scholarly journals Neuroendocrine Immunophenotype as Predictor of Clinical Recurrence in 110 Patients with Prostate Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 765-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Autorino ◽  
M.G. Lamendola ◽  
G. De Luca ◽  
M. De Sio ◽  
F. Giugliano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Recurrence ◽  
Psa Recurrence ◽  
Well Differentiated

We evaluated the relationship between NE expression and well-known prognostic factors and assessed whether tumor relapse after radical surgery correlates with the extent of NE differentiation. Radical prostatectomy specimens from 110 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were assessed. Patients were followed up every three months for the first two years after surgery and six monthly for 5 additional years until failure, or for a mean of 48 months from the time of surgery for those who did not experience failure. The percentage of cells showing CgA immunoreactivity was evaluated using a visual quantitative method. Tumor staining was categorized as positive if >10% and negative if <10% of tumor cells were stained, to ensure that only cases with significant positivity were included in the positive group. The median follow-up was 5.4 years (range 1.8 to 7.2). The median time to clinical recurrence was 7.5 years and the median time to biochemical recurrence was 2.8 years. Of 31 patients (28%) who experienced a PSA recurrence, 15 developed a clinical recurrence. The mean preoperative PSA level was 9 ng/ml (range 2.7 to 25). Most cases were well differentiated (Gleason score <7), intraprostatic (≤pT2) tumors. Immunoreactivity in ≥10% of the cells was seen in 17.2% (n=19) of the tumor specimens. The preoperative PSA level, Gleason score, use of neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy, lymphnode positivity were not statistically associated with NE expression. Only the primary pathologic stage appeared to be associated with CgA staining in the primary tumor (p=0.001). On the univariate analysis NE expression did not predict biochemical recurrence free survival, whereas it was associated with clinical recurrence. NE differentiation in clinically localized prostate cancer can be associated with failure after definitive surgical treatment, even if no conclusions can be drawn regarding its value as an independent prognostic factor.

scholarly journals Predictors of time to biochemical recurrence in a radical prostatectomy cohort within the PSA-era

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahva Shahabi ◽  
Raj Satkunasivam ◽  
Inderbir S. Gill ◽  
Gary Lieskovsky ◽  
Sia Daneshmand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Competing Risks ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Positive Surgical Margin ◽  
Clinical Recurrence

Introduction: We sought to determine predictors for early and late biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy among localized prostate cancer patients.Methods: The study included localized prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) at the University of Southern California from 1988 to 2008. Competing risks regression models were used to determine risk factors associated with earlier or late biochemical recurrence, defined using the median time to biochemical recurrence in this population (2.9 years after radical prostatectomy).Results: The cohort for this study included 2262 localized prostate cancer (pT2-3N0M0) patients who did not receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies. Of these patients, 188 experienced biochemical recurrence and a subset continued to clinical recurrence, either within (n=19, 10%) or following (n=13, 7%) 2.9 years after RP. Multivariable stepwise competing risks analysis showed Gleason score ≥7, positive surgical margin status, and ≥pT3a stage to be associated with biochemical recurrence within 2.9 years following surgery. Predictors of biochemical recurrence after 2.9 years were Gleason score 7 (4+3), preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and ≥pT3a stage.Conclusions: Higher stage was associated with biochemical recurrence at any time following radical prostatectomy. Particular attention may need to be made to patients with stage ≥pT3a, higher preoperative PSA, and Gleason 7 prostate cancer with primary high-grade patterns when considering longer followup after RP.

Use of TMPRSS2-ERG gene rearrangement and quantitative ERG expression to predict clinical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 36-36
Author(s):  
E. A. Klein ◽  
S. M. Falzarano ◽  
T. Maddala ◽  
D. Cherbavaz ◽  
W. F. Novotny ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Gene Rearrangement ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Clinical Recurrence ◽  
Psa Recurrence ◽  
Stage T1

