Oxaliplatin and Raltitrexed in the Treatment of Inoperable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Results of a Pilot Study

2001 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 391-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Maisano ◽  
Nicola Caristi ◽  
Giuseppe Toscano ◽  
Marcello Aragona ◽  
Pietro Spadaro ◽  
...  

Aims and Background The treatment of inoperable malignant pleural mesothelioma is a challenge for the oncologist. Available chemotherapy regimens achieve poor results, therefore new agents or combinations are needed. In a phase I study, the combination of oxaliplatin and raltitrexed was shown to be active against malignant pleural mesothelioma. We herein report the results of a pilot study about the treatment of this disease. Methods From April 1999 to June 2000, we enrolled 11 chemotherapy-naïve patients with inoperable malignant pleural mesothelioma suitable to receive the following combination chemotherapy: raltitrexed, 3 mg/m2 iv, and oxaliplatin, 130 mg/m2, as a 2-hr infusion every 3 weeks. Results Four partial responses, 1 regression of disease (objective response rate, 45%; 95% Cl, 15.6-74.4%), 4 stable diseases and 2 progressions of disease were observed. An improvement in disease-related symptoms was recorded in all responders and in 2 patients with stable disease. Toxicity was mild, with no toxic-related death and only 1 episode of grade 4 neurotoxicity. Conclusions We consider the combination promising and worthy of further studies.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3173-TPS3173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colette Shen ◽  
Jessica Frakes ◽  
Jared Weiss ◽  
Jimmy J. Caudell ◽  
Trevor G Hackman ◽  
...  

TPS3173 Background: Despite the past decade of transformative advances in immuno-oncology, the response rate to checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains low (~15%). There is significant interest in developing strategies to overcome resistance to these treatments, thus increasing response rate. Emerging evidence suggests that radiation therapy (RT) could potentially augment the antitumor response to ICIs through synergic effect. However, RT dose and ultimate efficacy are limited by toxicity related to exposure of healthy tissues. NBTXR3 is a first-in-class radioenhancer administered by direct intratumoral injection, designed at the nanoscale to increase RT dose deposition within tumor cells and RT-dependent tumor cell killing, without increasing surrounding normal tissue toxicity. Preclinical and early clinical data suggest NBTXR3 activated by RT can trigger an anti-tumor immune response, producing both local and systemic (abscopal) effects. We hypothesize that NBTXR3 activated by RT, in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy (R3/RT/PD-1), will act synergistically to maximize the local RT effect and produce a systemic response sufficient to increase the proportion of ICI responders or convert ICI non-responders to responders. Methods: This trial [NCT03589339] is a multicenter, open-label, phase I study to evaluate safety and tolerability of R3/RT/PD-1 in three cohorts: (1) Locoregional recurrent or recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) amenable to re-irradiation of the HN field, (2) Lung metastases, or (3) Liver metastases, both from any primary cancer eligible for anti-PD-1 treatment. Approximately two-thirds of patients in each cohort will be anti-PD-1 non-responders. NBTXR3 injected volume is based on a percentage of gross tumor volume (GTV). The primary objective is to determine the R3/RT/PD-1 recommended phase 2 dose in each cohort. Secondary objectives are to evaluate anti-tumor response (objective response rate; ORR), safety and feasibility of NBTXR3 injection, and NBTXR3 body kinetic profile. Exploratory objectives will assess biomarkers of R3/RT/PD-1 response, including PD-L1 status by IHC, as well as mRNA and cytokine immune marker profiling. To date, three patients have been treated, one in cohort 1, two in cohort 2. Clinical trial information: NCT03589339 .


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7087-7087 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Mutri ◽  
C. Pinto ◽  
S. Giaquinta ◽  
P. Di Tullio ◽  
V. Torri ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8553-8553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Phillips ◽  
Teresa Szyszko ◽  
Peter Hall ◽  
Gary J. R. Cook ◽  
Ramsay Khadeir ◽  
...  

