Effects of Preoperative Iodine Administration on Thyroidectomy for Hyperthyroidism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective The current guidelines recommend that potassium iodide be given in the immediate preoperative period for patients with Graves’ disease who are undergoing thyroidectomy. Nonetheless, the evidence behind this recommendation is tenuous. The purpose of this study is to clarify the benefits of preoperative iodine administration from published comparative studies. Data Sources We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL from 1980 to June 2018. Review Methods Studies were included that compared preoperative iodine administration and no premedication before thyroidectomy. For the meta-analysis, studies were pooled with the random-effects model. Results A total of 510 patients were divided into the iodine (n = 223) and control (n = 287) groups from 9 selected studies. Preoperative iodine administration was significantly associated with decreased thyroid vascularity and intraoperative blood loss. Significant heterogeneity was present among studies. We found no significant difference in thyroid volume or operative time. Furthermore, the meta-analysis showed no difference in the risk of postoperative complications, including vocal cord palsy, hypoparathyroidism/hypocalcemia, and hemorrhage or hematoma after thyroidectomy. Conclusion Preoperative iodine administration decreases thyroid vascularity and intraoperative blood loss. Nonetheless, it does not translate to more clinically meaningful differences in terms of operative time and postoperative complications.

Download Full-text

Safety and effectiveness evaluation of a two-handed technique combining harmonic scalpel and laparoscopic Peng’s multifunction operative dissector in laparoscopic hemihepatectomy

World Journal of Surgical Oncology ◽

10.1186/s12957-021-02311-5 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Jingwei Cai ◽

Guixing Jiang ◽

Yuelong Liang ◽

Yangyang Xie ◽

Junhao Zheng ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Operative Time ◽

Harmonic Scalpel ◽

Peak Level ◽

Bile Leakage ◽

Liver Parenchyma ◽

Control Group ◽

Case Group ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

And Control

Abstract Objectives This study was designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a two-hand technique combining harmonic scalpel (HS) and laparoscopic Peng’s multifunction operative dissector (LPMOD) in patients who underwent laparoscopic hemihepatectomy (LHH). Methods We designed and conducted a case-control study nested in a prospectively collected laparoscopic liver surgery database. Patients who underwent LHH for liver parenchyma transection using HS + LPMOD were defined as cases (n = 98) and LPMOD only as controls (n = 47) from January 2016 to May 2018. Propensity score matching (1:1) between the case and control groups was used in the analyses. Results The case group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss in milliliters (169.4 ± 133.5 vs. 221.5 ± 176.3, P = 0.03) and shorter operative time in minutes (210.5 ± 56.1 vs. 265.7 ± 67.1, P = 0.02) comparing to the control group. The conversion to laparotomy, postoperative hospital stay, resection margin, the mean peak level of postoperative liver function parameters, bile leakage rate, and others were comparable between the two groups. There was no perioperative mortality. Conclusions We demonstrated that the two-handed technique combing HS and LPMOD in LHH is safe and effective which is associated with shorter operative time and less intraoperative blood loss compared with LPMOD alone. The technique facilitates laparoscopic liver resection and is recommended for use.

Download Full-text

Comparison of nephroscopy and cystoscopy used in the treatment of bladder stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BMC Surgery ◽

10.1186/s12893-021-01461-3 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Liping Gou ◽

Zhenghao Wang ◽

Ye Zhou ◽

Xiaofeng Zheng

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Randomized Controlled Trials ◽

Operative Time ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Significant Heterogeneity ◽

Bladder Stones ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare the safety and efficiency of nephroscopy and cystoscopy in transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL) for bladder stones (BS). Methods The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to January 2021 for studies assessing the effect of different types of endoscopes among patients who underwent TUCL. The search strategy and study selection process were in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Results Five randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed no difference in stone-free rate (RR = 1.00, CI = 0.98–1.02, p = 1.00) between the two groups and nonsignificant heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, p = 1.00), and all patients were rendered stone free. Use of the nephroscope significantly shortened the operative time compared with the cystoscope group (RR= − 26.26, CI = − 35.84 to − 16.68, p < 0.00001), and there was significant heterogeneity (I2= 87%, p < 0.00001). There was no significant difference in mean urethral entries (RR = 0.66, CI = − 0.71 to − 2.04, p = 0.35), hospitalization (MD = 0.08, 95% CI = − 0.07 to 0.23, p = 0.31) or total complication rate (RR=1.37, 95% CI = 0.47–4.00, p = 0.56) between the two groups. Conclusions In conclusion, this systematic review demonstrates that both nephroscopy and cystoscopy have high stone clearance efficiency, low rates of complications and short hospitalizations. The mean urethral entries depend on the treatment method for large stone fragments. However, the use of nephroscopy can significantly reduce the operative time.