36 Background: The association of TMPRSS2-ERG fusions and ERG expression in prostate cancer (PC) with adverse clinical outcomes has been controversial, with mixed results in the literature. We conducted a study to test whether tumor-derived gene expression profiles, including the presence of TMPRSS2-ERG fusions and ERG gene expression, are associated with clinical recurrence (cR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: All patients with clinical stage T1/T2 prostate cancer treated with RP at CC from 1987 to 2004 were identified (n∼f2,600). A cohort sampling design was used to select 127 patients with cR and 374 patients without cR after RP. For each patient a primary Gleason pattern (GP) sample, secondary (or highest) GP sample, and an adjacent nontumor tissue sample were evaluated. Surgical Gleason Score (GS) and clinical data were centrally reviewed. RNA was extracted from 6 manually dissected 10 μ m formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections obtained from RP specimens and expression of TMPRSS2-ERGa, TMPRSS2-ERGb, ERG and reference genes were quantified using RT-PCR. Times to cR, PSA recurrence, and PC death were analyzed using Cox PH regression. Results: Blocks from 441 patients were evaluable. Median F/U was 5.8 years. Patients were mostly Caucasian (83%), clinical stage T1 (66%), had baseline PSA <10 ng/mL (82%), and had surgical Gleason score ≤7 (87%). 848 tumor samples and 410 non-tumor samples were assessed. TMPRSS2-ERGa and/or TMPRSS2-ERGb fusions were present in 51.8% of tumor samples and 7.5% of non-tumor samples. There was 89% concordance (95% CI: 86%, 92%) for TMPRSS2-ERG fusion status between the 2 tumor samples for each patient. High ERG expression was strongly associated with the presence of TMPRSS2-ERG fusions (p <0.01). We did not find an association between TMPRSS2-ERG a/b gene rearrangement or ERG expression with cR, PSA recurrence, PC death, or surgical GS (p > 0.2). Conclusions: This study was notable for the large number of cR events, use of a standardized quantitative assay, and rigorous central review of pathology and clinical data. We did not find an association of TMPRSS2-ERG gene rearrangements or ERG expression with aggressiveness of prostate cancer post RP. [Table: see text]

Treatment outcomes of radiotherapy versus prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer with Gleason 8 or more on biopsy.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 120-120
Author(s):  
Christopher Baker ◽  
Andrew M. McDonald ◽  
Grant Clark ◽  
Caleb Dulaney ◽  
Eddy Shih-Hsin Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Biochemical Failure ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Initial Biopsy

120 Background: There have been no prospective randomized controlled trials comparing current treatment options for patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer. This study seeks to compare the biochemical and metastatic outcomes of patients that received definitive radiotherapy (dRT) or radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer with Gleason score ≥ 8 on initial biopsy. Methods: A total of 106 patients met the inclusion criteria of Gleason score ≥ 8 on initial biopsy and biochemical follow-up ≥ 1 year. Seventy-one patients were initially treated with dRT (96% also receiving androgen deprivation therapy) and 35 patients were initially treated with RP (with or without postoperative RT). Our primary endpoint was biochemical failure (BF). For dRT patients, BF was recorded according to the Phoenix Consensus or if extranodal metastasis was diagnosed. For surgical patients, BF was recorded according to American Urological Association guidelines or if extranodal metastasis occurred. If adjuvant/salvage RT was given postoperatively, BF was recorded if PSA ≥ 0.5 on two consecutive measures after completion of RT. Pretreatment characteristics were compared using Pearson Chi-square method and independent samples Mann-Whitney U test. Actuarial rates of BF and metastasis were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Median follow-up for all patients was 5.3 years. There was no statistical difference in clinical T-stage, initial PSA, or months of follow up between patients treated initially with radiotherapy vs. prostatectomy. Patients initially treated with dRT were significantly older than those treated with RP. The dRT group had a lower rate of BF compared to the RP group, p < 0.001. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of BF at 5 years was 7.6% in the dRT group compared to 34.5% in the RP group. Additionally, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of distant metastasis at 10 years was 22.7% in the dRT group compared to 55.9% of the RP group, p = 0.01. Conclusions: For our sample of patients with Gleason score ≥ 8 on initial biopsy, initial treatment with dRT was associated with lower rates of biochemical failure and extranodal metastasis when compared to initial treatment with prostatectomy.

scholarly journals Bleeding Risk Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer in Men on Baseline Anticoagulant or Antiplatelet Therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abigail Pepin ◽  
Sarthak Shah ◽  
Monica Pernia ◽  
Siyuan Lei ◽  
Marilyn Ayoob ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Antiplatelet Medication ◽  
Before And After

