scholarly journals Risk Factors for Cognitive Impairment in Fragile X-Associated Tremor/Ataxia Syndrome

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 328-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreea L. Seritan ◽  
Kyoungmi Kim ◽  
Ian Benjamin ◽  
Ioana Seritan ◽  
Randi J. Hagerman
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 466-471
Author(s):  
Giulia Grigioni ◽  
Christian Saleh ◽  
Phillip Jaszczuk ◽  
Dorothea Wand ◽  
Stefanie Wilmes ◽  
...  

Fragile-X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) is a neurodegenerative disorder that manifests with intention tremor, progressive gait ataxia, and cognitive impairment. The disease is genetically characterized by a premutation of the <i>FMR1</i>gene on the X-chromosome manifesting with a CGG triplet expansion between 55 and 200. Given the phenotypical variety of this disease, diagnosis is frequently delayed. We present and discuss a male patient whose diagnosis of FXTAS was delayed due to his concomitant alcohol abuse.


2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Grigsby ◽  
Maureen A. Leehey ◽  
S??bastien Jacquemont ◽  
James A. Brunberg ◽  
Randi J. Hagerman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Richard A. Walsh

Fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome is a heredodegenerative syndrome that presents in older men as a tremor syndrome with less prominent ataxia and cognitive impairment initially. The underlying genetic cause, a premutation in the FMR1 gene, results in a toxic accumulation of mRNA. The full mutation, a triple-repeat expansion of more than 200 CGG repeats, gives rise to a reduction in FMR1 protein expression and fragile X, a neurodevelopmental disorder that may be identified in successive male generations. The prevalence of carrier status is high in the general population, and it is likely that most movement disorders clinics will have one or more patients with this syndrome, potentially carrying a label of essential tremor.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyung-Ji Kim ◽  
Jae-Hong Lee ◽  
E-nae Cheong ◽  
Sung-Eun Chung ◽  
Sungyang Jo ◽  
...  

Background: Amyloid PET allows for the assessment of amyloid β status in the brain, distinguishing true Alzheimer’s disease from Alzheimer’s disease-mimicking conditions. Around 15–20% of patients with clinically probable Alzheimer’s disease have been found to have no significant Alzheimer’s pathology on amyloid PET. However, a limited number of studies had been conducted this subpopulation in terms of clinical progression. Objective: We investigated the risk factors that could affect the progression to dementia in patients with amyloid-negative amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods: This study was a single-institutional, retrospective cohort study of patients over the age of 50 with amyloidnegative amnestic MCI who visited the memory clinic of Asan Medical Center with a follow-up period of more than 36 months. All participants underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), detailed neuropsychological testing, and fluorine-18[F18]-florbetaben amyloid PET. Results: During the follow-up period, 39 of 107 patients progressed to dementia from amnestic MCI. In comparison with the stationary group, the progressed group had a more severe impairment in verbal and visual episodic memory function and hippocampal atrophy, which showed an Alzheimer’s disease-like pattern despite the lack of evidence for significant Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Voxel-based morphometric MRI analysis revealed that the progressed group had a reduced gray matter volume in the bilateral cerebellar cortices, right temporal cortex, and bilateral insular cortices. Conclusion: Considering the lack of evidence of amyloid pathology, clinical progression of these subpopulation may be caused by other neuropathologies such as TDP-43, abnormal tau or alpha synuclein that lead to neurodegeneration independent of amyloid-driven pathway. Further prospective studies incorporating biomarkers of Alzheimer’s diseasemimicking dementia are warranted.


Author(s):  
Victoria J. Williams ◽  
Steven E. Arnold ◽  
David H. Salat

Throughout the lifespan, common variations in systemic health and illness contribute to alterations in vasculature structure and function throughout the body, significantly increasing risk for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease (CVD). CVD is a prevalent cause of mortality in late life; it also promotes brain alterations, contributing to cognitive decline and, when severe, vascular dementia. Even prior to diseased states, individual variation in CVD risk is associated with structural and functional brain alterations. Yet, how cumulative asymptomatic alterations in vessel structure and function contribute to more subtle changes in brain tissue integrity and function that emerge in late life is unclear. Finally, vascular risk factors are associated with the clinical progression of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD); however, recent theory posits that vascular degeneration may serve a contributory role in these conditions. This chapter reviews how lifespan changes in vascular health contribute to degenerative changes in neural tissue and the subsequent development of cognitive impairment and/or vascular dementia. It first discusses associations between vascular risk factors and cognition and also how declining vascular health may lead to cognitive impairment and dementia. Next, it identifies basic aspects of cerebrovascular anatomy and physiology sustaining tissue health and discusses how vulnerabilities of this system contribute to neurodegenerative changes. Finally, it reviews evidence of vascular contributions to AD and presents ideas for future research to better understand the full spectrum of cerebrovascular contributions to brain aging, cognitive decline, and dementia.


Author(s):  
Kent E. Duncan

Both RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and translation are increasingly implicated in several neurodegenerative diseases, but their specific roles in promoting disease are not yet fully defined. This chapter critically evaluates the evidence that altered translation of specific mRNAs mediated by RNA-binding proteins plays an important role in driving specific neurodegenerative diseases. First, diseases are discussed where a causal role for RNA-binding proteins in disease appears solid, but whether this involves altered translation is less clear. The main foci here are TAR DNA-binding protein (TDP-43) and fused in sarcoma (FUS) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Subsequently, diseases are presented where altered translation is believed to contribute, but involvement of RNA-binding proteins is less clear. These include Huntington’s and other repeat expansion disorders such as fragile X tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS), where repeat-induced non-AUG-initiated (RAN) translation is a focus. The potential contribution of both canonical and non-canonical RBPs to altered translation in Parkinson’s disease is discussed. The chapter closes by proposing key research frontiers for the field to explore and outlining methodological advances that could help to address them.


2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 15 ◽  
pp. 167-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oana Albai ◽  
Mirela Frandes ◽  
Romulus Timar ◽  
Deiana Roman ◽  
Bogdan Timar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document