Self-management of patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review of experiences and attitudes

Background: Patients with advanced cancer are increasingly expected to self-manage. Thus far, this topic has received little systematic attention. Aim: To summarise studies describing self-management strategies of patients with advanced cancer and associated experiences and personal characteristics. Also, to summarise attitudes of relatives and healthcare professionals towards patient self-management. Design: A systematic review including non-experimental quantitative and qualitative studies. Data were analysed using critical interpretive synthesis. Included studies were appraised on methodological quality and quality of reporting. Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science and Google Scholar (until 11 June 2019). Results: Of 1742 identified articles, 31 moderate-quality articles describing 8 quantitative and 23 qualitative studies were included. Patients with advanced cancer used self-management strategies in seven domains: medicine and pharmacology, lifestyle, mental health, social support, knowledge and information, navigation and coordination and medical decision-making (29 articles). Strategies were highly individual, sometimes ambivalent and dependent on social interactions. Older patients and patients with more depressive symptoms and lower levels of physical functioning, education and self-efficacy might have more difficulties with certain self-management strategies (six articles). Healthcare professionals perceived self-management as desirable and achievable if based on sufficient skills and knowledge and solid patient–professional partnerships (three articles). Conclusion: Self-management of patients with advanced cancer is highly personal and multifaceted. Strategies may be substitutional, additional or even conflicting compared to care provided by healthcare professionals. Self-management support can benefit from an individualised approach embedded in solid partnerships with relatives and healthcare professionals.

Download Full-text

Self-management support preferences of people with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

Chronic Illness ◽

10.1177/1742395319869443 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 174239531986944 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Selena O’Connell ◽

Vera JC McCarthy ◽

Eileen Savage

Keyword(s):

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽

Pulmonary Disease ◽

Healthcare Professionals ◽

Qualitative Studies ◽

Self Management ◽

Chronic Obstructive ◽

Management Support ◽

Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽

The Individual ◽

Behavioural Sciences

Objectives To synthesise findings from qualitative studies on the preferences of people with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for self-management support. Methods A thematic synthesis of literature was carried out. Six databases (ASSIA, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Psychology and the Behavioural Sciences and SSCI) were used to search for qualitative studies eliciting perspectives of adults with asthma and/or COPD on self-management support, published between May 2008 and April 2018. Results A total of 968 articles were retrieved across databases, with 15 articles included in the synthesis. Three themes were identified: Types of Support described the range of supports valued by participants in the studies, particularly education provided by competent healthcare professionals; The Support Relationship highlighted the importance of a collaborative relationship with one’s healthcare professional which was characterised by communication, trust and continuity over time and Accessibility identified the considerations of participants relating to physically accessible, prompt support which is provided in a format preferred by the individual. Discussion Increased understanding of patients’ preferences may provide insight which can be used to enhance engagement with self-management support. Further research needs to examine self-management support preferences outside the context of evaluating interventions for people with asthma/COPD and needs to address the optimal means of enhancing accessibility.

Download Full-text

Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of self-management support interactions: Systematic review and qualitative synthesis

Chronic Illness ◽

10.1177/1742395317710082 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 14 (2) ◽

pp. 79-103 ◽

Cited By ~ 24

Author(s):

Marika Franklin ◽

Sophie Lewis ◽

Karen Willis ◽

Helen Bourke-Taylor ◽

Lorraine Smith

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Healthcare Professionals ◽

Care Delivery ◽

Individual Responsibility ◽

Self Management ◽

Chronic Obstructive ◽

Traditional Model ◽

Management Support ◽

Model Of Care ◽

Qualitative Synthesis

Objective To review studies examining the experience of self-management support in patient–provider interactions and the shaping of goals through interactions. Methods We undertook a systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature. We searched six databases (2004–2015) for published studies on the provision of self-management support in one-to-one, face-to-face, patient–provider interactions for obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with 14 articles meeting inclusion criteria. Results Themes identified from studies were (1) dominance of a traditional model of care, encompassing the provision of generic information, exclusion of the psychosocial and temporal nature of interactions and (2) a context of individual responsibility and accountability, encompassing self-management as patients’ responsibility and adherence, accountability and the attribution of blame. Interactions were constrained by consultation times, patient self-blame and guilt, desire for autonomy and beliefs about what constitutes ‘effective’ self-management. Discussion Encounters were oriented towards a traditional model of care delivery and this limited opportunity for collaboration. These findings suggest that healthcare professionals remain in a position of authority, limiting opportunities for control to be shared with patients and shared understandings of social context to be developed.

