Topical Steroid for Chronic Rhinosinusitis without Polyps

2012 ◽  
Vol 146 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-179
Author(s):  
Martin J. Burton ◽  
Matthew W. Ryan ◽  
Richard M. Rosenfeld
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Cochrane Review ◽  
Topical Steroid ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Good Evidence ◽  
Therapeutic Benefits ◽  
Placebo Controls

The “Cochrane Corner” is a quarterly section in the Journal that highlights systematic reviews relevant to otolaryngology–head and neck surgery, with invited commentary to aid clinical decision making. This installment features a Cochrane Review, titled “Topical Steroid for Chronic Rhinosinusitis without Polyps,” that finds good evidence to support therapeutic benefits with no increase in adverse events compared with placebo controls.

Extracts from The Cochrane Library: Nasal saline irrigations for the symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis

2007 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
pp. 532-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin J. Burton ◽  
Lee D. Eisenberg ◽  
Richard M. Rosenfeld
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Cochrane Review ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
The Cochrane Library

The “Cochrane Corner” is a quarterly section in the journal that highlights systematic reviews relevant to otolaryngology–head and neck surgery, with invited commentary to highlight implications for clinical decision-making. This installment features a Cochrane Review entitled “Nasal saline irrigations for the symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis,” which shows that saline irrigations are well-tolerated and could be included as a treatment adjunct for the symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis.

Extracts from The Cochrane Library

2009 ◽  
Vol 141 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin J. Burton ◽  
Marion E. Couch ◽  
Richard M. Rosenfeld
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Cochrane Review ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Cancer Treatments ◽  
Radiation Induced ◽  
The Cochrane Library

The “Cochrane Corner” is a quarterly section in the Journal that highlights systematic reviews relevant to otolaryngology–head and neck surgery, with invited commentary to aid clinical decision making. This installment features a Cochrane Review entitled “Homeopathic medicines for adverse effects of cancer treatments,” which finds preliminary data to support efficacy of topical calendula for radiation-induced dermatitis and a proprietary mouthwash for chemotherapy-induced stomatitis.

Extracts from The Cochrane Library: Antibiotics for acute maxillary sinusitis

2008 ◽  
Vol 139 (4) ◽  
pp. 486-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin J. Burton ◽  
Ronald B. Kuppersmith ◽  
Richard M. Rosenfeld
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
Maxillary Sinusitis ◽  
Cochrane Review ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
The Cochrane Library

The “Cochrane Corner” is a quarterly section in the Journal that highlights systematic reviews relevant to otolaryngology–head and neck surgery, with invited commentary to highlight implications for clinical decision making. This installment features a Cochrane Review entitled “Antibiotics for acute maxillary sinusitis,” which concludes a small treatment effect in patients with uncomplicated acute sinusitis in a primary care setting with symptoms for more than seven days.

scholarly journals Phenotyping, endotyping and clinical decision-making

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-98
Author(s):  
Wytske J. Fokkens
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
New Ideas

We have exiting times in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The last year has brought us a number of new ideas and publications to help in decision-making in daily practice.

Cochrane Corner: Extracts from The Cochrane Library: Intranasal Steroids for Chronic Rhinosinusitis

2016 ◽  
Vol 156 (3) ◽  
pp. 397-402
Author(s):  
Richard Orlandi ◽  
Clair Hopkins ◽  
Carl Philpott ◽  
Richard M. Rosenfeld
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Nasal Congestion ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Cochrane Reviews ◽  
Intranasal Steroids ◽  
Expert Commentary ◽  
The Cochrane Library

The Cochrane Corner is a section in the journal that highlights systematic reviews relevant to otolaryngology–head and neck surgery, with invited commentary to aid clinical decision making. This installment features a pair of related Cochrane Reviews on intranasal steroids for chronic rhinosinusitis, which identify low- to moderate-quality evidence for a beneficial effect on overall symptoms, nasal congestion, and rhinorrhea. There is no evidence, however, to suggest superiority of any particular steroid preparation or drug delivery system. The related expert commentary should help clinicians make the best treatment decisions based on the studies and outcomes identified in these Cochrane Reviews.

Debates in Dysphagia Management: How Do You Use Evidence-Based Practice in Your Dysphagia Patient Care?

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 121-123
Author(s):  
Jeri A. Logemann
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Judgment ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Clinical Method ◽  
Do So

Evidence-based practice requires astute clinicians to blend our best clinical judgment with the best available external evidence and the patient's own values and expectations. Sometimes, we value one more than another during clinical decision-making, though it is never wise to do so, and sometimes other factors that we are unaware of produce unanticipated clinical outcomes. Sometimes, we feel very strongly about one clinical method or another, and hopefully that belief is founded in evidence. Some beliefs, however, are not founded in evidence. The sound use of evidence is the best way to navigate the debates within our field of practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document