An Active In-Home Physician Model of Palliative Care and Its Resulting Performance Indicators Related to Home Deaths, Unplanned Emergency Department Visits and Unplanned Hospital Admissions

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-49
Author(s):  
Colleen Webber ◽  
Aurelia Ona Valiulis ◽  
Peter Tanuseputro ◽  
Valerie Schulz ◽  
Tavis Apramian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
Unplanned Hospital Admissions

Background: Limited research has characterized team-based models of home palliative care and the outcomes of patients supported by these care teams. Case presentation: A retrospective case series describing care and outcomes of patients managed by the London Home Palliative Care Team between May 1, 2017 and April 1, 2019. Case management: The London Home Palliative Care (LHPC) Team care model is based upon 3 pillars: 1) physician visit availability 2) active patient-centered care with strong physician in-home presence and 3) optimal administrative organization. Case outcomes: In the 18 month study period, 354 patients received care from the London Home Palliative Care Team. Most significantly, 88.4% ( n = 313) died in the community or at a designated palliative care unit after prearranged direct transfer; no comparable provincial data is available. 21.2% ( n = 75) patients visited an emergency department and 24.6% ( n = 87) were admitted to hospital at least once in their final 30 days of life. 280 (79.1%) died in the community. These values are better than comparable provincial estimates of 62.7%, 61.7%, and 24.0%, respectively. Conclusion: The London Home Palliative Care (LHPC) Team model appears to favorably impact community death rate, ER visits and unplanned hospital admissions, as compared to accepted provincial data. Studies to determine if this model is reproducible could support palliative care teams achieving similar results.

Inpatient Palliative Care Consult: A Marker for High Risk of Readmission or Death in Discharged Oncology Inpatients

2019 ◽  
pp. 082585971986906
Author(s):  
Debbie Selby ◽  
Anita Chakraborty ◽  
Audrey Kim ◽  
Jeff Myers
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Advanced Illness ◽  
Phone Calls ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
Advance Care

Background: Emergency department visits or readmission to hospital are common particularly among those with advanced illness. Little prospective data exist on early outcomes specifically for patients seen by a palliative care consult service during their acute care admission, who are subsequently discharged home. Methods: This study followed 62 oncology patients who had had a palliative care consult during their admission to acute care with weekly phone calls postdischarge for 4 weeks. Events recorded included death, readmission, emergency department visits, and admission to a palliative care unit. Results: By the end of the study, 32 (52%) of 62 had had at least 1 event, (readmission, emergency department visit, or death), with the majority of these occurring in the first 2 weeks postdischarge. The overall 4-week death rate was 14 (22.6%) of 62. Conclusions: These data suggest that the need for a palliative care consult identifies inpatients at very high risk for early deterioration and underlines the critical importance of advance care planning/goals-of-care discussions by the oncology and palliative care teams to ensure patients and families understand their disease process and have the opportunity to direct their care decisions.

“They Shouldn’t Be Coming to the ED, Should They?”: A Descriptive Service Evaluation of Why Patients With Palliative Care Needs Present to the Emergency Department

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 984-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilie Green ◽  
Sarah Ward ◽  
Will Brierley ◽  
Ben Riley ◽  
Henna Sattar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Service Evaluation ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Direct Admission ◽  
Palliative Care Needs ◽  
Single Center Observational Study

Background: Patients with palliative care needs frequently attend the emergency department (ED). There is no international agreement on which patients are best cared for in the ED, compared to the primary care setting or direct admission to the hospital. This article presents the quantitative phase of a mixed-methods service evaluation, exploring the reasons why patients with palliative care needs present to the ED. Methods: This is a single-center, observational study including all patients under the care of a specialist palliative care team who presented to the ED over a 10-week period. Demographic and clinical data were collected from electronic health records. Results: A total of 105 patients made 112 presentations to the ED. The 2 most common presenting complaints were shortness of breath (35%) and pain (28%). Eighty-three percent of presentations required care in the ED according to a priori defined criteria. They either underwent urgent investigation or received immediate interventions that could not be delivered in another setting, were referred by a health-care professional, or were admitted. Conclusions: Findings challenge the misconception that patients known to a palliative care team should be cared for outside the ED. The importance and necessity of the ED for patients in their last years of life has been highlighted, specifically in terms of managing acute, unpredictable crises. Future service provision should not be based solely on a patient’s presenting complaint. Further qualitative research exploring patient perspective is required in order to explore the decision-making process that leads patients with palliative care needs to the ED.

