hypervascular tumor
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

27
(FIVE YEARS 7)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Shaaban Hanafy ◽  
Essam Elsayed Tharwat

Abstract Background PVT is an ultrasonographic finding in up to 8% of patients with liver cirrhosis. Once hepatocellular carcinoma has occurred as the final station in liver cirrhosis, the risk of PVT rises to 40%. Benign and malignant PVT can occur in patients with liver cirrhosis, and it is important to differentiate the nature of PVT as it has a great impact on patient’s management and outcome. Diagnosis Confirming portal vein thrombosis and extension by abdominal ultrasound, contrast-enhanced USG, CT, or MRI. Malignant criteria of PVT are pulsatile pattern in Doppler and heterogeneous contrast enhancement, which are especially seen at the arterial phase, neovascularity within PVT, portal vein thrombus with a diameter of > 23 mm while in benign thrombus, PV diameter does not exceed 20 mm. Visible hypervascular tumor is in close proximity to PVT. Conclusion It is not uncommon to find portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis, despite the fact that malignant variant is the most frequent, but efforts should be gathered to exclude benign PVT which may change the management of the patients dramatically.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yining Gong ◽  
Changming Wang ◽  
Hua Liu ◽  
Xiaoguang Liu ◽  
Liang Jiang

BackgroundThe role of preoperative embolization (PE) in reducing intraoperative blood loss (IBL) during surgical treatment of spinal metastases remains controversial.MethodsA systematic search was conducted for retrospective studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the IBL between an embolization group (EG) and non-embolization group (NEG) for spinal metastases. IBL data of both groups were synthesized and analyzed for all tumor types, hypervascular tumor types, and non-hypervascular tumor types.ResultsIn total, 839 patients in 11 studies (one RCT and 10 retrospective studies) were included in the analysis. For all tumor types, the average IBL did not differ significantly between the EG and NEG in the RCT (P = 0.270), and there was no significant difference between the two groups in the retrospective studies (P = 0.05, standardized mean difference [SMD] = −0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −1.03 to 0.00). For hypervascular tumors determined as such by consensus (n = 542), there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.52, SMD = −0.25, 95% CI: −1.01 to 0.52). For those determined as such using angiographic evidence, the IBL was significantly lower in the EG than in the NEG group, in the RCT (P = 0.041) and in the retrospective studies (P = 0.004, SMD = −0.93, 95% CI: −1.55 to −.30). For IBL of non-hypervascular tumor types, both the retrospective study (P = 0.215) and RCT (P = 0.947) demonstrated no statistically significant differences in IBL between the groups.ConclusionsOnly tumors angiographically identified as hypervascular exhibited lower IBL upon PE in this study. Further exploration of non-invasive methods to identify the vascularity of tumors is warranted.


JGH Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 773-774
Author(s):  
Keisuke Ishigami ◽  
Tomoya Sakuma ◽  
Masato Saito ◽  
Yujiro Kawakami ◽  
Yoshiharu Masaki ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 605-612
Author(s):  
Hiro Kiyosue ◽  
Satomi Ide ◽  
Masaki Morishige ◽  
Takeshi Kubo

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Tomino ◽  
Mizuki Ninomiya ◽  
Rumi Matono ◽  
Fumiya Narutomi ◽  
Yumi Oshiro ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Hepatoid carcinoma (HC) is an extra-hepatic neoplasm that shares the morphological and immunohistochemical features of hepatocellular carcinoma. Pancreatic HC exists as either pure or combined type. Pure pancreatic HC is extremely rare, with only a few cases reported in the literature to date. Because of the rarity of pure pancreatic HC, its clinical features including incidence, behavior, and prognosis remain unclear. We herein report the case of a 56-year-old man who developed pure pancreatic HC treated with surgical resection. We also include a review of the existing literature. Case presentation A 56-year-old male patient was admitted to our hospital after a pancreatic cyst was identified by abdominal ultrasonography on a comprehensive medical examination. Endoscopic ultrasound revealed a cystic mass measuring 13 mm in size in the pancreatic head and a low-density mass measuring 16 mm in size in the pancreatic tail, which was partially enhanced on contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed a branch duct type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in the pancreatic head and an early enhanced nodule measuring approximately 10 mm in size in the pancreatic tail. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the hypervascular tumor was performed. The hypervascular tumor was suspected to be a solid pseudopapillary neoplasm. Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy was performed. Histology was identical to hepatocellular carcinoma of the liver. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for hepatocyte paraffin 1, and a canalicular pattern was confirmed on the polyclonal carcinoembryonic antigen staining. The patient was diagnosed with a moderately differentiated pancreatic HC. The patient was followed up without adjuvant chemotherapy, and there was no evidence of recurrence at 6 months post-operatively. Conclusions We present a case of moderately differentiated pure pancreatic HC. For the accurate preoperative diagnosis of pure pancreatic HC, biopsy is preferred to cytology or preoperative imaging studies such as CT. The prognosis of pure pancreatic HC depends on its differentiation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (01) ◽  
pp. 57-60
Author(s):  
Ronald Koschny ◽  
Michael Allgäuer ◽  
Jan Pfeiffenberger ◽  
Jessica Seessle ◽  
Juri Fuchs ◽  
...  

AbstractA 37-year-old male patient with Crohn’s disease and multiple liver hemangiomas was referred to our hospital for an atypical hypervascular hepatic lesion detected on an external magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. The patient was otherwise well and had no history of any liver disease. Liver values and tumor markers were normal. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound confirmed multiple hemangiomas in different liver segments and a hypervascular tumor with a hypovascular rim in segment II/IV. Repeat MRI showed a strongly enhancing neoplasm of 2.6 cm with a texture distinctly different from the otherwise relatively uniform hemangiomas, without evidence of interim growth. Ultrasound-guided biopsy revealed a hepatic small vessel neoplasm. Due to the unknown malignant potential, atypical segmental surgical resection was performed. Final histopathological analysis confirmed the complete resection of the lesion. The postoperative course was uneventful.


Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (49) ◽  
pp. e13473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takehide Fujimoto ◽  
Osamu Inatomi ◽  
Ryo Mizuno ◽  
Shuhei Shintani ◽  
Atsushi Nishida ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Maria Paola Ciliberti ◽  
Rosa D'Agostino ◽  
Laura Gabrieli ◽  
Anna Nikolaou ◽  
Angela Sardaro

Hemangiopericytoma (HPC) is an extremely rare hypervascular tumor of mesenchymal lineage. It tends to recur and to develop distant metastases even many years after primary surgical resection. The management of recurrent and metastatic disease is not always so well defined. A complete surgical resection does not eliminate the high risk of local recurrences that occur in the central nervous system, often in the same surgical bed. However, treatment with adjuvant radiotherapy even in cases of complete resection remains controversial. Because of its rarity, there is no standard for treatment. We focused on radiotherapy treatment options, analyzing the literature and making a base on conduct further studies to establish the standard radiation dose to be used for locoregional control of such a complex and extremely rare disease and to help specialists to take the most appropriate therapeutic option.


Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (19) ◽  
pp. e0607
Author(s):  
Soo Jeong Lee ◽  
Ji Young Rho ◽  
Gwang Il Kim ◽  
Joonsuk Park

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document