Sexual Violence Among Men in the Military in South Korea

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1024-1042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Insook Kwon ◽  
Dong-Ok Lee ◽  
Elli Kim ◽  
Hyun-Young Kim
Keyword(s):  
South Korea ◽  
Sexual Violence ◽  
The Military

Innovative activity in the production of the military-industrial complex in the digital economy

2021 ◽  
pp. 56-63
Author(s):  
И.А. Зайцев ◽  
В.Д. Секерин
Keyword(s):  
South Korea ◽  
Military Spending ◽  
Digital Economy ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Sensor Systems ◽  
Military Logistics ◽  
Military Industrial Complex ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Military Engineering ◽  
The Military

В статье рассмотрено место инноваций в цифровой экономике. Рассмотрены тенденции развития инноваций в оборонно-промышленном комплексе. Приведена аналитика инноваций в ключевых областях: робототехнике, военном машиностроении, в сенсорных системах, военной логистике. Проведено сравнение России с другими странами, в частности по робототехнике описан опыт США и Германии. В области машиностроения рассмотрен опыт России, США и Южной Кореи. Приведена статистика военных расходов 20 стран. The article considers the place of innovation in the digital economy. The trends in the development of innovations in the military-industrial complex are considered. The analytics of innovations in key areas: robotics, military engineering, in sensor systems, military logistics. Russia is compared with other countries, in particular, the experience of the USA and Germany is described in robotics. In the field of engineering, the experience of Russia, the USA and South Korea is considered. Statistics of military spending of 20 countries are given.

scholarly journals High capacity, low resilience: The ‘developmental’ state and military–bureaucratic authoritarianism in South Korea

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olli Hellmann
Keyword(s):  
South Korea ◽  
State Capacity ◽  
High Capacity ◽  
Developmental State ◽  
The State ◽  
Sufficient Condition ◽  
International Context ◽  
The Military ◽  
Infrastructural Power

This article argues that high levels of state capacity are not a sufficient condition for consolidating autocratic rule. Rather, whether non-democratic rulers can harness the infrastructural power of the state to implement strategies of regime stabilization depends on three crucial factors: the state’s social embedding; the international context; and the extent of elite cohesion. The paper develops this argument through a case study of the military–bureaucratic regime in South Korea (1961–1987), which – despite a high-capacity ‘developmental’ state at its disposal – failed to maintain high levels of resilience.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document