Attitudes of Non-Oncology Physicians Dealing with Cancer Patients. A Survey Based on Clinical Scenarios in Ancona Province, Central Italy

1996 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 423-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Piga ◽  
Francesco Graziano ◽  
Georges Zahra ◽  
Riccardo Cellerino

Aims and Background With this study we attempted to determine to what extent recent acquisitions in clinical oncology had reached categories of physicians involved in the management of patients with cancer, namely general surgeons, internists and family doctors. Methods A questionnaire was prepared with scenarios based on the following clinical situations: Scenario A, Adjuvant therapy in colon cancer; Scenario B, Treatment of small-cell lung cancer; Scenario C, Adjuvant therapy in high-risk, node-negative breast cancer; Scenario D, Treatment of early stage breast cancer; Scenario E, Asymptomatic transient myelosuppression during chemotherapy. Questionnaires were mailed to 365 family doctors, 54 general surgeons and 61 internists of the Province of Ancona in central Italy. Results A total of 198 completed questionnaires were returned (41%). Respondents were 36.7% of family doctors, 54.1% of internists and 57.4% of surgeons. Less than half of respondents selected an adequate approach such as adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer and high-risk, node-negative breast cancer or chemotherapy as first-line treatment for small-cell lung cancer. Conservative surgery plus radiotherapy (QUART) for early stage breast cancer was indicated by 69% of respondents. Over three quarters of physicians would give treatment for asymptomatic transient chemotherapy-induced leukopenia. In most of the scenarios, significant differences were detected in the distribution of preferences according to category of physicians. Family doctors and young physicians (<40 years) generally performed worse than hospital-based physicians (general surgeons and internists) and older physicians. Conclusions Non-oncology physicians showed insufficient awareness of currently available knowledge in cancer treatment. Basic concepts in cancer management should be part of the professional knowledge of all medical doctors, and key advances in clinical oncology should spread outside the oncologic environment more promptly, with a wide circulation among all physicians who care for cancer patients.

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 638-644
Author(s):  
Andrey Arsenev ◽  
Sergey Novikov ◽  
Sergey Kanaev ◽  
Anton Barchuk ◽  
Andrey Nefedov ◽  
...  

An active introduction of screening programs potentially leads to a significant increase in the proportion of patients with early forms of non-small cell lung cancer. Surgical treatment, which is the standard of care for localized forms, due to functional limitations can be performed only in 65-70% of patients. The solution to this problem can be found in the improvement of the results of radiotherapy by using modern equipment, the planning systems, improved fractionation schemes and introduction of methods for summing radiation doses. Stereotactic radiotherapy allows high-precision delivery of high radiation dose to tumor with a minimal damage to surrounding healthy tissues. In this literature review based on the analysis of a large number of publications we show that it is not yet possible to make valid conclusions about the effectiveness and safety of stereotactic radiation therapy as an alternative to the surgical methods. It is necessary to plan and conduct randomized trials without further delay taking into account the expected high relevance of the method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document