scholarly journals Does a Hospital Palliative Care Team Have the Potential to Reduce the Cost of a Terminal Hospitalization? A Retrospective Case-control Study in a Czech Tertiary University Hospital

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuzana Kremenova ◽  
Jan Svancara ◽  
Petra Kralova ◽  
Martin Moravec ◽  
Katerina Hanouskova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Care Team ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Insurance Company ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Control Study

Abstract Background: More than 50% of patients worldwide die in hospitals. It is well known that end-of-life hospital care is costly.Our aims were to test whether the support of the palliative team can reduce end-of-life costs and to study the mechanisms of cost reduction.Methods: This was a one-centre descriptive retrospective case-control study. Big data from registries of routine visits were used for case-control matching. We included the expenses billed to the insurance company and added separately charged drugs and materials. We compared the groups over the duration of the terminal hospitalization, ICU days (ICU=intensive care unit), IV antibiotic use (IV=intravenous), MRI/CT scans (MRI/CR=magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography), oncologic treatment in the last month of life, and documentation of the dying phase.We searched for all in-hospital cases who died in the university hospital in Prague with the support of the hospital palliative team from January 2019 to April 2020 and matched them with similar controls. The controls were matched according to age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index and diagnosis recorded on the death certificate.Results: We identified 213 dyads. The average daily costs were three times lower in the palliative group (4,392.4 CZK per day=171.3 EUR) than in the non-palliative group (13,992.8 CZK per day=545.8 EUR), and the difference was caused by the shorter time spent in the ICU (16% vs 33% of hospital days). This was probably due to better documentation of the dying phase in the medical records.Conclusions: To date, there are sparse hospital data available on the economic aspects of end-of-life care. We showed that the integration of the palliative care team in the dying phase can be cost saving. The evidence that hospital palliative care can save a substantial amount of money can be used to support the integration of palliative care in hospitals in middle- and low-income countries. A multicentre study with the same design is planned in the future to increase the strength of the results.

Integration of spiritual care into palliative care service delivery models

2021 ◽  
pp. 1072-1080
Author(s):  
Yvan Beaussant ◽  
Alexandra Nichipor ◽  
Tracy A. Balboni
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Spiritual Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Clear Understanding ◽  
Care Provision ◽  
Serious Illness ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
Religious Dimensions

Addressing spirituality within serious illness is a core dimension of palliative care delivery. However, spiritual care frequently lacks integration within the care of patients and families facing serious illness. This chapter discusses the integration of spiritual care into palliative care delivery. Requisite to this integration is a clear understanding of definitions and palliative care guidelines informing spiritual care provision. Furthermore, integration is informed and motivated by a large body of evidence showing how spiritual and religious factors frequently play salient roles in serious illness and influence palliative care outcomes. The integration of spiritual care into palliative care practice relies on a generalist–specialist model, within which all members of the interdisciplinary palliative care team are responsible for spiritual care provision. Non-spiritual care specialist members of the palliative care team are responsible for generalist spiritual care delivery, including taking spiritual histories and screening for spiritual needs. The care team also includes spiritual care specialists, typically board-certified chaplains, who provide in-depth spiritual care delivery to patients and families and aid the care team in understanding the spiritual and religious dimensions of care. Additionally, data regarding tested spiritual care interventions are discussed as potential tools palliative care teams can employ to improve patient care and outcomes. Finally, the integration of spiritual care into palliative care teams presents both opportunities and challenges that must be considered as efforts needed to foster more seamless spiritual care delivery within palliative care.

