scholarly journals Preliminary Validation of an Abbreviated Acute Concussion Symptom Checklist Using Item Response Theory

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 3087-3093
Author(s):  
Kristin Wilmoth ◽  
Brooke E. Magnus ◽  
Michael A. McCrea ◽  
Lindsay D. Nelson

Background: Symptom assessment is a critical component of concussion diagnosis and management, with item selection primarily driven by clinical judgment or expert consensus. We recently demonstrated that concussion symptoms assessed by the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) are essentially unidimensional, implying that overall symptom severity may be accurately estimated with relatively few questions. Briefer, evidence-based forms for symptom assessment would provide clinicians flexibility. Purpose: To develop and validate an abbreviated assessment of general concussion symptom severity using item response theory analyses. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Broad clinical assessments (SCAT3, Immediate Post-concussion and Cognitive Testing, Balance Error Scoring System, and Brief Symptom Inventory–18 Global Severity Index) were completed by 265 injured athletes and 235 matched teammate controls at 24 to 48 hours and 8, 15, and 45 days after concussion. Symptom checklist short forms (3-14 items from the original 22) were selected using item response theory item information curves. Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach alpha), correlation with criterion measures assessed concurrently (ie, acute neurocognitive performance, balance, and emotional symptoms), predictive validity (correlations with symptom duration), and differences between concussed and control groups (Cohen d) were examined across forms. Sensitivity and false-positive rates of the forms were estimated and compared using reliable change indices derived from controls. Results: Across the 3- to 22-item forms, internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach alphas, 0.90-0.94). Clinical correlations were significant ( P≤ .017) and to similar degrees for all short forms. Group difference confidence intervals overlapped across forms at 24- to 48-hour (Cohen d, 1.27-1.51) and 8-day follow-up (Cohen d, 0.31-0.44). Sensitivity remained similar across short forms, with a low false-positive rate in controls. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that even an ultrashort (3-item) inventory provides sufficiently reliable and valid estimates of overall concussion symptom severity 24 to 48 hours after injury. Future revisions of the SCAT could eliminate inefficient items, although replication in larger samples and extension to other postinjury time points are warranted.

Assessment ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 107319112094715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angélica Acevedo-Mesa ◽  
Jorge Nunes Tendeiro ◽  
Annelieke Roest ◽  
Judith G. M. Rosmalen ◽  
Rei Monden

More than 40 questionnaires have been developed to assess functional somatic symptoms (FSS), but there are several methodological issues regarding the measurement of FSS. We aimed to identify which items of the somatization subscale of the Symptom Checklist–90 (SCL-90) are more informative and discriminative between persons at different levels of severity of FSS. To this end, item response theory was applied to the somatization scale of the SCL-90, collected from a sample of 82,740 adult participants without somatic conditions in the Lifelines Cohort Study. Sensitivity analyses were performed with all the participants who completed the somatization scale. Both analyses showed that Items 11 “feeling weak physically” and 12 “heavy feelings in arms or legs” were the most discriminative and informative to measure severity levels of FSS, regardless of somatic conditions. Clinicians and researchers may pay extra attention to these symptoms to augment the assessment of FSS.


2018 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 521-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Molly E. Marino ◽  
Emily C. Dore ◽  
Pengsheng Ni ◽  
Colleen M. Ryan ◽  
Jeffrey C. Schneider ◽  
...  

Mindfulness ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1615-1628 ◽  
Author(s):  
William E. Pelham III ◽  
Oscar Gonzalez ◽  
Stephen A. Metcalf ◽  
Cady L. Whicker ◽  
Emily A. Scherer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marieke J Spijk-de Jonge ◽  
Martijn A H Oude Voshaar ◽  
Lisanne Renskers ◽  
Anita M P Huis ◽  
Mart A F J van de Laar ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The aim was to develop two disease- and treatment-related knowledge about RA (DataK-RA) short forms using item response theory-based linear optimal test design. Methods We used the open source Excel add-in solver to program a linear optimization algorithm to develop two short forms from the DataK-RA item bank. The algorithm was instructed to optimize precision (i.e. reliability) of the scores for both short forms, subject to a number of constraints that served to ensure that each short form would include unique items and that the short forms would have similar psychometric properties. Agreement among item response theory scores obtained from the different short forms was assessed using the Bland–Altman method and Student’s paired t-test. Construct validity and relative efficiency of the short forms was evaluated by relating the score to age, sex and educational attainment. Results Two short forms were derived from the DataK-RA item bank that satisfied all content constraints. Both short forms included 15 unique items and yielded reliable scores (r > 0.70), with low ceiling and floor effects. The short forms yielded statistically indistinguishable mean scores according to Student’s paired t-test and Bland–Altman analysis. Scores on short forms 1 and 2 were associated with age, sex and educational attainment to a similar extent. Conclusion In this study, we developed two DataK-RA short forms with unique items, yet similar psychometric properties, that can be used to assess patients pre- and post-test interventions aimed at improving disease-related knowledge in RA patients.


2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 1301-1313 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Victorson ◽  
Seung Choi ◽  
Marc A. Judson ◽  
David Cella

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document