Film-Screen Vs. Digital Radiography in Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Hand

1994 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Á. Jónsson ◽  
A. Borg ◽  
P. Hannesson ◽  
K. Herrlin ◽  
K. Jonsson ◽  
...  

In a prospective investigation the diagnostic accuracy of film-screen and digital radiography in rheumatoid arthritis of hands was compared. Seventy hands of 36 patients with established rheumatoid arthritis were included in the study. Each of 11 joints in every hand was evaluated regarding the following radiologic parameters: soft tissue swelling, joint space narrowing, erosions and periarticular osteopenia. The digital images were obtained with storage phosphor image plates and evaluated in 2 forms; as digital hard-copy on film and on a monitor of an interactive workstation. The digital images had a resolution of either 3.33 or 5.0 lp/mm. ROC curves were constructed and comparing the area under the curves no significant difference was found between the 3 different imaging forms in either resolution group for soft tissue swelling, joint space narrowing and erosions. The film-screen image evaluation of periarticular osteopenia was significantly better than the digital hard-copy one in the 3.33 lp/mm resolution group, but no significant difference was found in the 5.0 lp/mm group. These results support the view that currently available digital systems are capable of adequate diagnostic performance.

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 275.1-275
Author(s):  
L. Rombaut ◽  
K. De Baere ◽  
E. Debacker ◽  
L. Decavele ◽  
F. Malfait ◽  
...  