A simplified screening tool to identify seriously ill patients in the Emergency Department for referral to a palliative care team

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Cotogni ◽  
Anna De Luca ◽  
Andrea Evangelista ◽  
Claudia Filippini ◽  
Renata Gili ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Seriously Ill Patients ◽  
Seriously Ill

First-Year Analysis of a New, Home-Based Palliative Care Program Offered Jointly by a Community Hospital and Local Visiting Nurse Service

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Pouliot ◽  
Carol S. Weisse ◽  
David S. Pratt ◽  
Philip DiSorbo
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Palliative Care Program ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Visiting Nurse

Background: There is a growing need for home-based palliative care services, especially for seriously ill individuals who want to avoid hospitalizations and remain with their regular outside care providers. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of Care Choices, a new in-home palliative care program provided by the Visiting Nurse Services of Northeastern New York and Ellis Medicine’s community hospital serving New York’s Capital District. Methods: This prospective cohort study assessed patient outcomes over the course of 1 year for 123 patients (49 men and 74 women) with serious illnesses who were new enrollees in the program. Quality of life was assessed at baseline and after 1 month on service. Satisfaction with care was measured after 1 and 3 months on service. The number of emergency department visits and inpatient hospitalizations pre- and postenrollment was measured for all enrollees. Results: Patients were highly satisfied (72.7%-100%) with their initial care and reported greater satisfaction ( P < .05) and stable symptom management over time. Fewer emergency department ( P < .001) and inpatient hospital admissions ( P < .001) occurred among enrollees while on the palliative care service. Conclusion: An in-home palliative care program offered jointly through a visiting nurse service and community hospital may be a successful model for providing quality care that satisfies chronically ill patients’ desire to remain at home and avoid hospital admissions.

scholarly journals Implementation of early will directives: facilities and difficulties experienced by palliative care teams

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline Carniato Dalle Nogario ◽  
Edison Luiz Devos Barlem ◽  
Jamila Geri Tomaschewski-Barlem ◽  
Rosemary Silva da Silveira ◽  
Silvana Bastos Cogo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Implementation Process ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Rio Grande Do Sul ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Difficult Situations

ABSTRACT Objective: To know the facilities and difficulties the palliative care team professionals experience in the implementation process of advance healthcare directives. Method: Exploratory-descriptive study with a qualitative approach, involving 51 professionals from seven palliative care teams in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The data were collected between December 2018 and April 2019 and discursive textual analysis was applied. Results: The facilities found were: the approach by the palliative care team; listening and respecting patients' wishes; effective communication between professionals, patients, and family members and resolution of difficult situations. The difficulties reported were: legal issues; the lack of knowledge of professionals about the subject; the lack of institutional protocols; the difficulty in talking about death and the family barrier. Conclusion: Despite the perceived facilities and difficulties, palliative care professionals intend to work based on the patients' desires and will, aiming to offer dignity in the dying process.

A National Survey of Palliative Care Team Compositions

2021 ◽  
pp. 082585972110589
Author(s):  
Joseph Chen ◽  
Allison de la Rosa ◽  
Dejian Lai ◽  
Maxine De La Cruz ◽  
Donna Zhukovsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Team Composition ◽  
Cancer Centers ◽  
Interprofessional Teams ◽  
Palliative Care Teams

Purpose: It is unclear how well palliative care teams are staffed at US cancer centers. Our primary objective was to compare the composition of palliative care teams between National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated cancer centers and non-NCI-designated cancer centers in 2018. We also assessed changes in team composition between 2009 and 2018. Methods: This national survey examined the team composition in palliative care programs at all 61 NCI-designated cancer centers and in a random sample of 60 of 1252 non-NCI-designated cancer centers in 2018. Responses were compared to those from our 2009 survey. The primary outcome was the presence of an interprofessional team defined as a palliative care physician, nurse, and psychosocial member. Secondary outcomes were the size and number of individual disciplines. Results: In 2018, 52/61 (85%) of NCI-designated and 27/38 (71%) non-NCI-designated cancer centers in the primary outcome comparison responded to the survey. NCI-designated cancer centers were more likely to have interprofessional teams than non-NCI-designated cancer centers (92% vs 67%; P = .009). Non-NCI-designated cancer centers were more likely to have nurse-led teams (14.8% vs 0.0%; P = .01). The median number of disciplines did not differ between groups (NCI, 6.0; non-NCI, 5.0; P = .08). Between 2009 and 2018, NCI-designated and non-NCI-designated cancer centers saw increased proportions of centers with interprofessional teams (NCI, 64.9% vs 92.0%, P < .001; non-NCI, 40.0% vs 66.7%; P = .047). Conclusion: NCI-designated cancer centers were more likely to report having an interprofessional palliative care team than non-NCI-designated cancer centers. Growth has been limited over the past decade, particularly at non-NCI-designated cancer centers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document