Download Full-text

Robotic, laparoscopic or open hemihepatectomy for giant liver haemangiomas over 10 cm in diameter

10.21203/rs.2.13230/v5 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Minggen Hu ◽

Kuang Chen ◽

Xuan Zhang ◽

Chenggang Li ◽

Dongda Song ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Operative Time ◽

Liver Volume ◽

Future Liver Remnant ◽

Oral Intake ◽

Postoperative Recovery ◽

Postoperative Outcomes ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Liver Remnant ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hemihepatectomy for giant liver haemangiomas.Methods: From April 2011 to April 2017, consecutive patients who underwent hemihepatectomy for giant liver haemangiomas were included in this study. According to the type of operation, these patients were divided into the robotic hemihepatectomy (RH) group, the laparoscopic hemihepatectomy (LH) group, and the open hemihepatectomy (OH) group. The perioperative and short-term postoperative outcomes were compared among the three groups. The study was reported following the STROCSS criteria.Results: There were no significant differences in age, sex, tumour location, body surface area (BSA), future liver remnant volume (FLR), standard liver volume (SLV), liver haemangioma volume, FLR/SLV, resected normal liver volume/resected volume, hepatic disease, rates of blood transfusion, liver function after 24 hours of surgery, operative morbidity and mortality among the three groups. Compared with patients in the RH group (n=19) and the LH group (n=13), patients in the OH group (n=25) had a significantly longer postoperative hospital stay (P< 0.05), time to oral intake (P < 0.05), and time to get-out-of-bed (P < 0.05); a higher VAS score after 24 hours of surgery (P < 0.05); and a shorter operative time (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in these postoperative outcomes (P＞0.05) between the RH group and the LH group. When the setup time in the RH group was excluded, the operative time in the RH group was significantly shorter than that in the LH group (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in the operative time between the RH group and the OH group (P＞0.05). The amount of intraoperative blood loss in the RH group was the lowest among the three groups (P＜0.05), and the amount of intraoperative blood loss in the LH group was less than that in the OH group (P＜0.05).Conclusion: Robotic and laparoscopic hemihepatectomies were associated with less intraoperative blood loss,better postoperative recovery and lower pain score. Compared with laparoscopic hemihepatectomy, robotic hemihepatectomy was associated with significantly less intraoperative blood loss and a shorter operative time.

Download Full-text

Blood Loss from Transverse Versus Longitudinal Uterine Incision in Abdominal Myomectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

10.21203/rs.2.9943/v3 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Alaa Elguindy ◽

Hosam Hemeda ◽

Mohamed Esmat Shawky ◽

Mohamed Elsenity ◽

Medhat Adel Elsayed ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Operative Time ◽

P Value ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Postoperative Fever ◽

Longitudinal Incision ◽

Abdominal Myomectomy ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Uterine Incision ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background: It is unclear whether transverse uterine incision is non-inferior to longitudinal incision during myomectomy with regard to bleeding. Our aim was to compare between transverse and longitudinal uterine incisions in myomectomy. Methods: A parallel randomized controlled single-blinded study in a university affiliated hospital, in the period between January 2017 and April 2018, in which 52 women candidates for abdominal myomectomy were randomized into transverse uterine incision or longitudinal uterine incision groups (26 in each group). Intraoperative blood loss (estimated directly by blood volume in suction bottle and linen towels and indirectly by difference between preoperative and postoperative hematocrit), operative time and postoperative fever were analyzed. Results: No statistically significant difference was found between transverse and longitudinal incisions regarding intraoperative blood loss (389.7 ± 98.56 ml vs 485.04 ± 230.6 ml respectively, p value=0.07), operative time (59.96 ± 16.78 min vs 66.58 ± 17.33 min respectively, p value=0.18), and postoperative fever (4% vs 8.33%, p value=0.6). Conclusion: Transverse uterine incision does not cause more blood loss than longitudinal incision and is a reasonable option during abdominal myomectomy. Trial registration: NCT03009812 at clinicaltrials.gov, registered January 2017