PurposePatients on anticoagulant/antiplatelet medications are at a high risk of bleeding following external beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. SBRT may reduce the bleeding risk by decreasing the volume of bladder/rectum receiving high doses. This retrospective study sought to evaluate the rates of hematuria and hematochezia following SBRT in these patients.MethodsLocalized prostate cancer patients treated with SBRT from 2007 to 2017 on at least one anticoagulant/antiplatelet at baseline were included. The minimum follow-up was 3 years with a median follow-up of 72 months. Patients who had a rectal spacer placed prior to SBRT were excluded. Radiotherapy was delivered in 5 fractions to a dose of 35 Gy or 36.25 Gy utilizing the CyberKnife system. Hematuria and hematochezia were prospectively assessed before and after treatment using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26). Toxicities were scored using the CTCAE v4. Cystoscopy and colonoscopy findings were retrospectively reviewed.ResultsForty-four men with a median age of 72 years with a history of taking at least one anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet medication received SBRT. Warfarin (46%), clopidogrel (34%) and rivaroxaban (9%) were the most common medications. Overall, 18.2% experienced hematuria with a median time of 10.5 months post-SBRT. Altogether, 38.6% experienced hematochezia with a median time of 6 months post-SBRT. ≥ Grade 2 hematuria and hematochezia occurred in 4.6% and 2.5%, respectively. One patient required bladder neck fulguration and one patient underwent rectal cauterization for multiple non-confluent telangiectasia. There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Cystoscopy revealed bladder cancer (40%) and benign prostatic bleeding (40%) as the most common hematuria etiology. Colonoscopy demonstrated hemorrhoids (54.5%) and radiation proctitis (9.1%) as the main causes of hematochezia. There was no significant change from the mean baseline EPIC-26 hematuria and hematochezia scores at any point during follow up.ConclusionIn patients with baseline anticoagulant usage, moderate dose prostate SBRT was well tolerated without rectal spacing. High grade bleeding toxicities were uncommon and resolved with time. Baseline anticoagulation usage should not be considered a contraindication to prostate SBRT.

scholarly journals Correlation between Chromosome 9p21 Locus Deletion and Prognosis in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Érika Aparecida Felix de Barros ◽  
José Pontes-Junior ◽  
Sabrina Thalita Reis ◽  
Amanda Eunice Ramos Lima ◽  
Isida C. Souza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Chromosome Loss ◽  
Grade Group ◽  
Time To Recurrence ◽  
9P21 Locus

Background Some studies have reported that deletions at chromosome arm 9p occur frequently and represent a critical step in carcinogenesis of some neoplasms. Our aim was to evaluate the deletion of locus 9p21 and chromosomes 3, 7 and 17 in localized prostate cancer (PC) and correlate these alterations with prognostic factors and biochemical recurrence after surgery. Methods We retrospectively evaluated surgical specimens from 111 patients with localized PC who underwent radical prostatectomy. Biochemical recurrence was defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >0.2 ng/mL and the mean postoperative follow-up was 123 months. The deletions were evaluated using fluorescence in situ hybridization with centromeric and locus-specific probes in a tissue microarray containing 2 samples from each patient. We correlated the occurrence of any deletion with pathological stage, Gleason score, ISUP grade group, PSA and biochemical recurrence. Results We observed a loss of any probe in only 8 patients (7.2%). The most common deletion was the loss of locus 9p21, which occurred in 6.4% of cases. Deletions of chromosomes 3, 7 and 17 were observed in 2.3%, 1.2% and 1.8% patients, respectively. There was no correlation between chromosome loss and Gleason score, ISUP, PSA or stage. Biochemical recurrence occurred in 83% cases involving 9p21 deletions. Loss of 9p21 locus was significantly associated with time to recurrence (p = 0.038). Conclusions We found low rates of deletion in chromosomes 3, 7 and 17 and 9p21 locus. We observed that 9p21 locus deletion was associated with worse prognosis in localized PC treated by radical prostatectomy.

