scholarly journals Randomised Comparison of Three Types of Continuous Anterior Abdominal Wall Block after Midline Laparotomy for Gynaecological Oncology Surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Cowlishaw ◽  
P. J. Kotze ◽  
L. Gleeson ◽  
N. Chetty ◽  
L. E. Stanbury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Rectus Sheath ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Wall Block ◽  
Gynaecological Oncology ◽  
Posterior Rectus Sheath

Effective analgesia after midline laparotomy surgery is essential for enhanced recovery programs. We compared three types of continuous abdominal wall block for analgesia after midline laparotomy for gynaecological oncology surgery. We conducted a single-centre, double-blind randomised controlled trial. Ninety-four patients were randomised into three groups to receive two days of programmed intermittent boluses of ropivacaine (18 ml 0.5% ropivacaine every four hours) via either a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) catheter, posterior rectus sheath (PRS) catheter, or a subcutaneous (SC) catheter. All groups received patient-controlled analgesia with morphine, and regular paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication. Measured outcomes included analgesic and antiemetic usage and visual analog scores for pain, nausea, vomiting, and satisfaction. Eighty-eight patients were analysed (29 SC, 29 PRS and 30 TAP). No differences in the primary outcome were found (median milligrams morphine usage on day two SC 28, PRS 25, TAP 21, P=0.371). There were differences in secondary outcomes. Compared with the SC group, the TAP group required less morphine in recovery (0 mg versus 6 mg, P=0.01) and reported less severe pain on day one (visual analog scores 36.3 mm versus 55 mm, P=0.04). The TAP group used fewer doses of tropisetron on day one compared with the PRS group (8 versus 21, P=0.016). Programmed intermittent boluses of ropivacaine delivered via PRS, TAP and SC catheters can be provided safely to patients undergoing midline laparotomy surgery. Initially TAP catheters appear superior, reducing early opioid and antiemetic requirements and severe pain, but these advantages are lost by day two.

scholarly journals A pragmatic, evidence-based approach to coding for abdominal wall reconstruction

Hernia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
B. K. Poulose ◽  
L.-C. Huang ◽  
S. Phillips ◽  
J. Greenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction ◽  
Rectus Sheath ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Myofascial Release ◽  
Posterior Rectus Sheath

Abstract Purpose Ambiguity exists defining abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) and associated Current Procedural Terminology code usage in the context of ventral hernia repair (VHR), especially with recent adoption of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted AWR techniques. Current guidelines have not accounted for the spectrum of repair complexity and have relied on expert opinion. This study aimed to develop an evidence-based definition and coding algorithm for AWR based on myofascial releases performed. Methods Three vignettes and associated outcomes were evaluated in adult patients who underwent elecive VHR with mesh between 2013 and 2020 in the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative including: (1) no myofascial release (NR), (2) posterior rectus sheath myofascial release (PRS), and (3) PRS with transversus abdominis release or external oblique release (PRS-TA/EO). The primary outcome measure was operative time based on the following categories (min): 0–59, 60–119, 120–179, 180–239, and 240 + ; secondary outcomes included disease severity measures and 30-day postoperative outcomes. Results 15,246 patients were included: 7287(NR), 2425(PRS), and 5534(PRS-TA/EO). Operative time increased based on myofascial releases performed: 180–239 min (p < 0.05): NR(5%), PRS(23%), PRS-TA/EO(28%) and greater than 240 min (p < 0.05): NR (4%), PRS (17%), PRS-TA/EO(44%). A dose–response effect was observed for all secondary outcome measures indicative of three distinct levels of patient complexity and outcomes for each of the three vignettes. Conclusion AWR is defined as VHR including myofascial release. Coding for AWR should reflect the actual effort used to manage these patients. We propose an evidence-based approach to AWR coding that focuses on myofascial release and is inclusive of minimally invasive techniques.