Background:The Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes (EDS) are a group of rare heritable connective tissue disorders caused by various defects in the biosynthesis or secretion of fibrillar collagens. The three main clinical features of EDS are joint hypermobility, skin fragility and general soft tissue fragility. 13 clinical subtypes of EDS are recognized, of which the hypermobile type (hEDS) and classical type (cEDS) are the most prevalent. It has been hypothesized that the (micro-)trauma in the joint due to typical subluxations and dislocations, make EDS patients prone to developing osteoarthritis (OA) in early stage. Conversely, it has been mentioned that joint hypermobility provides a larger joint surface area and prevents OA. Abnormal biomechanical loading has been identified as a risk factor for the development of OA in the wrist and hand. However, no studies have yet been performed in EDS patients.Objectives:The primary aim was to investigate the presence of any degenerative features for hand OA, and if this differs between cEDS and hEDS patients. The second aim was to evaluate hand function and pain related to OA signs in EDS patients.Methods:cEDS and hEDS patients between 35 and 50 years old were invited to participate. cEDS diagnosis was genetically confirmed and hEDS diagnosis was performed according the clinical 2017 hEDS criteria. Exclusion criteria were a body mass index ≥35, not being able to stand straight up for five minutes, suffering from an auto-immune disease or rheumatological condition, or pregnancy. Conventional X-rays of both hands were performed and scored independently by three assessors according to Kallman1. Presence of osteophytes (0-3), joint space narrowing (0-3), malalignment (>15°)(0/1), erosions (0/1), subchondral sclerosis (0/1), and subchondral cysts (0/1) were scored in all interphalangeal (distal and proximal), metacarpophalangeal and thumb base joints of both hands1. We defined early hand OA as minimally three features (≥1) were present. Several clinical assessments were made, e.g. tenderness, bony swelling and soft tissue swelling. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) and Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) questionnaires were completed.Results:In total, 31 patients (mean age 41 ± 5.6 years, 13 men and 18 women) diagnosed with EDS participated, of whom 19 with cEDS and with 12 hEDS. In total, 927 joints were assessed. Level of agreement of radiographic assessments was very high (>98%). Early hand OA was found in more than 40% of the EDS patients, with a significant higher frequency in cEDS patients compared to hEDS patients (58% vs. 17%) (p=0.032). Joint space narrowing was most frequently present and significantly more in the cEDS patients compared to hEDS patients (79% vs. 21%) (p=0.003). However, radiographic changes were found in only 10% of all finger joints. Of all fingers, thumb joints were most affected. Regarding the clinical features of hand OA, all patients showed deformity in one or more finger joints, most frequently at the thumb, especially the IP joint (both hyperflexion and hyperextension). Tenderness and bony swelling was present in 36% and 45% of all patients, respectively, whereas soft tissue swelling was less frequently observed (10% of all patients). Here, no significant differences were found between cEDS and hEDS patients. Moderate disability was present (mean (SD) AUSCAN= 45.47 (27.10) and MHQ = 65.97 (14.21). cEDS showed significant less hand pain (p=0.03), a better hand function (p=0.03) and less disability (p=0.026) than hEDS.Conclusion:This explorative study demonstrates that a high number of EDS patients present with minimal degenerative features of hand OA, but in a minority of joints. Patients with cEDS were significantly more affected, but showed a better function compared to hEDS. Possibly, cEDS patients are more susceptible to develop hand OA.References:[1]Altman R, Gold G. Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised. OARSI. 2007;15:A1-A56.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. Lechtenboehmer ◽  
T. Burkard ◽  
S. Reichenbach ◽  
U. A. Walker ◽  
A. M. Burden ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives A considerable proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) also suffer from hand osteoarthritis (OA). We here assess the association between conventional synthetic (cs) and biological (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and radiographic distal interphalangeal-(DIP) OA in patients with RA. Methods Adult RA patients from a longitudinal Swiss registry of rheumatic diseases who had ≥ 2 hand radiographs were included at the first radiograph and followed until the outcome or the last radiograph. Patients were grouped into two cohorts based on whether DIP OA was present or absent at cohort entry (cohorts 1 and 2, respectively). Modified Kellgren-Lawrence scores (KLS) were obtained by evaluating DIP joints for the severity of osteophytes, joint space narrowing, subchondral sclerosis, and erosions. KLS ≥ 2 in ≥ 1 DIP joint indicated incident or existing OA, and increase of ≥ 1 in KLS in ≥ 1 DIP joint indicated progression in existing DIP OA. Time-varying Cox regression and generalized estimating equation (GEE) analyses were performed. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of DIP OA incidence (cohort 2), or progression (cohort 1), in bDMARD monotherapy, bDMARD/csDMARD combination therapy, and past or never DMARD use, when compared to csDMARD use. In post hoc analyses, we descriptively and analytically assessed the individual KLS features in cohort 1. Results Among 2234 RA patients with 5928 radiographs, 1340 patients had DIP OA at baseline (cohort 1). Radiographic progression of DIP OA was characterized by new or progressive osteophyte formation (666, 52.4%), joint space narrowing (379, 27.5%), subchondral sclerosis (238, 17.8%), or erosions (62, 4.3%). bDMARD monotherapy had an increased risk of radiographic DIP OA progression compared to csDMARD monotherapy (adjusted HR 1.34 [95% CI 1.07–1.69]). The risk was not significant in csDMARD/bDMARD combination users (HR 1.12 [95% CI 0.96–1.31]), absent in past DMARD users (HR 0.96 [95% CI 0.66–1.41]), and significantly lower among never DMARD users (HR 0.54 [95% CI 0.33–0.90]). Osteophyte progression (HR 1.74 [95% CI 1.11–2.74]) was the most significantly increased OA feature with bDMARD use compared to csDMARD use. In 894 patients without initial DIP OA (cohort 2), the risk of incident OA did not differ between the treatment groups. The results from GEE analyses corroborated all findings. Conclusions These real-world RA cohort data indicate that monotherapy with bDMARDs is associated with increased radiographic progression of existing DIP OA, but not with incident DIP OA.


1991 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 660-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. Sharp ◽  
Frederick Wolfe ◽  
Donald M. Mitchell ◽  
Daniel A. Bloch

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-375
Author(s):  
Shota Ichikawa ◽  
Tamotsu Kamishima ◽  
Kenneth Sutherland ◽  
Hideki Kasahara ◽  
Yuka Shimizu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document