Download Full-text

The accessibility and acceptability of self-management support interventions for men with long term conditions: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

BMC Public Health ◽

10.1186/1471-2458-14-1230 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 42

Author(s):

Paul Galdas ◽

Zoe Darwin ◽

Lisa Kidd ◽

Christian Blickem ◽

Kerri McPherson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Qualitative Studies ◽

Self Management ◽

Management Support ◽

Long Term Conditions

Download Full-text

Barriers and enablers to sustaining self-management behaviours after completing a self-management support intervention for type 2 diabetes: a protocol for a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis

HRB Open Research ◽

10.12688/hrbopenres.13466.1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 4 ◽

pp. 129

Author(s):

Márcia Carvalho ◽

Pauline Dunne ◽

Dominika Kwasnicka ◽

Molly Byrne ◽

Jenny McSharry

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Type 2 Diabetes ◽

Behaviour Change ◽

Qualitative Studies ◽

Self Management ◽

Qualitative Evidence Synthesis ◽

Management Support ◽

Support Intervention ◽

Barriers And Enablers

Background: Attendance at self-management support interventions is associated with improved outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes. However, initial improvements are often not sustained beyond one year, which may be a result of difficulties in sustaining positive changes made to self-management behaviours. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise qualitative research on the barriers and enablers to sustaining self-management behaviours following completion of a self-management support intervention for type 2 diabetes. Methods: The review will use the “best fit” framework synthesis method to develop a new conceptual model of sustained behaviour change in type 2 diabetes. MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Elsevier), CINAHL (EBSCO), PsycINFO (Ovid), SCOPUS, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, WorldCat and Open Grey will be searched to identify primary qualitative studies. A parallel search will be conducted in Google Scholar to identify relevant theories for the development of an a priori framework to synthesise findings across studies. Methodological limitations of included studies will be assessed using an adapted version of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool for Qualitative Studies. A sensitivity analysis will be conducted to examine the impact of studies with methodological limitations on synthesis findings. Confidence in the synthesis findings will be assessed using the GRADE-CERQual tool. Screening, data extraction, methodological limitation assessment, synthesis and GRADE-CERQual assessment will be conducted by one author with a second author independently verifying a randomly selected 20% sample. Discussion: This review will develop a new model of sustained behaviour change in type 2 diabetes self-management. The findings can be used to inform the development of new interventions or revision of existing interventions to better support sustained engagement in type 2 diabetes self-management behaviours.

Download Full-text

Self-management of Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review of Experiences and Attitudes

10.26226/morressier.5c76c8b6e2ea5a7237612265 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Sophie van Dongen

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Advanced Cancer ◽

Self Management

Download Full-text

Effectiveness of self-management interventions in inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review informing the 2021 EULAR recommendations for the implementation of self-management strategies in patients with inflammatory arthritis

RMD Open ◽

10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001647 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 (2) ◽

pp. e001647

Author(s):

Andréa Marques ◽

Eduardo Santos ◽

Elena Nikiphorou ◽

Ailsa Bosworth ◽

Loreto Carmona

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Full Text ◽

Inflammatory Arthritis ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Management Strategies ◽

Psychosocial Interventions ◽

Behavioural Therapy ◽

Self Management ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Management Interventions

ObjectiveTo perform a systematic review (SR) on the effectiveness of self-management interventions, in order to inform the European League Against Rheumatism Recommendations for its implementation in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA).MethodsThe SR was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook and included adults (≥18 years) with IA. The search strategy was run in Medline through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, and PEDro. The assessment of risk of bias, data extraction and synthesis were performed by two reviewers independently. A narrative Summary of Findings was provided according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation.ResultsFrom a total 1577 references, 57 were selected for a full-text review, and 32 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria (19 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 13 SRs). The most studied self-management components were specific interactive disease education in ten RCTs, problem solving in nine RCTs, cognitive–behavioural therapy in eight RCTs, goal setting in six RCTs, patient education in five RCTs and response training in two RCTs. The most studied interventions were multicomponent or single exercise/physical activity in six SRs, psychosocial interventions in five SRs and education in two SRs. Overall, all these specific components and interventions of self-management have beneficial effects on IAs-related outcomes.ConclusionsThe findings confirm the beneficial effect of the self-management interventions in IA and the importance of their implementation. Further research should focus on the understanding that self-management is a complex intervention to allow the isolation of the effectiveness of its different components.

Download Full-text