An Evaluation of Tension Measurements During Myofascial Release for Hernia Repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (9) ◽  
pp. 1159-1162
Author(s):  
Rajavi S. Parikh ◽  
Justin Faulkner ◽  
William Borden Hooks ◽  
William W. Hope
Keyword(s):  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Rectus Sheath ◽  
Abdominal Wall Hernia ◽  
Mesh Size ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Wall Tension ◽  
Hernia Defect ◽  
Myofascial Release ◽  
Posterior Rectus Sheath

Tension-free repairs have revolutionized the way we repair hernias. To help reduce undue tension when performing ventral hernia repair, multiple different techniques of myofascial releases have been described. The purpose of this project is to evaluate tension measurements for commonly performed myofascial releases in abdominal wall hernia repair. Patients undergoing myofascial release techniques for their ventral hernias were enrolled in a prospective Institutional Review Board-approved protocol to measure abdominal wall tension from June 1, 2011 to August 1, 2019. Abdominal wall tensions were measured using tensiometers before and after myofascial release techniques. Descriptive statistics were performed and data were analyzed. Thirty patients had tension measurements (5 anterior myofascial separation, 25 posterior myofascial separation with transversus abdominis release [TAR]). Average age was 60.1 years (range 29-81), 83% Caucasian, 53% female, and 42% recurrent hernias. The average hernia defect in patients undergoing anterior myofascial release was 117.3 cm2, and the average mesh size was 650 cm2. The reduction in tension after anterior release was 4.7 lbs (2.7 lbs vs 7.4 lbs). The average hernia defect in patients undergoing posterior myofascial release (TAR) was 183 cm2, and the average mesh size was 761.36 cm2. The reduction in tension after bilateral posterior rectus sheath incision was 2.55 lbs (5.01 lbs vs 7.56 lbs) with 0.66 lbs further reduction in tension after TAR (4.35 lbs vs 5.01). In this evaluation, abdominal wall tension measurements are shown to be a feasible adjunct during open hernia repair. Preliminary data show tension reductions associated with the different myofascial release techniques and, with further study, may be a useful intraoperative adjunct for decision making in hernia repair.

scholarly journals A randomized controlled study to compare the efficacy of hughes abdominal repair with conventional abdominal closure-to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias in Indian population

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 2291
Author(s):  
Rajasekaran C. ◽  
Vijaykumar K. ◽  
Arulkumaran M. ◽  
Meera S. S.
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Incisional Hernias ◽  
Abdominal Closure ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Abdominal Repair

Background: Incisional hernia forms the most common delayed morbidity following midline laparotomy surgeries- causing mental trauma to the patient impairing their quality of life and scars the name and fame of the surgeon. So, the need for possible attributes on surgeon’s aspect to prevent the incisional hernia is the need of the hour. We planned a randomized controlled trial to compare two different abdominal closure techniques to reduce the incidence of Incisional hernia following midline laparotomy incisions. We advocated Hughes abdominal repair which includes a series of two horizontal and two vertical mattresses within single suture whereby the tension load of suture is distributed both along and across the suture line.Methods: 1:1 Randomized controlled trial in which the patient is blinded and obviously operating surgeon is non-blinded. Evaluating examiner and radiologist are blinded.100 patients who underwent emergency and elective midline laparotomies were enrolled in the study and intra-operatively randomized into two groups in 1:1 pattern. Ethical clearance obtained from the Institutional ethical committee. The primary outcome measure is the incidence of burst abdomen at the end of 15 days by the evaluating surgeon (non-operated surgeon who is blinded). The secondary outcome is the incidence of incisional hernia at the end of one year-evaluated by detailed clinical examination with radiological proof using CT abdomen.Results: The incidence of incisional hernia is significantly low in Hughes abdominal repair than conventional abdominal closure.Conclusions: Hughes abdominal wall closure is superior to conventional closure in both emergency and elective laparotomy cases, in prevention of wound dehiscence and Incisional hernias later. Present study encourages us that Hughes abdominal wall repair is comparable to mesh repairs. This study needs to be continued further to a vast sample size to perfectly assess the statistical significance.

Transversus Abdominis Plane and Rectus Sheath Blocks

2021 ◽  
pp. 81-88
Author(s):  
Natalea Johnson ◽  
Jorge A. Pineda
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Umbilical Hernia ◽  
Visceral Pain ◽  
Rectus Sheath ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Rectus Sheath Block ◽  
Intercostal Nerves