Multicenter phase II study of combined neoadjuvant docetaxel and androgen ablation (ADT) prior to radical prostatectomy (RP) for patients (pts) with high risk localized prostate cancer (LCaP): Pathologic outcomes and 3-year follow-up analyses

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5002-5002 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Winquist ◽  
K. N. Chi ◽  
J. Chin ◽  
L. Goldenberg ◽  
L. Klotz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Androgen Ablation ◽  
Psa Recurrence

5002 Background: Pts with high risk LCaP (cT3, Gleason score > 7 &/or PSA > 20) have an increased risk of relapse with a biochemical failure rate of >50% at 3 years after RP. Docetaxel is active in hormone refractory prostate cancer & potentially beneficial if combined with ADT for treatment naïve disease. The objectives of this trial were to assess the pathologic outcomes & feasibility of docetaxel + ADT in men with LCaP prior to RP. Methods: A phase II multi-center study of newly diagnosed previously untreated pts with clinically LCaP with high-risk features. All pts received ADT (buserelin acetate 6.3 mg q8 weeks x 3 and anti-androgen for 4 weeks) plus docetaxel (35 mg/m2 weekly for 6 out of 8 weeks for 3 cycles) prior to RP. Results: 72 men with a median age of 59 years (range 46–78) were enrolled at 6 sites. Baseline characteristics included: clinical stage T1C, T2 & T3 in 14%, 47% & 39%; and Gleason score <7, 7 & >7 in 10%, 30% & 60% of pts; respectively. Median baseline PSA was 10.8 μg/L (range 1.6–65.6) with PSA < 10 in 47%, 10–20 in 24% & >20 in 29% of pts. Eight pts did not complete protocol therapy because of toxicity (n=4), withdrawal of consent (n=1), or other reasons (n=3). 1 pt had myocardial infarction day 1 post-operatively & 1 pt had DVT 1.5 months after RP. No other major post-operative complications were reported. Of the 64 pts completing protocol therapy, 2 had a complete pathologic response and pathologic stage was T2 in 34 (53%) and T3 in 28 (44%) pts. Four pts had N1 disease & positive surgical margins were identified in 17 (27%). On multivariate Cox regression analysis only baseline Gleason score (=7 vs. >7) was associated with PSA recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 4.58, 95% CI 1.32–15.93). At a median follow-up of 42.7 months (range 25.6–65.6), 19 (30%) pts have relapsed. Three pts have died at 32.0, 40.0 & 40.3 months, with all deaths attributed to prostate cancer. Conclusions: Combined ADT and docetaxel prior to RP was feasible and resulted in encouraging pathologic outcomes and PSA- recurrence free survival. These data further support the rationale for randomized trials determining the efficacy of chemo-hormonal therapy in pts with clinically LCaP. [Table: see text]

Impact of primary Gleason grade 4 on biochemical recurrence after permanent interstitial brachytherapy in Japanese patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 77-77
Author(s):  
T. Saika ◽  
T. Uesugi ◽  
K. Edamura ◽  
M. Kobuke ◽  
H. Nose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
National Comprehensive Cancer Network ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Gleason Grade ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Nccn Guidelines ◽  
Cancer Network

77 Background: To reveal a predictive factor for biochemical recurrence (BCR) after permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) using iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation in patients with localized prostate cancer classified as low or intermediate risk based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Methods: From January 2004 to December 2009, consecutive 418 Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer classified as low or intermediate risk based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines were treated by PPB. The clinical factors including pathological data reviewed by central pathologist and follow-up data were prospectively collected. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess the factors associated with BCR. Results: Median follow-up was 36.0 months. The 2, 3, 4 and 5-year BCR free rates using Phoenix definition were 98.3%, 96.0%, 91.6% and 87.0% respectively. On univariate analysis, primary Gleason grade 4 in biopsy specimen was strong predicting factor (p<0.0001), while Gleason sum, age, initial PSA, initial PSA density, T stage and D90 were insignificant factors. Multivariate analysis indicated that primary Gleason grade 4 was most powerful prognostic factor associated with BCR (hazard ratio=10.101, 95% IC 3.080-33.126, p=0.0001). Conclusions: The primary Gleason grade 4 carried a worse BCR than the primary grade 3 in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer. Therefore, the indication for PPB in patients with Gleason sum 4+3 should deserve careful and thoughtful consideration. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document