizon measures (Gaspar et al., 2005), the authors categorize institutional investors into long-term and short-term investors. This method captures the heterogeneity of investors. Findings The authors show that long-term institutional investors promote CSR engagement, while short-term investors discourage it. The authors further document that shareholders’ ownership horizon has implications on corporate decisions in the CSR framework. The presence of long (short)-term institutional investors is positively (negatively) associated with dividend payout, discourages (encourages) managerial misbehaviors and enhances (reduces) firm valuation, only for firms with high CSR performance. Research limitations/implications Different from previous studies that treat institutional investors homogeneously, this paper provides empirical support that investors are indeed different in influencing CSR. Originality/value Few prior studies address the question of whether active engagement by institutional shareholders on CSR issues differs by the types of institutional ownership. The study attempts to fill this gap by examining the effects of institutions’ investment horizon, one of the major ways to classify institutional shareholders, on the CSR performance of firms.

scholarly journals The Effect of Listing Period on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Korea

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 2447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nam Chul Jung ◽  
Hyun Ah Kim
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Analyst Following ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
The Us ◽  
Prior Literature ◽  
Corporate Social

Newly listed firms can actively engage in corporate social responsibility (CSR) to build reputation, but they may postpone CSR until they have enough slack for it. Related to this, prior literature does not provide consistent results, the US evidence supports the latter while the Chinese results support the former. To extend the literature, we use Korean listed companies and examine the association between the listing period and CSR. We further investigate the effect of analyst following on the relationship. The empirical results show that firms with a shorter listing period invest more in CSR and that the association exists only in firm-years followed by analysts, indicating the importance of the information environment to inform CSR. We additionally find that young listed companies mainly use social contribution and soundness, which can be discretionarily conducted from a short-term perspective. The results of this study using CSR to obtain a short-term objective suggest that policymakers need to analyze a firm’s behavior from various perspectives and to establish proper guidelines to achieve a long-term goal of CSR “sustainability”.

scholarly journals Corporate Social Responsibility and Maturity Mismatch of Investment and Financing: Evidence from Polluting and Non-Polluting Companies

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 4972
Author(s):  
Xiaolan Bao ◽  
Qiaosheng Luo ◽  
Sicheng Li ◽  
M. James C. Crabbe ◽  
XiaoGuang Yue
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Mandatory Disclosure ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Maturity Mismatch ◽  
Ecological Development ◽  
Investment And Financing ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Impact

We investigate the influence of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on the maturity mismatch of investment and financing from the perspective of both polluting and non-polluting companies. The results reveal that CSR performance can aggravate the maturity mismatch of investment and financing; and the effect can be more serious in the polluting companies. At the same time, we find that CSR makes companies obtain more short-term debt. What is more, polluting companies perform more environmental responsibilities in the form of long-term investments than non-polluting companies. These phenomena exacerbate the maturity mismatch of investment and financing; and this effect is only significant when polluting companies choose CSR mandatory disclosure. The impact of CSR on the maturity mismatch of investment and financing is more apparent in companies with lower value and at smaller scales. We show that companies should not only perform their CSR to maintain a balanced economic and ecological development, but also pay attention to the aggravation of the maturity mismatch of investment and financing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document