Download Full-text

Only Tumors Angiographically Identified as Hypervascular Exhibit Lower Intraoperative Blood Loss Upon Selective Preoperative Embolization of Spinal Metastases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Frontiers in Oncology ◽

10.3389/fonc.2020.597476 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 ◽

Author(s):

Yining Gong ◽

Changming Wang ◽

Hua Liu ◽

Xiaoguang Liu ◽

Liang Jiang

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Retrospective Studies ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Spinal Metastases ◽

Preoperative Embolization ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Hypervascular Tumors ◽

Hypervascular Tumor ◽

Tumor Types

BackgroundThe role of preoperative embolization (PE) in reducing intraoperative blood loss (IBL) during surgical treatment of spinal metastases remains controversial.MethodsA systematic search was conducted for retrospective studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the IBL between an embolization group (EG) and non-embolization group (NEG) for spinal metastases. IBL data of both groups were synthesized and analyzed for all tumor types, hypervascular tumor types, and non-hypervascular tumor types.ResultsIn total, 839 patients in 11 studies (one RCT and 10 retrospective studies) were included in the analysis. For all tumor types, the average IBL did not differ significantly between the EG and NEG in the RCT (P = 0.270), and there was no significant difference between the two groups in the retrospective studies (P = 0.05, standardized mean difference [SMD] = −0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −1.03 to 0.00). For hypervascular tumors determined as such by consensus (n = 542), there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.52, SMD = −0.25, 95% CI: −1.01 to 0.52). For those determined as such using angiographic evidence, the IBL was significantly lower in the EG than in the NEG group, in the RCT (P = 0.041) and in the retrospective studies (P = 0.004, SMD = −0.93, 95% CI: −1.55 to −.30). For IBL of non-hypervascular tumor types, both the retrospective study (P = 0.215) and RCT (P = 0.947) demonstrated no statistically significant differences in IBL between the groups.ConclusionsOnly tumors angiographically identified as hypervascular exhibited lower IBL upon PE in this study. Further exploration of non-invasive methods to identify the vascularity of tumors is warranted.

Download Full-text

Robotic, laparoscopic or open hemihepatectomy for giant liver hemangiomas of over 10 cm in diameter

10.21203/rs.2.13230/v3 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Minggen Hu ◽

Kuang Chen ◽

Xuan Zhang ◽

Chenggang Li ◽

Dongda Song ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Operative Time ◽

Liver Volume ◽

Future Liver Remnant ◽

Oral Intake ◽

Postoperative Recovery ◽

Postoperative Outcomes ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Liver Remnant ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background To evaluate the clinical efficacy of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hemihepatectomy for giant liver hemangiomas.Methods From April 2011 to April 2017, consecutive patients who underwent hemihepatectomy for giant liver hemangiomas were included into this study. According to the type of operation, these patients were divided into the robotic hemihepatectomy (RH) group, the laparoscopic hemihepatectomy (LH) group, and the open hemihepatectomy (OH) group. The perioperative and short-term postoperative outcomes were compared among the three groups. The study was reported following the STROCSS criteria.Results There were no significant differences in age, sex, tumor location, body surface area (BSA), future liver remnant volume (FLR), standard liver volume (SLV), liver hemangioma volume, FLR/SLV, resected normal liver volume / resected volume, hepatic disease, rates of blood transfusion, liver function after 24 hours of surgery, operative morbidity and mortality among the three groups. Compared with patients in the RH group (n=19), and the LH group (n=13), patients in the OH group (n=25) had significantly longer postoperative hospital stay (P< 0.05), time to oral intake (P < 0.05), time to get-out-of-bed (P < 0.05), a higher VAS score after 24 hours of surgery (P < 0.05) and a shorter operative time (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in these postoperative outcomes (P>0.05) between the RH group and the LH group. When the setup time in the RH group was excluded, the operative time of the RH group was significantly shorter than the LH group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the operative time between the RH group and the OH group (P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss of the RH group was the least among the three groups (P<0.05) and the intraoperative blood loss of the LH group was less than the OH group (P<0.05).Discussion Robotic, laparoscopic, and open hemihepatectomy were safe and efficacious treatments for giant liver hemangiomas. Robotic and laparoscopic hemihepatectomy were significantly better than open hemihepatectomy in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative recovery and pain score. Compared with laparoscopic hemihepatectomy, robotic hemihepatectomy was associated with significantly less intraoperative blood loss and shorter operative time.