8553 Background: Argininosuccinate synthetase 1 (ASS1)-deficient malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) cells are sensitive to arginine deprivation with pegylated arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG20), which also potentiates the cytotoxic effect of pemetrexed (PEM). In the phase I dose-escalation TRAP study (NCT02029690) we showed that ADI-PEG20 with first-line PEM and cisplatin (CIS) chemotherapy (ADIPEMCIS) produced a 100% disease control rate (DCR) in patients (pts; n = 9) with ASS1-deficient thoracic cancers, with no additional toxicity (Beddowes et al 2017). Here, we present the TRAP expansion cohort experience in MPM. Methods: Good performance (ECOG 0-1) MPM pts with non-resectable disease and measurable by modified RECIST, were enrolled in a phase I TRAP expansion cohort at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ADIPEMCIS, using tumoral ASS1 loss as a selection biomarker. PEM (500mg/m2) and CIS (75mg/m2) were given every 3 weeks with weekly IM ADI-PEG20 (36mg/m2) for a maximum of 6 cycles with maintenance ADI-PEG20 in responding pts. Primary endpoint was tumor response rate (modified RECIST), with secondary endpoints including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. We measured plasma arginine and citrulline concentrations, ADI-PEG20 antibodies, and biopsied patients on progression to explore resistance mechanisms. Results: 31 ASS1-deficient MPM pts (median age 67) were enrolled (11 epithelioid, 10 biphasic and 10 sarcomatoid) out of 92 screened pts. Plasma arginine decreased with a reciprocal increase in plasma citrulline. The partial response rate was 35.5% (95% CI 19.2%-54.6%) with a DCR of 93.5% (95% CI 78.6%-99.2%). Median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI 4-6) and median OS was 10.1 months (95% CI 6.7-17.7). 10/31 pts (32.3%) experienced grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities, the most common being neutropenia (16.1%). Upregulation of ASS1 expression was observed in 2/3 biopsies on progression. Conclusions: The ADIPEMCIS regimen is active in ASS1-deficient MPM pts, including non-epithelioid disease. Based on these data the ATOMIC-meso phase 2/3 trial has opened comparing ADIPEMCIS versus PEMCISPlacebo, focusing on pts with non-epithelioid MPM. Clinical trial information: NCT02029690.


2015 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. ii16 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. van Zandwijk ◽  
N. Pavlakis ◽  
S. Kao ◽  
S. Clarke ◽  
A. Lee ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 1007-1017 ◽  
Author(s):  
S T Ong ◽  
N J Vogelzang

