scholarly journals Neurobiological mechanisms associated with antipsychotic drug-induced dystonia

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anton JM Loonen ◽  
Svetlana A Ivanova

Dystonia is by far the most intrusive and invalidating extrapyramidal side effect of potent classical antipsychotic drugs. Antipsychotic drug-induced dystonia is classified in both acute and tardive forms. The incidence of drug-induced dystonia is associated with the affinity to inhibitory dopamine D2 receptors. Particularly acute dystonia can be treated with anticholinergic drugs, but the tardive form may also respond to such antimuscarinic treatment, which contrasts their effects in tardive dyskinesia. Combining knowledge of the pathophysiology of primary focal dystonia with the anatomical and pharmacological organization of the extrapyramidal system may shed some light on the mechanism of antipsychotic drug-induced dystonia. A suitable hypothesis is derived from the understanding that focal dystonia may be due to a faulty processing of somatosensory input, so leading to inappropriate execution of well-trained motor programmes. Neuroplastic alterations of the sensitivity of extrapyramidal medium-sized spiny projection neurons to stimulation, which are induced by the training of specific complex movements, lead to the sophisticated execution of these motor plans. The sudden and non-selective disinhibition of indirect pathway medium-sized spiny projection neurons by blocking dopamine D2 receptors may distort this process. Shutting down the widespread influence of tonically active giant cholinergic interneurons on all medium-sized spiny projection neurons by blocking muscarinic receptors may result in a reduction of the influence of extrapyramidal cortical-striatal-thalamic-cortical regulation. Furthermore, striatal cholinergic interneurons have an important role to play in integrating cerebellar input with the output of cerebral cortex, and are also targeted by dopaminergic nigrostriatal fibres affecting dopamine D2 receptors.

2002 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 569-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Starr ◽  
Laura B. Kozell ◽  
Kim A. Neve

2003 ◽  
Vol 986 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 22-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana A Alcantara ◽  
Violeta Chen ◽  
Bruce E Herring ◽  
John M Mendenhall ◽  
Monica L Berlanga

Neuroscience ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 1005-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lindskog ◽  
P. Svenningsson ◽  
B.B. Fredholm ◽  
P. Greengard ◽  
G. Fisone

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 1609-1618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo F Gallo ◽  
Michael C Salling ◽  
Bo Feng ◽  
Jose A Morón ◽  
Neil L Harrison ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 1512-1520 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Bay-Richter ◽  
M J O’Callaghan ◽  
N Mathur ◽  
C M P O'Tuathaigh ◽  
D M Heery ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Eduardo F. Gallo ◽  
Julia Greenwald ◽  
Eric Teboul ◽  
Kelly M. Martyniuk ◽  
Yulong Li ◽  
...  

AbstractCholinergic interneurons (CINs) in the striatum respond to salient stimuli with a multiphasic response, including a pause, in neuronal activity. Slice physiology experiments have shown the importance of dopamine D2 receptors (D2Rs) in regulating CIN pausing yet the behavioral significance of the CIN pause and its regulation by dopamine in vivo is still unclear. Here, we show that D2R upregulation in CINs of the nucleus accumbens (NAc) lengthens the pause in CIN activity ex vivo and enlarges a stimulus-evoked decrease in acetylcholine (ACh) levels during behavior. This enhanced dip in ACh levels is associated with a selective deficit in the learning to inhibit responding in a Go/No-Go task. Our data demonstrate, therefore, the importance of CIN D2Rs in modulating the CIN response induced by salient stimuli and points to a role of the pause in inhibitory learning. This work has important implications for brain disorders with altered striatal dopamine and ACh function, including schizophrenia and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 1719
Author(s):  
Kavya Prasad ◽  
Erik F. J. de Vries ◽  
Philip H. Elsinga ◽  
Rudi A. J. O. Dierckx ◽  
Aren van Waarde

Adenosine and dopamine interact antagonistically in living mammals. These interactions are mediated via adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors (R). Stimulation of A2AR inhibits and blockade of A2AR enhances D2R-mediated locomotor activation and goal-directed behavior in rodents. In striatal membrane preparations, adenosine decreases both the affinity and the signal transduction of D2R via its interaction with A2AR. Reciprocal A2AR/D2R interactions occur mainly in striatopallidal GABAergic medium spiny neurons (MSNs) of the indirect pathway that are involved in motor control, and in striatal astrocytes. In the nucleus accumbens, they also take place in MSNs involved in reward-related behavior. A2AR and D2R co-aggregate, co-internalize, and co-desensitize. They are at very close distance in biomembranes and form heteromers. Antagonistic interactions between adenosine and dopamine are (at least partially) caused by allosteric receptor–receptor interactions within A2AR/D2R heteromeric complexes. Such interactions may be exploited in novel strategies for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, substance abuse, and perhaps also attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Little is known about shifting A2AR/D2R heteromer/homodimer equilibria in the brain. Positron emission tomography with suitable ligands may provide in vivo information about receptor crosstalk in the living organism. Some experimental approaches, and strategies for the design of novel imaging agents (e.g., heterobivalent ligands) are proposed in this review.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document