Download Full-text

Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy (LSPDP) versus Open Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy (OSPDP): A Comparative Study

Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology ◽

10.1155/2019/9367868 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 2019 ◽

pp. 1-7 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jing Huang ◽

Dipesh Kumar Yadav ◽

Chaojie Xiong ◽

Ye Sheng ◽

Xinhua’ Zhou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Postoperative Complications ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Pancreatic Fistula ◽

Distal Pancreatectomy ◽

Operative Time ◽

Malignant Tumors ◽

Low Grade ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Spleen Preserving

Objective. To compare outcomes between laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) and open spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (OSPDP) for treatment of benign and low-grade malignant tumors of the pancreas and evaluate feasibility and safety of LSPDP. Methods. The clinical data of 53 cases of LSPDP and 44 cases of OSPDP performed between January 2008 and August 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared. Results. There was no significant difference in preoperative data between the two groups. However, the LSPDP group had statistically significant shorter operative time (145.3±55.9 versus 184.7±33.5, P=0.03) and lesser intraoperative blood loss (150.6±180.8 versus 253.5±76.2, P=0.03) than that of the OSPDP group. Moreover, the LSPDP group also had statistically significant earlier passing of first flatus (2.2±1.4 versus 3.1±1.9, P=0.01), earlier diet intake (2.3±1.8 versus 3.4±2.0, P=0.01), and shorter hospital stay (6.2±7.2 versus 8.8±9.3, 0.04) than that of the OSPDP group. However, postoperative pancreatic fistula (P=0.64) and total postoperative complications (P=0.59) were not significantly different between the groups. The rate of pancreatic fistula and total postoperative complications occurred in 62.5% and 64.5%, respectively, in LSPDP group and, similarly, 70% and 70.0%, respectively, in OSPDP group. Conclusion. This study confirms that LSPDP is safe, feasible, and superior to OSPDP in terms of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and postoperative recovery. Hence, it is worth popularizing LSPDP for benign and low-grade malignant tumors of the pancreas.

Download Full-text

THORACOLUMBAR BURST FRACTURES, SHORT X LONG FIXATION: A META-ANALYSIS

Coluna/Columna ◽

10.1590/s1808-185120161501154925 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 15 (1) ◽

pp. 78-84 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Carlos Alberto Assunção Filho ◽

Filipe Cedro Simões ◽

Gabriel Oliveira Prado

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Postoperative Period ◽

Operative Time ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures ◽

Kyphosis Correction ◽

Burst Fractures ◽

Significant Difference

ABSTRACT The number of fixed segments in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures remains controversial. This study aims to compare the results of short and long fixation in thoracolumbar burst fractures through a meta-analysis of studies published recently. MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were used. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative studies (prospective and retrospective) were selected. Data were analyzed with the software Review Manager. There was no statistically significant difference in the Cobb angle of preoperative kyphosis. Long fixation showed lower average measurements postoperatively (MD = 1.41; CI = 0.73-2.08; p<0.0001) and in the last follow-up (MD = 3.98; CI = 3.22-4.75; p<0.00001). The short fixation showed the highest failure rates (RD = 4.03; CI = 1.33-12.16; p=0.01) and increased loss of height of the vertebral body (MD = 1.24; CI = 0.49-1.98; p=0.001), with shorter operative time (MD = -24.54; CI = -30.16 - -18.91; p<0.00001). There was no significant difference in blood loss and clinical outcomes. The high rates of kyphosis correction loss with short fixation and the lower correction rate in the immediate postoperative period were validated. There was no significant difference in the blood loss rates because arthrodesis was performed in a short segment in the analyzed studies. The short fixation was performed in a shorter operative time, as expected. No study has shown superior clinical outcomes. The short fixation had worse rates of kyphosis correction in the immediate postoperative period, and increased loss of correction in long-term follow-up, making the long fixation an effective option in the management of this type of fracture.

