Evaluation of the Dunlap/Rippstein Method for Determination of Femoral Neck Angles

1985 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Reikerås ◽  
A. Høiseth ◽  
A. Reigstad
Keyword(s):  
1981 ◽  
Vol &NA; (156) ◽  
pp. 189???195 ◽  
Author(s):  
HYMAN POGRUND ◽  
W. M. RIGAL ◽  
MYER MAKIN ◽  
GORDON ROBIN ◽  
J. MENCZEL ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110407
Author(s):  
Samuel Morgan ◽  
Ofer Sadovnic ◽  
Moshe Iluz ◽  
Simon Garceau ◽  
Nisan Amzallag ◽  
...  

Background: Femoral anteversion is a major contributor to functionality of the hip joint and is implicated in many joint pathologies. Accurate determination of component version intraoperatively is a technically challenging process that relies on the visual estimation of the surgeon. The following study aimed to examine whether the walls of the femoral neck can be used as appropriate landmarks to ensure appropriate femoral prosthesis version intraoperatively. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study based on 32 patients (64 hips) admitted to our centre between July and September 2020 who had undergone a CT scan of their lower limbs. Through radiological imaging analysis, the following measurements were performed bilaterally for each patient: anterior wall version, posterior wall version, and mid-neck femoral version. Anterior and posterior wall version were compared and evaluated relative to mid-neck version, which represented the true version value. Results: Mean anterior wall anteversion was 20° (95% CI, 17.6–22.8°) and mean posterior wall anteversion was −12° (95% CI, −15 to −9.7°). The anterior walls of the femoral neck had a constant of −7 and a coefficient of 0.9 (95% CI, −9.8 to −4.2; p  < 0.0001; R2 0.77). The posterior walls of the femoral neck had a constant of 20 and a coefficient of 0.7 (95% CI, 17.8–22.5; p  < 0.0001; R2 0.60). Conclusions: Surgeons can accurately obtain femoral anteversion by subtracting 7° from the angle taken between the anterior wall and the posterior femoral condyles or by adding 20° to the angle taken between the posterior wall and the posterior femoral condyles.


Injury ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 456-457
Author(s):  
E.A. Melamed ◽  
D. Fuchs ◽  
N.D. Reis ◽  
C. Zinman

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barış Çaypınar ◽  
Bülent Erol ◽  
Mert Topkar ◽  
Onur Başçı

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e0149480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian J. Hartel ◽  
Andreas Petersik ◽  
Anne Schmidt ◽  
Daniel Kendoff ◽  
Jakob Nüchtern ◽  
...  

1966 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 93-97
Author(s):  
Richard Woolley

It is now possible to determine proper motions of high-velocity objects in such a way as to obtain with some accuracy the velocity vector relevant to the Sun. If a potential field of the Galaxy is assumed, one can compute an actual orbit. A determination of the velocity of the globular clusterωCentauri has recently been completed at Greenwich, and it is found that the orbit is strongly retrograde in the Galaxy. Similar calculations may be made, though with less certainty, in the case of RR Lyrae variable stars.


1999 ◽  
Vol 190 ◽  
pp. 549-554
Author(s):  
Nino Panagia

Using the new reductions of the IUE light curves by Sonneborn et al. (1997) and an extensive set of HST images of SN 1987A we have repeated and improved Panagia et al. (1991) analysis to obtain a better determination of the distance to the supernova. In this way we have derived an absolute size of the ringRabs= (6.23 ± 0.08) x 1017cm and an angular sizeR″ = 808 ± 17 mas, which give a distance to the supernovad(SN1987A) = 51.4 ± 1.2 kpc and a distance modulusm–M(SN1987A) = 18.55 ± 0.05. Allowing for a displacement of SN 1987A position relative to the LMC center, the distance to the barycenter of the Large Magellanic Cloud is also estimated to bed(LMC) = 52.0±1.3 kpc, which corresponds to a distance modulus ofm–M(LMC) = 18.58±0.05.


1961 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 29-41
Author(s):  
Wm. Markowitz
Keyword(s):  

A symposium on the future of the International Latitude Service (I. L. S.) is to be held in Helsinki in July 1960. My report for the symposium consists of two parts. Part I, denoded (Mk I) was published [1] earlier in 1960 under the title “Latitude and Longitude, and the Secular Motion of the Pole”. Part II is the present paper, denoded (Mk II).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document