Chapter 9 discusses truncal peripheral nerve blocks, which are utilized for supplemental analgesia for abdominal surgeries by providing local anesthesia to the anterior abdominal wall. These blocks are adjuvants because they will not block visceral pain. Unilateral analgesia to the skin, muscles, and parietal peritoneum of the abdominal wall is achieved. The transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) reliably provides analgesia to the lower abdominal wall in the T10–L1 distribution. Rectus sheath blocks anesthetize the terminal branches of the lower thoracic intercostal nerves and provide midline analgesia from the xiphoid process to the umbilicus. Surgical indications for TAP blocks include laparotomies, laparoscopies, inguinal hernia repairs, and appendectomies. Rectus sheath block indications include midline surgeries such as single-port appendectomies and umbilical hernia repairs.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Trans-Abdominal Retromuscular (TARM) Repair for Ventral Hernia: A Novel, Low-Cost Technique for Sublay and Posterior Component Separation

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 1081-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashwin A. Masurkar
Keyword(s):  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Rectus Sheath ◽  
Component Separation ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Mesh Placement ◽  
Posterior Component Separation ◽  
Posterior Rectus Sheath ◽  
Midline Closure

Abstract Background The complications of intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for ventral hernia has favored sublay mesh placement like open Rives–Stoppa repair (ORS). There was a need for low-cost laparoscopic trans-abdominal repair using a polypropylene mesh (PPM) with sublay, midline closure and addition of posterior component separation (PCS) by transversus abdominis release (TAR). Methods The techniques used three or six operating ports with triangulation. After adhesiolysis, a transverse incision was made on the peritoneum (P) and posterior rectus sheath (PRS). The retromuscular space was developed by raising a P-PRS flap. Midline closure was performed with No. 1 polydioxanone, and a PPM was placed in sublay, followed by closure of defect and P-PRS incision. For large hernias with divarication; myo-fascial medialization using PCS-TAR aided low-tension midline closure. Results Eighty-nine patients were operated from 2010 to 2019, 26 primary ventral; 63 incisional; and 22 recurrent hernias. Of the primary, 21 were umbilical, one Spigelian and four epigastric hernias. The incisional group had 57 patients with lower midline scars (C-section 25, open tubal ligation 15, abdominal hysterectomy 17), five lateral (appendicectomy), one post-laparotomy. The mean age, male/female sex ratio and BMI were 41.23 years, 1:10.1 and 29.2 kg/m2, respectively. Mean defect and mesh area were 110 cm2 and 392 cm2. Mean operating time was 192 min. Conversion to open, mesh infection and recurrence rates were 3.4%, 1.1% and 5.62%. Conclusion Laparoscopic TARM with PPM in sublay avoids mesh–bowel contact. It provides midline closure and PCS-TAR within the same port geometry with results comparable with ORS.

scholarly journals Effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block with rectus sheath block on patients undergoing laparoscopy-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Liang ◽  
Xia Xv ◽  
Chunguang Ren ◽  
Yongxing Yao ◽  
Xiujuan Gao
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Rectus Sheath ◽  
Radical Resection ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Rectus Sheath Block

Abstract Background Many patients complain of pain following laparoscopic surgery. Clinicians have used ultrasound-guided posterior transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) and rectus sheath block (RSB) for multimodal analgesia after surgery. We investigated the analgesic effects of US-guided posterior TAPB with RSB on postoperative pain following laparoscopy-assisted radical resection of early-stage rectal cancer. Methods Seventy-eight adults scheduled for laparoscopy-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer were enrolled in this double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomized into 3 groups: the TR Group underwent US-guided bilateral posterior TAPB (40 mL 0.33% ropivacaine) with RSB (20 mL 0.33% ropivacaine); the T Group underwent US-guided bilateral posterior TAPB alone; and the Control Group received saline alone. All patients also had access to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with sufentanil. The primary outcome was postoperative sufentanil consumption at 0–24, 24–48, and 48–72 h. The secondary outcomes were postoperative pain intensity and functional activity score at rest and while coughing for the same three time periods, intraoperative medication dosage, use of rescue analgesia, recovery parameters, and adverse effects. Results The three groups had no significant differences in baseline demographic and perioperative data, use of intraoperative medications, recovery parameters, and adverse effects. The TR group had significantly lower postoperative use of PCIA and rescue analgesic than in the other two groups (P < 0.05), but the Control Group and T Group had no significant differences in these outcomes. Conclusions Postoperative US-guided posterior TAPB with RSB reduced postoperative opioid use in patients following laparoscopy-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer. Trial registration The trial was registered with chictr.org (ChiCTR2000029326) on January 25, 2020.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document