PURPOSE AND DESIGN We reviewed the published literature of clinical studies in malignant pleural mesothelioma, including phase II trials of the newer antifolates and plant derivatives, as well as older single-agent and combination chemotherapy trials. We excluded trials with less than 15 patients, although we have mentioned smaller trials in the text to make a specific point, as well as ones that show promise. We have also included confidence intervals when cited in the original reports, or calculated them when absent. RESULTS No drugs have consistently induced a response greater than 20%. Higher response rates have been reported with detorubicin, high-dose methotrexate, and edatrexate at 26%, 37%, and 25%, respectively, but these have yet to be confirmed. Agents that produce response rates in 10% to 20% of patients include doxorubicin, epirubicin, mitomycin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, and carboplatin. Combination chemotherapy trials do not demonstrate a consistently greater response rate than single-agent trials. However, the combination of doxorubicin, cisplatin, bleomycin, and mitomycin demonstrated a response rate of 44% (95% confidence interval, 27% to 63%), but this remains unconfirmed. Intrapleural therapy using interferon gamma, particularly for small-volume disease, shows promise. CONCLUSION The successful treatment of unresectable pleural mesothelioma awaits the discovery of active drugs. Recent trials of high-dose methotrexate and other antifolates are encouraging. Newer agents, including suramin, should be evaluated in phase II trials. Off-protocol combination therapy cannot be recommended over single-agent therapy, but studies that use combinations of the newer agents should be conducted.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 934-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie H. Sehn ◽  
Sarit E. Assouline ◽  
Douglas A. Stewart ◽  
Joy Mangel ◽  
Pavel Pisa ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 934 Background: GA101 (RO5072759) is the first humanized glycoengineered type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody to enter clinical trials. Preclinical studies have shown superior efficacy compared to rituximab and an initial phase I trial with 3-weekly dosing (Salles, ASH 2008) has demonstrated promising activity. The current phase I study has investigated the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of escalating doses of GA101 administered on a weekly x 4 schedule followed by maintenance therapy. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory CD20+ malignant disease for whom no therapy of higher priority was available were treated with GA101 monotherapy administered as a flat dose on days 1, 8,15 and 22 (with first infusion administered at 50% of cohort dose). Cohort doses were escalated based on safety in a 3+3 design. Tumor response was assessed at 3 months. Patients achieving a CR or PR were eligible to receive 3-monthly maintenance GA101 × 2 years. Select patients with stable disease (SD) and major clinical benefit were also permitted to receive maintenance therapy. Results: Since January 2008, 22 patients at 5 Canadian sites have been treated with GA101 at doses ranging from 100 mg to 2000 mg. Safety data is available on all patients, 20 of whom are evaluable for response following induction. The median age was 59 yrs (47-77). Histologies included follicular lymphoma (10), CLL (5), DLBCL (3), SLL (2), MCL (1) and MZL with high-grade transformation (1). Patients were highly pretreated, receiving a median of 4 (1-7) prior therapies: 19/22 (86%) had been treated with rituximab at least once, median was twice (1-4). 11/22 patients (50%) were refractory to rituximab. GA101 was well tolerated with no dose limiting toxicities observed across the escalating dose cohorts. The most common adverse events were grade 1/2 infusion-related reactions (IRRs), characterized by fever, chills, hypo/hypertension, nausea and vomiting. IRRs were mainly associated with the first infusion (16 events), with decreased frequency in subsequent infusions (only 8 events for all subsequent infusions). There were 4 grade 3 IRRs (one associated with tumour lysis syndrome) and one grade 4 IRR (with hypoxia) on day 1, the grade 4 event leading to the only permanent discontinuation from the protocol. During the induction period, a total of 6 minor infections and one episode of febrile neutropenia were reported in 4 patients. Five cases of grade 3/4 neutropenia (1 febrile) were reported in 4 patients and 1 case of grade 3 thrombocytopenia. To date, 8 serious adverse events have been reported in 7 patients (two of which were IRRs). Two patients have died, one with DLBCL who completed induction but progressed and died prior to efficacy assessment and one with follicular lymphoma who progressed and died on day 133. Measurement of plasma cytokines during and immediately after the first infusion showed an increase in IL6 and IL8 with a smaller increase in IL10 and TNF , a pattern of change that is broadly similar to other anti-CD20 antibodies. Minimal change in complement fractions was observed, which is in keeping with the known pre-clinical profile of GA101. GA101 pharmacokinetics in this study was characterized by two clearance components, one linear and one saturable, consistent with target-mediated disposition. Peak serum concentration levels were achieved by the third dose with significant inter-patient variability in peak levels noted. The overall response rate was 25% (5 pts, all PRs) with 13 patients having SD and 2 progressing. Of those patients with SD, 6/13 had objective evidence of tumour shrinkage, with one consolidating to a PR with maintenance treatment. Clinical benefit was seen across all dosing cohorts, including rituximab-refractory patients. The overall (best) response rate in patients with lymphoma was 38% (6 PRs). In all, 8 patients have continued on to maintenance treatment following induction, 3 of whom have subsequently progressed (2 aggressive lymphoma, 1 CLL). 5 patients remain on maintenance therapy; 4 in remission with durations ranging from 73 to 258 days and one patient with SD. Conclusion: GA101 is a novel type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that appears to have a safety profile similar to rituximab with promising efficacy in a clinically heterogeneous, heavily pretreated, end-stage patient population. Following review of pharmacokinetic and efficacy data, a dose of 1000 mg has been selected for ongoing phase II trials. Disclosures: Sehn: Roche, Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Stewart:Roche, Inc: Honoraria, Research Funding. Pisa:F Hoffman La Roche: Employment. Kothari:Roche Products Limited : Employment. Crump:Roche, Inc: Honoraria.


1992 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 380-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesare Gridelli ◽  
Rosario Pepe ◽  
Giuseppe Airoma ◽  
Pasquale Incoronato ◽  
Antonio Rossi ◽  
...  

Twelve patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma were subjected to mitomycin C (MMC) and vindesine (VDS) chemotherapy (MMC 10 mg/m2, i.v., d 1; VDS, 3 mg/m2, i.v., d 1–8, every 4 weeks). No objective response was obtained; 3 (25%) patients had stable disease and 9 (75%) progression of disease. We conclude that MMC plus VDS is an ineffective combination chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma.


2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 514-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Mahmoud Abbass Ellithy ◽  
Noha Salah El Din M. El Baghdady ◽  
Lamia Mohamed El Wakeel ◽  
Karim Ahmed Abdeltawab ◽  
Osama Ahmed Badary

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document