scholarly journals Ménière’s Disease

2016 ◽  
Vol 155 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew G. Crowson ◽  
Kristine Schulz ◽  
Kourosh Parham ◽  
Andrea Vambutas ◽  
David Witsell ◽  
...  

Objective (1) Integrate practice-based patient encounters using the Dartmouth Atlas Medicare database to understand practice treatments for Ménière’s disease (MD). (2) Describe differences in the practice patterns between academic and community providers for MD. Study Design Practice-based research database review. Setting CHEER (Creating Healthcare Excellence through Education and Research) network academic and community providers. Subjects and Methods MD patient data were identified with ICD-9 and CPT codes. Demographics, unique visits, and procedures per patient were tabulated. The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care was used to reference regional health care utilization. Statistical analysis included 1-way analyses of variance, bivariate linear regression, and Student’s t tests, with significance set at P < .05. Results A total of 2071 unique patients with MD were identified from 8 academic and 10 community otolaryngology–head and neck surgery provider centers nationally. Average age was 56.5 years; 63.9% were female; and 91.4% self-reported white ethnicity. There was an average of 3.2 visits per patient. Western providers had the highest average visits per patient. Midwest providers had the highest average procedures per patient. Community providers had more visits per site and per patient than did academic providers. Academic providers had significantly more operative procedures per site ( P = .0002) when compared with community providers. Health care service areas with higher total Medicare reimbursements per enrollee did not report significantly more operative procedures being performed. Conclusion This is the first practice-based clinical research database study to describe MD practice patterns. We demonstrate that academic otolaryngology–head and neck surgery providers perform significantly more operative procedures than do community providers for MD, and we validate these data with an independent Medicare spending database.

2007 ◽  
Vol 122 (8) ◽  
pp. 773-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Stapleton ◽  
R Mills

AbstractIntroduction:Ménière's disease is a diagnosis requiring expert clinical judgment. There are several differences between the American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery diagnostic guidelines and Prosper Ménière's original description of the disease.Methods:Six hundred and fifty patients attending a specialist balance clinic had their clinical profiles fully analysed according to each set of diagnostic criteria.Results:Application of the American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery guidelines resulted in the diagnosis of three times more patients than did use of Ménière's diagnostic criteria. Treatment options for patients in both groups were similar. It is unlikely that the application of different diagnostic criteria would have an effect on the treatment of individual patients.Discussion:The American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery guidelines are more sensitive and less specific in diagnosing Ménière's disease than Prosper Ménière's original description. Standardised criteria should be applied across published series, in order to make results accurate, comparable and useful in the long term. We would recommend the introduction of a stricter diagnostic category for definite Ménière's disease.


1999 ◽  
Vol 113 (3) ◽  
pp. 244-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akhtar Hussain ◽  
Michael S. W. Lee

AbstractThe authors present a technique using electrocautery diathermy to make surgical tattoos. This method has been used in over 300 patients who underwent head and neck surgery at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary and Albany Medical College, New York, over a period of five years. A wide variety of operative procedures such as total laryngectomies and neck dissections were performed. The electrocautery surgical tattoos have a major advantage of persisting until the end of the operative procedure by which time other types of tattoos have faded. The technique is widely available, inexpensive, and has to date been complication free.


