A Double-Blind Controlled Trial of ‘Vivalan’ (Viloxazine Hydrochloride) and Imipramine Hydrochloride in the Treatment of Depression in General Practice

1974 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 260-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
P F C Bayliss ◽  
A R Dewsbury ◽  
J F Donald ◽  
J W Harcup ◽  
M Mayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Depressive Illness ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Patient Study ◽  
Treatment Of Depression ◽  
Imipramine Hydrochloride

One hundred and twenty-three patients with mild to moderate depressive illness were entered into a double-blind between-patient study of viloxazine hydrochloride (150 mg/day, expressed as base) and imipramine hydrochloride (75 mg/day, expressed as salt) by nine general practitioners. Sixty-two took viloxazine and sixty-one took imipramine. Both drugs produced a statistically highly significant improvement in both the depressive and anxiety symptoms over the period of the study, an effect being seen as early as the seventh day of treatment. Viloxazine produced fewer side-effects than imipramine, in particular significantly less drowsiness and dry mouth. The only side-effect seen with viloxazine was an upper gastro-intestinal disturbance with nausea and occasional vomiting, but this was transient. It is concluded that viloxazine hydrochloride is an effective anti-depressant in mild to moderate cases of depression in general practice and has the advantage of fewer side-effects than imipramine. The absence of sedation with viloxazine is of particular value in the treatment of ambulant patients.

A Double-Blind Comparative Clinical Trial of Floctafenine and Four Other Analgesics Conducted in General Practice

1976 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
D M Lomas ◽  
J Gay ◽  
R N Midha ◽  
D L Postlethwaite
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Analgesic Effect ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
The Other ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Comparative Clinical Trial

Three hundred and twelve patients suffering from painful conditions were admitted to a multicentre, double-blind controlled trial, conducted in general practice in which five analgesics—floctafenine (Idarac), paracetamol, aspirin, dihydrocodeine and pentazocine—were compared. Overall ratings of analgesic effect placed floctafenine first in rank order. Floctafenine was statistically significantly superior in effect to pentazocine but not to the other three agents as far as doctor ratings were concerned; and superior to both pentazocine and dihydrocodeine in the opinion of patients. Fewer patients experienced side-effects on floctafenine than on the other four analgesics and this difference between floctafenine and pentazocine, and floctafenine and dihydrocodeine was statistically significant.

A Comparative Clinical Trial of Org GB 94 and Imipramine in the Treatment of Depression in General Practice

1975 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 251-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
J E Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Treatment Period ◽  
Therapeutic Effect ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Comparative Clinical Trial ◽  
Two Agents ◽  
Treatment Of Depression

A double-blind controlled comparative clinical trial of Org GB 94 and imipramine was conducted in general practice. Fifty-five patients were treated with Org GB 94 (60 mg daily) and fifty-four with imipramine (150 mg daily). In the doses employed both agents were equally effective in relieving depression over a four week treatment period. Tolerance of the two agents was similar. Although no statistically significant differences emerged, with regard to both therapeutic effect and some side-effects a trend in favour of Org GB 94 was apparent.

A Multicentre Double Blind Trial of Fluoxetine versus Amitriptyline in the Treatment of Depressive Illness

1993 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona K. Judd ◽  
Kate Moore ◽  
Trevor R. Norman ◽  
Graham D. Burrows ◽  
Ramesh K. Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
Serotonin Reuptake ◽  
Depressive Illness ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Side Effect Profile ◽  
Double Blind Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Antidepressant Efficacy ◽  
To Receive

The antidepressant efficacy and side effect profile of a fixed dose of 20 mg/day of fluoxetine, a specific serotonin reuptake inhibitor, were compared to those of amitriptyline. Fifty-eight patients with DSM-III-R depression were randomly assigned to receive either fluoxetine or amitriptyline. Fifty-six patients (fluoxetine N = 23, amitriptyline N = 23) completed the 6 week study. Comparable antidepressant efficacy was demonstrated for the two drugs. Patients taking fluoxetine reported less side-effects than those taking amitriptyline.