Download Full-text

Blood loss from transverse versus longitudinal uterine incision in abdominal myomectomy: a randomized controlled trial

BMC Women s Health ◽

10.1186/s12905-020-01113-3 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Alaa Elguindy ◽

Hosam Hemeda ◽

Mohamed Esmat Shawky ◽

Mohamed Elsenity ◽

Medhat Adel Elsayed ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Operative Time ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Postoperative Fever ◽

Longitudinal Incision ◽

Abdominal Myomectomy ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Uterine Incision ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background It is unclear whether transverse uterine incision is non-inferior to longitudinal incision during myomectomy with regard to bleeding. Our aim was to compare between transverse and longitudinal uterine incisions in myomectomy. Methods A parallel randomized controlled single-blinded study in a university affiliated hospital, in the period between January 2017 and April 2018, in which 52 women candidates for abdominal myomectomy were randomized into transverse uterine incision or longitudinal uterine incision groups (26 in each group). Intraoperative blood loss (estimated directly by blood volume in suction bottle and linen towels and indirectly by difference between preoperative and postoperative hematocrit), operative time and postoperative fever were analyzed. Results No statistically significant difference was found between transverse and longitudinal incisions regarding intraoperative blood loss (389.7 ± 98.56 ml vs 485.04 ± 230.6 ml respectively, p value = 0.07), operative time (59.96 ± 16.78 min vs 66.58 ± 17.33 min respectively, p value = 0.18), and postoperative fever (4% vs 8.33%, p value = 0.6). Conclusion Transverse uterine incision does not cause more blood loss than longitudinal incision and is a reasonable option during abdominal myomectomy. Trial registration: NCT03009812 at clinicaltrials.gov, registered January 2017

Download Full-text

Robotic, laparoscopic or open hemihepatectomy for giant liver hemangiomas of over 10 cm in diameter

10.21203/rs.2.13230/v2 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Minggen Hu ◽

Kuang Chen ◽

Xuan Zhang ◽

Chenggang Li ◽

Dongda Song ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Operative Time ◽

Liver Volume ◽

Future Liver Remnant ◽

Oral Intake ◽

Postoperative Recovery ◽

Postoperative Outcomes ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Liver Remnant ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract [EXSCINDED] Abstract Abstract Abstract Background To evaluate the clinical efficacy of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hemihepatectomy for giant liver hemangiomas.Methods From April 2011 to April 2017, consecutive patients who underwent hemihepatectomy for giant liver hemangiomas were included into this study. According to the type of operation, these patients were divided into the robotic hemihepatectomy (RH) group, the laparoscopic hemihepatectomy (LH) group, and the open hemihepatectomy (OH) group. The perioperative and short-term postoperative outcomes were compared among the three groups. The study was reported following the STROCSS criteria.Results There were no significant differences in age, sex, tumor location, body surface area (BSA), future liver remnant volume (FLR), standard liver volume (SLV), liver hemangioma volume, FLR/SLV, resected normal liver volume / resected volume, hepatic disease, rates of blood transfusion, liver function after 24 hours of surgery, operative morbidity and mortality among the three groups. Compared with patients in the RH group (n=19), and the LH group (n=13), patients in the OH group (n=25) had significantly longer postoperative hospital stay (P< 0.05), time to oral intake (P < 0.05), time to get-out-of-bed (P < 0.05), a higher VAS score after 24 hours of surgery (P < 0.05) and a shorter operative time (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in these postoperative outcomes (P>0.05) between the RH group and the LH group. When the setup time in the RH group was excluded, the operative time of the RH group was significantly shorter than the LH group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the operative time between the RH group and the OH group (P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss of the RH group was the least among the three groups (P<0.05) and the intraoperative blood loss of the LH group was less than the OH group (P<0.05).Discussion Robotic, laparoscopic, and open hemihepatectomy were safe and efficacious treatments for giant liver hemangiomas. Robotic and laparoscopic hemihepatectomy were significantly better than open hemihepatectomy in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative recovery and pain score. Compared with laparoscopic hemihepatectomy, robotic hemihepatectomy resulted in significantly less intraoperative blood loss and shorter operative time.

Download Full-text