Author(s):  
José Florencio F. Lapeña

The nineteenth of June 2011 marks a century and fifty years since the birth of José Protasio Rizal in 1861.1 The ninth of November 2011 also marks the Golden Jubilee of the foundation of the Departments of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology of the Philippine General Hospital (PGH) in 1961, dividing the original Department of Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat that was established a century ago in May 1911. The national hero of the Philippines and Pride of the Malay Race2 is immortalized in countless ways, reflecting his multiple accomplishments that mark a true renaissance individual. The two departments of the national University of the Philippines (UP) have likewise made their mark in pace with the many achievements of their alumni. Rizal was a polyglot and polymath poet, painter, sculptor, sportsman, scientist and patriot, whose writings led to his execution and sparked the Philippine Revolution of 1898.1,3 He was also a physician and an ophthalmologist who insightfully dissected the ills of his patients and society.4 What have the departments and their hospital contributed to health and to humankind?   If precedence were the measure of significance, the pioneering “firsts” would have to include the first laryngo-fissure operation by founding department head Dr. Reinhard Rembe in 1913, the first intracapsular cataract lens extraction in the country using a suction erisophake after the technique of Barraquer by the next chair (and nephew of the national hero) Dr. Aristeo Rizal Ubaldo in 1920, the first laryngectomy by Drs. Ubaldo and founding president of the Philippine Academy of Ophthalmology Antonio S. Fernando in 1923 and the first labyrinthectomy by Drs. Ubaldo and Vicencio C. Alcantara in 1927.5 There was a time when the chairs and senior consultants of most departments of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery in the Philippines were alumni of the UP-PGH, as was the leadership of the Philippine Society of Otolaryngology and Bronchoesophagology (later Philippine Society of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery) which separated from the Philippine Ophthalmological and Otolaryngological Society (subsequently Philippine Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology) in 1956. But those are bygone days, and the folly of resting on one’s laurels becomes all too apparent, as these are quickly eclipsed by the capabilities of newer, better-equipped health care facilities that are manned by experts trained in their respective institutions. Thus the race to super-specialize and sub-specialize, perhaps to regain lost ground and primacy at the expense of tertiary general health care has become the battle cry for some, led by the present administration of the PGH.   And yet, the majority of Filipinos still do not have access to primary health care.6 They who do not even have the services of a basic physician much less can avail of special care of their sight, hearing and balance, smell and taste, breathing, swallowing or speaking, nor of the face with which they face the world. Witness the number of adults with unrepaired cleft lips and untreated head and neck tumors roaming the streets of the city.   The UP College of Medicine (UPCM) founded in 1905 aims “towards leadership and excellence in community-oriented medical education, research and service directed particularly to the underserved.”5 As the teaching hospital of the UPCM, with whom it shares such academic and clinical departments as Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, the hundred-year-old Philippine General Hospital and its leadership cannot and must not turn a blind eye or deaf ear to the underserved it is mandated to serve. Its true strength lies in relevance, which is quickly lost if it succumbs to the delusionary glitter of super specialization beyond the reach of most people. Of what benefit is it to be the “first,” if it does not redound to the good of the “many?” Of Rizal, it has been said “to his patients he gave sight; and to his country he gave vision.”7 As the Departments of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology pursue the arts and sciences of vision, hearing and balance, olfaction and gustation, respiration and deglutition, phonation and facial expression, may they sharpen the sensitivity of health providers in PGH and other loco-regional general hospitals to the real issues of health and humankind in the developing world and embolden us to overcome the apathy to “hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil.”


2021 ◽  
pp. 000348942110396
Author(s):  
David W. Wassef ◽  
Gregory L. Barinsky ◽  
Sara Behbahani ◽  
Sudeep Peddireddy ◽  
Jordon G. Grube ◽  
...  

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare the number of citations received by open access articles versus subscription access articles in subscription journals in the Otolaryngology literature. Methods: Using the Dimensions research database, we examined articles indexed to PubMed with at least 5 citations published in 2018. Articles were included from Otolaryngology— Head and Neck Surgery, The Laryngoscope, JAMA Otolaryngology— Head and Neck Surgery, Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, and American Journal of Otolaryngology. Multivariate Poisson regression modeling was used to adjust for journal, article type, and topic. Practice guidelines, position statements, or retractions were excluded as potential outliers. Results: 137 open access articles and 337 subscription access articles meeting inclusion criteria were identified, with a median citation number of 8 (IQR 6-11). The most common article type was original investigation (82.5%), and the most common study topic was head and neck (28.9%). Open access articles had a higher median number of citations at 9 (IQR 6-13) when compared to subscription access articles at 7 (IQR 6-10) ( P = .032). Open access status was significantly associated with a higher number of citations than subscription access articles when adjusting for journal, article type, and topic (β = .272, CI 0.194-0.500, P < .001). Conclusions: Although comprising a minority of articles examined in this study of subscription journals, open access articles were associated with a higher number of citations than subscription access articles. Open access publishing may facilitate the spread of novel findings in Otolaryngology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document