A Placebo Controlled Trial of Viloxazine with and without Tranquillizers in Depressive Illness

1975 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
R V Magnus
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Clinical Effect ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Depressive Illness ◽  
Antidepressant Effect ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Depressed Patients ◽  
Crossover Studies

Two double-blind four-way crossover studies are reported, comparing the antidepressant effect of 14-day courses of: viloxazine, viloxazine with a tranquillizer either perphenazine or diazepam or tranquillizer alone, against a placebo. In one study the antidepressant effect of viloxazine at a dose of 150 mg daily was statistically greater than that of placebo, whilst in the second study viloxazine was statistically superior to diazepam (15 mg daily). In depressed patients with a clear anxiety component, viloxazine alone seemed preferable to a combination with a tranquillizer as such a combination did not produce an enhanced clinical effect and the incidence of side-effects was possibly increased. Viloxazine was generally well tolerated and side-effects, when they occurred, were generally a mild upper gastro-intestinal disturbance.

Treatment of Arthritis in General Practice A Comparison between Benorylate and Indomethacin

1973 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 166-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Jaffé
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Double Blind

In a double-blind controlled trial two groups of 40 patients with rheumatoid or osteo-arthritis were treated for two weeks with indomethacin or benorylate. Benorylate was as effective as indomethacin in relieving symptoms but side effects were substantially less.

A Comparative Clinical Trial of Mianserin (Norval®) and Amitriptyline in the Treatment of Depression in General Practice

1978 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Eric Murphy ◽  
K M Bridgman
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Comparative Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Comparative Clinical Trial ◽  
Treatment Of Depression

A double-blind controlled comparative trial of mianserin (Norval®) and amitriptyline was conducted in general practice. Fifty-one patients were treated with amitriptyline and fifty-five with mianserin. The dosage for the first week was 25 mg t.d.s. for amitriptyline and 10 mg t.d.s. for mianserin, increasing to 50 mg t.d.s. and 20 mg t.d.s. respectively for the subsequent three weeks. Both drugs proved equally effective in relieving the symptoms of primary depression but mianserin showed a reduced incidence of side-effects which was statistically significant.

Maprotiline (Ludiomil®) in Depression: A Report of a Monitored Release Study of 10,000 Patients in General Practice

1977 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
W A Forrest
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Single Dose ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
Depressive Illness ◽  
Effective Therapy ◽  
Withdrawal Of Treatment ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Release Study

In a three-week study of 10,000 general practice patients with depressive illness, a single dose of maprotiline 75 mg at night was effective therapy in three-quarters of the patients who completed the study. At this dose the drug was well tolerated, and troublesome side-effects presented in only a small percentage of patients. Drowsiness was the most commonly reported side-effect, and the main reason for withdrawal of treatment. The drug was acceptable to most physicians, and in this study was used in a wide range of patients and over a broad spectrum of depressive illness.

Baclofen versus clonidine in the treatment of opiates withdrawal, side-effects aspect: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Ahmadi-Abhari ◽  
S. Akhondzadeh ◽  
S. M. Assadi ◽  
O. L. Shabestari ◽  
Z. M. Farzanehgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals Side effects of the metacognitive training for depression compared to a cognitive remediation training in patients with depression

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona Dietrichkeit ◽  
Marion Hagemann-Goebel ◽  
Yvonne Nestoriuc ◽  
Steffen Moritz ◽  
Lena Jelinek
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
Statistical Power ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Cognitive Remediation ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Metacognitive Training ◽  
To Receive

AbstractAlthough awareness of side effects over the course of psychotherapy is growing, side effects are still not always reported. The purpose of the present study was to examine side effects in a randomized controlled trial comparing Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT) and a cognitive remediation training in patients with depression. 84 patients were randomized to receive either D-MCT or cognitive remediation training (MyBrainTraining) for 8 weeks. Side effects were assessed after the completion of each intervention (post) using the Short Inventory of the Assessment of Negative Effects (SIAN) and again 6 months later (follow-up) using the Negative Effects Questionnaire (NEQ). D-MCT and MyBrainTraining did not differ significantly in the number of side effects. At post assessment, 50% of the D-MCT group and 59% of the MyBrainTraining group reported at least one side effect in the SIAN. The most frequently reported side effect was disappointment in subjective benefit of study treatment. At follow-up, 52% reported at least one side effect related to MyBrainTraining, while 34% reported at least one side effect related to the D-MCT in the NEQ. The most frequently reported side effects fell into the categories of “symptoms” and “quality”. Our NEQ version was missing one item due to a technical error. Also, allegiance effects should be considered. The sample size resulted in low statistical power. The relatively tolerable number of side effects suggests D-MCT and MyBrainTraining are safe and well-received treatment options for people with depression. Future studies should also measure negative effects to corroborate our results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document